Illuminati Confessions
by Leo Lyon Zagami
All you always wanted to know about the Real Story of the Illuminati  

 

ARTICLES 36-45

 

RASPUTIN, IL SANTO PECCATORE di Roberto Negrini

Posted on Wednesday, October 11, 2006 at 08:37PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

rasputin2.jpeg

RASPUTIN, IL SANTO PECCATORE
Estasi, magia e illuminismo sociale nel crepuscolo dell’Impero russo
di ROBERTO NEGRINI

Pubblicato unitamente ai 3 Box sul mensile
I Misteri n°5, Luglio 1995.

Troppo spesso un metodo storiografico miope, unilaterale o parzialistico impedisce di applicare all’analisi degli eventi storici criteri adeguati a esplorarne la complessit . In particolare la lettura esclusivamente sociologica, economica, politica o religiosa di avvenimenti e personaggi chiave da cui sono scaturiti crocevia o decisioni determinanti lascia spazio a piccole e grandi zone d’ombra, scomode, inquietanti, ma di enorme interesse per lo studioso multidisciplinare e libero da pregiudizi accademici. Esempio paradigmatico ne è la transazione dall’Impero sacrale degli Zar a quello comunista sovietico, nelle cui pieghe ritroviamo l’oscura e dimenticata protagonista di quell’ora fatale del nostro secolo: la spiritualit  magica russa e i suoi strani, evanescenti interpreti. Una comparata analisi di quelle pluriformi fenomenologie sociali, religiose, etnologiche e magico-esoteriche compresenti nell’area dell’Impero zarista a cavallo fra Otto e Novecento aspetta ancora di essere scritta. Nell’intrecciarsi traumatico di una contraddittoria serie di influenze che raccordavano l’assolutismo teologico della più rigida ortodossia all’illuminismo razionalistico introdotto da Caterina la Grande, in un territorio comprendente parte dell’Europa e larga parte dell’Asia si videro coesistere sopravvivenze sciamaniche e teologia bizantina, feudalesimo medievale e rivoluzione industriale, immense ricchezze individuali e indicibili povert  collettive. Un coacervo dal quale ebbe paradossalmente vita la più monumentale costruzione sociale materialistica di tutti i tempi.

Il mito della Terza Roma

“Caro amico, dirò ancora una volta: è spaventosa la nuvola che sta sopra la Russia, disgrazia e tristezza immense, buio senza schiarite, un illimitato mare di lacrime e di sangue. Cosa dire? Non ci sono parole, orrore indescrivibile. So che tutti vogliono da te la guerra, anche i fedeli, non sapendo che sar  la rovina ... Tu sei lo Zar, il padre del popolo, non permettere che i pazzi vincano e perdano il popolo e se stessi. Ecco, si vincer  la Germania; ma la Russia? A pensarci, non c’è vittima più pietosa in tutti i secoli, è sommersa nel sangue, grande è il disastro, infinita la tristezza”.
Con queste accorate parole dirette allo Zar di tutte le Russie Nicola II, cariche di enfasi profetica e vergate con mano malferma dal suo letto di ospedale a Tjumen nel luglio 1914, il monaco “maledetto” Grigorij Rasputin tentava per l’ultima volta di arrestare la catena di eventi che era sul punto di travolgere e sconvolgere l’Europa.
Soltanto poche settimane prima, il 28 giugno (15 giugno secondo il calendario Giuliano ancora vigente in Russia a quell’epoca), a Sarajevo il terrorista serbo Gavrilo Prinzip aveva ucciso in un attentato l’arciduca d’Austria Francesco Ferdinando, erede al trono asburgico e sua moglie. La conseguente dichiarazione di guerra alla Serbia da parte dell’Austria, forte della sua alleanza con la Germania di Guglielmo II, aveva rapidamente trascinato lo Zar verso la mobilitazione generale a favore degli alleati serbi, nonostante il gi  precario equilibrio interno dell’Impero. E proprio in quei giorni, con una sincronicit  che ebbe tutto il sapore del complotto, lo stregone Rasputin, la cui enorme influenza a corte gi  più volte aveva esautorato i piani guerrafondai dell’estrema destra politica e religiosa, era caduto vittima di un attentato durante una visita al suo paese nativo nella zona della Siberia occidentale.
Travestita da mendicante, Chionija Guseva, una mistica fanatica e debole di mente discepola del predicatore e ieromonaco ultranazionalista Jliodor (Sergei Trufanov), aveva atteso per due intere settimane l’arrivo di Rasputin e infine era riuscita ad avvicinarlo e pugnalarlo a tradimento al grido di “ho ucciso l’Anticristo!”. Nonostante la gravissima ferita al ventre la tempra fisica eccezionale e forse gli strani poteri del monaco-contadino ebbero la meglio e dopo il trasporto al vicino ospedale di Tjumen l’“Anticristo” superò la crisi e sopravvisse. La forzata lontananza dalla corte non gli permise però di raggiungere, come invece tante volte era accaduto, la mente e il cuore dello Zar e nonostante i suoi ripetuti appelli, le sue lettere, i suoi frenetici telegrammi a Pietroburgo l’Impero zarista aprì l’ultimo capitolo della propria storia mentre in Europa si accendevano i bagliori del primo conflitto mondiale.
Si narra infatti che Nicola II, che pure per quasi un decennio aveva prepotentemente subito il fascino magnetico di Rasputin fino ad eleggerlo a proprio consigliere personale, abbia strappato con rabbia l’ultimo telegramma dell’amico convalescente che ancora lo implorava di desistere dalla guerra. In quel frangente le influenze di gran parte della Duma (il Parlamento russo), dell’aristocrazia e dell’esercito prevalsero e, forse per la prima volta nella sua sfortunata carriera di autocrate amletico, Nicola Romanov ritenne di dover pienamente incarnare il mito imperiale del “sovrano vittorioso” ereditato dai suoi avi. Forse in quel rigurgito di orgoglio militare, e in qualche modo religioso, che lo spingeva a contare su una guerra vittoriosa come strumento di riaffermazione della propria sovranit  teocratica, egli rilesse o ricordò le parole, ben diverse, che un altro monaco visionario, Filoteo di Pskov, aveva inviato in un’epistola, 300 anni prima, al granduca di Mosca Basilio III (1505-1533): “la Chiesa dell’antica Roma cadde per la sua eresia; le porte della seconda Roma, Costantinopoli, furono abbattute dalle asce dei turchi infedeli; ma la Chiesa di Mosca, la nuova Roma, risplende più del sole su tutto l’universo. Tu sei il sovrano ecumenico, tu devi reggere le redini del governo nel timore di Dio; abbi timore di Lui che te le ha affidate. Due Rome sono cadute, ma la terza rimane salda in piedi; una quarta non vi sar . Il tuo Regno Cristiano non sar  mai dato ad alcun altro sovrano”.
Secondo i teologi ortodossi russi, quindi, la Prima Roma aveva portato nel mondo il Cristianesimo e la sua legge incarnando l’autorit  del Padre; poi era caduta nell’eresia e la luce della retta dottrina, il Verbo-Logos o Figlio, si era incarnata, dopo lo scisma della Chiesa Orientale, in Costantinopoli, la Seconda Roma; infine quando Costantinopoli “per la sua corruzione” era caduta in mani islamiche (1453) lo Spirito Santo aveva trovato una sua incorporazione nella Terza Roma: Mosca, dalla quale si sarebbe irradiato nel mondo il culto ortodosso e santificante dell’Impero Perfetto. E quando nel 1547 Ivan IV “il terribile”, successore di Basilio III, si era consolidato nel titolo di Zar (interpretato dai russi come l’equivalente del Basileus bizantino) e successivamente il Metropolita di Mosca era stato nominato Patriarca l’idea-forza della Terza Roma aveva trovato nell’anima russa una completa sanzione storica.

Eretici, riformatori e visionari nel nome della Grande Madre

All’inasprimento istituzionale di ogni ortodossia vengono sempre a contrapporsi atteggiamenti alternativi ed eretici. Anche nell’ambito dell’ortodossia russa gi  dagli anni precedenti alla salita al trono di Ivan IV si erano delineate due principali tendenze religiose sensibilmente diverse tra loro.
La prima di queste, detta dei Giuseppiniti dal nome del principale sostenitore Josif Sanin, Superiore del monastero di Volotsk, sosteneva la necessit  teologica e politica di una stretta alleanza fra Chiesa e Trono, autorit  spirituale e potere secolare, con la conseguente enfasi sull’unit  dogmatica e sul formalismo ritualistico. La Terza Roma doveva riflettere il modello teocratico gi  rappresentato da Bisanzio e dai Papi e ogni forma eretica di libero approccio al sacro andava decisamente repressa.
L’opposta tendenza, definita dei Non Possidenti e capeggiata dal monaco vagante Nilo di Sorks, un mistico esicasta che aveva soggiornato per qualche tempo presso il monastero del Monte Athos, propugnava l’assoluta separazione della dimensione religiosa da quella mondana, la totale autonomia dei monaci dal potere politico, la necessit  etica di un’equa distribuzione delle ricchezze e un libero approccio alle Sacre Scritture articolato sull’esperienza mistica e individuale del divino.
Per evidenti motivi di opportunit  politica la corrente giuseppinita trovò più largo consenso presso i granduchi di Mosca - divenuti “Zar di tutte le Russie” - e conseguentemente verso la met  del secolo XVII, con l’avvento della dinastia dei Romanov, venne accelerato un processo di irrigidimento politico-religioso che portò infine a una piena e dichiarata nazionalizzazione della Chiesa russa. Pietro III Romanov il Grande fu proclamato di fatto capo assoluto della Chiesa e il Patriarcato di Mosca venne abolito per essere sostituito da un “Santo Sinodo” di vescovi eletti e controllati dallo Zar.
Ma nel Seicento le condizioni storiche e geografiche della Terza Roma erano profondamente diverse da quelle dei modelli bizantini e occidentali che erano maturate sull’onda portante dell’Impero Romano. Di fatto la stretta e forzata coesione fra l’aristocrazia guerriera di Mosca e la multiforme spiritualit  cristiano-ortodossa portò fatalmente a un indebolimento di entrambe; la reazione dei Non possidenti contro il Patriarca Nikon (1605-1681), che aveva spianato la strada alla teocrazia bizantineggiante dei Romanov, si concretizzò infatti in un autentico scisma, con la separazione dalla Chiesa russa di un vasto movimento dissidente di ispirazione mistica noto come i Vecchi Credenti.
La dottrina di questa dissidenza, che si diffuse dapprima fra le classi più libere e intraprendenti come i mercanti, i contadini dell’est e del nord e i cosacchi, enfatizzava sia un ritorno alle radici slave del culto cristiano ortodosso, sia una rinnovata forma di intimismo religioso e un radicale rifiuto delle influenze greche e bizantine nel rito e nella prassi sociale, aprendo così la strada alla proliferazione di ulteriori e ben più radicali movimenti e sette, sempre più orientati verso una spiritualit  slegata da ogni margine dogmatico o formalismo istituzionale. Andrej Amal’rick, uno dei più interessanti fra gli storici sovietici dissidenti, ricorda che “le prime sette sorsero in Russia a cavallo dei secoli XVII e XVIII. Anche prima vivevano in Russia adepti di sette diverse che subivano influenze provenienti principalmente dalla Lituania e dalla Svezia, ma a causa della predilezione delle masse per l’aspetto rituale della religione ebbero poca risonanza prima dell’effervescenza suscitata dallo scisma. Lo stato in cui l’uomo si sente sottoposto a una volont  non umana, in cui ha visioni e proferisce parole incoerenti, era noto gi  da tempo nella Russia pagana e ‘profeti’ e ‘profetesse’ di campagna cadevano in trances isteriche. Generalmente si attribuivano queste manifestazioni a forze demoniache, ma dalla fine del secolo XVII alcuni di tali profeti cominciarono ad assicurare che erano ispirati dallo Spirito Santo” (Rasputin, il “monaco nero” e la corte dell’ultimo Zar, Einaudi 1984).
La rivolta contro la sclerosi dogmatica e burocratica dell’ortodossia ufficiale generò le migliori condizioni per il riaffiorare di arcaici retaggi cultuali di carattere sciamanico pre-cristiano e di influenze, mai del tutto sopite, risalenti ai precedenti secoli di dominazione tartara. La trance, l’estasi, la danza sfrenata, la possessione mistica, le varie tecniche per indurre un superamento, anche violento, del normale stato di coscienza attraverso il dolore o il piacere estremi emersero (o riemersero) enfaticamente nella fenomenologia religiosa; si caratterizzarono così forme estreme e dirette di rapporto con lo Spirito Santo, cioè con quell’aspetto del divino che più di ogni altro, nonostante il travestimento cristiano, rifletteva l’arcaica eredit  della Grande Madre Cosmica, il più antico fra gli Archetipi del Sacro.
Patrona della Terza Roma era la Vergine Maria e fin dall’epoca dei teologi gnostici le correnti illuminate ed eretiche del Cristianesimo, sia orientale che occidentale, avevano assimilato il suo simbolismo femminino - ricalcato sui culti materni pre-cristiani - al mito dello Spirito Santo, terza Persona della Trinit  cristiana. I mistici russi, e in particolare quelli dissidenti, tesero così a identificare lo “spirito di illuminazione” con l’abbraccio estatico e ambiguamente erotico della Grande Madre, sviluppando forme di culto personali o collettive in cui la diretta identificazione con il Divino veniva ricercata attraverso l’esaltazione emozionale e la danza dionisiaca. E spesso tale processo venne spinto fino al parossismo orgiastico carnale, inteso come formula rettificatrice e liberatoria dalla “schiavitù dei sensi”.
Le figure più caratteristiche di questo particolare scenario furono gli staretz, monaci laici itineranti dotati di virtù profetiche e spesso taumaturgiche che, vivendo dell’elemosina dei fedeli, vagavano di paese in paese predicando le più diverse dottrine. E se molti di loro erano malati di mente o fanatici invasati e deliranti le cui follie venivano interpretate dalla superstizione popolare come segni di elezione, altri dimostrarono di possedere autentiche facolt  sovranormali e crearono movimenti o sette in cui sono ravvisabili interessanti elementi di carattere magico o sciamanico e contenuti e tecniche di un qualche valore iniziatico.
La prima e probabilmente più significativa tra queste sette fu quella della “gente di Dio”, detta dei Christi o Chlysty, fondata nel Seicento nell’Alto Volga dallo staretz Danilo Filippovic che, secondo la leggenda, aveva gettato nel fiume tutte le sacre scritture cristiane dichiarando che “per la salvezza occorre un unico libro: Libro d’oro, Libro di vita, Libro-colomba, Il Signore Spirito Santo stesso”.
Dalla seconda met  del Settecento, con l’introduzione a corte della cultura illuministica voluta da Caterina la Grande, anche fra le classi colte e presso una certa aristocrazia iniziarono a diffondersi forme di religiosit  alternativa e tendenze filosofiche ereticali, dovute principalmente all’influenza delle correnti illuminate e iniziatiche europee, soprattutto massoniche. Tanto che - come lamenta un autore contemporaneo evidentemente di parte come Nicholas Zernov, teologo ortodosso e professore di teologia ecumenica alla Drew University (USA) - “nella seconda met  del secolo XVIII le classi più elevate della popolazione russa incominciarono a disertare la loro Chiesa in cerca di altri sistemi di vita e alcuni si allontanarono completamente dalla fede e dalla morale cristiana. Alcuni si consideravano discepoli di Voltaire, altri entravano nella Massoneria. Il numero di questi disertori fu in un primo tempo piuttosto ristretto, ma tutti appartenevano all’aristocrazia e a poco a poco i loro princìpi incominciarono a penetrare nelle classi inferiori” (Il Cristianesimo orientale, Mondadori 1990).
Così il medesimo spirito di libert  e alterit  spirituale che animava le pratiche popolari e contadine dei Chlysty si reificò e diede i suoi frutti attraverso pensatori e filosofi, spesso di ampio respiro, che fino all’alba del nostro secolo fecero sentire le loro voci. Essi tentarono di conciliare nell’anima russa l’eroica rivolta del libero pensiero contro la plumbea oppressione di una religiosit  sclerotizzata e malata di autoritarismo con la difesa dei valori più autentici dell’anima slava, mistica e sensuale a un tempo. Il romanziere simbolista Dmitrij Merezkovsky (1865-1941), il mistico pansessualista Vasilij Rozanov (1856-1919) - le cui dottrine magico-sessuali possono essere affiancate a quelle di P.B. Randolph e di Aleister Crowley - e lo stesso tormentato Lev Tolstoj sono esempi emblematici di questo sommovimento, in cui il rifiuto dell’assolutismo sia morale che filosofico e sociale apriva le porte a una concezione magica del mondo. Un’interazione tra diversificate influenze che contribuì più di quanto gli storici razionalisti vogliano ammettere a generare l’humus collettivo di un generale e catartico ribaltamento di valori di cui la rivoluzione socio-economica non rappresentò che l’ultimo stadio.

L’economista e il contadino-sciamano alleati per la pace

Tra il 1904 e il 1905 la stabilit  politica interna dell’Impero zarista era stata fortemente scossa dalla sconfitta nell’infausta guerra contro il Giappone. Questo disastro militare, oltre ad aver frustrato le mire espansionistiche di Nicola II verso l’Oriente, aveva favorito l’azione destabilizzatrice dei primi Soviet, portando alla sanguinosa rivolta popolare del gennaio 1905 e alla nascita di un effimero Parlamento, la Duma.
Grande protagonista del delicato momento politico era stato il ministro delle finanze e successivamente Primo ministro conte Sergeij Jul’evic Witte, autentico genio economico e massone di larghe vedute. A Witte, elevato a dirigere il Ministero delle finanze gi  sotto Alessandro III, andava il merito della grande industrializzazione russa di fine secolo, con la promozione soprattutto di acciaierie e di campi petroliferi, nonché l’attuazione della grande ferrovia transiberiana e la riforma monetaria a sistema aureo che permise fortunate transazioni con banche straniere. Il progetto politico di Witte, che ben presto trovò l’ostilit  dell’aristocrazia fondiaria e dello stesso Zar, era di evitare l’inasprimento dei conflitti di classe e i conseguenti pericoli di crollo dell’intero sistema imperiale attraverso una serie di graduali riforme economiche. Per questo sia nel 1904 che successivamente nel 1914 egli si dimostrò ostile alla guerra, nella quale vedeva soltanto un grande pericolo di indebolimento sociale, oltre che di disagio economico e politico. Mentre di contro la corrotta struttura burocratica dell’aristocrazia non intendeva rinunciare ai propri privilegi economici e si stringeva intorno allo Zar alimentando in tutti i modi la sua pur gi  notevole miopia politica.
Altro grande protagonista di questo scenario fu il misterioso monaco-sciamano, Grigorij Jefimovic Rasputin.
Nato a Pokrovskoe nella Siberia occidentale a est degli Urali, probabilmente nel gennaio 1864, da una famiglia di contadini, Grigorij dimostrò fin dall’infanzia di essere dotato di strane facolt  precognitive e di misteriose capacit  di comunicazione con la natura e con il mondo animale.
Dopo una gioventù dedita alle risse, alla vodka e soprattutto ai piaceri carnali aveva subito una repentina trasformazione spirituale in seguito a un pellegrinaggio al monastero di Verchotur’e - nella regione di Ekaterinburg, oggi Sverdlovsk - noto come centro di aggregazione locale dei Chlysty. E’ quindi molto probabile, anche se non del tutto dimostrato, che il turbolento e sensuale mugik (contadino) abbia realizzato la sua strana svolta esistenziale attraverso la partecipazione ai misteri di questa setta. Fatto sta che da quel momento iniziò una serie di pellegrinaggi che, attraverso i luoghi sacri e i principali monasteri della Russia, lo condusse fino al monte Athos e a Gerusalemme. Lo accompagnavano ovunque una crescente fama di santo staretz e l’eco dei suoi prodigiosi poteri ipnotici, taumaturgici e profetici.
Se pure i suoi maestri spirituali erano stati i Chlysty, Rasputin sicuramente estremizzò e superò le loro pratiche e dottrine fino ad articolare una propria originale forma di religiosit  sciamanica, di cui la danza, il sesso e a un certo punto anche l’ebbrezza alcolica furono le componenti base per lo scatenamento di un travolgente potere personale. In particolare l’enorme ascendente che egli sempre esercitò sulle donne di ogni et  e condizione sociale ricorda da vicino alcune forme di stregoneria sessuale tipiche della tradizione tantrica indo-tibetana e cinese e nell’area etnica cui egli appartenne trovano forse l’uguale soltanto nell’analoga, anche se più raffinata, personalit  di George Gurdjieff.
Dal momento della sua apparizione a corte, nel novembre 1905, Rasputin conquistò la completa fiducia e devozione dei sovrani, delle loro giovani figlie e in particolare del piccolo Aleksej, erede al trono, le cui continue emorragie emofiliache parevano sanabili esclusivamente dalle magnetiche mani del taumaturgo. I miracolosi interventi con cui Rasputin salvò più volte la vita dello Zarevic sono ampiamente documentati e lo stesso Aleksej, secondo una testimonianza diretta, poco dopo la morte dello staretz ebbe a dire: “adesso mi curano e pregano per me, ma non serve a niente. Lui invece mi portava una mela, mi faceva una carezza l  dove io avevo male e subito stavo meglio”.
Ben presto la fama del monaco-stregone divenne enorme ed enorme fu il suo potere di influenzamento sullo Zar e soprattutto sulla zarina Alexandra, che su di lui concentrò tutto il suo mistico fanatismo, tanto che si disse ne fosse divenuta l’amante.
La pur vasta letteratura, soprattutto scandalistica e diffamatoria, su Rasputin ha sempre enfatizzato la sua immagine di astuto ciarlatano semianalfabeta ed erotomane, ma una più accurata analisi, libera da pregiudizi storici e religiosi e basata su quanto ci raccontano i documenti dell’epoca, favorevoli e non, ci presenta una realt  ben più sfaccettata.
“Sono venuto a portarvi la Voce della nostra Santa Madre Terra e a insegnarvi il beato segreto che essa mi ha trasmesso circa la santificazione mediante il peccato”: in queste parole di Rasputin è racchiuso il senso più profondo della sua opera e probabilmente di tutta la sua vita. Egli volle, sempre e ovunque, cavalcare la tigre di un mondo politico e religioso in sfacelo, carico di ipocrisie, menzogne, crudelt  e “peccati” di ogni genere. Di tutto questo egli fece il proprio strumento per offrire sia al popolo che all’aristocrazia una via di scambio e di reciproca redenzione sociale e spirituale.
Per più di un decennio il “santo diavolo”, come molti religiosi lo chiamavano, manovrò le menti e i corpi dei teocrati di Pietroburgo, consolando le nevrosi ossessive di Alexandra e istruendo lo Zar ad ascoltare il cuore piuttosto che la ragione - imbrigliata com’era nella ferrea logica dell’autocrazia - tanto da riuscire a ritardare la crisi bellica di almeno due anni. Nel frattempo beneficò e spesso guarì da malattie fisiche e psichiche decine e decine di persone, soprattutto fra gli aristocratici, pur non dimenticando, quando e come poteva, di porgere il suo aiuto agli innumerevoli diseredati che gli si rivolgevano. Quando accettò denaro da amici abbienti fu solo per distribuirlo generosamente a chi ne era bisognoso e la sua figura ben presto divenne una sorta di ponte gettato fra lo Zar e il suo popolo.
Con una strategia basata più sull’istinto naturale che su un pensiero strutturato, a lui probabilmente estraneo, Rasputin promosse attraverso manovre e amicizie, in particolare femminili, una formula politica improntata al pluralismo e alla tolleranza sociale e religiosa, soprattutto verso le classi e le categorie sociali maggiormente penalizzate come i contadini e gli Ebrei. Le sue operazioni politiche sembrarono, così, perfettamente sintonizzate con le profetiche vedute del conte Witte, il massone illuminato che, allontanato dal potere fin dal 1906, fu forse uno dei pochissimi a comprendere realmente lo staretz e, pur senza esserne soggiogato, gli fu amico devoto. Witte giunse infatti a dire nell’estate del 1914, mentre nonostante gli sforzi suoi e di Rasputin la Russia stava inesorabilmente avviandosi verso la guerra: “esiste un solo uomo oggi in grado di sbrogliare la complessa situazione politica ... e quello è Rasputin”.

Profezia e catastrofe

Lo zar Nicola II, isolato fisicamente dal suo consigliere a causa prima dell’attentato allo staretz nel 1914, poi dei suoi impegni al fronte, divenne succube di altre influenze e neppure l’alleanza tra l’illuminismo massonico di Witte e i poteri sciamanici di Rasputin poté evitare l’ultimo atto della tragica saga imperiale russa.
In Rasputin e nella sua capacit  di assommare e trasmutare tutti i peccati e le cattive coscienze della “nuova” Roma si consumò la possibile opzione di una terza via per la cibernetica della storia, una via altra, diversa e forse superiore rispetto sia alla senescenza teocratica dei nobili reazionari, sia a quel nascente ed effimero astro incarnato da un altro “monaco”, laico, gelido, spietato e totalitario, che portava il nome di Vladimir Il’ic Ul’Janov: Lenin.
In una lettera scritta allo Zar il 18 aprile 1916 Rasputin aveva preconizzato in questi termini la propria morte: “sento che devo morire prima dell’anno nuovo. Voglio fare presente però al popolo russo, al Babbo, alla Madre della Russia e ai Ragazzi che se io sarò ucciso da comuni assassini, e specialmente dai miei fratelli contadini russi, tu, Zar di Russia, non avere paura, resta sul tuo trono e governa ... Ma se io verrò ucciso dai nobili le loro mani resteranno macchiate dal mio sangue ... Zar della terra di Russia, se tu odi il suono della campana che ti dice che Grigorij è stato ucciso devi sapere questo. Se sono stati i tuoi parenti che hanno provocato la mia morte allora nessuno della tua famiglia, cioè nessuno dei tuoi figli o dei tuoi parenti, rimarr  vivo per più di due anni. Essi saranno uccisi dal popolo russo”.
La romanzesca morte di Rasputin nel dicembre 1916, che tra veleni e pallottole apparentemente inefficaci finì per terrorizzare gli aristocratici attentatori, capeggiati appunto da un parente di Nicola II, precedette di soli pochi mesi l’abdicazione dello Zar e lo sterminio della famiglia Romanov da parte dei Bolscevichi, proprio come lo staretz aveva previsto. Nella localit  di Ekaterinburg, a breve distanza dal misterioso monastero dei Chlysty da cui il cammino dell’“Anticristo” era iniziato, il sangue degli ultimi teocrati cristiani segnò il tramonto della Terza Roma, e nessuno sapr  mai quale corso avrebbe avuto la nostra storia se la voce appassionata e sensuale della Santa Madre Terra fosse stata ascoltata dai “Signori della guerra e della fede”.

BOX 1

I Chlysty, gli Illuminati della Carne

Il movimento dei Chlysty, o “gente di Dio”, che ha avuto una sua importanza fino ai primi decenni del Novecento, rappresentò in Russia una vera e propria religione nella religione, organizzata come societ  segreta secondo un modello che presenta forti analogie con alcune sette medievali europee quali quelle degli Adamiti, dei Luciferiani, dei Fratelli del Libero Spirito o degli stessi Catari, tutte decisamente pervase da un’intensa connotazione paganeggiante e, per molti versi, dionisiaca.
Lo storico Mircea Eliade ci ricorda l’esistenza nella Russia del XIX e del XX secolo di altri movimenti mistico-erotici, fra cui gli Innocentisti che, nell’estatica ricerca rituale della “purezza adamica delle origini”, vivevano “in caverne sotterranee, praticamente nudi e impegnati esclusivamente in rapporti sessuali indiscriminati, sperando in tal modo che la redenzione venisse loro dall’enormit  dei loro peccati” (Occultismo, stregoneria e mode culturali, Sansoni 1982). Ma i Chlysty furono indubbiamente il primo e il più articolato, oltre che il più longevo, fra questi modelli meta-religiosi e nonostante le cruente persecuzioni della Chiesa ufficiale e del potere imperiale la loro influenza socio-politica fu enorme e giunse fino a penetrare negli ambienti aristocratici di Mosca e Pietroburgo.
Presso la gente di Dio la morte del “vecchio Adamo” e la rinascita della divinit  interiore dovevano essere realizzate attraverso una violenta forma catartica di spersonalizzazione collettiva, in cui gli istinti di piacere e di dolore venivano artificialmente esasperati fino al raggiungimento di una dimensione estatica, in virtù della quale lo Spirito Santo scendeva a incarnarsi negli adepti e nelle adepte. E alla rigorosa morale esteriore - che comprendeva la proibizione dell’uso di bevande fermentate e la totale astensione da ogni manifestazione mondana e soprattutto dal sesso, anche tra coniugi - veniva così combinata una precisa e codificata utilizzazione dell’ebbrezza e dell’erotismo orgiastico, intesi come tecnica estatica di collegamento con il divino.
I rituali, celebrati nel cuore della notte, implicavano grandi cerchi concentrici di danzatori e danzatrici, che nella crescente esaltazione del movimento giungevano a un furore pandemico, stracciandosi le bianche vesti rituali, flagellandosi a sangue e infine gettandosi gli uni sugli altri in una sfrenata orgia dei sensi. Un processo drammatico e liberatorio attraverso il quale le energie del “peccato” si esaurivano e i fedeli, uomini e donne, diventavano “puri” veicoli del Santo Spirito, manifestando visioni e profezie.
Nei punti di più alta tensione gli adepti ritenevano di raggiungere la personificazione del Cristo (da cui la denominazione di Chrysti, mutatasi poi in Chlysty), mentre le profetesse, che spesso gestivano il culto costituendone il principale polo di attrazione, assumevano l’identit  della Vergine Maria, divenendo rappresentazioni viventi della Grande Madre Terra rigenerata dallo Spirito delle origini e simboleggiata dall’arcaico sigillo sciamanico della croce a otto bracci.

BOX 2

La corte dei miracoli

Nikolaij Aleksandrovic Romanov, figlio di Alessandro III e Zar regnante dal 1896 con il nome di Nicola II, incarnò gli aspetti più deteriori dell’aristocrazia russa del suo tempo. Di carattere debole e superficiale, sostanzialmente pavido ma capace di pur ottusa rigidit  autocratica, governò di fatto subendo la costante influenza dei vari gruppi di potere e delle personalit  che lo circondavano, oscillando costantemente da una posizione all’altra senza mai - come egli stesso confessò - “riflettere troppo su nulla”. Soprattutto ebbe potere su di lui la mistica e nevrotica moglie, la zarina Alexandra Fedorovna, che pure lo amò teneramente e ne fu riamata fino alla morte.
Intanto nell’epoca in cui ormai si annunciavano il tramonto della teocrazia russa e la tragica apocalisse dei suoi ultimi, sfortunati teocrati si assisteva a una paradossale convivenza, sia a corte che in certi ambienti aristocratici, tra la formale difesa della più autocratica ortodossia e la sempre maggiore indulgenza verso dimensioni eretiche e magiche del sacro. I principali interessi di Alexandra infatti, e quindi di Nicola, erano la religione e un certo malato pseudo-misticismo tendente a proiettarsi verso le peggiori forme di religiosit  “occulta”. Perciò alcune fazioni di astuti cortigiani e di familiari intriganti erano solite introdurre a corte ogni sorta di “santi”, predicatori e “folli di Dio” allo scopo di servirsene per influenzare le azioni e le decisioni dei regnanti. I quali li accolsero soprattutto per poter rimediare all’assenza di un figlio maschio e poi, quando nel 1904 nacque finalmente lo zarevic Aleksej, erede al trono, per poter guarire quest’ultimo da una perniciosa forma ereditaria di emofilia.
In tutto quel periodo alla corte di Carskoe Selo vicino a Pietroburgo, la residenza estiva dove la famiglia reale viveva gran parte dell’anno in volontario isolamento, furono ricevuti e ospitati decine di strani personaggi, spesso folli o pericolosamente esaltati, come l’ex macellaio balbuziente e probabilmente pazzo Mitja Kozel’skij, che fu presentato a corte insieme al suo protettore Sergei Nilus. Scopo di Nilus era diventare consigliere spirituale dello Zar e pochi anni dopo questo mistico fanatico, e sedicente professore, sarebbe diventato famoso per la “denuncia” di un allucinante complotto ebraico per la conquista del mondo, delineato in un falso documento di presunta origine ebraico-massonica conosciuto come i “Protocolli dei Savi Anziani di Sion”, la cui prima edizione Nilus curò e commentò nel 1904. E’ tristemente nota la successiva strumentalizzazione dei Protocolli da parte di forze politiche antisemite e soprattutto del regime nazista, che ne fece uno degli alibi fondamentali per la sistematica persecuzione e lo sterminio degli Ebrei.
Fra tanto squallore non va dimenticata la pur fugace presenza a corte di personaggi di ben diversa levatura, quali l’occultista e massone francese Papus (Gerard Encausse) - Gran Maestro dell’Ordine Martinista e alto dignitario di alcuni tra i principali Ordini illuministici europei - e il suo amico e fratello spirituale Philippe Nozier che dal 1902 al 1905 visitò varie volte Carskoe Selo. In questo caso fu la pochezza spirituale dei sovrani a disgustare l’aristocratica sensibilit  di Papus, che dopo aver tentato di coinvolgere Nicola II in una Loggia sperimentale martinista - come risulta da alcuni documenti conservati da questo Ordine - tornò in Francia affermando: “quella gente è pazza; sono alla mercé del primo furfante che sappia accattivarsi le loro ossessioni; stanno scivolando verso l’abisso”. Philippe invece, sicuramente più mistico, reazionario e vicino alla sensibilit  dei Romanov, acquisì per breve tempo una discreta influenza, ma alla fine, nel 1905, su pressioni della polizia segreta e di alcuni cortigiani legati alla fazione di Nilus e Mitija, venne allontanato dalla Russia, non senza aver lasciato ai sovrani il viatico di una profezia: un altro amico sarebbe venuto che avrebbe parlato loro “di Dio”.
Soltanto pochi mesi dopo, attraverso una serie di contatti mediati dall’Archimandrita dell’Accademia teologica di Pietroburgo, il primo novembre 1905 un nuovo staretz veniva di fatto presentato a corte: il suo nome era Grigorij Rasputin e la strana parabola del suo destino si sarebbe sovrapposta a quella dei Romanov e della Russia per i successivi 11 anni. Lo scopo di chi lo introdusse presso i sovrani era quello di farne un ulteriore, docile strumento di controllo sulla famiglia reale: speranze che furono amaramente frustrate dai poteri e dalla statura psicologica assolutamente indipendente e incontrollabile del “santo diavolo”.

BOX 3

L’allucinante morte dello stregone

La notte tra il 16 e il 17 dicembre 1916 il giovane principe Feliks Jusupov, figlio omosessuale di una parente dei Romanov gi  a suo tempo allontanata da corte per la sua ostilit  a Rasputin, attirò quest’ultimo nel proprio palazzo per un colloquio privato che risultò invece un mortale tranello.
Jusupov offrì allo staretz biscotti imbottiti di cianuro e Madera avvelenato. Rasputin per due ore mangiò e bevve avidamente, come suo solito, senza dare alcun segno di malessere e fissando con aria di sfida il suo assassino inorridito. Alla fine il principe, sconvolto, estrasse un'arma e sparò al cuore del “diavolo”, che stramazzò al suolo. Sopraggiunsero allora i complici del giovane, ma poco dopo il loro arrivo Rasputin, ancora vivo, balzò in piedi e riuscì a fuggire dall’edificio. Inseguito dai congiurati, fu abbattuto con diversi colpi di pistola da Vladimir Puriskevic, deputato di estrema destra della Duma. Il corpo martoriato dello stregone fu legato e avvolto in una coperta e quindi gettato nelle acque gelide del Neva.
Quando alcuni giorni dopo il cadavere fu ripescato si dovette constatare che Rasputin si era “risvegliato” in acqua ed era riuscito a liberare una mano dalle corde assumendo una posizione benedicente. La morte definitiva era sopravvenuta per affogamento.

Supreme Magus leaves the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (The UK illuminati )

Posted on Wednesday, October 11, 2006 at 07:03PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

SRIA 2 DOCUMENT.jpgIn June 2005 e.v

an historic event took place in the secretive world of the illuminati.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Supreme Magus of the English illuminati known as the SRIA , leaves his office for the first time in history.This naturaly happens after the OTO satanic infiltration of Bro.Simon Kane and Frater Rui Gabirro's black magic practices are finaly exposed to the rest of the British illuminati.This episode forced the SRIA Metropolitan College in London to shut for one month! But check for yourself  the official reasons instead in this rare illuminati document.Bro.Simon Kane and Bro.Rui Gabirro are no longer members of the SRIA.

 

REVEALING THE PERVERSE PRACTICES OF GARDNERIAN WITCHCRAFT

Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 08:33PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | Comments1 Comment

You must have often wondered how the New World Order manipulates poor ignorant kids towards the devil using low forms of magic and witchcraft.
So experience for yourself the Book of Shadows
Gardnerian Traditional Witchcraft Part I

intro.jpg

A.1. Casting the Circle (1949)
It is most convenient to mark the circle with chalk, paint or otherwise, to show where it is; but marks on the carpet may be utilized. Furniture may be placed to indicate the bounds.
The only circle that matters is the one drawn before every ceremony with either a duly consecrated Magic Sword or an Athame. The circle is usually nine feet in diameter, unless made for some very special purpose. There are two outer circles, each six inches apart, so the third circle has a diameter of eleven feet.
1 Having chosen a place proper, take the sickle or scimitar of Art or a Witch's Athame, if thou mayest obtain it, and stick it into the center, then take a cord, and 'twere well to use the Cable Tow for this, and loop it over the Instrument, four and one half feet, and so trace out the circumference of the circle, which must be traced either with the Sword, or the knife with the black hilt, or it be of little avail, but ever leave open a door towards the North. Make in all 3 circles, one with in the other, and write names of power between these.
2 First draw circle with Magic Sword or Athame.
3 Consecrate Salt and Water: Touch water with Athame, saying, "I exorcise thee, O creature of Water, that thou cast out from Thee all the impurities and uncleannesses of the Spirits of the World of Phantasm, so they may harm me not, in the names of Aradia and Cernunnos."
4 Touching Salt with Athame, say, "The Blessings of Aradia and Cernunnos be upon this creature of Salt, and let all malignity and hindrance be cast forth hencefrom, and let all good enter herein, for without Thee man cannot live, wherefore I bless thee and invoke thee, that thou mayest aid me."
5 Then put the Salt into the water.
6 Sprinkle with exorcised water.
7 Light candles; say, "I exorcise thee, O Creature of Fire, that every kind of Phantasm may retire from thee, and be unable to harm or deceive in any way, in the names of Aradia and Cernunnos."
8 Caution initiate (if any); warn companions; enter circle and close doors with 3 pentagrams.
9 Proclaim object of working
10 Circumambulate 3 times or more before commencing work.
11 Summon: "I summon, stir, and Call thee up, thou Mighty Ones of the East, South, West, and North."
Salute and draw pentacle with Magic Sword or Athame, the first stroke being from the top down to the left.

A.2. Drawing Down the Moon (1949)
High Priestess stands in front of Altar, assumes Goddess position (arms crossed).
Magus, kneeling in front of her, draws pentacle on her body with Phallus- headed Wand, invokes, "I Invoke and beseech Thee, O mighty Mother of all life and fertility. By seed and root, by stem and bud, by leaf and flower and fruit, by Life and Love, do I invoke Thee to descend into the body of thy servant and High Priestess [name]."
The Moon having been drawn down, i.e., link established, Magus and other men give Fivefold Kiss:
(kissing feet) "Blessed be thy feet, that have brought thee in these ways";
(kissing knees) "Blessed be thy knees, that shall kneel at the sacred altar";
(kissing womb) "Blessed be thy womb, without which we would not be";
(kissing breasts) "Blessed be thy breasts, formed in beauty and in strength";
(kissing lips) "Blessed be thy lips, that shall speak the sacred names." Women all bow.
If there be an initiation, then at this time the Magus and the High Priestess in Goddess position (Arms Crossed) says the Charge while the Initiate stands outside the circle.

A.3. "Lift Up the Veil" [The Charge] (1949)
Magus: "Listen to the words of the Great mother, who of old was also called among men Artemis, Astarte, Dione, Melusine, Aphrodite, Cerridwen, Diana, Arianrhod, Bride, and by many other names."
High Priestess: "At mine Altars the youth of Lacedaemon in Sparta made due sacrifice. "Whenever ye have need of anything, once in the month, and better it be when the moon is full, ye shall assemble in some secret place and adore the spirit of Me who am Queen of all Witcheries and magics.
"There ye shall assemble, ye who are fain to learn all sorcery, yet have not won its deepest secrets. To these will I teach things that are yet unknown."
"And ye shall be free from slavery, and as a sign that ye be really free, ye shall be naked in your rites, both men and women, and ye shall dance, sing, feast, make music, and love, all in my praise."
"There is a Secret Door that I have made to establish the way to taste even on earth the elixir of immortality. Say, `Let ecstasy be mine, and joy on earth even to me, To Me,' For I am a gracious Goddess. I give unimaginable joys on earth, certainty, not faith, while in life! And upon death, peace unutterable, rest, and ecstasy, nor do I demand aught in sacrifice."
Magus: "Hear ye the words of the Star Goddess."
High Priestess: "I love you: I yearn for you: pale or purple, veiled or voluptuous."
"I who am all pleasure, and purple and drunkenness of the innermost senses, desire you. Put on the wings, arouse the coiled splendor within you." "Come unto me, for I am the flame that burns in the heart of every man, and the core of every Star."
"Let it be your inmost divine self who art lost in the constant rapture of infinite joy."
"Let the rituals be rightly performed with joy and beauty. Remember that all acts of love and pleasure are my rituals. So let there be beauty and strength, leaping laughter, force and fire by within you."
"And if thou sayest, `I have journeyed unto thee, and it availed me not, ' rather shalt thou say, `I called upon thee, and I waited patiently, and Lo, thou wast with me from the beginning,' for they that ever desired me shall ever attain me, even to the end of all desire."
This much of the rites must ever be performed to prepare for any initiation, whether of one degree or of all three.

A.4. The Initiation (1949)
[First Degree]
Magus leaves circle by the doorway, goes to Postulant, and says, "Since there is no other brother here, I must be thy sponsor, as well as priest. I am about to give you a warning. If you are still of the same mind, answer it with these words: `Perfect Love and Perfect Trust.'" Placing the point of the sword to the Postulant's breast, he says, "O thou who standeth on the threshold between the pleasant world of men and the domains of the Dread Lords of the Outer Spaces, hast thou the courage to make the Assay? For I tell thee verily, it were better to rush on my weapon and perish miserably than to make the attempt with fear in thy heart."
Postulant: "I have two Passwords: Perfect Love and Perfect Trust."
Magus drops the sword point, saying, "All who approach with perfect love and perfect trust are doubly welcome."
Going around behind her, he blindfolds her, then putting his left arm around her waist and his right arm around her neck, he pulls her head back, says, "I give you the 3rd password, a Kiss to pass through this dread Door," and pushes her forward with his body, through the doorway and into the circle.
Once inside, he releases her saying, "This is the way all are first brought into the circle."
Magus closes the doorway by drawing the point of the sword across it three times, joining all three circles, saying, "Agla, Azoth, Adonai," then drawing three pentacles to seal it.
Magus guides Postulant to south of altar, and whispers, "Now there is the Ordeal."
Taking a short piece of cord from the altar, he ties it around her right ankle, saying, "Feet neither bound nor free."
Taking a longer cord, he ties her hands together behind her back, then pulls them up, so that the arms form a triangle, and ties the cord around her neck, leaving the end dangling down in front as a Cable Tow.
With the Cable Tow in his left hand and the sword in his right hand, the Magus leads her sunwise around the circle to the east, where he salutes with the sword and proclaims, "Take heed, O Lords of the Watchtowers of the East, (name), properly prepared, will be made a Priestess and a Witch."
Magus leads her similarly to the south, west, and north, making the proclamation at each quarter.
Next, clasping Postulant around the waist with his left arm, and holding the sword erect in his right hand, he makes her circumambulate three times around the circle with a half-running, half-dancing step.
He halts her at the south of the altar, and strikes eleven knells on the bell. He then kneels at her feet, saying, "In other religions the postulant kneels, as the Priests claim supreme power, but in the Art Magical, we are taught to be humble, so we kneel to welcome them and say:
"Blessed be thy feet that have brought thee in these ways." (He kisses her feet.)
"Blessed be thy knees that shall kneel at the sacred altar." (He kisses her knees.)
"Blessed be thy womb, without which we would not be." (He kisses her Organ of Generation.)
"Blessed by thy breasts, formed in beauty and in strength." (He kisses her breasts.)
"Blessed be thy lips, which shall utter the sacred names." (He kisses her lips.)
Take measure thus: height, around forehead, across the heart, and across the genitals.
Magus says, "Be pleased to kneel," and helps her kneel before the altar. He ties the end of the Cable Tow to a ring in the altar, so that the postulant is bent sharply forward, with her head almost touching the floor. He also ties her feet together with the short cord.
Magus strikes three knells on the bell and says, "Art ready to swear that thou wilt always be true to the Art?"
Witch: "I am."
Magus strikes seven knells on the bell and says, "Before ye are sworn, art willing to pass the ordeal and be purified?"
Witch: "I am."
Magus strikes eleven knells on the bell, takes the scourge from the altar, and gives a series of three, seven, nine, and 21 strokes with the scourge across the postulant's buttocks.
Magus says, "Ye have bravely passed the test. Art always ready to help, protect, and defend thy Brothers and Sisters of the Art?"
Witch: "I am."
Magus: "Art armed?"
Witch: "With a knife in my hair."
Magus: "Then on that knife wilt thou swear absolute secrecy?"
Witch: "I will."
Magus: "Then say after me. `I, (name), in the presence of the Mighty Ones, do of my own will and accord, most solemnly swear that I will ever keep secret and never reveal the secrets of the Art, except it be to a proper person, properly prepared, within a circle such as I am now in. All this I swear by my hopes of a future life, mindful that my measure has been taken, and may my weapons turn against me if I break this my solemn oath.'"
Magus now unbinds her feet, unties the Cable Tow from the altar, removes the blindfold, and helps her up to her feet.
Magus says, "I hereby sign thee with the triple sign. "I consecrate thee with oil."
(He anoints her with oil on the womb, the right breast, the left breast, and the womb again.)
"I consecrate thee with wine." (He anoints her with wine in the same pattern.)
"I consecrate thee with my lips" (he kisses her in the same pattern),
"Priestess and Witch." Magus now unbinds her hands and removes the last cord, saying, "Now I Present to thee the Working Tools of a Witch.
"First the Magic Sword. With this, as with the Athame, thou canst form all Magic Circles, dominate, subdue, and punish all rebellious Spirits and Demons, and even persuade the Angels and Geniuses. With this in your hand you are the ruler of the Circle. [Here "kiss" means that the initiate kisses the tool, and the Magus then kisses the Witch being initiated.]
"Next I present the Athame. This is the true Witch's weapon and has all the powers of the Magic Sword [kiss].
"Next I present the White-Handled Knife. Its use is to form all instruments used in the Art. It can only be properly used within a Magic Circle [Kiss].
"Next I present the Wand. Its use is to call up and control certain Angels and geniuses, to whom it would not be mete to use the Magic Sword [Kiss].
"Next I present the pentacles. These are for the purpose of calling up appropriate Spirits [Kiss].
"Next I present the Censer of Incense. This is used to encourage and welcome Good Spirits and to banish Evil Spirits.[kiss]
"Next I present the scourge. This is a sign of power and domination. It is also to cause suffering and purification, for it is written, to learn you must suffer and be purified. Art willing to suffer to learn?"
Witch: "I am.
"[Kiss]
Magus: "Next, and lastly I present the Cords. They are of use to bind the sigils in the Art, the material basis, and to enforce thy will. Also they are necessary in the oath. I Salute thee in the name of Aradia and Cernunnos, Newly made Priestess and Witch."
Magus strikes seven knells on the bell and kisses Witch again, then circumambulates with her, proclaiming to the four quarters, "Hear, ye Mighty Ones, (name) hath been consecrated Priestess and Witch of the Gods."
(Note, if ceremony ends here, close circle with "I thank ye for attending, and I dismiss ye to your pleasant abodes. Hail and farewell." If not, go to next degree.)
[Second Degree]
Magus binds Witch as before, but does not blindfold her, and circumambulates with her, proclaims to the four quarters, "Hear, ye Mighty Ones, (name), a duly consecrated Priestess and Witch, is now properly prepared to be made a High Priestess and Witch Queen."
Magus now leads her thrice around the circle with the half-running, half- dancing step, halts south of the altar, has the Witch kneel, and ties her down to the altar as before.
Magus: "To attain this sublime degree, it is necessary to suffer and be purified. Art ready to suffer to Learn?"
Priestess Witch: "I am."
Magus: "I prepare thee to take the great oath." He strikes three knells on the bell, and again gives the series of three, seven, nine, and 21 strokes with the scourge as before.
Magus: "I now give thee a new name: _______. [kiss]
Magus: "Repeat thy new name after me, I, (name), swear upon my mother's womb and by mine Honor among men and among my brothers and sisters of the Art, that I will never reveal to any at all any of the secrets of the Art, except it be to a worthy person, properly prepared, in the center of a Magic Circle, such as I am now in. This I swear by my hopes of Salvation, my past lives, and my hopes of future ones to come, and I devote myself to utter destruction if I break this my solemn oath. "
Magus kneels, placing left hand under her knees and right hand on her head, thus forming magic link.
Magus: "I hereby will all my power into you." Wills.
Magus now unties her feet, unties the Cable Tow from the altar, and helps the Witch to her feet.
Magus: "I hereby sign and consecrate you with the great Magic Sign. Remember how it is formed and you will always recognize it.
"I consecrate thee with oil." (He anoints her with oil on her womb, right breast, left hip, right hip, left breast, and womb again, thus tracing a point-down pentacle.)
"I consecrate thee with wine." (He anoints her with wine in the same pattern.)
"I consecrate thee with my lips" (he kisses her in the same pattern), "High Priestess and Witch Queen."
Magus now unbinds Witch's hands and removes the cord, saying, "Newly made High Priestess and Witch Queen" [kiss]
"you will now use the working tools in turn. First, the Magic Sword; with it you will scribe the Magic Circle [kiss]
"Secondly, the Athame" (Form Circle) [kiss]
"Thirdly, the White Handled Knife" (use) [kiss]
"Fourthly, the Wand" (Wave to 4 Quarters) [kiss]
"Fifthly, the Pentacle" (Show to 4 Quarters) [kiss]
"Sixthly, the Censer of Incense" (Circle, cense) [kiss]
"Seventhly, the cords; bind me as I bound you.
" Witch binds Magus and ties him to Altar.
Magus: "Learn, in Witchcraft, thou must ever return triple. As I scourged thee, so thou must scourge me, but triple. So where you received 3, return 9; where you received 7, return 21; where you received 9, return 27; where you received 21, return 63."
Witch scourges Magus as instructed, 120 strokes total.
Magus: "Thou hast obeyed the Law. But mark well, when thou receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold." Witch now unbinds Magus and helps him to his feet. Magus, taking the new Initiate by the hand and holding the Athame in the other, passes once round the Circle, proclaiming at the Four Quarters,
"Hear, Ye Mighty Ones, (name) hath been duly consecrated High Priestess and Witch Queen."
(Note, if ceremony ends here, close circle with "Hail and farewell." If not go to next degree.)
[Third Degree]
Magus: "Ere we proceed with this sublime degree, I must beg purification at thy hands." High Priestess binds Magus and ties him down to the altar. She circumambulates three times, and scourges Magus with three, seven, nine, and 21 strokes. She then unbinds him and helps him to his feet. Magus now binds the High Priestess and ties her down to the altar. He circumambulates, proclaiming to the four quarters, "Hear, ye mighty Ones, the twice consecrate and Holy (name), High Priestess and Witch Queen, is properly prepared and will now proceed to erect the Sacred Altar." Magus scourges High Priestess with three, seven, nine, and 21 strokes. Cakes and wine may now be taken [see section A.5].
Magus: "Now I must reveal to you a great Mystery." [kiss]. Note: if High Priestess has performed this rite before, omit these words. High Priestess assumes Osiris position.
Magus: "Assist me to erect the Ancient Altar, at which in days past all worshipped, the Great Altar of all things. For in the old times a woman was the Altar. Thus was the altar made and so placed [Priestess lies down in such a way that her vagina is approximately at the center of the circle], and the sacred place was the point within the center of the circle, as we of old times have been taught, that the point within the center is the origin of all things. Therefore should we adore it." [kiss] "Therefore, whom we adore, we also invoke, by the power of the lifted lance." Invokes. "O circle of stars [kiss], whereof our Father is but the younger brother [kiss], "Marvel beyond imagination, soul of infinite space, before whom time is ashamed, the mind bewildered and understanding dark, not unto thee may we attain unless thine image be of love [kiss]. "Therefore, by seed and root, and stem and bud and leaf and flower and fruit do we invoke thee, O, Queen of space, O dew of light, O continuous one of the Heavens [kiss]. "Let it be ever thus, that men speak not of Thee as one, but as none, and let them not speak of thee at all, since thou art continuous, for thou art the point within the circle [kiss], which we adore [kiss], the fount of life without which we would not be [kiss]. "And in this way truly are erected the Holy Twin Pillars Boaz and Jachin [kisses breasts]. In beauty and strength were they erected, to the wonder and glory of all men."
(Eightfold Kiss: 3 points, Lips, 2 Breasts and back to lips; 5 points) "O Secrets of secrets that art hidden in the being of all lives. Not thee do we adore, for that which adoreth is also thou. Thou art that and That am I [kiss]. "I am the flame that burns in every man, and in the core of every star [kiss]. "I am Life and the giver of Life, yet therefore is the knowledge of me the Knowledge of Death [kiss]. "I am alone, the Lord within ourselves whose name is Mystery of Mysteries [kiss]. "Make open the path of intelligence between us. For these truly are the 5 points of fellowship [on the right appears an illuminated diagram of the point-up triangle above the pentacle, the symbol for the third degree], feet to feet, knee to knee, groin to groin, breast to breast, arms around back, lips to lips, by the Great and Holy Names Abracadabra, Aradia, and Cernunnos.
Magus and High Priestess: "Encourage our hearts, Let thy Light crystallize itself in our blood, fulfilling us of Resurrection, for there is no part of us that is not of the Gods."
(Exchange Names.)
Closing the Circle High Priestess Circumambulates, proclaiming, "The twice consecrate High Priestess greets ye Mighty Ones, and dismisseth ye to your pleasant abodes. Hail and Farewell." She draws the banishing pentacle at each quarter.

A.5. Cakes and Wine (1949)
Magus kneels, fills Cup, offers to Witch [she is seated on the altar, holding her athame; Priest kneels before her, holding up the cup]. Witch, holding Athame between palms, places point in cup.
Magus: "As the Athame is the Male, so the Cup is the female; so, conjoined, they bring blessedness."
Witch lays aside Athame, takes Cup in both hands, drinks and gives drink. Magus Holds Paten to Witch, who blesses with Athame, then eats and gives to Eat.
It is said that in olden days ale or mead was often used instead of wine. It is said that spirits or anything can be used so long as it has life.

A.6. The Sabbat Rituals (1949)
November Eve
Walk or slow dance, Magus leading High Priestess, both carrying Phallic wand or broom, people with torches or candles.
Witch chant or song:
"Eko, eko, Azarak Eko, eko, Zomelak Bazabi lacha bachabe Lamac cahi achababe Karrellyos Lamac lamac Bachalyas cabahagy sabalyos Baryolos Lagoz atha cabyolas Samahac atha famolas Hurrahya!"
Form circle.
High Priestess assumes Goddess position.
Magus gives her Fivefold Kiss and is scourged.
All are purified [that is, bound and scourged with forty strokes, as in the initiation rituals].
Magus assumes God position.
High Priestess invokes with Athame: "Dread Lord of the shadows, god of life and the giver of life. Yet is the knowledge of thee the knowledge of death. Open wide, I pray thee, thy gates through which all must pass. Let our dear ones who have gone before, return this night to make merry with us. And when our time comes, as it must, O thou the comforter, the consoler, the giver of peace and rest, we will enter thy realms gladly and unafraid, for we know that when rested and refreshed among our dear ones, we shall be born again by thy grace and the grace of the Great Mother. Let it be in the same place and the same time as our beloved ones, and may we meet and know, and love them again. Descend, we pray thee, upon thy servant and Priest ( name) "
High Priestess gives Fivefold Kiss to Magus.
Initiations if any; all others are purified.
(Note: Couples may purify each other if they will.)
Cakes and Wine.
The Great Rite if possible, either in token or truly.
Dismiss [the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the people then stay to] feast and dance.
February Eve
After usual opening, all are doubly purified [that is, with eighty strokes].
Dance round outside circle,
High Priestess with sword girded on and drawn, phallic wand in left hand.
Enter circle.
Magus assumes God position.
High Priestess gives Fivefold Kiss, invokes: "Dread Lord of death and Resurrection, life and the giver of life, Lord within ourselves, whose name is Mystery of Mysteries, encourage our hearts. Let the light crystalize in our blood, fulfilling us of resurrection, for there is no part of us that is not of the gods. Descend, we pray thee, upon this thy servant and Priest (name)."
All should be purified in sacrifice before him.
He then purifies the High Priestess with his own hands, and others if he will.
Cakes and wine.
Great Rite if possible, in token or real.
Games and dance as the people will.
Dismiss [the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the people then stay to] feast and dance.
May Eve
If possible ride poles, brooms, etc. High Priestess leading, quick dance step, singing
"O do not tell the priests of our arts. For they would call it sin, For we will be in the woods all night A conjuring summer in. And we bring you good news by word of mouth for women, cattle, and corn: The sun is coming up from the south, With oak and ash, and thorn."
Meeting dance if possible.
Form circle as usual, and purify.
High Priestess assumes Goddess position; officers all give her the fivefold kiss.
She purifies all.
High Priestess again assumes Goddess position.
Magus invokes, draws down moon, "I invoke thee and call upon thee, O mighty Mother of us all, bringer of all fruitfulness, By seed and root, by stem and bud, by leaf and flower and fruit, by life and love, do we invoke thee, to descend upon the body of thy servant and Priestess here."
Magus gives Fivefold Kiss to High Priestess.
All should be purified in sacrifice before her, and she should purify Magus and some others with her own hands.
Cakes and wine.
Games.
Great Rite if possible, in token or truly.
Dismiss the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the people then stay to feast and dance.
August Eve If possible, ride poles, broomsticks, etc.
Meeting Dance if possible [the double-spiral dance described in Witchcraft Today, p. 167].
Form circle.
Purify.
High Priestess stands in pentacle position.
Magus invokes her: "O mighty Mother of us all, Mother of all fruitfulness, give us fruit and grain, flocks and herds and children to the tribe that we be mighty, by thy rosy love, do thou descend upon thy servant and Priestess (name) here."
Magus gives Fivefold Kiss to High Priestess.
Candle game: Seated, the men form a circle, passing a lighted candle from hand to hand "deosil".
The women form circle outside, trying to blow it out over their shoulders.
Whoever's hand it is in when it is blown out is 3 times purified by whoever blew it out, giving fivefold Kiss in return. This game may go on as long as the people like.
Cakes and wine, and any other games you like.
Dismiss the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the people then stay to feast and dance.

B.1. On Chants (1953)
Of old there were many chants and songs used especially in the Dances. Many of these have been forgotten by us here, but we know that they used cries of IAU which seems muchly like the cries EVO or EVOHE of the ancients. Much dependeth on the pronunciation if this be so. In my youth, when I heard IAU it seemed to be AEIOU, or rather, AAAEEIOOOOUU. This may be but the natural way to prolong it to make it fit for a call, but it suggests that these be possibly the initials of an invocation as Agla is said to be, and of sooth 'tis said that the whole Hebrew alphabet is said to be such, and for this reason is recited as a most powerful charm, but at least this is certain, these cries during the dances do have profound effect, as I myself have seen.
Other calls are IEHOUA and EHEIE; also Ho Ho Ho Ise Ise Ise.
IEO VEO VEO VEO VEOV OROV OV OVOVO may be a spell but is more likely to be a call. 'Tis like the EVOE EVOE of the Greeks and the "Heave ho!" of sailors. "Emen hetan" and "Ab hur, ab hus" seem calls; as "Horse and hattock, horse and go, horse and Pellatis, ho, ho, ho!" "Thout, tout a tout tout, throughout and about" and "Rentum tormentum" are probably mispronounced attempts at a forgotten formula, though they may have been invented by some unfortunate being tortured, to evade telling the real formula.

B.2. To Help the Sick (1953)
1 Ever remember the promise of the goddess, "For ecstasy is mine and joy on earth" so let there ever be joy in your heart. Greet people with joy, be glad to see them. If times be hard, think, "It might have been worse. I at least have known the joys of the Sabbath, and I will know them again." Think of the grandeur, beauty, and Poetry of the rites, of the loved ones you meet through them. If you dwell on this inner joy, your health will be better. You must try to banish all fear, for i t will really touch you. It may hurt your body, but your soul is beyond it all.
2 And ever remember, that if you help others it makes you forget your own woes. And if another be in pain, do what you may to distract his attention from it. Do not say "You have no pain," but if you may, administer the drugs which sooth as well as those that cure. But ever strive to make them believe they are getting better. Install into them happy thoughts. If you can only get this into his inner mind so that it be always believed.
3 To this end it is not wrong to let people think that we of the cult have more power than we have. For the truth is that if they believe we have more power than we really possess, we do really possess these powers, insomuch we can do good to them .
4 You must try to find out about people. If you tell a slightly sick man, "You are looking better. You will soon be well," he will feel better, but if he is really ill, or in pain, his Knowledge that he is in pain will cause him to doubt your words in future. But if you give him one of the drugs and then say, "The pain is growing less. Soon it will be gone," because the pain goes, the next time you say, "The pain is going," he will believe you and the pain will really get less. But you must ever say so with conviction, and this conviction must come from your believing it yourself, because you yourself know that if you can fix his mind so that he believes you, it is true.
5 'Tis often better to look exactly between their eyes, looking as if your eyes pierced their heads, opening your eyes as wide as you may and never blink. This continued gazing oft causes the patient to grow sleepy. If they show signs of this, say "You are growing sleepy. You will sleep, you are tired. Sleep. Your eyes grow tired. Sleep." If they close their eyes, say "Your eyes close, you are tired, you cannot open your eyes." If they cannot, say "Your arms are tired, you cannot raise them." If they cannot, say "I am master of your mind. You must ever believe what I tell you. When I look like this into your eyes you will sleep and be subject to my will," then tell them they will sleep and wake up refreshed, feeling better. Continue this with soothing and healing drugs, and try to infuse into them the feeling of ecstasy that you feel at the Sabbath. They cannot feel it in full, but you can command them to feel what is in your own mind, and try to concentrate on this ecstasy. If you may safely tell that you are of the Cult, your task may be easier. And it were well to command them to know it only with their sleeping mind, and forget it, or to be at least unable to tell anyone about it when awake. A good way is to command them that, if they are ever questioned about Witchcraft or Witches, to immediately fall asleep.
6 Ever remember if tempted to admit or boast of belonging to the cult you be endangering your brothers, for though now the fires of persecution may have died down, who knows when they may be revived? Many priests have knowledge of our secrets, and they well know that, though much religious bigotry has calmed down, many people would wish to join our cult. And if the truth were known of its joys, the Churches would lose power, so if we take many recruits, we may loose the fires of persecution against us again. So ever keep the secrets.
7 Think joy, think love, try to help others and bring joy into their lives. Children are naturally easier to influence than grown people. Ever strive to work through people's existing beliefs. For instance, more than half of the world believe in amulets. An ordinary stone is not an amulet but if it hath a natural hole in it, it must be something unusual, so if the patient hath this belief give him one. But first carry it next your skin for a few days, forcing your will into it, to cure pain, to feel safe, or against their particular fear, and this amulet may keep imposing your will when you are absent. The masters of talismans knew this full well when they say they must be made in a circle, to avoid distraction, by someone whose mind is on the subject of the work.
8 But keep your own mind happy. Remember the Words of the Goddess: "I give unimaginable joys on Earth, certainty, not faith, while in life, and upon death, peace unutterable, rest, and ecstasy, and the promise that you will return again." In the old days many of us went to the flames laughing and singing, and so we may again. We may have joy in life and beauty, and peace and Death and the promise of return.
9 The Bible speaks sooth, "A merry heart doeth good like a medicine but a broken spirit breaketh the bones." But you may not have a merry heart. Perchance you were born under an evil star. I think that the effects of the stars are overestimated, but you cannot make a merry heart to order, you say. But you can, in the Cult; there be secret processes by which your will and imagination may be influenced. This process also affects the body, and brings it to joy. Your body is happy, so your mind is happy. You are well because you are happy, and you are happy because you are well.
10 Prayer may be used with good result if the patient believes it can and will work. Many believe it can, but do not believe their God or saint will help. Prayers to the Goddess help, especially the Amalthean Horn Prayer, as it causes stimulation to the body as well as to the mind.

B.3. The Scourge and the Kiss. (1953)
1 Invocation
(Feet, knees, and wrists should be tightly bound to retard blood.) Scourge 40 or more, to make skin tingle, then say, invoking Goddess,
Hail, Aradia, from the Amalthean horn
Pour forth thy store of Love. I lowly bend
Before Thee! I invoke thee at the end
When other Gods are fallen and put to scorn.
Thy foot is to my lips! My sighs inborn
Rise, touch, curl about thy heart. Then spend,
Pitiful Love, loveliest Pity, descend
And bring me luck who am lonely and forlorn.
Ask the Goddess to help you to obtain your desires, then Scourge again to bind the spell. This be powerful in ill luck and for sickness. It must be said in a Circle, and you must be properly prepared and well purified, both before and after saying, to bind the spell. Before starting you must make a very clear picture in your mind of what you wish. Make yourself see the wish obtained. Be sure in your own mind exactly what it is and how it is to be fulfilled. This spell is the one that was taught to me long ago and I have found it works, but I don't think there is any special virtue in these words. Any others can be substituted provided they ask the goddess's (or gods') help, and say clearly what you wish and you form the clear mental image; and if it doesn't work at first, keep on trying till it works. Your helper, who wields the scourge, must know what you wish, and also form the mental image. And at first at any rate, it will be better for you to work the spell, then for the girl to take your place and work it also; you scourge her. Don't try anything difficult at first, and do it at least once a week till it works. You have to get into sympathy with each other, before anything happens, and regular working helps this. Of spells, the exact words matter little if the intent be clear and you raise the true power, and sufficient thereof. Always in rhyme they are. There is something queer about rhyme. I have tried, and the same seem to lose their power if you miss th e rhyme. Also in rhyme, the words seem to say themselves. You do not have to pause and think: "What comes next?" Doing this takes away much of your intent. [2] Order and discipline must be kept. A High Priest or Priestess may and should punish all faults to this end, and all of the Cult must accept such corrections willingly. All are brothers and sisters, for this reason: that even the High Priestess must submit to the scourge. Each fault should be corrected separately. The Priest or Priestess must be properly prepared and call the culprit to trial. They must be prepared as for initiation and kneel, be told their fault and sentence pronounced.
Punishment should be the scourge, followed by a forfeit such as several fivefold kisses or something of this nature. The culprit must acknowledge the justice of the punishment by kissing hands and scourge on receiving sentence and again when thanking for punishment received.*
3 The scourgings are 3, 7, 9 (thrice three), and 21 (thrice seven) 40 in all. It is not meet to make offerings [scourgings] of less than two score to the Goddess, for here be a mystery. The fortunate numbers be: 3 and 5. For three added to two ( the Perfect Couple) be five. And three and five be eight; eight and five be thirteen; thirteen and eight be twenty-one.
The Fivefold Kiss is called 5, but there are 8 kisses, for there be 2 feet and 2 knees and genitals and 2 breasts and the lips. And 5 times 8 be two score. Also, fortunate numbers be 3, 7, 8, and 21, which total 40, or two score. For each man and woman hath ten fingers and ten toes, so each totals a score. And a perfect couple be two score.
So a lesser number would not be perfect prayer. If more are required make it a perfect number, as four score or six score.
Also there be Eight Elemental Weapons.
4 To make the anointing ointment, take some glazed pans filled half full with grease or olive oil. Put in one sweet mint, marjoram in another, ground thyme in a 3rd, and it you may have it, patchouli, dried leaves pounded. Place pans in hot water bath. Stir and cook for several hours, then pout into linen bags, and squeeze grease through into pans again, and fill up with fresh leaves. After doing this several times, the grease will be highly perfumed. Then mix all together and store in a well-corked jar.Anoint behind ears, throat, armpits, breasts, and womb. Also, for all ceremonies where the feet are kissed, they should also be anointed.

B.4. The Priestess and the Sword (1953)
It is said, "When a woman takes the main part in worship of the Male God, she must be girt with a sword." Note. This hath been explained as meaning that a man should be Magus representing the God, but if no one of sufficient rank and knowledge be present, a woman armed as a man may take his place. The sheath should be worn in a belt. She should carry the sword in hand, but if she has to use her hands, she should sheath the sword. Any other woman in the circle while this worship is performed shall be sword in hand. Those outside the circle only have the athame.
A woman may impersonate either the God or the Goddess, but a man may only impersonate the God.

B.5. The Warning (1953)
Keep this book in your own hand of write. Let brothers and Sisters copy what they will, but never let this book out of your hands, and never keep the writings of another, for if it be found in their hand of write, they may well be taken and tortured. Each should guard his own writings and destroy them whenever danger threatens. Learn as much as you may by heart, and when the danger is past, rewrite your book. For this reason, if any die, destroy their book if they have not been able to, for, if it be found, 'tis clear proof against them. "Ye may not be a Witch alone"; so all their friends be in danger of the torture. So destroy everything not necessary. If your book be found on you, 'tis clear proof against you. You may be tortured. Keep all thought of the cult from your mind. Say you had bad dreams, that a Devil caused you to write this without your knowledge. Think to yourself, "I Know Nothing . I Remember nothing. I have forgotten all." Drive this into your mind. If the torture be too great to bear, say, "I will confess. I cannot bear this torment. What do you want me to say? Tell me and I will say it." If they try to make you talk of the brotherhood, do not, but if they try to make you speak of impossibilities, such as flying through the air, consorting with the Devis, sacrificing children, or eating men's flesh, say, "I had an evil dream. I was not myself. I was crazed." Not all Magistrates are bad. If there be an excuse, they may show you mercy. If you have confessed aught, deny it afterwards. Say you babbled under the torture; you knew not what you did or said. If you be condemned, fear not. The Brotherhood is powerful. They may help you to escape if you are steadfast. If you betray aught, there is no hope for you, in this life, or in that which is to come. But, 'tis sure, that if steadfast you go to the pyre, drugs will reach you. You will feel naught , and you go but to Death and what lies beyond, the ecstasy of the Goddess.
The same with the working Tools. Let them be as ordinary things that anyone may have in their homes. The Pentacles shall be of wax that they may be melted or broken at once. Have no sword unless your rank allows you one. Have no names or signs on anything. Write them on in ink before consecrating them and wash it off at once when finished. Never boast, never threaten, never say you wish ill to anyone. If any speak of the craft, say, "Speak not to me of such, it frightens me, 'tis evil luck to speak of it."

B.6. Of the Ordeal of the Art Magical (1953)
Learn of the spirit that goeth with burdens that have not honour, for 'tis the spirit that stoopeth the shoulders and not the weight. Armour is heavy, yet it is a proud burden and a man standeth upright in it. Limiting and constraining any of the s enses serves to increase the concentration of another. Shutting the eyes aids the hearing. So the binding of the initiate's hands increases the mental perception, while the scourge increaseth the inner vision. So the initiate goeth through it prou dly, like a princess, knowing it but serves to increase her glory. But this can only be done by the aid of another intelligence and in a circle, to prevent the power thus generated being lost. Priests attempt to do the same with their scourgings and mortifications of the flesh. But lacking the aid of bonds and the ir attention being distracted by their scourging themselves and what little power they do produce being dissipated, as they do not usually work within a circle, it is little wonder that they oft fail. Monks and hermits do better, as they are apt to work in tiny cells and coves, which in some way act as circles. The Knights of the Temple, who used mutually to scourge each other in an octagon, did better still; but they apparently did not know the virtue of bonds and did evil, man to man.
But perhaps some did know? What of the Church's charge that they wore girdles or cords?
B.7. The Eightfold Way. (1953)
Eightfold Path or Ways to the Centre.
1. Meditation or Concentration. This in practice means forming a mental image of what is desired, and forcing yourself to see that it is fulfilled, with the fierce belief and knowledge that it can and will be fulfilled, and that you will go on willin g till you force it to be fulfilled. Called for short, "Intent"
2. Trance, projection of the Astral.
3. Rites, Chants, Spells, Runes, Charms, etc.
4. Incense, Drugs, Wine, etc., whatever is used to release the Spirit. (Note. One must be very careful about this. Incense is usually harmless, but you must be careful. If it has bad aftereffects, reduce the amount used, or the duration of the time it is inhaled. Drugs are very dangerous if taken to excess, but it must be remembered that there are drugs that are absolutely harmless, though people talk of them with bated breath, but Hemp is especially dangerous, because it unlocks the inner eye swiftly and easily, so one is tempted to use it more and more. If it is used at all, it must be with the strictest precautions, to see that the person who uses it has no control over the supply. This should be doled out by some responsible person , and the supply strictly limited.)
5. The Dance, and kindred practices.
6. Blood control (the Cords), Breath Control, and kindred practices.
7. The Scourge.
8. The Great Rite.
These are all the ways. You may combine many of them into the one experiment, the more the better.

The Five Essentials:
1. The most important is "Intention": you must know that you can and will succeed; it is essential in every operation.
2. Preparation. (You must be properly prepared according to the rules of the Art; otherwise you will never succeed.)
3. The Circle must be properly formed and purified.
4. You all must be properly purified, several times if necessary, and this purification should be repeated several times during the rite.
5. You must have properly consecrated tools.
These five essentials and Eight Paths or Ways cannot all be combined in one rite. Meditation and dancing do not combine well, but forming the mental image and the dance may be well combined with Chants. Spells, etc., combined with scourging and No. 6, followed by No. 8, form a splendid combination. Meditation, following scourging, combined with Nos. 3 and 4 and 5, are also very Good. For short cuts concentration, Nos. 5, 6, 7, and 8 are excellent.

B.8. To Gain the Sight (1953)
1 This cometh to different people in diverse ways. 'Tis seldom it cometh naturally, but it can be induced in many ways. Deep and prolonged meditation may do it, but only if you be a natural, and usually prolonged fasting was also necessary. Of ol d monks and nuns obtained visions by long vigils, combined with fasting, flagellation till the blood came, and other mortifications of the flesh, and so undoubtedly had visions. In the East it is tried with various tortures, at the same time sitting in cramped postures, which retard the flow of blood, and these torments, long and continued, give good results. But in the Art we are taught an easier way to intensify the imagination, at the same time controlling the blood supply, and this may bes t be done by using the ritual.
2 Incense is also good to propitiate the Spirits, but also to induce relaxation and to help to build up the atmosphere which is neces-sary to suggestibility. (For our human eyes are so blind to what really is, that it is often necessary to suggest that it is there, before we may see it, as we may point out to another something at a distance before they may see it themselves. Gum mastic, aromatic rush roots, cinnamon bark, musk, juniper, sandalwood, and ambergris in combination are all good, b ut patchouli is best of all. And if you may have hemp, 'tis better still, but be very careful of this.
3 The circle being formed, all properly prepared, and the Rites done, and all purified, the aspirant should warlock and take his tutor round the circle, saluting the Mighty Ones, and invoke them to aid the operation. Then both dance round till gid dy, invoking or using chants. Scourge. Then the Tutor should warlock very tightly, but not so to cause discomfort, but enough to retard the blood slightly. Again they should dance round, chanting, then scourge with light, steady, monotonous, slow s trokes. lt is very good that the pupil may see them coming (this may be arranged from position, or if a big mirror is available, this can be used with excellent effect) as this has the effect of passes, and helps greatly to stimulate the imagination , and it is important that they be not hard, the object being not to do more than draw the blood to that part and so away from the brain. This with the tight warlocking, which should be warricked, slows down the circulation of the blood, and the pas ses soon induce a drowsiness and a stupor. The tutor should watch for this. As soon as the aspirant sleeps, the scourging should cease. The tutor should also watch that the pupil become not cold, and if they struggle or become distressed, they sho uld be at once awakened. (Note: if it cannot be arranged for the pupil to see, the wand may be used, for a time, then return to scourging.)
4 Do not be discouraged if no results come after two or three attempts. It will come, when both are in the right state. When you get some result, then results will come more quickly. Soon some of the ritual may be shortened, but never neglect to invoke the Goddess, and the Mighty Ones, or to form the Circle and do everything rightly. And for good and clear results, it is ever better to do too much ritual than too little. [5] It hath been found that this practice doth often cause a fondness between aspirant and tutor, and 'tis a cause of better results if this be so. If for any reason it is undesirable that there be any great fondness between aspirant and tutor, this may be easily avoided, by both parties from the onset firmly resolving in their minds that if any doth ensue, it shall be that of brother and sister or parent and child. And it is for this reason that a man may only be taught by a woman and a woman by a man, and that man and man, and woman and woman, should never attempt these practices together. And may all the Curses of the Mighty Ones be on any who make the attempt.*
6 Remember, the Circle, properly constructed, is ever necessary to prevent the power released from being dissipated. It is also a barrier against any disturbances of mischievous forces, for to obtain good results you must be free from all disturba nces. Remember that darkness, points of light gleaming amid the surrounding dark, incense, and the steady passes by a white arm are not stage effects. They are the mechanical implements which start the suggestions, which later unlocks the knowledge that it is possible to obtain the divine ecstasy, and so attain knowledge and communion with the Divine Goddess. When once you have attained this, Ritual is not needed, as you may attain the state of ecstasy at will, but till then, or if you having attained this yourself, and wish to bring a companion to this state of joy, ritual is best.

B.9. Power (1953)
Power is latent in the body and may be drawn out and used in various ways by the skilled. But unless confined in a circle it will be swiftly dissipated. Hence the importance of a properly constructed circle. Power seems to exude from the body via the skin and possibly from the orifices of the body; hence you should be properly prepared. The slightest dirt spoils everything, which shows the importance of thorough cleanliness. The attitude of mind has great effect, so only work with a spirit of reverence. A little wine taken and repeated during the ceremony, if necessary, helps to produce power. Other strong drinks or drugs may be used, but it is necessary to be very mod erate, for if you are confused, even slightly, you cannot control the power you evoke.
The simplest way is by dancing and singing monotonous chants, slowly at first and gradually quickening the tempo until giddiness ensues. Then the calls may be used, or even wild and meaningless shrieking produces power. But this method inflames the mind and renders it difficult to control the power, though control may be gained through practice. The scourge is a far better way, for it stimulates and excites both body and soul, yet one easily retains control.
The Great Rite is far the best. It releases enormous power, but the conditions and circumstances make it difficult for the mind to maintain control at first. It is again a matter of practice and the natural strength of the operator's will and, in a lesser degree, of those of his assistants. If, as of old, there were many trained assistants present and all wills properly attuned, wonders occurred.
Sorcerors chiefly used the blood sacrifice; and while we hold this to be evil, we cannot deny that this method is very efficient. Power flashes forth from newly shed blood, instead of exuding slowly as by our method. The victim's terror and anguish add keenness, and even quite a small animal can yield enormous power. The great difficulty is in the human mind controlling the power of the lower animal mind. But sorcerers claim they have methods for effecting this and that the difficulty disapp ears the higher the animal used, and when the victim is human disappears entirely. (The practice is an abomination but it is so.) Priests know this well; and by their auto-da-fs, with the victims' pain and terror (the fires acting much the same as circles), obtained much power.
Of old the Flagellants certainly evoked power, but through not being confined in a circle much was lost. The amount of power raised was so great and continuous that anyone with knowledge could direct and use it; and it is most probable that the clas sical and heathen sacrifices were used in the same way. There are whispers that when the human victim was a willing sacrifice, with his mind directed on the Great Work and with highly skilled assistants, wonders ensued but of this I would not speak .

B.10. Properly Prepared. (1953)
Naked, but sandals (not shoes) may be worn. For initiation, tie hands behind back, pull up to small of back, and tie ends in front of throat, leaving a cable-tow to lead by, hanging down in front. (Arms thus form a triangle at back.) When initiate is kneeling at altar, the cable-tow is tied to a ring in the altar. A short cord is tied like a garter round the initiate's left leg above the knee, with ends tucked in. Another is tied round right ankle and ends tucked in so as to be out of the w ay while moving about. These cords are used to tie feet together while initiate is kneeling at the altar and must be long enough to do this firmly. Knees must also be firmly tied. This must be carefully done. If the aspirant complains of pain, th e bonds must be loosened slightly; always remember the object is to retard the blood flow enough to induce a trance state. This involves slight discomfort, but great discomfort prevents the trance state; so it is best to spend some little time loosening and tightening the bonds until they are just right. The aspirant alone can tell you when this is so. This, of course, does not apply to the initiation, as then no trance is desired; but for the purpose of ritual it is good that the initiates b e bound firmly enough to feel they are absolutely helpless but without discomfort.

B.11. The Meeting Dance. (1953)
The Maiden should lead. A man should place both hands on her waist, standing behind her, and alternate men and women should do the same, the Maiden leading and they dance following her. She at last leads them into a right-hand spiral. When the cen ter is reached (and this had better be marked by a stone), she suddenly turns and dances back, kissing each man as she comes to him. All men and women turn likewise and dance back, men kissing girls and girls kissing men. All in time to music, it i s a merry game, but must be practices to be done well. Note, the musicians should watch the dancers and make the music fast or slow as is best. For the beginners it should be slow, or there will be confusion. It is most excellent to get people to know each other at big gatherings.

B.12. To Leave the Body. (1953)
'Tis not wise to strive to get out of your body until you have thoroughly gained the Sight. The same ritual as to gain the Sight may be used, but have a comfortable couch.

THE ENTERED APRENTICE HANDBOOK by W.Bro. J.S.M. WARD

Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 08:00PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

EA.BMP

THE ENTERED APPRENTICE HANDBOOK

by W.Bro. J.S.M. WARD

INTRODUCTION - By the Hon. Sir John A. Cockburn

W. Bro. Ward is one of the most able and earnest of Masonic students. He brings to bear on the task of research the mind of a scholar, enriched by extensive reading, much travel and a wide experience of men and affairs. In addition to being a well known author of Masonic Works, he was the Founder of the Masonic Study Society, whose first President was the late Sir Richard Vassar Vassar-Smith, 33 degree, and in whose ranks are to be found many eminent Masonic writers.
Brother Ward has by precept and example led others to become eager explorers in the realms of Masonic truth. The present volume is No. 1 in a series of studies as to the meaning of our Ritual. It deals with the degree of an Entered Apprentice and is calculated to inspire the younger brethren with the resolve not to content themselves with the outward form of our ceremonies, beautiful though it be, but to gain a knowledge of the indwelling soul of Masonry and to comprehend the deep meaning of the ritual with which they are step by step becoming familiar.
Hence they will learn to regard the Craft not only as a world-spread, civilising medium, nor yet only as the most benevolent of all Institutions, but also as a mine of surpassing wealth in which the Wisdom of the Ages has become embedded and preserved. Bro. Ward at the outset disarms anything like hostile criticism by admitting that many brethren may not find themselves in complete accord with all his conclusions. Indeed, it would be surprising if this were the case.
Like Holy Writ, the Ritual is capable of many interpretations. It is a gradual accretion in which succeeding epochs have left their mark. Evolution takes place under the alternation of forces that make for difference and agreement. The process demands a continual adjustment between these apparently contrary, but in reality complementary factors. Each age sets out to balance any deficiency in the preceding period.
When materialism has been pushed to excess, the tendency is rectified by a spiritual revival. On the other hand, an age in which zeal for the gifts of the spirit has caused neglect of temporal welfare is naturally followed by a renaissance of the just claims of the flesh. The subject matter of Masonry is the relationship between Spirit and Matter, between Heaven and Earth, between God and Man, between the Soul and the Body.
Emphasis is everywhere laid on the necessity of their reconciliation. Consequently to attain the juste milieu emphasis has sometimes to be laid on one side and sometimes on the other. For example, the Cross and the Square, which have now such deeply spiritual significance , were originally signs of Earth, and became respectively, the essential symbols of Christianity and Masonry, because it was necessary to proclaim the fact that professions of piety towards God were idle, unless they bore fruit in kindly relationship between man and man.
Bro. Ward regards the J.W. as representing the body, and the S.W. the soul, although the emblems and jewel of the former are celestial and of the latter terrestrial. The fact is that things divine and human are so interwoven in Masonry as to be inseparable. Duty towards God and towards our neighbour are but different aspects of the same truth. For the Fatherhood of God implies the Brotherhood of Man, and, conversely, he who devotes himself to the service of his fellow creatures proves, through his brotherly relationship, his descent from the Father of AII.
The issue of Bro. Ward's series of handbooks cannot fail to accomplish its main object, which is to lead not only juniors, but also those well versed in the ritual, to mark, leam and inwardly digest the significance of the ceremonies, which when properly understood, causes our jewels and emblems to glow with an inner light which infinitely enhances their beauty.
The ready reception which Bro. Ward's books have already received at the hands of the Craft, prove that they meet a recognised requirement as expositions of the character of a ritual with whose external features we are familiar, and in which we take our daily delight.
J.A.C.
The Mysteries
In every race and every clime,
Since the earliest days of Time,
Men have taught the Mystic Quest
Shown the Way to Peace and rest.

Bacchus died, and rose again,
On the golden Asian Plain;
Osiris rose from out the grave,
And thereby mankind did save:
Adonis likewise shed his blood
By the yellow Syrian flood,
Zoroaster brought to birth
Mithra from His Cave of Earth.

And to-day in Christian Lands
We with them can join hands.

J.W.

CHAPTER I. THE OPENING OF THE FIRST DEGREE.
The W.M. calls the brethren together with one knock so as to remind them that the body must be prepared to obey the higher faculties, for if it is not, no spiritual progress is possible. The first question and answer of the J.W. indicate this quite clearly, for the J.W. represents the body and so he satisfies himself that man's body is on guard against outside influences. The S.W., representing the Soul, next proves that all present have made some progress towards the light.
It is only when this has been achieved that any real advancement becomes possible, and only those who have started can help those who still remain in spiritual darkness. The next series of questions indicates that Man has a seven-fold nature. The Ancient Egyptians held this view , and it is endorsed in Masonry by the fact that it takes seven to make a perfect lodge.
There is also, no doubt, an astrological reference to the seven planets and a connection with stellar worship, but as our system is mainly solar, it is almost impossible to give a logical planetary interpretation to the seven who form a lodge, or to the seven officers. In short, the planetary symbolism has become disorganised by the stress laid on the solar aspect of the three principal officers who rule a lodge. Moreover, the predominance of the solar aspect has emphasised the triune nature of man, and symbolises it in these officers.
Thus it will be seen that too much stress must not be laid on the planets, as represented by the seven officers, and a passing reference to the fact that it is still remembered in the number seven is all that can be logically maintained. Similarly there is merely a hint of the seven-fold nature of man. If ours were a stellar system, then clearly the Tyler would represent the body, the divine spark would be represented by the W.M. , the various officers between would symbolise the various sub-divisions of the non-materials parts of man, such as his astral body, his intellectual faculties, and so forth.
Since, however, our system is solar in the main, we should continue to interpret our symbols from that aspect, making but passing reference to stellar influences when they occur. The duties of the Tyler are considered elsewhere, so we will pass to the I.G. Although in some popular workings he and the other two subordinate officers are not allowed to speak for themselves, the Wardens doing this work, in many other rituals they are allowed to answer the W.M. direct.
The I.G. stands for the power which permits the Soul to enter flesh at any given moment. The Soul may desire to become incarnate, but unless its time has come it is turned back at the threshold, and even if it forces itself into birth it is cut short. Entry into life is not an accident, but ordained of God, Who works through His spiritual as well as through His human agents. Those who saw Maeterlinck's play, "The Blue Bird," will remember that the same idea is dealt with in one of the scenes.
Spiritually, the I.G. represents the warning which must be given to those who attempt, without due caution, to probe into the Mysteries of God. They must neither rush forward hastily, nor, having once started, withdraw suddenly; for, if they do, dire evil will befall. This warning all the Mysteries gave, and it is certain that those who dabble in the so-called occult run grave risks unless they use the utmost caution.
Hence it is absolutely essential that the candidate should be properly prepared before he starts on his quest. The J.D. represents the physical means by which the Soul, represented by the S.W., passes on the inspirations received from the Spirit, the W.M., to the material world. In this sense therefore he represents intelligence, and the five senses of man, whereas the S.D. stands for intuition, whereby the Soul obtains its inspiration from the Divine.
In the ancient operative days these officers no doubt had a practical use, the S.D. being the personal messenger of the Master, who took messages to the S.W., not merely when in Lodge, but when he was at a distance, employed on his task, or possibly when he was resting from his labours, In like manner the S.W. 's deacon was sent by him to find the J.W. The J.W. describes his position in L. and indicates quite clearly that he represents the Sun at noon.
From the operative point of view it must be remembered that Noon has always been, and still is, a workingman's dinner hour, hence the special duty of the J.W. ; but in the spiritual sense, since he stands for the body, it is natural that he should have charge over the body's needs. As he also represents the preservative side of God, his interest in the physical well-being of man is appropriate.
With this in mind the F. C. will realise the significance of the P.W., and its connection with C. and W. , which are the emblems of the God of Vegetation in the more primitive rites. When men evolved, and the solar system of religion developed, the God of Vegetation became the Preserver. This characteristic of the J.W. is emphasised by the upright lines of his plumb, which latter reminds us of water which falls from heaven, and of the cast marks of Vishnu in India.
This aspect of the J.W., as representing the Preserver , is carefully maintained throughout the whole of the three degrees and must never be forgotten. In like manner, the fact that he stands for the body is also maintained throughout. Bearing this in mind , we shall perceive the significance of the fact that the Architect of K.S. 's Temple was the J.W. Finally, bread and water represent the bare necessities, without which mortal life cannot be preserved.
Luxuries, which are obtained when we have acquired worldly possessions, i.e., wealth, lead to the death of the soul, and even of the body, unless employed with the greatest caution. Some masons claim that the J.W. originally sat in the North to mark the Sun at noon, meaning to see, or point out, that it had reached the midheavens. Honestly, I can find no real evidence in support of this view, which likewise places the W.M. in the West and the S.W. in the East. It is due, in my opinion, to a complete misunderstanding of the use of the words "to mark."
This phrase implies that the J.W. is placed on a certain spot to mark the position of the Sun at noon, and not that 'he may see it. In a closed-in building, such as a lodge room was, it would be desirable to mark the three positions of the Sun, for the candidate has to pass through each point in turn, and these three officers, who represent the Sun in its three aspects, would naturally sit in the positions in use in a speculative lodge.
Any arguments adduced from the rituals of the modern Operative Lodges are vitiated by two facts-(1) we have no evidence that this peculiarity is really old (it may be due to Stretton's inventive mind) and (2) the Operatives, if old, would be descended from the Guild Masons and not from the Freemasons ; and this might be a peculiarity of theirs, or deliberately adopted so as to differentiate them from the Freemasons.
That the Guild Masons and Freemasons were quite distinct has been proved as far back as 1913, and the fact is gone into in my other book, "Freemasonry and the Ancient Gods." That the Operatives are not descended direct from the Mediaeval Freemasons is shown by the fact that they have entirely different signs from our own. Thus we need not discuss further the question as to whether the J.W. should be in the North or South.
The S.W., as he indicates in his reply to the W.M., represents the Sun in its setting, and so the Destructive Side of the Deity, or Shiva. He also stands for the Soul. Shiva shall close not only our mortal life, but Time itself. But I have dealt with this side of the S.W. very fully elsewhere. It should be noted, however, that the S.W. is associated with level and horizontal lines , and not with perpendiculars, and here again he follows the Hindu system, for Shiva's caste mark is two or more parallel lines.
As the Great Leveller this is most natural, and it reminds us that in the sight of God all souls are equal, even though in mortal life their stations may appear to differ. Shiva is associated with the element of Fire, whereas Vishnu is associated with Water, and as we see that great care has been taken to maintain the connection between the J.W. and Water, so we find that with us the S.W. is similarly associated with Fire, though perhaps less obviously.
Firstly, his level is of a triangular form with the point upward, the world-wide symbol for Fire. Again, the S.W. 's P.W. has hidden within it the same idea. A smith who works in metals can only do so by the help of fire, and in one ritual this fact is stressed. Thus metals come out from the dark earth, and the Sun sinks in the West into darkness and the grave, as does man. But, by means of fire, man obtains wealth from the metals hidden in the earth, and in like manner the Soul of Man rises refined and purified from the grave by means of the divine fire within.
Moreover, one cannot ignore the fact that there is here a hint of the necessity of the purging fire of remorse to cleanse away our sins. The S. W. is the Soul, the link between mortal life and the Divine Spark , but he acts on instructions from the Spirit; in other words, it is only when God decrees our death that the Soul departs from the body. The W.M. represents, as his words indicate, the creative side of God and the Divine Spirit in Man. He sets us to work on earth, but delegates to another the task of calling us back whence we came.
He represents the male aspect of the Deity, as is shown by the tau crosses, called levels, on his apron, and by his use of the gavel, which represents the same emblem. The Tau Cross is, of course, a phallic symbol and stands for the male and creative aspect in Man. As the three principal officers represent the Sun (a masculine planet) in various phases, it is natural that they should all wield the gavel, but the two wardens are less essentially male than the W.M., as is indicated by the fact that they do not have the tau cross or Master's level on their aprons.
The Spirit, being active, is male; whereas both soul and body, being more or less passive, are female. The feminine side of the S.W. or Soul is deliberately emphasised later-in the first degree-by a reference to the Moon, a feminine planet, the emblem of the Soul and of the psychic nature in man. Nor can we ignore the fact that the West is known as the feminine quarter of the heavens, whereas the East is the masculine; it is also worth noticing that Shiva is often depicted with the moon.
Finally, before declaring the L. open, the W.M. offers up a prayer, thereby reminding us that the Divine Spark in Man, or the Spirit, must turn to the Source of All for aid if it would control body and soul. The three knocks, as distinct from the one knock with which the proceedings started, indicate that the members are about to work for the union and advancement of body, soul and spirit, and not for the body only. But the way in which the three knocks are given show that, as yet, there is no unity between the three elements which constitute Man.

CHAPTER II. THE TYLER
The first thing that greets the eyes of the aspirant to our Order is a man, whom he soon discovers is called the Tyler, standing in front of the door with a d.n. s.d. in his hand. He naturally wants an answer to the question which actually occurs in a certain famous old ritual, "Why does the Tyler wear a s.d.?"and the answer is, "To guard the brethren and to hele the Word." Let us consider this answer: "To guard the brethren. "In certain old rituals of the 18th century we are told that Masons' Lodges formerly met in the open-"on the highest hill or lowest valley, where never dog barked nor cock crew."
Brethren will no doubt have read the interesting article in the "Masonic Record" relating to this state of affairs, but I am bound to say that I do not think that the ordinary mediaeval lodge met in such places. The reference to the cock, together with certain details we possess with regard to those lodges which did meet in the open, (they were mostly in Scotland) indicate that they were not ordinary Craft lodges, but much more probably Templar Lodges.
The Templars in the 18th century claimed to be descended from a body which had been suppressed in the years 1307 to 1314-, and actually prescribed. There was every reason therefore why they should meet in out of the way places, but no such reason existed in the case of a lodge of ordinary Freemasons. That such a phrase should have wandered into a craft ritual from Templary is perfectly natural, but it is not safe to argue from this that all Masonic lodges met under the canopy of heaven.
In those early days, many higher degrees were worked in ordinary Craft Lodges, in a way not permitted to-day; and this may easily account for phrases more appropriate to a Templar Preceptory being found in a Craft working. I might add that until the middle of the 19th century Templar meetings were always called "Encampments," indicating that they were camps held in the open fields.
But in mediaeval times we know that the Freemasons had Lodge buildings, and if they went to a new place to build a church or castle , the first thing they did was to erect a temporary Lodge room, which they attended before starting the day's work. Those interested will find abundant details in Fort Newton's interesting little book, "The Builders." There also it is clearly shown that there were two kinds of masons in those days, and the man who conclusively proved this was not a modern Speculative Freemason.
The two groups were the Freemasons and the Guild Masons. The former were lineal descendents of the Comacine Masons-who, incidentally, knew a certain Masonic Sign-and these men were skilled architects, free to go anywhere. They had a monopoly of ecclesiastical building and of work otlrside the towns, e.g. castles. The Guild Masons were humbler folk. They were not allowed to build outside their particular city, but had a monopoly of all building inside that city, with one important and significant exception:-they were not allowed to build ecclesiastical buildings.
In return for their charter they had to maintain the fortifications. When a church had to be built the Freemasons were sent for, and apparently they called on the Guild Masons to help them with the rough work, e.g., to square the stones, etc. I suggest that Speculative Freemasonry is mainly descended from the Freemasons, whereas the few Operative Lodges that survive are probably descended from the Guild masons. This theory is borne out by the fact that while the Operatives have our g.s. they have not our s.ns, yet these s.ns are unquestionably old.
They would all have the same g. for convenience in proving to the Freemasons that they were really masons, but they would keep their s.ns to themselves, as did the Freemasons, since they did not want the other group to have access to their private meetings. Further, we find that the Master Masons of the Freemasons were entitled to maintenance as "gentlemen," clearly indicating that they were different from ordinary craftsmen (See Fort Newton).
After the Reformation no doubt Freemasons and Guild masons tended to amalgamate, and this explains much. Now if the Freemasons erected a lodge before they started to build a church or castle, we shall see that their meeting in the open would be merely occasional, e.g., while the temporary lodge was being built, and not a regular custom ; but the very fact that is was a temporary building, and open to approach by all and sundry who came to the site of the new edifice, is quite sufficient to explain why they had someone on guard.
Why, however, is he called a Tyler, instead of Sentinel, or some similar name? There are three explanations, and we can adopt which we please:-
1. To tile is to cover in; hence the Tyler is one who covers or conceals what is going on in the lodge. 2. In the old mediaeval Templar ceremony there were three sentinels; one inside the door, one outside, and one on the roof or tiles, who could see if anyone was approaching the building. It will be remembered that the old Templar Churches were round, so that a man perched on the roof was able to see in every direction. 3. That the tilers were inferior craftsmen as compared with the genuine Freemasons; poor brethren, as it were, and not admitted to full membership, although one or two were chosen to act as Outer Guards.
I am not greatly impressed with the latter theory, and my person predilection is in favour of No. 1 ; but there is a good deal to be said for No. 2. The tyler guarded the brethren from "cowans" or eavesdroppers. The former word is still used in the country districts of Lancashire and Westmorland for a dry-dyker, that is, a man who builds rough walls between the different fields, of rough, uncut, and unmortared stones.
When I was living in Yorkshire I had a number of fields so surrounded; the stones for which were picked from the hillside, and piled one upon another. No particular skill was needed to build such a wall; I repaired several myself. In other words, a "cowan" is one who pretends to be a mason because he works in stone, but is not one. Some fanciful derivations have been suggested from "Cohen," the Jewish priest. I disagree entirely with this view.
Why should the Jewish Cohens be more likely to pretend to be Freemasons than any other priests? As the other word is spelt as we spell ours, and means what I have stated, I see no reason to invent this suggestion regarding the Jewish priests, who were always few in number, and in the Middle Ages hardly existed:-the Jews were driven out of England by Edward I., and not re-admitted until the time of Cromwell. "Eavesdroppers" means men who listen under the eaves.
The eaves of a primitive or of a mediaeval cottage overhung a considerable distance beyond the walls, and between the roof and the wall was an open space. Through this space the smoke of the fire escaped; the general arrangement being very similar to that found in the tropics. The walls of such a cottage were often only five to six feet high, and thus a man could stand under the eaves in the shadow, hidden from the light of the sun or moon, and both see and hear what was going on inside, without those who were in the lodge knowing he was there.
But the Tyler was on guard outside the door of the Lodge; he was armed with a d..n s..d, and woe betide any eavesdropper he discovered, for our mediaeval brethren undoubtedly interpreted their obligations literally. Incidentally, I understand that nominally the duty of carrying out the pen. still rests on the shoulders of the Tyler.
With regard to the use of temporary buildings on or near the site of the edifice, it should be noted that during the building of Westminster Abbey there was at least one, if not two, such lodges, and they are mentioned in the records of the Abbey. One seems to have stood on the site of the subsequent nave. Thus we can see that it was essential that there should be an Outer Guard to keep off intruders, owing to the fact that Lodges were usually held in temporary buildings, often with overhanging eaves and an open space between the top of the walls and the beams which supported the roof.
The word "hele" should, in my opinion, be pronounced "heal," not "hale." The use of "hale" is due to the fact that in the 18th century the words "conceal," and "reveal," were pronounced "concale" and "revale." Since the words obviously were a jingle, I consider it is more correct to-day to pronounce it "heal." Moreover, the word "hele" means to cover over.
You still hear the phrase used, "to hele a cottage," or even a haystack, and the word "Hell" implies the place that is covered over, e.g., in the centre of the earth. "Hele" is connected with "heal"-to cover up, or to close up, a wound-and the meaning therefore is tautalogical, viz, "to cover up the word." (The Masonic s -t")
The use of the pronunciation "Hale" is to-day most misleading, and is apt to cause a newly initiated Bro. to think he has to "hail" something, or "proclaim it aloud." The C. is taken in hand by the Tyler, who makes him sign a form to the effect that he is free and of the full age of 21 years. Why "free?" Well, in mediaeval days he had to bind himself to serve as an apprentice for seven years.
Unless he was a free man, his owner might come along and take him away, before he had completed his apprenticeship and, worse still, might extort from him such secrets as he had learnt from the masons. Thus the master might be enabled to set himself up as a free lance, not under the control of the fraternity. The twenty-one years is, I believe, an 18th century Speculative innovation, aiming at a similar object.
I think there is no doubt that usually in the Middle Ages an apprentice was a boy, who placed himself under the control of a Master with his parents' consent. The Master was henceforth in loco parentis. In the 18th century without some such safeguard (as 21 years) some precocious youth might have joined the fraternity without his father's consent.
The father might have been one who disapproved of F.M., and in such a case would probably have not hesitated to exercise his parental authority in the drastic manner at that time in vogue, and so exhort the secrets, which he could then have "exposed." To-day it is still a very reasonable clause, for it presupposes that man has reached years of discretion and knows what he is about.
Any real hardship is removed by the fact the G.L. has power to dispense, which power it constantly uses in the case of the University Lodges at Oxford and Cambridge. I myself was one of those who thus benefited. It is, I believe, still the custom in England that a Lewis, the son of a mason, may be admitted at 18, though the right is seldom claimed; but in some countries, I understand, it is a privilege highly valued, and regularly used by those entitled to it.
In masonry a lewis is a cramp of metal, by which one stone is fastened to another. It is usually some form of a cross, and a whole chapter could be written on its significance, but this casual reference must suffice.

CHAPTER III. PREPARATION.
The next thing that happens is that the C. is prepared by the Tyler. This is a very important matter. There seems little doubt that originally candidates were str..d n..d, and even to-day in the U.S.A. C's are left in their sh-s only. In Burma we changed out of everything into a one-piece pyjama suit, a most convenient arrangement.
What we now have is a system by which the parts which have to be b. are made b. We take our ob. on our L.K., therefore that.K. must be B.. Why? So that our flesh may be in contact with Mother Earth. It is possible that there was a practical as well as a symbolical meaning in this , and also in the case of our deprivation of m..s. In some of the ancient mysteries it has been suggested that a charge of electricity was passed through the C. as he knelt at the altar, either from a battery, or by what is now called magnetism.
If any question the use of electricity in those days, I would point out that certain statements of Herodotus, to the effect that the Egyptian priests brought down lightning by means of rods, can best be explained by admitting that they had some rudimentary knowledge of electricity. The b.b. is in order that the S.I. can be applied.
The Scotch ritual, however, says it is to show your sex, but I am inclined to think this is a modern gloss. Personally, I should not regard this as conclusive proof in itself, for I have seen (when abroad) many well grown girls who had no breasts worth mentioning, while many native men had quite well developed busts.
It should always be remembered that this is the degree of birth and we were born n..d.. We are s. s. because we are about to tread on holy ground, just as in the East we wear slippers when entering a mosque. It is probable that the Scotch ritual has preserved a real tradition when it refers to the custom in Israel of removing a shoe, as a witness, when confirming an obligation.
Those interested will find the details in Ruth, where Boaz under-takes to marry Ruth. A.C.T. is placed about his n.. This piece of symbolism is old and world wide. On a vase found at Chama, in Mexico, several candidates are depicted going through a ceremony very similar, apparently, to a certain degree in M.,* One is being taught a certain sign, and the others wha stand waiting their turn all have C.T.s with a running noose about their necks.
In India this C.T. is the emblem of Yama, the God of Death, with which he snares the souls of men and drags them forth from their bodies. It is carried by - Shiva to indicate his destructive character in relation to human life. There are in masonry meanings within meanings, and I will therefore indicate a few of those associated with the C.T. , but I shall not do so with all the details upon which I shall touch. The C.T. is an emblem of Death.
It is fastened round the necks of captives as showing that they are at the absolute mercy of their conqueror. Thus the burghesses of Calais had to come before Edward III. in their shirts-note that-with c.T. 's round their necks. They were only saved by the desperate pleading of good Queen Philippa. But this is the degree of birth. Some come into the world with a caul which may strangle them if not removed, and in any case we are said to be born in original sin and therefore doomed to die.
*See "Freemasonry and the Gods" Birth, in the very nature of things, means death, and that is why the Hindoos have made Shiva, the Lord of Death, also the Lord of Birth. We ourselves are captives-souls bound by the chains of the flesh-and offenders against the Law of the King of Kings. Further, we come in bondage to sin, seeking to be freed from our bonds by the word of God.
The holding of the C.T. , and the dangers entailed, are sufficiently explained to need no further mention just now, though this does not imply there are not inner meanings. The h.w. is always found in every great initiatory rite. In general, it reminds us that as in the physical world we came out of darkness into light, so in the intellectual, and finally, in the spiritual world.
We come into masonry seeking the Light of God's word. In other language, to try and comprehend through the use of symbols what God really is. But as the veil of darkness is slightly lifted as we grow in years and our intellect awakens , so it is in the craft, and the first thing we see there is the V.S.L., itself a symbol of Divine inspiration; for without the Divine spark, which speaks from the inmost recesses of the soul, we shall remain in spiritual darkness all our natural life.
The C. is then brought to the door of the L. and challenged, but strange to say, in our ritual there is no p.w.. There was once, I have no doubt, and it is still in use in Scotland, Ireland and U.S.A. Moreover, it is one of the tests there when visiting, and if a man cannot give it he will run a serious risk of being refused admission. Strange to say, we do get it inside the Lodge, though perhaps most brethren do not realise it.
It is "The T. of G.R." (sometimes it is "Free and of G.R.," though this is less usual). But before entering we are deprived of M.. Now, among the Dervishes M. = mineral substances, but we interpret it M . . . 1. It is M . . . 1s!-that is important. "Valuables" is a real, but subsidiary, meaning. Let us consider this carefully. There is an explanation of why it is done in the lecture,-now, alas, seldom read in Lodge-and also, of course, in the questions.
These lectures were the real instruction; on them were based the tracing board Iectures, which were pictorial summaries, on which were set certain questions. Now the lectures (which can be bought at any Masonic furnishers) tell us that at the building of the Temple no metallic implements were used. Why? Because metals came from below. They were the gifts of the Thonic Gods:-the Gods of the Underworld-useful, no doubt, but being gifts of the Gods of the Underworld they were in their very nature evil, and abhorrent to the Gods of Light, whom the white races worshipped.
For this reason the Egyptians continued to use stone knives to open the corpse preparatory to embalming it, long after they used metal knives constantly. The holy dead must not be polluted with the gifts of the evil powers. If there is anything in the theory of an electric or magnetic discharge being made at the time when a metal point is applied to the n. 1. b. at the ob. , this would also be a practical reason; the presence of metal might make such a charge dangerous.
But the first reason is no doubt the original one, and probably the only one. The idea that we bring nothing into this world is, of course, likewise obvious; but its full significance is lost in our ritual, although seen in the Irish. There a C. is deprived of metals in the first and in the second degrees. The significance of this will be realised by M.M.'s if they ponder awhile on the meaning of the S.W.'s P.W.- "How hardly shall a rich man enter the kingdom of Heaven." That worldly possessions hamper a man's spiritual progress is proclaimed by every religion in the world which can truly be called great.
The Buddhist monk and the mediaeval friar alike agree on this. Why p.w.s. at all? Here we wander into a strange field, no less than that of old world magic, I think. The C. enters an E. A. Lodge from the outside world. Prior to his entry this Lodge has been opened by a peculiar ceremony :- a ceremony which, in the technical language of magic and the occult, raises the vibrations of those present; thus they are , as it were , raised to a higher key, and force is generated.
Now those who have studied such matters know that a body of men who are all concentrating on a particular subject do generate a peculiar, subtle, but powerful force, which has not been accurately defined by science , but is loosely called magnetic. In the old days of phenomenal magic certain words, when uttered in the correct tone, were believed to be in consonance with this "power," like a tuning fork is to a violin.
Therefore we give this p.w. to the C. to raise him quickly to the same "power" as the Lodge. But I am afraid I may be getting rather deep for our younger readers. All I need say further is that such p.w.s are universal in the great mystery rites, ancient or modern, and it is not surprising, therefore, that in some rituals we find a P.W. leading to the 1 degree.

CHAPTER IV. ADMISSION.
Now our C. enters and is received on a S.L.. This signifies many things, one idea lying within the other. It reminds us of the pain we, as distinct from our mothers , suffered when we entered this physical world. It is a test of our courage and obedience. Probably in olden days blood was drawn, as a sacrifice. The Can. comes seeking for knowledge; self-restraint and quiet confidence should mark his bearing.
In all primitive initiatory rites most painful tests are applied, and if the candidate does not bear them with courage he is rejected, and told that henceforth he is to dress as a woman and will be treated with contempt by the men of the tribe. We note that the instrument is a Latin cross, the age-old symbol of suffering, and this is the only place in the Lodge where the C. sees this cross, (e.g. when it is shown him later) though M.M. 's may realise that there does come a time when he treads the Way of the Cross of suffering.
The use of a Latin Cross as the S.I. is peculiarly significant, for it is associated with pain and the danger of death, and tells us, in symbolic language, that the way of life is the path of suffering, and begins with the threat of death and ends in death itself: but by this hard road we draw nearer to the object of our quest. Next the C. kneels while the blessing of H. is invoked.
This needs no explanation, for he is about to start on The Quest and needs Divine help. But the phrase, "Relying on such sure support, you may safely rise and follow your leader, . . . , for where the name of God is invoked we trust no danger can ensue" seems pointless in Emulation working, for the danger was at the door and is passed.
At Leeds, however, they have a working which is, they say, derived from the Old York ritual, and it does explain this passage. I saw this ceremony at Alfred 306, Leeds. The C. was brought in h-w and bidden to k . . l., and after the prayer, the W.M. said:- "Mr. Brown it is but fair to tell you of the perilous position in which you are now placed.
Before you stand one with a d.s. in his hand, pointed at your n. l.b. , and behind you one holds the end of the c.t. which is about your neck; in this position of difficulty and danger, in whom do you put your trust?" Answer:-"In God. " W.M.:-"Right glad am I to see your faith is so well founded; relying, etc." Here you see the C. is in danger. Next the C. is taken round with the Sun, for this is the road of life , and in all ancient religions on entering a temple a man had to follow this path.
In Burma to this day you are expected to pass round the pagoda in this manner. The words are:-"Brethren in the N.E.S. and W. will take notice. " It is clear therefore that emphasis is laid on the fact that the candidate is following the path of the Sun, for otherwise why not employ the more usual phrase, "North, South, East and West?"
Now the Swastika, which may be regarded as the "lost sign" in Freemasonry (+), indicates the path of the Sun and is the emblem of life, whereas the Suwastika is the emblem of the life beyond the grave, for, according to ancient symbolism and eschatology, the departed soul went through the underworld the reverse way, just as the Sun was supposed to do, e.g. W.S.E.N.
This then, is the road of the Spirits. Thus the candidate starts on the symbolic (+) First suggested by Wor. Bro. Sir John Cockburn. journey of life, and in some of the eighteenth century rituals there is evidence that the way was made hard and difficult, to symbolise the trials and tribulations we meet with in life , particularly if we strive to attain to the Light.
This lesson is still taught in certain foreign rituals. In "Freemasonry and the Ancient Gods" I have discussed the probability of the theory that the Swastika was once used in our Lodges to represent God, as it still is in the operative lodges, and have shown that a square-a-gamma *, the Greek "G," and therefore that the fourfold gamma represents the four letters of the Hebrew alphabet which denote the sacred name of God.
I refer again to this point later, and so will content myself with saying that in an operative lodge the Swastika if formed of four gallow-squares, one of which always rests on the open volume of the Bible, while the other three belong to the three Grand Master Masons, and are placed by them on the Bible before opening the Lodge, in such a way as to form a Swastika.
Thus even to-day in the manner of our progress round the L. we are reminded of that age-old symbol, which is found all over the world, *First suggested by Wor. Bro. Sir John Cockburn. representing Life and the Sun, the latter being itself an emblem for God. The C. is then told to step off with the l. f. f.. Why? Because the Preserver in ancient mythology is always depicted as trampling with his l. f. on the Serpent of Evil.
This is so, alike in ancient Egypt, in India and elsewhere. But some may ask "Why should Horus or Krishna plant his l. f. on the serpent of Evil?" Major Sanderson, who has spent many years in Nyasaland as Medical Officer of Health and has been initiated into several native rites, tells me that among many primitive races there is a superstition that when entering a shed where rice is stored one must enter r. f. first, "so as not to hurt the Spirit who rules over the rice store." The same idea prevails among these people wherever food is stored, and we here get an explanation of "l. f. f.".
When fighting against the Spirit of Evil you do desire to hurt him, and so reverse the superstition, and step off l. f. f.. This is Major Sanderson's view, and I consider it is probably the correct one. It may also be well to point out that our ceremonies have come in contact, at various periods, with many different religious beliefs, ana this fact explains why there are often several meanings attached to certain points in the ritual, all of which may be correct.
The great serpent, Apepi, in Egypt, represents the powers of spiritual evil, e.g. the Devil. But it also specifically refers to ignorance, as is shown in the Indian legend in which Krishna tramples on the five-headed cobra. The five heads, moreover, also have a reference to our five senses, which in that allegory must be cleansed of every evil thought. Thus we may consider that the World is represented by the C.T. and H.W., and the brotherhood helps us to free ourselves from them.
The Flesh is represented by the f. r. s. , in which we "trample" on the Tau Cross, while the Devil is represented by the snake, of whose existence we are reminded by the warning to "step off with the l. f. f.". Strictly, the C. should enter the L. in the N. , not in the West. The North is the place of darkness, and at birth we come out of darkness into physical light, and so in the spiritual journey.
This is done at Leeds. Out of darkness, Light. But the Light shineth in the darkness and the candidate comprehends it not, for the darkness of gross materialism is upon him until he kneels before the emblem of the divine light, the V.S.L.. The C. is then challenged by the J.W. and the S.W.. The J.D. gives the pass word "Free and of G.R. ," and the Wardens acknowledge its potency and bid him enter (Note "enter,") as if he were outside a door on which he had knocked for admission.
This brings to our mind the three regular knocks. For reasons which cannot be stated here, but which I will deal with more fully later, I suggest that the E.A. knocks remind us that man is Body, Soul and Spirit, and as in this stage of ignorance the Body is as important as the other two, the three knocks are all of equal duration. Lest any misunderstand this, I would argue that in the process of creation the Spirit first comes from God, secondly, clothes itself with a Soul, and finally enters flesh.
Thus, the first knock represents the Spirit, seeking God whence it came, the second, the Soul, and the third, the Body. To understand the full meaning of this passing by the Wardens one needs to consider why the C. is being led round the L..
There are two reasons given- (1) To show that he is properly prepared. (2) To show that he is a fit and proper person to be made a mason. Being made a mason symbolises the birth of the Christ within, and before anyone can attain to this mystical re-birth he must have progressed some way along the road of evolution, have gained certain experiences, and learned certain lessons.
Think again of the P.W., F. and of G.R.! In the earlier stages man is bound in materialismearthly things satisfy, and he is ruled by his physical passions. The C. for masonry has begun to desire more than the material: he has felt the desire for spiritual growth and knowledge, and so has become "free. " This is recognised as he passes the J.W. , who represents the Material Nature. Next he approaches the S. W.- the representative of the Soul-and with the aid of the P.W. is again bidden to enter.
Notice, having passed the material stage, when the Body reigns supreme, the Soul immediately, takes control, and presents the C. to the W.M.-i.e. the Soul calls upon the Divine Spirit of God to give L. to the C. The reply is significant, but is almost incomprehensible unless one understands the symbolical journey which the C. has just taken, and one is apt to wonder why the questions which follow were not asked at the very beginning of the ceremony.
Really they are most important! They constitute the final testing of the C. before he is bidden to advance towards the E. to receive the L. , and enter on the pathway which begins with initiation and ends with God Himself. Also they "are very searching: the C. being required to declare solemnly that he comes seeking knowledge, not because others desire him to do so, nor yet for unworthy motives of personal gain, but because he is prompted from within by a genuine desire to help Humanity.
Then follows a hint that the journey upwards is by no means easy, and patience, perseverance, caution and courage are essential if we are to achieve our goal. The C. having replied satisfactorily, the S.W. is given permission to direct the guide to instruct him in the proper method of advancing towards the L. This is by three squares which symbolise, not only uprightness of life, but also the three letters of the Great Name, Yod, He, Vau; Male, Female, and Variable.
In other words, God the Father, Mother, and child; and the fourth square is on the Ped., which gives us the final He, or the complete name of Him we seek,- Jehovah, or J.H.V.H. But the letter HE (pronounced Hay) is female, and its female aspect is emphasised by the position of the sq. and c.s., which form a lozenge, itself a well known symbol for the Vesica Piscis, as all who study heraldry know ; for in heraldry a woman's arms are placed, not on a shield, as are a man's, but on a lozenge.
A great truth is here taught,-that each soul is part of the Divine whole and cannot be separated from the God we seek. The C. is only just about to emerge from the darkness of gross materialism, yet the God he seeks is within him. True He is so veiled that many do not realise His presence, just as hundreds of C's tread out the proper steps without ever realising their full significance, but those who rise above the material start on the path of return to God, and each stage that they pass as they progress along the path, reveals more fully His Nature and Being. Notice, the C. only treads three squares,-Yod, He, Vau; Male, Female, Variable; the fourth square needed to complete the whole is on the Ped.
This is particularly significant-never whilst in the flesh shall we be able fully to comprehend His nature. No finite mind can comprehend the Infinite Deity. It is only after we have left the first initiation long behind, and travelled far, that we can hope to obtain that transcendent knowledge which enables us to understand fully, the Nature and Being of Him Who is the beginning and end of all.
Again comes the reminder that Masonry is free ; entrance to the path can only be gained by those who hear the call from within. No-one is coerced;-even at this late stage the C. is given an opportunity to retire. Thus he is asked if he is willing to take a serious Ob., and on his agreeing to do so, the W.M. directs him to k. on his l. k. etc.
It should be noted that the l. side of an individual is usually said to be "Femine," and it is not surprising, therefore that in this, the first and femine degree, the C. is told to k. on his l. k.. Notice the exact position! On the l. k. keeping the r. f. in the f. of a s. Now when you k. on the l. k. you must of necessity form a sq. at that k. , and, if you try it, you will find that you cannot keep the r. f. in the form of a sq. without keeping the r. k. in the form of a sq. also; so once again we get three sq's, with the fourth on the Ped.
Thus we get another glimpse of the truth already hinted at, that each soul is part of the Divine whole, and cannot be separated from God. The C. is only just about to emerge from the darkness of ignorance , and yet he is instructed so to k. that by his very attitude, -i.e. by forming three sq.'s with his body (the fourth being on the Ped.) he shows symbolically that the God he seeks is within.
Possibly the C. is not conscious of His presence , any more than he realizes the significance of the steps by which he approached the Ped. , or of the posture he assumes as he k's thereat, yet verily God is with him, and within him, and, be the journey short or long, back to God he must return. Once a M. , ever a M. , there is no such thing as straying permanently from the path.

CHAPTER V. THE OBLIGATION.
Why should there be any ob. ? In all the ancient mysteries an ob. was exacted, and for this reason: -The secret teachings given in these mysteries disclosed an inner meaning, often of a most exalted kind, unsuitable for the general public, who were lacking in education. In the ancient world the external religion, with its worship of many gods, suited the ordinary man in the street, who was incapable of comprehending more advanced spiritual truths.
It would have been dangerous, alike to the populace and to the preacher, to have shouted aloud such a doctrine as the essential unity of God, and still more fatal to have attempted to describe His Nature. The danger to the populace was that the preacher might have destroyed their belief in the religious system in which they had been reared, while failing to convert them properly to the new doctrine.
For the preacher, the fate of Socrates, and the failure of the so-called heretic King of Egypt-who tried to popularise the worship of the one God, under the symbol of the Atendisk, or disk of the Sun-are sufficient evidence of the risks which would be encountered. Moreover, these mysteries all purported to teach certain occult secrets, whose diffusion among vicious, or ignorant, men would have been dangerous. Even in the Middle Ages these dangers were still very real.
Any deviation from orthodoxy might have endangered the social fabric of the community, and such an attempt was certain to involve the advocate of new doctrines in a struggle with Church and State which could only have ended at the stake. Within an oath-bound Society men felt free to speculate and compare their personal standpoints, while to the outside world they continued to conform to orthodoxy.
The fate of the Templars must have been an ever present warning to the speculative mind, in the Middle Ages. In addition, there is little doubt that the building trades, like other Guilds, had important trade secrets, and wished to safeguard these from interlopers. A mediaeval Guild , on the one hand protected the interests of its members, while on the other it trained those members, and inspected and passed their wtirk; thus protecting the community from deliberate fraud or careless work.
Nor must it be forgotten that in a building bad work might involve actual danger to the users of that building. For all these reasons it was right and proper that no one who was not a member of the fraternity should be in possession of its trade secrets. The ob. is undoubtedly ancient, but its full significance is realised by few. The penalty is d. , and in the Middle Ages I do not doubt that it would have been enforced, though to-day it is purely symbolical.
Studying it carefully, we note in passing the word "hele," whose meaning has already been explained, -and also that every printed ritual in existence is a clear breach of our Ob. The strict interpretations of this clause is one of the reasons why we cannot expect to find any mediaeval rituals, although the fact that the bulk of the members in those days could not read or write would lessen the temptation to make them.
From a practical point of view, however, the essential object to-day is to prevent anyone who has not been regularly initiated from entering our Lodges and the printed rituals usually does this, for s. ns., w.s. and g.s. are missing and a careful cross-questioning would undoubtedly lead to the discovery of an imposter, even if he could produce a stolen G.L. certificate. In the altered conditions of the present era our secrecy is more of the nature of privacy, unlike that which prevails in a political secret society, which usually has revolutionary tendencies.
The old penalty has many striking points. It means that the culprit will be sl., and his b. b . . d. in unconsecrated ground. More than that, the ground can never be consecrated, and, according to the beliefs of the middle ages, and also of the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, the soul of a man so buried could not rest in peace , but would wander up and down in misery till the Judgment Day.
Suicides, for a similar reason, were buried at the cross road, and to prevent their bodies being used by vampires a stake was driven through the middle of the body to keep it nailed down. (It should be noted than even in England the p . . . s vary in different localities). Thus the culprit is not only d. . . . d to d . . . h, but to be a wandering outcast spirit till the day when the Great Judge consigns it to Hell. It is not perhaps a very charitable, or Christian idea, but that is what is meant all the same.
The T. is removed so that he cannot s. on his own behalf at the Judgment Day. The more effective punishment is, of course , a later "gloss," inserted at a time when; owing to better police supervision, it would have been dangerous to the members of the Order to enforce the ancient py. To-day, in England, it is the only effective penalty, but in some foreign countries d. is still enforced under certain circumstances.
In such cases, however, the Lodges are usually strongly political and revolutionary in tendency. But with us it still remains an obvious symbolical meaning. Immediately after the Ob. the W.M. says, "Having been kept . . . ."etc. We have seen that the C. has already been asked several questions ; these have gradually led up to this, the greatest and most important! Now the climax is reached. It is as if the W.M. says, you have declared that you are here of your own free will, not for unworthy motives, but led by an earnest desire for knowledge.
Your humility and obedience have been tested, and you are therefore entitled to request the fulfilment of the greatest desire of your heart. The question put at this moment can be answered by no one but the C. , for it is meant to teach him that essential lesson that no appeal for L. is ever made in vain. His answer given, the w.M. says, "Then let . ." etc. Notice the word restored.
Mystical rebirth marks the beginning of our journey towards God the Light, of our ascent towards God, but it is a restoration,-a journey back to Him from Whom we came. Exactly the same procedure is followed in the initiatory rites of the Turkish Dervishes. Among them, however, the incident is followed by a beautiful exposition of the mystical meaning of Light.
It is the Divine Light, emblem of God Himself, and of Divine inspiration. It is, moreover, present, not only in the sacred writings, but in every true believer's heart. The light of the sun itself is but a faint similitude of the Divine Light of God's love, through which, and in which, we have our being. Though not expressed in our ritual , this act has the same inner meaning, as I have explained.
So to the C.L. is restored, and he sees, what? The V.S.L. , the S. and the C.s. The V.S.L. is in a place of honour, because without its divine standard and authority the S. and C.s. placed thereon would be practically meaningless. These latter form a lozenge, which as I have already said , is a well known symbol for the Vesica Piscis , which represents the female or preservative principle of the Deity, without which we could not exist for a single day, or hope to be preserved from the powers of darkness which threaten us upon our spiritual journey.
Thus the W.M. 's words teach the aspirant that we have a duty to God, ourselves, and our brother men. The C. is raised with the proper g. , but this is not explained at once. Rather his attention is directed to the three lesser lights, which we are told represent the Sun, Moon and the Master. As our Lodges are at present arranged the W.M. should point to the S. for the Sun, and to the W. for the Moon , but it must be admitted that the lesson to be derived from these three luminaries is not very clear.
Indeed, the Moon plays no real part in our mysteries, which are essentially solar in character, while the implied contrast between Sun, Moon and Master is in no way helpful. In reality the three lesser lights are the W.M. and his two wardens, with their respective candles, and these officers have a real symbolic meaning of great importance, which symbolic characters they maintain consistently throughout all three degrees.
My personal view is that it was to the lights on the pedestals, and their respective officers, that this phrase originally applied, and that the Sun and Moon are 18th century interpolations.
THE THREE PRINCIPAL OFFICERS In any case this makes a convenient place in which to consider the symbolic meaning of the three principle officers in a lodge. The W.M. represents the rising Sun, and in this sense he covers two distinct meanings: the first in connection with the nature of God, and the other with regard to the nature of man. And a similar dual character exists in the case of S.W. and J.W.
The W.M. represents God the Creator, He who calls the Lodge into being, He who created the World out of Chaos. In India this aspect of God, the Incomprehensible, has been individualised as Brahma, so that the devotee many be able to comprehend Him, at least in part. It is the Master who opens the Lodge, who calls it out of nothing. He sits in the East, the place of light; but though he opens, he does not close the lodge.
That is the work of another aspect of the Divine Being. In the nature of man the W.M. represents the Spirit, the Divine Spark within us, ever striving for the light, never truly separated from the divine source of its being. This dual aspect of the W.M. and his principal officers must be borne in mind, if we are to delve down into the inner, or esoteric, meaning of our wonderful rituals. The S.W. represents the Setting Sun, and hence the Destructive, or Transformative , aspects of the Deity.
Among the Hindoos this aspect is called Shiva. He shall one day close the Grand Lodge of this World, when time shall be swallowed up into Eternity. The S.W. closes the Lodge. As the Destroyer he reminds us that Death, the great leveller, will bring all men low, and his symbol is the Level. This in itself reminds us of the caste mark of Shiva, which consists of horizontal lines. But in the nature of Man he represents the Soul, which alone enables the Spirit to raise the body towards divine things.
Without the medium of the Soul, the Spirit would be unable to influence the body. It is for this reason that the C. is invested in craft masonry by the S.W. or Soul, and not by the W.M. , representing the Divine Spark. Thus we learn that we must raise ourselves , step by step , towards the Divine Light. Shiva is, above all, the great M.M..
The J.W. represents the Sun in its Meridian. He stands for the Way of Life, the balance between birth and death. His is the sunny side of life. He calls us from labour to refreslunent and from refreshment to labour. In the divine aspect he represents the Preserver, called Vishnu in India, of whom it is stated that as Rama he sent the skilful craftsmen , Hanuman , to build the bridge for Him , by means of which He crossed the straits to fight against the powers of evil in ancient Ceylon.
Vishnu is associated with the element of water and with corn, and his caste mark is a perpendicular, straight line , referring to the rain which falls from heaven. This symbol is remembered in our lodges by the plumb rule. In the nature of man he stands for the body, which perishes. He is H.A.B. in the Grand Lodge at Jerusalem. He represents the life and sufferings of the body, only terminated by death; the body which in every man dies before its divine work is accomplished.
Our divine temple is not finished at death: all that we can hope is that the foundations have been well and truly laid. In short, in this life we cannot hope to "see God face to face," nor, being finite, can we truly comprehend the Infinite , but we can hope to make such progress that, when called hence, we shall be able to continue , and complete , the work of our own salvation on the foundations of a good and spiritual earthly life.
Finally, it will be noted that in every degree these three officers co-operate to advance the C., and so it is in the spiritual life, for body, soul and spirit' must co-operate if real progress is to be attained. Next the C. is informed of the three great dangers-note the triplicity again-and the few sentences devoted to them must be considered in the light of what has already been written by me on the S.I., the C.T., and the Ob..
At the door of the L. the C. was in great danger, because entrance thereat marked the beginning of the ceremony of initiation into m., and initiation symbolises the mystical re-birth, the end of the descent into matter and the beginning of the ascent to God, and there can be no more critical time than that. The S.I. warns us of the dangers of rushing unprepared into the field of occultism, while the C.T. indicates the danger that the Divine Spark may be quenched, strangled by materialism, if we do not continue steadfastly.
But even when these dangers are passed, throughout the whole of our mystic journey there remains that last danger of our ob., namely, that of infidelity to the vows which marked our entrance, or of abandoning our further quest for light;-knowing the right, but deliberately choosing the wrong. This means death; not primarily physical death, but that greater death, referred to by our Hindoo Brethren as "Being born again at the bottom of the ladder of evolution up which we have for so long been ascending. " We next come to the moment, so long expected, when the s. . . . s are disclosed.
No doubt many Brethren could not suppress a slight feeling of disappointment at their comparative insignificance. Was such a tremendous Ob. necessary to safeguard a S. , W. , and G. which appear to be Purely arbitrary? This question is a fair one, and the answer is that the Ob. safeguards, not so much the G., etc., which are but the outward and visible signs, as the inner esoteric meaning, hidden in our ritual, and never properly explained.
Firstly, the W.M. instructs the C. in the f. r. s., which on investigation proves to be the tau cross. The tau cross was originally the phallus, and has many inner meanings. It is the emblem of generation and creation, but since these powers may be prostituted they must be brought under control. As the f. r. s. , it represents our natural and animal passions, which must be trampled underfoot and brought under complete control, otherwise we cannot make any advancement in Freemasonry.
In plain language , unless we bring our passions into complete subjection, we cannot hope to advance towards a true knowledge of God. For that, I consider, is the real search, or quest, in Freemasonry. Therefore in every one of the Craft degrees we trample on the tau cross. It will be remembered that one of the charges against the Templars, in 1307, was that they trampled on the cross, and this charge seems to be correct.
Yet these same men adored the Cross three times a year in their ceremonies and, moreover, fought and died for it on many a corpse-strewn field in Palestine. I have no doubt this act of theirs was a symbolic one , associated more with the cross as an emblem of our passions than with the Christian cross of suffering. Yet symbols emerge by imperceptible degrees into each other, and so it is that we can truly say that Christ was crucified on the Cross of our passions.
In mediaeval pictures you will usually find that while Christ hangs on a Latin, or fourarmed cross , the two thieves are hung on Tau , or three-armed crosses. This indicates that they died for their own sins, but Christ, Who hangs on the cross of sacrifice , died for the sins of others. Thus, my brothers, the f. r. s. is full of inner meaning nor is this the only place in which we meet with the tau cross in the craft. Its higher and holier aspect when associated with the W.M. I shall discuss later.

CHAPTER VI. CONCLUSION OF THE CEREMONY.
Having taken the f. r. s. the C. is given the S.. This he is told refers to the P. of his Ob., and no doubt it does, but it also seems to refer to something much more startling. The part of the body indicated has always been regarded as an important occult centre. In some strange way, the laws of which are but little understood, it has always been associated with the phenomena known amongst psychic students as Materialisations.
As, however, this subject lies somewhat outside our theme, we will discuss the point no further. But all our P. 's have a striking analogy to the legend of the creation of man as given by the Hindoo sages. From Brahma sprang all four castes. From His head came the Brahmins, from His Breasts the Kshatra, or fighting caste, from His Belly, the peasants, and from His feet, the Sudras.
The latter were not true Arians, and were not twice born men; in other words, only the first three castes were regarded as really and truly admissible to the Temple of the High Gods, and free to participate in Their worship. It will be noted that in this degree the S..n suggests the cutting off of the first caste from those below. This S..n, Bro. Major Sanderson suggests, was originally a mantra, or magic prayer, which must be most carefully guarded from the profane.
The T. appears to be an arbitrary one, although it may possibly refer to a certain piller. Explanations of this, together with the meaning, derivation , and significance of the W. , are reserved for the next volume, for reasons which will be obvious to those entitled to know them. No doubt, however, the basic idea of both pillar and word is phallic, and other interpretations have evolved later.
Having received s. w. and t. , the C. is warned to be cautious and told how to receive a challenge, then, having been given strength to help him on his way, he is sent forth in order that the important lesson of caution may be implanted in his mind. The testing by J.W. and S.W. are obviously of practical use, but I think that here also there is an inner meaning. The Body and Soul test the Cand. to see that the lessons have been well and truly learnt; also there seems to be a definite astrological reference.
Having satisfied these important officers, the s.w. asks for some special mark of favour. That is, the Soul calls on the Spirit, but is told that it is the Soul which must invest the regenerate man with the outward signs of the change he has undergone. This point has already been mentioned, but its deep significance must not be forgotten. It may truly be said that it is the S.W. who sets the seal on the candidate's initiation, and proclaims him as at length a member of the Order.
The address of the S.W. and the subsequent one by the Master, are fairly self-explanatory. But one or two points deserve stressing. The reference to the antiquity of the apron refers mainly, of course, to its use among the Operatives, and implies the dignity of honest labour. The present form of our apron is comparatively modern, but there is evidence that our predecessors, the Comacine Masons , wore aprons when they met in Lodge , and aprons have had a special significance among many religious systems.
Thus some of the Chinese gods wear aprons , and I have a photograph of one (See The Hung Society, Vol. III., op. p. 122) and this "God" is making a certain high degree sign. Among the ancient races of America the apron was also evidently used with a religious significance (see picture of the Toltec Preserver in "Freemasonry and the Ancient Gods"). The address of the W.M. lays stress on the importance of not entering the L. if a brother is at variance with another.
At first sight this may seem a somewhat unnecessary charge. Normal, well conducted gentlemen are not likely to start an unseemly wrangle in Lodge , even if they are at enmity; and should two men so far forget the common decencies of life as to do so, the W.M. has ample power to deal with the situation. The real significance of the injunction, however, is that it implies that the mere presence of two brethren who are at variance will disturb the harmonious atmosphere of the meeting.
This is a purely spiritual atmosphere, and the belief that such disturbance would occur without any open disagreement, is correct. In short, such differences disturb the spiritual atmosphere, prevent concentration, and can be detected by sensitive individuals. Every Lodge has an "atmosphere of its own," and any sensitive man who comes to it can detect it* I have myself noticed the different "atmospheres" of various lodges, and also variations in that of my own.
Too much regard therefore cannot be paid to this rule, and if ignored the Lodge will certainly suffer. The C. is placed in the N.E. corner of the Lodge for the reason given in the ritual, but it is important to remember that he himself is building his own temple-a spiritual temple to the glory of God. Why should the cornerstone be laid in the N.E.? This was for a very practical reason; namely, so that the Operatives could work round with the Sun, and thus obtain the maximum amount of light.
Symbolically, it refers, of course, to the journey of the soul, which begins in the N., enters life at the East, at birth, and so proceeds to the West, where death ends our day. The position in which the C. stands is not only a sq., the emblem of rectitude and of God, but at the particular point he make a "lewis," or angle clamp, which binds together the life which has been (in the North) and his future life (in the East).
In physical life the North is pre-natal, but in the spiritual it is before we turned to better things. Above all, such a clamp gives rigidity and strength to the corners, and assures stability. It will be noted that this position in like manner makes a "footing stone." The testing of the candidate is explained, but perhaps I ought once more to remind my reader that it is absolutely essential that we should leave behind us the baleful gifts of the underworld and the canker of wealth, which destroy spirituality. The lecture on the working tools explains itself. It appears to be mainly 18th century work.

CHAPTER VII. THE CHARGE.
When the C. has been restored to his personal comfort he receives the charge. The first significant point is the phrase "Ancient, no doubt it is, as having subsisted from time immemorial." In "Freemasonry and the Ancient Gods" I have endeavoured to show that this phrase is literally true , and a stong claim can be made that modern Freemasonry is the lineal descendant of the Ancient Mysteries, via the Roman Colleges of Architects, the Comacine Masons, and the Mediaeval Freemasons.
The other significant phrase is that relating to "The Ancient Landmarks." Much learned discussion has taken place concerning what these are. Common sense indicates the following points as obviously falling within this heading, whereas many others may be matters of opinion, on which brethren are entitled to differ. 1.-The signs, words and tokens. I
f these were changed it would shatter the universality of Freemasonry and prevent old masons recognising new ones, or members of various jurisdictions doin so. It must be acknowledged that the charge mad by the Ancients against the Moderns, that they had removed the Ancient Landmarks, was largely justified, for they appear to have transposed the w.s. in the first and second degrees. Still apparently, they did not entirely change them. 2 & 3.-Belief in God and a Future Life.
I these are removed, then the object and purpose of masonry is destroyed, since it is the "quest of knowledge of, and union with, God." Again, the elimination of the idea of a future life" woull destroy the teaching of one of the most important craft degrees. If these landmarks were removed, Freemasony would either perish, or else have to substitute a new object, as the Grand Orient of France has done. This having become atheistical, had to turn masonry into a secret political society, with disastrous results.
Hence it is that the Grand Lodge of England felt compelled to break off fraternal relations with that body. 4.-The Order of the Degrees. If these were reversed or changed it would reduce the whole system to nonsense. The remainder of this address is fairly clear as it stands. It contains excellent teaching, the meaning of which lies on the surface, and so we need spend no further space on it here. The first tracing board contains a great deal of useful instruction, but it is so seldom given in most lodges that we will pass it by, hoping at some future date to give it the attention it deserves.
The purpose of these tracing boards will be explained in the book dealing with the second degree, and we can therefore take leave of the Entered Apprentice. There is no pretence that we have exhausted the subject, much more could be written, but in a small book like this the author must restrict himself to giving an outline explanation, and suggestions for study, in the hope that his readers will follow the hints given, and discover further meanings for themselves.

CHAPTER VIII THE CLOSING OF THE FIRST DEGREE.
The first degree closing is remarkably short, and its meaning is fairly clear. The candidate has not yet advanced sufficiently far to be able to appreciate any more esoteric teaching. He is therefore given one brief and tremendous lesson. The Destructive side of the Deity is invoked, and the same officer, it must be remembered, also represents the Soul. Thus, at the very beginning of his symbolical career, the novice is warned of the inevitable end.
During the ceremony of his initiation the fact has been impressed upon him that his spiritual advancement is by means of his soul, i.e. when the S.W. invests him with his apron. Now he is warned that the same soul which may help him to rise, may also cause his spiritual destruction. But even more this fact should show him that, when he has learned all that life can teach him, the Soul acting on the instructions of God, calls him to other fields of usefulness. It should also be noted that the S.W. closes in the name of the G.A., and by command of the W.M. , thus reminding us of Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End

CONCLUSION.
This then concludes our consideration of the meaning of the first degree. The author has not tried to be exhaustive , and would stress the point that usually he has only attempted to give one esoteric meaning, although often there are other inner meanings, each within the other. But he trusts he will have helped his brethren to perceive that there are indeed deep and invaluable meanings hidden within our ritual, and that his readers, having once started on this line of study , will not rest content until they themselves have discovered further inner meanings. If this be so, then this little book will not have been in vain.

AL PRESIDENTE:MEDITANDO SUL TEATRINO DI ROMA E IL VITELLO D'ORO

Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 11:33AM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

Monster Mason.jpgSubject: AL PRESIDENTE:MEDITANDO SUL TEATRINO DI ROMA E IL VITELLO D'ORO...
To: presidenza.republica@quirinale.it
26 Luglio 2006 Oslo
documento dell' ORDO ILLUMINATORUM UNIVERSALIS

AL PRESIDENTE DELLA REPUBLICA ITALIANA
DAL DIRETTORE DELLA AS-HERMETIS FOUNDATION (OSLO)

MEDITANDO SUL TEATRINO DI ROMA E IL VITELLO D'ORO...

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
Anti-Masonry and Anti-Semitism
Leon Zeldis, FPS, 33°
PSGC, Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite for the
State of Israel
Honorary Adjunct Grand Master

More than once in the course of the last two
centuries, anti-Masonry has been fused with an older
hatred, hatred of the Jews, that is to say
anti-Semitism. Probably, the irrational nature of both
phobias facilitates their juxtaposition. Be that as it
may, from the middle of the 19th Century, we are
witnessing an increasing wave of simultaneously
anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic propaganda. Possibly,
the paradigmatic work of this class of "literature" is
an opuscule entitled "The Protocols of the Wise Men of
Zion" sometimes also known as "The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion."

This is one of the most well-known literary
falsifications in history, based on plagiarism and
fraud from the very beginning of its gestation.
Nevertheless, this swindle has captivated the
imagination of many people who are sensible in other
respects, and it has been transformed into the "source
of indispensable information" in the baggage of all
the anti-Semites and anti-Masons.

dal Libro di Serge Hutin
GOVERNI OCCULTI E SOCIETA SEGRETE
(EDIZIONI MEDITERRANEE)

Tuttavia i famosi Protocolli dei Savi anziani di Sion
non sono che un falso.
Infatti il redattore non e' altri che Piotr Ivanovic
Rachovsky,che dal 1884 al 1902 diresse ,come abbiamo
gia' detto ,la sezione estera della polizia segreta
Zarista.l'Okhrana.Egli avrebbe molto semplicemente
plagiato e rimaneggiato un Dialogue aux enfers entre
Machiavel et Montesquieu(Dialogo agli inferi tra
Macchiavelli e Montesquieu) disponibile su ECIG,Genova
1995,si tratta di una curiosa opera del francese
Maurice Joly ,la morte del quale ,nel 1878,e' sempre
rimasta un mistero (aggiungiamo ???)
E' un fatto che il dialogo scritto da Joly era di per
se' un manuale per gli apprendisti dittatori del mondo
moderno.Nella settima parte,Macchiavelli,che si
suppone conversi con Montesquieu post mortem,dice
infatti ."CAPO DEL GOVERNO ,TUTTI I MIEI ORDINI
TENDEREBBERO ALLO STESSO FINE:LO SVILUPPO SMISURATO
DELLA PREPONDERANZA DELLO STATO ,SI DA FARNE IL
MASSIMO PROTETTORE,PROMOTORE E REMUNERATORE".
Tra i mezzi atti a provocare il livellamento delle
masse sono enumerati nella medesima settima parte:l'
aumento costante delle tasse,il privilegio sistematico
accordato all'industria e alla speculazione,che
trascina fatalmente al declino agricoltura e
artigianato.
Tuttavia ,da un esame piu' attento sia del dialogo che
dei Protocolli appare chiaro,secondo noi,come i
secondi non siano affatto un abile plagio del primo
,ma appaiono piuttosto come la tracrizione diretta
dellle decisioni prese durante le assemblee segrete
dei governanti occulti d'Europa.
Quali furono,dunque,i motivi che spinsero Rachovsky a
diffondere sistematicamente i Protocolli?Quelli di
servire le autorita' dell'Impero Russo appoggiando gli
antisemiti.Questi ultimi non potevano che reaggire
violentemente all'idea di un immensa cospirazione
ebraica su scala internazionale ,mirante a provocare
ovunque crisi economiche e rivoluzioni per giungere
infine al potere.Vi si trovano i temi della battaglia
ideologica sostenuta da precedenti opere,come quelle
di Gougenot des Mousseaux (Le juif,le judaisme et la
judaisation des peuples chrétiens,edito a Parigi nel
1869) o come il famoso France juive di Edouard
Drumont.In Germania,ancor piu' che in
Francia,l'antisemitismo si era compiaciuto
d'attribuire agli ebrei un osuro piano di
conspirazione internazionale.Romanzi come Biarritz di
"Sir John Retcliffe" ( pseudonimo dello scrittore
Herman Goedsche,Berlino1868),avevano contribuito alla
diffusione di quest'idea.Nel romanzo in questione
troviamo un capitolo,fantasioso al massimo,nel quale
e' descritta un'impressionante cerimonia segreta
notturna nel vecchio cimitero ebraico di Praga,dove si
raccolgono i tredici capi del governo invisibile.Delle
misteriose figure vestite d'un lungo mantello
bianco,scivolano ad un ad una nel cimitero per
riunirsi attorno ad un sinistro monumento
funebre.Quando si odono i dodici rintocchi della
mezzanotte ,l'ultimo personaggio il tredicesimo
,prende posto.Al segnale di uno strano suono metallico
una fiamma bluastra illumina la pietra tombale.Chi
sono questi tredici inquietanti personaggi? I membri
del governo segreto mondiale ebraico.Essi
rappresentano le dodici tribu' d'Israele ed il
tredicesimo rappresenta "gli scomparsi e gli
esiliati".Ognuno di loro getta sulla tomba una pietra
ed a questo punto dalla fiamma irreale sorge un enorme
vitello d'oro...

MA IL FRATELLO JOLY?
L'illustre Fratello Maurice Joly apparentemente faceva
parte di uno specifico Rito Massonico che apparteneva
fin dalla sua nascita in Italia e poi in Francia a una
specifica famiglia Ebrea collegata alla Lobby Sionista
e rivestiva la carica di Rosa+Croce e noi studiosi del
settore sappiamo benissimo come stanno le cose in base
al successivo collegamento tra il patto Sinarchico,i
Protocolli e il falso Priorato di Sion.

PAPUS I PROTOCOLLI E SION
In 1884 a certain copies of The Protocols of Zion
were found circulating amongst the members of a
Masonic lodge to which Papus himself belonged - the
lodge where the aforementioned legend of the wise
Egyptian sage named Ormus.

LA QUESTIONE SIONISTA
La domanda a lei caro illustrissimo Presidente della
Republica Italiana e la seguente: vogliamo continuare
ad adorare un vitello d'oro o finalmente ascoltare
tutti insieme la parola di Dio?

Questo potrebbe accadere come non mai nel nuovo
villaggio globale di internet ,ma anche e sopratutto
in maniera piu' Sacrale nel nuovo villaggio per gli
affari interreligiosi che si va via via costruendo a
ridosso del monte Sinai in Egitto grazie al supporto
di tutti i veri Illuminati delle varie fedi.
Personaggi chiari,onesti,mossi da intenzioni genuine,
desiderosi di comunicare in maniera chiara e autentica
il messaggio di pace e vera liberta' che Dio a per gli
uomini di buona volonta', non il fondamentalismo
inutile di questi tristi giorni che servono da
copertura per affari corporativi di natura oserei dire
criminale e senza scrupoli verso l'umanita' intera.
Non si puo' continuare a giocare con gli uomini e
gestire le Nazioni Unite come un business in giacca e
cravatta per ipocriti dell'ultima ora, bisogna invece
poter aprire un dialogo serio e costruttivo sulla
rinascita spirituale delle nuove generazion italiane
ed estere in pasto ad una minoranza satanica che
preferisce purtroppo tenersi il vitello d'Oro
Hollywoodiano, il materialismo sfrenato, e le farse
Medio Orientali.Farse che servono solamente per
gettare discredito sui veri credenti nell'unico Dio il
Grande Architetto degli Universi che e' uguale per
tutti che lo vogliate oppure no.
Noi giovani (ho solamente 36 anni) che ci sposiamo ora
e cerchiamo con mille difficolta di mettere su
famiglia come il sottoscritto vogliamo la pace nel
mondo caro Presidente, e siamo pronti piu' che mai a
lasciar da parte l'ipocrisia delle chiacchere
corporative per dar finalmente posto all'amore piu'
sincero verso Dio e alla carita' tra le genti di
questo pianeta,un pianeta' come lei ben sa sempre piu'
afflitto dal maligno e dai suoi compari.Quindi
Fratellanza Universale SI ma con il rispetto dovuto da
noi occidentali a culture millenarie che vengono
direttamente da Dio altissimo,il compassionevole,il
misericordioso e tutto questo in ricordo di sua
Santita' Giovanni Paolo II e del suo memorabile
incontro di Assisi.
A presto.
Cordialmente,
Leo Lyon Zagami

 

LA MASSONERIA IN VATICANO

Posted on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 04:55PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

La rivista cattolica messicana `Processo` (No 832 del 12 Ottobre 1992) informava che la massoneria ha diviso il territorio Vaticano in otto quartieri,dove sono in funzione quattro logge massoniche del Rito Scozzese i cui adepti ,alti funzionari del piccolo Stato,standovi in forma indipendente non si riconoscerebbero fra loro,neanche battendo i colpi col polpastrello del police.Esse all`occorenza prendono contatti con altre logge massoniche delle singole nazioni,anzi la dove la Chiesa opera in clandestinita` a causa del Corano ,le relazioni con la Chiesa locale passano segretamente attraverso tale network.

Nel 1987 il gionalista massone Pier Carpi,confermando l`assunto del Fratello Fulberto Lauro secondo il quale alla Loggia P2 aderivano anche cardinali e vescovi in incongnito ,specificava che si chiama Loggia Ecclesia ed ` in contatto diretto con il Gran Maestro della Gran Loggia Unita d`Inghilterra il Duca Michele di Kent.Tale loggia opera in Vaticano dal 1971.Vi appartengono piu` di cento fra cardinali ,vescovi e monsignori di curia.Riescono a mantenere il piu` assoluto segreto , ma non al punto da sfuggire alle indagini degli uomini della potente `Opus Dei`.(L`Espresso,12 Dicembre 1987)

A me e` stato confermato sia da un alto dignitario della Gran Loggia Unita d`Inghilterra sia da un Porporato di mia conoscenza che esistono ben due logge di Rito Emulation che lavorano con i nomi `Simbolo` ed `Ekklesia` all`interno della citta` del Vaticano con una bolla americana,la Libera Muratoria in Vaticano sembra quindi operare nell`ipocrisia generale dal 1945, con il supporto interessato degli Stati Uniti d`America che la usa allegramente per i suoi scopi di manipolazione generale insieme alla perfida Albione.

Ci sono poi numerosi Vescovi della Chiesa Cattolica coinvolti nella massoneria Italiana che non fanno parte del GOI o della Gran Loggia d`Italia degli ALAM ma di formazioni minori, che pur essendo Regolari dal punto di vista constitutivo garantiscono una maggiore segrettezza e riservatezza per i propri affiliati, un Vescovo era presente a Roma in occasione del bicentenario della famosa Patente 1805 del R.S.A.A. proprio durante i funerali di Papa Giovanni Paolo II, come puo dimostrarvi chiaramente e senza ombre di dubbio, il seguente documento a firma dell'illustre Fratello Massone Klaus E. Schmidt, attuale capo della polizia segreta Albanese:

Report on the visit to the meeting in Rome 8 - 10 April 2005
Dear Bro. Gabirro:

I was received at the airport by GM Cesare Cocchi and some other Brr.
Due to the air traffic restrictions at the day of the funeral of the
Pope 14 delegations could not arrive in Rome for this event.

Delegations present: France, Spain, Serbia - Montenegro, Italy, UK

Ritual work: Saturday, 09 April 2005, from 09:00 - 12:30 and 16:00 - 18:00
The main work plan was delivered by Bro. Sarigu Armando from the
Orient of Cantanzaro (a Catholic Bishop !)
Greetings of the MHC of England and Wales during work were delivered

Formal dinners with all delegations: Friday, 8 April 2005, 20:00 -
23:00 and Saturday, 8 April 2005, 20:00 - 23:00.

Special contacts:

ITALY

Bro. Cesare Cocchi, GM
Bro. (Prof) Lello Gervasi
Bro. Antonio Notaro

FRANCE

Bro. Gerald Frapech, gfrapech@wanadoo.fr

SPAIN

Bro. Gaspar Guzzo Galvez
Bro. Rafael Roman Jara, GM of Andaluza
Bro. Jesus Corella Garcia, Grand Orador
Bro. Johnny Sheppard Regules

SERBIA

Bro. Milan Lajhner
Bro.Dragutin Zagorac, Grand Commandeur Serbia
Bro.Predrag Nikolic, Grand sec
Bro.Aleksandar D. Rodic

Some of the Brr from Serbia will pay me a visit to Tirana soon.

The Brr from the different delegations are seeking official close
cooperation with the MHC of England and Wales and expressed their wish
to stay in frequent contact with me. I told them that I will forward
this to the MHC in due time.

The delegation from Serbia handed over a present for the MHC which I
will deliver during me visit in London.

The entire meeting was blessed with an extremely good spirit and
closed in harmony.

Best frat. greetings
Klaus E. Schmidt

Ricordiamoci poi l`articolo publicato prima di morire dal povero Fratello Mino Pecorelli il 12 Settembre 1978 sul suo intrigante settimanale `OP` dal titolo `La Gran Loggia Vaticana`....121 nomi di esponenti vaticani...

vi segnalo inoltre riviste e rotocalchi che hanno scritto apertamente dell`infiltrazione massonica in Vaticano e potrebbero magari aiutarvi nella vostra ricerca su questo delicato argomento:

`Panorama` del 10 Agosto 1976,

`Introibo` del Luglio 1976

`Euroitalia` del 17 e 25 Agosto 1978`

`Osservatore Politico` del 12 Settembre 1978

`Oggi` del 17 Giugno 1981

`30 Giorni` dell`11 Novembre 1992

Ed infine la recente nomina a Gran Cappellano di un prete Cattolico alla Gran Loggia Regolare d'Italia nonostante la scomunica ufficiale di Papa Ratzinger. Poveri noi, abitiamo ormai nel Regno del Maligno e dell'ipocrisia, dove la doppia appartenenza Massoneria-Opus Dei e' quasi diventata un vanto.

Leo Lyon Zagami

Freemasonry,Satanism,and the Church of England

Posted on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 04:41PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

IMG_0304.jpg

Freemasonry, Satanism and the Church of England: The correspondence between the Grand Secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England and the new Archbishop of Canterbury

"New Archbishop: Masons have no place in the Church "
by Jason Bennetto ("The Independent", 15 November 2002)

The new Archbishop of Canterbury has said he believes Christianity and Freemasonry are "incompatible" and has refused to appoint clergymen to senior posts because they are members of the Brotherhood.
Dr Rowan Williams, who becomes head of the Church of England next month, told The Independent that he is not in favour of ministers being Masons because it is a "secret organisation" whose views are questionable.
He also voiced doubts in a letter to Hugh Sinclair, who has been investigating the Brotherhood: "I have real misgivings about the compatibility of Masonry and Christian profession ... I have resisted the appointment of known Masons to certain senior posts."
Dr Williams' comments will renew controversy about the Freemasons. In the past 50 years some of its most senior members have been in the Church's higher echelons, and there have been links between the two organisations for centuries. Thousands of leading clergymen and churchgoers are among its 350,000 British members.
The Rev Gregory Cameron, chaplain to Dr Williams, said: "He questions whether it's appropriate for Christian ministers to belong to secret organisations. He also has some anxiety about the spiritual content of Masonry."
A spokesman for the Archbishop said he was "worried about the ritual elements in Freemasonry - which some have seen as possibly Satanically inspired - and how that sits uneasily with Christian belief". He continued: "The other idea is that because they are a society, there could be a network that involves mutual back-scratching, which is something he would be greatly opposed to."
A spokesman for the Freemasons in England said: "As far as we are concerned, there is no incompatibility between Christianity and our organisation whatsoever."

****

The Most Reverend and Rt. Hon. Archbishop of Canterbury
Lambeth Palace
London
SE1 7JU

2 December 2002

Dear Archbishop

I write in response to the reports in The Independent newspaper of your views on Freemasonry.

According to the reports:

a) you have doubts on the compatibility of Freemasonry with Christianity and believe that elements of the ritual may have a Satanic basis

b) you believe Freemasonry to be both a secret society and a self-serving network

c) you have in the past not appointed to sensitive senior posts candidates who are Freemasons and intend to continue that practice.

For nearly 300 years Freemasonry has existed in an organised way in England and Wales. During that period hundreds of thousands of committed Christians (clergy and laity) have found no incompatibility between their Christian faith and the principles and practices of Freemasonry. Indeed many have testified that their membership of Freemasonry has strengthened their faith and, in some cases, brought them back into active church membership.

The prime and inalienable qualification for admission into Freemasonry is a belief in God. An individual's religion is a matter for his conscience, and Freemasonry will not interfere in or in any way comment on religious matters. As a result our membership encompasses Christians of all denominations, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, etc., who meet together in harmony, knowing that their religions differ but not allowing those differences to come between them on Masonic occasions.

The suggestion that Freemasonry is "Satanically inspired" in its rituals would be risible were it not for the fact that it questions the basis of the faiths of over 300,000 Freemasons under the United Grand Lodge of England, whatever their religion may be. Even a small amount of elementary research would have shown how nonsensical this dreadful assertion is, and would have enabled you to avoid giving deep and gratuitous offence to so many who are encouraged in every form of Freemasonry to be true to their God above all other considerations.

As for the claim that Freemasonry is a "secret organisation", it must surely be a very peculiar "secret" society which makes its rules and aims available to the public; publishes annual lists of its national and local leaders together with the dates and places of meeting of all of its units; opens its national headquarters to the general public on a daily basis; maintains national and local web sites on the Internet; gives regular briefings to the media; and provides spokesmen to speak anywhere about its nature and activities. Each Freemason is at perfect liberty to tell whomsoever he pleases that he is a Freemason. Indeed Freemasonry is one of the few organisations to have been specifically declared not to be a secret society. In July 2001 the European Court of Human Rights ruled that (a) Freemasonry was neither a secret, criminal nor an illegal organisation, and (b) that in making appointments or promotions it is illegal to discriminate against a candidate simply because he is a Freemason.

Rather than being a self-serving network, the opposite is true. On at least six occasions during the process of becoming a Freemason the new member is told that it is contrary to our principles and rules to use his membership to gain any form of advantage for himself or anyone else. Any attempt to do so will result in disciplinary proceedings, with sanctions running from admonition to irrevocable expulsion.

I have enclosed two booklets and some leaflets which explain the background to Freemasonry and how it relates to society in general. The booklet "Your Questions Answered" deals in particular with the myths which surround Freemasonry.

I also extend to you an invitation to meet privately with some senior Freemasons to discuss at the true source any doubts you may have, in preference to simply putting your faith in secondary and unreliable information. Your three immediate predecessors each came here for lunch and found it an interesting, stimulating and enjoyable experience. I realise that you have much to consider at the present, and that it may not be convenient to accept this invitation immediately. I trust that you will permit me to write to you again after your Enthronement to reaffirm our wish to welcome you here and show that your doubts about Freemasonry have no justification in fact.

Yours sincerely

R A H Morrow
Grand Secretary

****

R. A. H. Morrow
Grand Secretary, United Grand Lodge of England
Freemason's Hall
Great Queen Street
London
WC2B 5AZ

23 January 2003


Dear Mr Morrow

I have been sorry to learn of the distress of a considerable number of Freemasons. It is true that a great deal of upset and hurt has been caused by the newspaper reports about my purported views on freemasonry. In replying to private correspondence, I had no intention of starting a public debate nor of questioning the good faith and generosity of individual freemasons and I regret the tone and content of the media coverage.

Much of the distress has been due to what amounts to a serious misrepresentation of views I am supposed to hold. The quoted statements about the "satanic" character of masonic ceremonies and other matters did not come from me and do not represent my judgement. Since my late father was a member of the Craft for many years, I have had every opportunity of observing the probity of individual members.

Where anxieties exist, however, they are in relation not to Freemasonry but to Christian ministry, and. my letter simply reflected a personal unease about Christian ministers subscribing to what could be and often is understood (or misunderstood) as a private system of profession and initiation, involving the taking of oaths of loyalty. Concerns like these have led to a number of debates within the church in recent years and it is clear that there are still widely differing views ? held with sincerity and honesty ? about the compatibility of certain aspects of Freemasonry with Christian belief, ministry and, service.

My statement about resisting the appointment of freemasons to certain posts in Wales needs to be understood against the background of the belief that I and the church had deliberately advanced the cause of Freemasons. In saying that I had resisted the appointment of Freemasons to certain posts I was not suggesting that people had been blackballed, but asserting that I was satisfied that membership of the Craft was neither a disqualifier nor an advantage.

I welcome the manner in which Freemasons have engaged in debate and especially the increasing openness of recent years. Their commitment to charitable causes and the welfare of the wider community is beyond question.

Yours sincerely,

+ Rowan Cantuar [Williams]

Archbishop of Canterbury

25th of January 2005 and the creation of the Masonic High Council - REGULAR GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND

Posted on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 03:20PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

EXPELLED_1.JPG

To all concerned Masons

Masonic High Council for England,
Wales the Channel Islands and Districts Overseas
ANCIENT AND HONOURABLE FRATERNITY OF FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS
A group of Regular Master Masons, disillusioned, disappointed and concerned by the state of the Administration and Management of the Masonic Order in general and the Craft in particular, assembled at Freemasons Arms, Convent Garden in London in order to put forward their legitimate concerns and to discuss and debate those issues being ignored by the Craft Administration. This Assembly of Masons at London, with the assistance of various highly respected and knowledgeable Brethren, Constituted and Consecrated a Masonic High Council for England, Wales and the Channel Islands in Due Form on the 25th of January, 2005.

The Masonic High Council is a de jure and de facto Sovereign Masonic Body with jurisdiction over the Craft in England and Wales and has issued a warrant for the Creation of its first Lodge, named Grand Lodge No.1, at the orient of London. Three other regularly established Lodges have requested to join the Masonic High Council.

Once this process in completed it is the aim of the MHC to establish a Regular Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of England in Accordance with the Old Constitutions.

The MHC/RGLE is a truly independent and self-governing body with authority over Craft Freemasonry in the symbolic degrees of Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft and Master Mason.

The MHC/RGLE is a male only organization.

The MHC/RGLE requires of all its members a belief in a Supreme Being or Creator.

The Volume of the Sacred Law is present and open at all its Lodge meetings and all Oaths and Obligations are made upon it.

The Masonic light and symbols are present at all Lodge meetings.

The discussion of religion and politics within MHC/RGLE Lodges is prohibited.

The MHC/RGLE observes the Ancient Landmarks and Old Constitutions and insists on them being observed within all its Lodges.

Concern for the Craft

Thoughtful Brethren have long endured serious dissatisfaction with the administration and state of the Craft in England. It was in direct response to these concerns that on the 25th of January this year a number of Master Masons came together to constitute a Masonic High Council, to prepare a firm Foundation for a Regular Grand Lodge of England true to the Ancient Constitutions and fundamental spiritual values of the Craft.

At the core of these concerns is the heartfelt lament that Masonry in England has effectively degenerated into a social and dining club, meeting upon the excuse of a initiating yet another candidate into a society whose only apparent purpose is to carry out initiations, whilst seeking to justify its existence through the business of institutional charity. And where the heirarchy classically maintains discipline through the assiduous manufacture of ‘honours’ whilst ignorantly sacrificing ancient form and spiritual value in obeisance to transient political correctness.

Harsh words indeed, and doubtless the majority of English Masons will persist in their disinclination to give any thought to there being anything more to the Order than this. But whatever it is, and however socially valuable in some respects it may be, it isn’t Freemasonry.

If the words of our initiation ceremonies are actually heeded, rather than airily dismissed as so much quaint mumbo-jumbo, we learn that we are speculative Masons. And as speculative Masons we are meant to moralise, philosophise and speculate upon the symbols of the Craft, as traditionally practised in Lodges of old, before the initiation sausage-machine had been cranked up. If Freemasonry means anything it means the making of the whole man, from rough ashlar to polished stone. It implies a psychological and spiritual journey through an esoteric interpretation of our rich symbology. For too long have English Freemasons wishing to pursue such studies in a working setting been effectively disenfranchised.

Thus the Masonic High Council, after heartfelt debate and consideration, regretfully concluded that our duty to the Craft in general and to our Brethren and to ourselves in particular far outweighed attachment to the United Grand Lodge of England which we, and very many others, believe has long neglected the core, esoteric values of Freemasonry and now represents little more than a grandiose façade of what was and what might have been. The almost overwhelming response received from numerous Brethren, both in England and overseas, has more than confirmed us in this belief.

The Masonic High Council for England, Wales the Channel Islands and Districts Overseas.

“THE ACT OF REGULARITY

To amend what has happen amiss, and to hold a yearly communication and General Assembly of Masons at London, England.

1 – The Reinstatement of the full wording on the delivery of the Masonic Penalties.

2 – The freedom and right of a Lodge to Practice its Masonic ritual of choice, such as York, Ancient and Accepted, Ancient and Primitive, Adoniram, Swedish, Rectified Scottish Rite, Schroeder Rite, etc…

3 – The right of every Master Mason to use and chose an apron design as long it is decorated with symbols that relate to the Craft.

4 – No interference of the Craft in the so-called higher degrees and vice versa.

5 – An equilibrium between Masonic work, instruction and science and charitable and social duties.

6 – The option of reading the Masonic ritual in Lodge.

7 – Greater autonomy for the Symbolic Lodges.

8 – Better and more transparency in Grand Lodge decisions and affairs.

9 – Devolution of the Masonic Library, Museum and archives to the Craft legal owners.

10 – To permit all aspects of the esoteric Masonic tradition, such as symbols, words, uses and customs.

11 – Freedom of association outside of the Craft.

12 – To promote the spirit of Brotherhood among Freemasons.

13 - The reinstatement of the Mark Mason Ceremony as a complement of the Fellow Craft Degree.

Lastly, this our Regulations shall be Recorded in our Registry, to show posterity how much we desire to revive the Ancient Craft upon true Masonical principles.

EXPELLED_2.JPGFile0106.JPG

FOR MORE INFO ON THE MASONIC HIGH COUNCIL AND THE REGULAR GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND PLEASE CHECK:
http://www.rgle.org.uk/

THE XIo DEGREE OF THE OTO AND THE VATICAN interview with Senior OTO Caliphate Officer

Posted on Wednesday, October 11, 2006 at 09:51PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

otolamen.gif

THE XIo DEGREE OF THE ORDO TEMPLI ORIENTIS AND THE VATICAN
interview with Senior OTO Caliphate officer by Leo Young
 
 Did the original Swiss-based Reuss branch of the OTO initiate candidates in a homosexual XI degree ritual? No. There is no evidence for this whatsoever that I am aware of. Reuss was accused of incorporating the mutual touching of phalluses into his rituals, but I believe this was a smear campaign rather than an intimation of something queer going on. After reviewing the available evidence, I believe the XIo was entirely Crowley's invention, the basic formula having been explored prior to his membership in OTO (See the Vision & the Voice --Crowley was initiated into OTO about 4 months later, and received the IXo about 4 years after that.) In any case, the XIo is not, strictly speaking, a homosexual degree -- I'll go into that below. Do or did any other OTO jurisdictions, contemporary or defunct (e.g. OTO-Antigua, etc.) initiate candidates in a homosexual XI degree ritual? I'm not so sure about that, but it is my impression that only C.S. Jones was ever entrusted with the XIo secrets by Crowley, if indeed anyone was. This impression follows primarily from instructions to Jones in Liber Aleph. There have been many attempts to incorporate what others see the XIo into magical orders -- sometimes it involves homosexuality (as in Bertiaux's group), and sometimes it doesn't (as in SOTO,TOTO). IMO, there is no reason to believe that any of these various XIos have anything much to do with Crowley's idea of the XIo.Does the ©OTO currently initiate candidates with a homosexual XI degree ritual? I believe there are members of "cOTO" who currently hold the XIo. That degree was not exclusively homosexual in Crowley's time since he records many XIo operations with women in his magical diaries. I don't believe it is "homosexual" in its current incarnation in the Caliphate OTO, but this is so primarily to bring it into line with Crowley's vision -- there is no reason homosexuals can't be admitted to the degree of course,and to some extent, the sex magick of the XIo is better suited to homosexuals (IMO) than heterosexuals. If the ©OTO does not currently initiate candidates with a homosexual XI degree ritual, did it ever do so (e.g. when Grady McMurtry rather than William Breeze was head of the order)? Grady McMurtry (at Patrick King's demand, by his own admission) chartered an experimental XIo sanctuary run by Patrick King called the "Rite of Shiraz." Some members of the Caliphate OTO around at the time felt that Grady chartered the Rite of Shiraz so he could wash his hands of the degree feeling that it was homosexual and therefore something he didn't wantassociated with him. In any case, the Rite of Shiraz was pronounced defunct by the current OHO for various reasons -- primarily, I think (I haven't asked him, so this is just speculation more than anything, although I think there's an old issue of the Magical Link that contains a note to this effect), because it failed to really live up to thenature of the XIo as Crowley understood it. There's a great deal of information about the XIo in Crowley's published works, actually, and having seen some of the materials that Patrick King produced, I happen to agree. If the ©OTO did at one time initiate candidates with a homosexual XI degree ritual, and does not do so now, when was the ritual terminated and what reason was given for the termination? I could be wrong, but I seem to remember that the Rite of Shiraz was declared defunct -- a failed experiment basically -- in 1987. Hymenaus Beta has publicly claimed XIo, so I think it's entirely probable that there is currently a functioning body of XIo initiates, though it must be relatively small and it seems to be present in what Crowley defined with his own words as the Black Lodge of the Vatican, a place of equal demonic strenght that Crowley respected very much.The rise of the Pink Palace phenomena within the US Catholic Church in the 60's made it possible for the OTO XIo degree to infiltrate the Vatican even further as demonstrated by the recent scandals in the United States Catholic clergy  and then  find support in the already existing Black Lodge of homosexuals and pedophiles residing since time immemorial in the Vatican HQ's in Rome.

Leo Young

Crowley and Satanism, compiled by P.R. Koenig ( a Jewish satanist secretely working for the illuminati)

Posted on Wednesday, October 11, 2006 at 09:36PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | CommentsPost a Comment

smallcrowley1.gif

To: "leo young"
From: "Peter-R. Koenig"
Subject: Satanism and Thelema

regarding satanism and crowley, i have written a short summary on all
this, that is: quotations of his secret diaries.

anyway, here is my summary on satanism:

-------------------------

Crowley and Satanism, compiled by P.R. Koenig

"I was compelled to set myself in opposition to the Bible itself," "I
simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I cannot tell why,"
(The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, edited by John Symonds/Kenneth
Grant, London 1969, 67, 73).

Crowley identified Aiwaz, the outer-human-intelligence who allegedly
dictated the Book of the Law in 1904 with/as "Thee Satan my saviour",
diary entry 15th March 1922. Crowley saw Aiwaz, His Holy Guardian Angel,
as the messenger/avenger of Hoor-Paar-Krat, ie Set, god of destruction,
brother and murderer of Osiris. Set is Shaitan, the role-model for the
christian Satan. Crowley referenced this also when he credited "thanks
to Aiwaz, our Lord God the Devil," or: "I sing for God, our Devil, our
Lord, Aiwaz," etc. (Magical Records, 22nd and 28th July 1920.
Similarily also in Symonds/Grant: "Magical and Philosophical Commentaries,"
Montreal 1974, 81). See also Crowley's Liber Samekh/The Bornless Ritual:
"Thou Satan-Sun [...] Satan, my Lord! The Lust of the Goat!".

Diary, 30th June 1920: "When I was [Eliphas] Levi, I drew myself as
Ayin or Baphomet, 'The Devil', with Beast's Head. This is the Beast
throned, crowned, exalted; the leaper, the erect, the butter-in. Her womb is
my city, Babel. This Ayin is then my Phallic Will, my Holy Guardian
Angel, Aiwaz, who was afterwards called Satan." Diary 19th/20th January
1918 about Baphomet: "I find 729 = the curse of Satan! Of course."

His sexmagickal formula was summoned in ShTN (Shaitan, Set, Satan): Sh
the magical fire, T the lion snake, N as the Scarlet Woman. Defining
himself as To Mega Therion equates him with Shaitan. Crowley is Aiwaz and
equally Thelema in persona: Diary 22nd October 1920: "I am the Beast
[...] I am Thelema" and on 27th May 1917: "I myself AIWAZ have been
considering all the time how to act as to Crowley's body and mind." On 14th
June 17: "I am getting quite to the point of habitual recognition of
myself as AIWAZ."

----------------------------------------------------

The Womb of Thelema,
questions by P.R. Koenig, reactions by Thelemites


The Womb Of Thelema

"I was compelled to set myself in opposition to the Bible itself," "I
simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I cannot tell why,"
(The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, edited by John Symonds/Kenneth
Grant, London 1969, 67, 73).

* Didn't he at that time think the anglican church was 'satanic',
he himself coming from a Plymouth brethren background?

Crowley identified Aiwaz, the outer-human-intelligence who allegedly
dictated the Book of the Law in 1904 with/as "Thee Satan my saviour",
diary entry 15th March 1922. Crowley saw Aiwaz, His Holy Guardian Angel,
as the messenger/avenger of Hoor-Paar-Krat, i.e. Set, god of
destruction, brother and murderer of Osiris. Set is Shaitan, the role-model for
the christian Satan. Crowley also referred to this when he wrote in his
Magical Records, 22nd and 28th July 1920: "thanks to Aiwaz, our Lord God
the Devil," or: "I sing for God, our Devil, our Lord, Aiwaz," etc. (see
also in Symonds/Grant: "Magical and Philosophical Commentaries,"
Montreal 1974, 81). Read Crowley's Liber Samekh/The Bornless Ritual: "Thou
Satan-Sun [...] Satan, my Lord! The Lust of the Goat!".

AC also states in Book IV that a devil exalted to the status of a God
cannot be considered to be a devil anymore. Moreover, Liber Samekh
contains both polarities of God and Devil, the ritual intends to transcend
both. Mentioning the term 'Satan' or 'Devil' doesn't make one a
satanist.
* Do You know much about the Yezidi, true Satan worshippers, where
Satan originated in name? Have you any idea what it would mean to set
yourself in opposition to the Bible itself, THE BOOK, so to speak, of
power in the world today, that is, Western World? If Crowley was working
with the powers that be, than why would he set himself in opposition to
the Bible? If he wanted to make a complete demarkation in the religious
belief of the time, than he would certainly bring back, the worth of
the Body, the body which was so ignored and rejected by Constantines new
religeon, THE BIBLE.
Diary, 30th June 1920: "When I was [Eliphas] Levi, I drew myself as
Ayin or Baphomet, 'The Devil', with the Beast's Head. This is the Beast
throned, crowned, exalted; the leaper, the erect, the butter-in. Her
womb is my city, Babel. This Ayin is then my Phallic Will, my Holy
Guardian Angel, Aiwaz, who was afterwards called Satan."
* Referring to the Tarot card of 'The Devil' with a whole complex
of meanings surrounding that, doesn't make one a satanist.
Diary 19th/20th January 1918 about Baphomet: "I find 729 = the curse
of Satan! Of course."
* he identifies Baphomet® with the Tarot card of the Devil.
His sexmagickal formula was summoned in ShTN (Shaitan, Set, Satan): Sh
the magical fire, T the lion snake, N as the Scarlet Woman. Defining
himself as To Mega Therion equates him with Shaitan. Crowley is Aiwaz and
equally Thelema in person: Diary 22nd October 1920: "I am the Beast
[...] I am Thelema" and on 27th May 1917: "I myself AIWAZ have been
considering all the time how to act as to Crowley's body and mind." On 14th
June 17: "I am getting quite to the point of habitual recognition of
myself as AIWAZ."

Let's assume that Crowley knew what he was doing. Liber AL was a poem
developed over a longer period of time. All terms and ideas exist in
context (preexisting ideas based on "other" sources).
Did Crowley (fueled by his own ego's fantasies) use on purpose a
"satanic" context in order to put himself and his followers under the stigma
of a masochistic religion?

The embrace of satanism by Aleister Crowley demonstrates the degree of
inescapable influence his religious upbringing had on him, and that he
was unable to remove himself from within the ideological box formed by
the biblical religions. He joked about it, and made many contradictory
statements concerning biblical myth, yet it's clear which basket he
placed his eggs in. The challenge for 21st century Thelemites is to
extricatethemselves from the ideological box by abandoning the
sinkingbiblical barge for higher ground before it sinks entirely--it's already
listing to one side. TBOTL provides the basis needed to moveforward without
constantly being pulled backwards, which is the onlything tradition and
dogma are really good for.
With references to Satan and Satanism absent from TBOTL, there is no
direct literary connection between Satanism and Thelema. The Biblical
characters the Beast and Scarlet Woman are generally perceived as
being in league with the Devil, which makes it easy for critics of TBOTL to
associate it with Satanism. The Beast and the Scarlet Woman could just
as easily and accurately be viewed as personal monikers for Aleister
Crowley and his wife Rose-
* If there is no necessity please provide some precendence in any
literature for the use of these ideas. They are clearly references to
the Apocalypseof St. John. the Beast and Scarlet Woman are a pair of
male/female images taken from Revelations due to the appeal the
characters had for Crowley, a result of his fascination with the myth, and his
life-long fantasy of being the Beast.
to ignore the obvious biblical references seems determined to be pretty
silly. All terms and ideas exist in context. A reader cannot understand
any term unless they have some preexisting idea based onpreviously
experienced sources. Since the only sources for these ideas are the Bible
or literature directly dependant on the Bible your assertion here is
false on its face.
The source of an image can, and is often secondary, or even irrelevant
to the use and purpose intended by an author or artist for the image.
In this case, the origin of the Beast and the Scarlet Woman as Biblical
imagery is irrelevant to the contextual meaning of the images provided
by the author of TBOTL. The Beast and Scarlet Woman are equated to the
Sun and Moon, the two most universally recognized symbols of the
male/female forces found in nature. Better yet, the author goes one step
further and equates the Beast and Scarlet Woman to the two most
widely-known images of the male/female counterparts in ancient Egypt: the winged
sun--the winged secret flame--and the arched figure of Nuit--the
stooping starlight.
Provided the fictional characters had been known at the time TBOTL was
created, the author could have used the characters Blondie and Dagwood,
Lucy and Dezi, or Popeye and Olive Oil--they can all serve the same
purpose, with exception of the fact that using the Beast and Scarlet Woman
appealed to Aleister Crowley's ego, and fueled his fantasies, thereby
assuring his cooperation.
There is want to divorce Crowley from authorship of the BOTL but even
assuming some seperate praeter human authorship assumes the words the
author uses have contextual meaning. As no other contextual meaning is
even vaguely possible here, blaming Crowley is absurd at best.
-there is no necessity in projecting Biblical myth into the pages of
TBOTL. On the other hand, Crowley relished his assumption of the role of
the Beast of Revelations, and the role of the anti-christ. Crowley also
identified his perceived Holy Guardian Angel--Aiwass--as being a
core-figure at the heart of what he fantasized was the origin of
Satanism, the worship of Shaitan in Mesopotamia. Any connections that exist
between Thelema as it is known today and Satanism rests squarely on the
shoulders of Aleister Crowley.
Jesus and Mary are mentioned in TBOTL. How about the Desolation of
Abomination, this has a purely and exclusively biblical origin. The Quran
isn't mentioned in the Book of the Law either.
The issue of Satanism and Thelema existing as bedfellows certainly
raises an interesting question. If the author of TBOTL had intended for the
book to act as a catalyst for the integration of the world's religions,
he certainly seems bent on self-defeat in that area of achievement.
Invoking the names of the two characters most dreaded by readers of the
New Testament, combined with vicious attacks leveled
at religions' demigods, all but insures that TBOTL will be viewed
negatively by most people.

PRKoenig:
#> ...Set is Shaitan, the role-model for the christian Satan....

I gather that a good number of Satanists believe this, some of them
Setians. my research into the history of the personification of evil
through time does not lead me to this simplistic conclusion and I would
appreciate additional reflection from any reading this.
no doubt some post-Christians and Neopagan Setians think that this is
the case, but I'm not aware that the most recent Egyptology or
investigations into the roots of the Christian Bogey play out so clearly as a
single derivation of Satan from this particular deity.
corrections welcomed.

Becky Brook
< beckybrook@a...>:
# Do You know much about the Yezidi, true Satan worshippers,
# where Satan originated in name?

everything I encounter about the Yezidis indicates their encompassing
enshrinement of the Most High God and respects to its Creation that
include the anti-God or Force For Waywardness and Sin. that they are
interested in appeasing or assisting this has been used by Satanists to call
them kindred, and surely there is some kind of relationship
amongst those who have in mind the assistance to the demonic. yet it
would be foolhardy to presume that such activities are usually
monolatric, or in this case strictly demonolatric (worshipping one being, let
alone merely the Adversary, Iblis, or whatever they do).

  1. Have you any idea what it would mean to set yourself in opposition

  2. to the Bible itself, THE BOOK, so to speak, of power in the world

  3. today, that is, Western World?

a good many secular humanists have made an effort to do so, and even to
go further and educate the world in materialistic empiricism. it is my
contention that dispensing with the Evul Book and The Books of the
Fathers of the Religions of the Book has come due. for this reason such
texts as promote their superiority may be mocked and burnt in revelry and
without compunctions about their sacrality to us.

  1. If Crowley was working with neters, that is, the powers that be,

I have absolutely no reason to think he was.

  1. [then] why would he set himself in opposition to the Bible?

quite simply, the powers that be are not so associated. in large they
are not associated with any single cult or culture, even with any single
species. anthropomorphism is almost as popular as insular cult
dogmaticism and intertribal warfare over symbol.

  1. If he wanted to make a complete demarkation in the religious

  2. belief of the time,

with EyeofHoor, I echo the commentary that Crowley was boxed into his
Christian religion and constitutes a kind of Bridge or Tunnel from it
into an enhanced subjective landscape. it does not appear that he himself
fully navigated said Bridge, but that he may have made it available to
others (as LaVey did with his CoSatanism) is remarkable and admirable
to a degree.

  1. [then] he would certainly bring back, the worth of the Body,

  2. the body which was so ignored and rejected by Constantines

  3. new religeon, THE BIBLE.

anything associated with it ought be considered subsumed to it.
so many times Christians have sought to recapture something
fundamental (discipline, focus on the changing scripture or its
enshrined cementation, feminine-progeny-attractors, etc.), that any particular
novel emphasis is one more of a myriad lineage composite at least
trying to draw from it (as in syncretic pursuits like Hermeticism or
applied within Christianity proper).

--------------------------------------------------------

attached you also find several online postings from high degree members
of the 'caliphate'.
regarding satanism in Thelema: all OTO people are heavily against the
Temple of Set and the Church of Satan: double membership is strictly
forbidden.

i hope that i have helped you bit. if you forward this email: please do
so in extenso/complete.

HTML Attachment [ Scan and Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]

Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen

Groups Suchergebnis 16 für satan thelema crowley maroney

Best Western Hotels • Thousands of Discounted Hotel rooms Compare, Reserve, and Save Money! • www.BestStay.com Anzeigen
Masonic Software • e-books, Masonic Database, test, screensavers, graphics and more! • mastermason.biz
FreeMason Store • 2400+ Masonic items for sale. Rings, Books, Auto Emblems and More • www.freemasonstore.com

Suchergebnis 16
Von:Bill Heidrick (heidrick@well.sf.ca.us)
Betrifft:Re: More fake AC bio (was: Need advice regarding Co-Masonry)
View: Complete Thread (2 Beiträge)
Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.freemasonry, alt.magick, alt.satanism
Datum:1994-11-19 09:14:22 PST
93

Tim Maroney (tim@toad.com) writes:

>The Simon Necronomicon was published in 1979 or 1980, more
>than thirty years after Crowley's death.

Not only that, Crowley would likely have considered it revolting.

>Crowley was a Mason, and was granted degrees in numerous
>rites of Masonry.

Well, yes, but not in regular GLOE Masonry, it would appear. His
French Lodge was recently made regular, but that isn't retroactive.

>His groups, the A.'. A.'. and O.T.O., use Masonic
>symbolism extensively.

Quite true, although much more so of O.T.O. than of A.'.A.'., honor
points excluded. Consider also that Crowley's main book: "Liber AL vel
Legis" is called "The Book of the Law" and is used in those O.T.O.
initiations as the VSL.

>There's little doubt that to Crowley, "Satan" was an entirely
>positive symbol, and he repeatedly identified himself with it.

Tim, I disagree with you on this utterly. It simply isn't true.
Crowley did use "Satan" as the subject of poetry and irony, but
he denied the existence of the critter. "Entirely positive"
is belied by may instances of his usage. A study of incidence
of the words: "Lucifer", "Satan" and "Christ" in 20 megs of A.C.'s
Stuff here on disk came out with the following:

lucifer ---- 22 occurrences
satan ---- 165 occurrences
christ ---- 1,260 occurrences

Analysis of "lucifer" finds (some from Crowley's translation of E.Levi's
The Key of the Mysteries in Equinox Vol. I, #10 supplement):

similes (one is a duplicate)---------------------------------- 3
Satanists called Christians ---------------------------------- 1
name of a person (Fr. Lucifer) ------------------------------- 1
figures of speech (e.g. left Lucifer at the door) ------------ 1
poetic salutation (O' Lucifer) ------------------------------- 1
Lucifer saved eventually (see below)-------------------------- 1
Lucifer is not Satan (see below)------------------------------ 1
"Daughter of Lucifer and accomplice of Prometheus" ----------- 1
Rhetorical question ------------------------------------------ 1
Book review, scurrilous remark ------------------------------- 1
Book review, non scurrilous ---------------------------------- 1
Warning against pride ---------------------------------------- 1
Poetic image linking Lucifer, Satan and Christ (below) ------- 2 (dup)
Not Satan, but one of the princes of evil -------------------- 1
As Brahma (part of a general assault on religions) (below) --- 2 (dup)
As planet Venus ---------------------------------------------- 1
Acceptance of common usage (MTP below) out of frustration ---- 1
Other poet using the word "Lucifer" -------------------------- 1

Equinox Vol. I, No. 10, page 23 suppliment:

Lucifer, of whom the dark ages have made the genius of evil, will be truly
the angel of light when, having conquered liberty at the price of infamy, he
will make use of it to submit himself to eternal order, inaugurating thus the
glories of voluntary obedience.

Ibid:

The fallen angel is not Lucifer the light-bearer; it is Satan, who
calumniated love.

Eq. I, 4:

By Thy most secret and Holy Name of Apophis be Thou blessed, Lucifer, Star
of the Dawn, Satan-Jeheshua, Light of the World!

Eq. I, 5:

And Satan is worshipped by men under the name of Jesus; and Lucifer is
worshipped by men under the name of Brahma; and Leviathan is worshipped by
men under the name of Allah; and Belial is worshipped by men under the name
of Buddha.

Magick in Theory and Practice (MTP):

This has led to so much confusion of thought that THE BEAST 666 has
preferred to let names stand as they are, and to proclaim simply that AIWAZ
--- the solar-phallic-hermetic "Lucifer" is His own Holy Guardian Angel, and
"The Devil" SATAN or HADIT of our particular unit of the Starry Universe.

Conclusion: Except for the MTP reference, which context places as a
defiance of popular prejudice more than an _expression of belief, Crowley
did not appear to make much use of "Lucifer" as a serious subject. Most
references combining "Lucifer" and "Satan", few though they are,
differentiate between the two.

-------------------

The references to "satan" are more varied. Most are simile, metaphor,
derogatory or associations of "Satan" to Christianity. Some appear to
use the term in a non-traditional fashion. Examples of the latter below.
There are a couple of poems dedicated to Satan, but they appear to be
intended either for humor or shock value. Satan is also associated with
Saturn in Astrology, the Sun in mythology (not Astrology), and several
philosophical ideas and ancient deities not relevant to Christian
concepts of a Devil or Personification of Evil. The first example below
associates "Satan" to a geographic direction.

Comment on Liber AL:

It is also to be considered that Nu is connected with North, while
Had is Sad, Set, Satan, Sat (equals "Being" in Sanskrit), South.

Confessions:

I simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I cannot tell why.

My satanism did not interfere with it at all; I was trying to take the
view that the Christianity of hypocrisy and cruelty was not true
Christianity.

The problem of life was not how to satanize, as Huysmans would have
called it; it was simply to escape from the oppressors and to enjoy the
world without any interference of spiritual life of any sort.

For instance, if I mention a beetle I expect the reader to understand
an allusion to the sun at midnight in its moral sense of Light-in-Darkness;
if a pelican, to the legend that she pierces her own breast to feed her
young on her heart's bleed; if a goat, to the entire symbolism of
Capricornus, the god Pan, Satan or Jesus (Jesus being born at the winter
solstice, when the sun enters Capricorn); if a pearl, to the
correspondences of that stone as a precious and glittering secretion of
the oyster, by which I mean that invertebrate animal life of man, the
Nephesch.

Equinox I, 1:

[Or vice versa, friend, if you are a Satanist; 'tis a matter of
words --- words --- words.

Eq. I, 10:

and Satan is only so incoherent and so formless because he is made up
of all the rags of ancient theogonies.

Eq. I, 2:

Thus it happens that until you become God, God Himself is in Reality
The Tempter, Satan, and the Prince of Darkness, who, assuming the
glittering robes of Time and Space, whispers in our ears: "Millions and
millions and millions of eternities are as nothingness to me; then how
canst thou, thou little mote dancing in the beam of mine eye, hope to
span me?

Eq. I, 5:

SMAL, Satan so-called, but really only Samael, the accuser of the
brethren, unpopular with the Rabbis because their consciences were
not clear.

Also OMMV SThH, Ommo Satan, the Satanic Trinity of Typhon, Apophis,
and Besz; also ShM IHShVH, the name of Jesus.

Gospel According to St. Bernard Shaw:

Refreshed, he continued: "The men who are willing by this means to
become the saviours of their country shall be called the Synagogue of
Satan, so as to keep themselves from the friendship of the fools who
mistake names for things.

MTP:

This "Devil: is called Satan or Shaitan, and regarded with horror
by people who are ignorant of his formula, and, imagining themselves
to be evil, accuse Nature herself of their own phantasmal crime.

Satan is Saturn, Set, Abrasax, Adad, Adonis, Attis, Adam, Adonai, etc.

This serpent, SATAN, is not the enemy of Man, but He who made Gods of
our race, knowing Good and Evil; He bade "Know Thyself!

Thus, in low grades of initiation, dogmatic quarrels are inflamed
by astral experience; as when Saint John distinguishes between the Whore
BABALON and the Woman clothed with the Sun, between the Lamb that was
slain and the Beast 666 whose deadly wound was healed; nor understands
that Satan, the Old Serpent, in the Abyss, the Lake of Fire and Sulphur,
is the Sun-Father, the vibration of Life, Lord of Infinite Space that
flames with His Consuming Energy, and is also that throned Light whose
Spirit is suffused throughout the City of Jewels.

He is the Lord of the Sabbath of the Adepts, and is Satan, therefore
also the Sun, whose number of Magick is 666, the seal of His servant the
BEAST.

In AL note that Saturn or Satan is exalted in the House of Venus or
Astarte, and it is an airy sign.

Conclusion: Crowley used "Satan" most often in the Christian context
as a term of common speech to indicate some image of myth suited to
another subject under discussion; next most often as an anti-establishment
slur, especially for a brief period in his late teens or early 20's when
he followed "Satan" as an act of rebellion; more rarely but philosophically
as a Miltonian ideal and positive image for ideas concealed by common
prejudices; occasionally as an insult or joke, including categorization
of his own public reputation. The more profound usages of "Satan" by
Crowley appear to be totally irrelevant to Christian ideas.

---------

The 1,260 occurrences of "Christ" (including "Christian", "Christmas"
and other combinations) in this sample indicate a greater interest in
Christianity than Satanism, per say. With so large a number, I have
not analyzed the patterns closely, but at significant number are positive.
One is a usage of devotion to Christ (Crowley's 5 = 6 G.'.D.'. motto).
Most references to "Christ" directly are quite positive, although very
frequently contrary to popular views of the historicity of "Christ".
About half the references to Christianity are negative, emphasizing
"false doctrines" and vice pervading Christian theology or tradition.

>His tradition of Thelema has a great deal to do with the Satanic
>symbols of the Beast and the Scarlet Woman, servitors of the Draconic
>form of Satan in the Apocalypse of John.

Calling these various things "Satanic symbols" is not responsible,
IMHO. To Christians, yes, mostly. To Satanists, some, yes, some no.
To Thelemites, mostly no. To the author of the Apocalypse, definitely
no. Where do you get "servitors of the Draconic form of Satan..."?
That one throws me.

>Our own Bill Heidrick denies that any of these symbols are actually
>central to Thelema, to which opinion he is of course entitled, just as
>I am entitled to the opinion that Crowley did consider them central.

On the centricity or lack of it in the symbols, I've never commented.
On the meaning of these symbols in Crowley's usage and in Thelema,
not all of this is a matter of opinion. There is ample evidence in
Crowley's writings toward determination actual fact of usage.

N.B. for follow-up, it might be best if the alt.freemasonry cross-post
was dropped on some follow-up. If you want me to respond, please retain
the cross-post to alt.magick.

93 93/93
Bill Heidrick

©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]

Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen

Groups Suchergebnis 20 für satan thelema crowley

European Security Fencing • Concertina manufacturer & installer for high security fencing. • www.europeansf.com Anzeigen
Digital CCTV • Specialists in multi site remote management and observation • www.globaleye.co.uk
Securityproshop • Your complete source for top brands video surveillance products & more • www.securityproshop.com

Suchergebnis 20
Von:Tim Maroney (tim@hoptoad.uucp)
Betrifft:Re: Thelema
View: Complete Thread (7 Beiträge)
Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.pagan
Datum:1991-03-13 15:52:00 PST
In article raven@pagan.uucp (Al Billings) writes:
> Since Tim Moroney has deigned not to respond, I thought I would post
> a file from one of the bulletin board systems he frequents, ThelemNet.

Well, the last time some bozo showed up with this "Thelema is not
Satanism" crap, the Thelemites here (including an O.T.O. member) jumped
all over him, and I thought it would happen again. I guess everyone
else is as tired of this cut-and-dried issue as I am. But I will
happily give examples of the Satanic focus of Thelema. Do you want
ritual examples, theological examples, mythological examples,
scriptural examples, philosophical examples, biographical examples,
or what?

As for the file you posted, the questions and answers express the
opinions of particular individuals, not of Thelema as a whole or even
of the O.T.O. Some of them do not even represent the opinion of Josh
Gordon, the sysop of the board you mentioned; for instance, he was one
of the affirmative posters in the last alt.pagan round of "is Thelema a
kind of Satanism?" The file is rather old and was written before the
late-1980's round of consciousness raising on the idea of Satanism,
back when denial was still king.

>3. Q: Are you Satanists?
> A: No. Are you a murderer and a rapist? Neither am I. And I'd rather you
> didn't associate me with them. Satanism is a Christian heresy, and
> doesn't interest me in the least (except academically.)

Notice the Satanist-bashing manner of expressing this. I think that
these days, even those Thelemites who still say that Thelema is not
Satanism would be embarrassed to make such a Texe-Marrs-type
statement. (Incidentally, I'm surprised no one has mentioned my
favorite fact about Texe Marrs in the current discussion; in MYSTERY
MARK OF THE NEW AGE, Marrs says that the Smurfs are a Satanic
conspiracy!)

The current argument among the "Thelema is not Satanism" crowd,
paraphrased, is "Well, sure Crowley was incredibly fond of Satan and of
such chthonic deities, demons, and devils, and sure he identified with
the Satanic symbol of the Beast and sang rapturous love-songs to Satan,
but he didn't use only Satan. A Satanist uses only Satan, and
Thelema doesn't, even though it uses him a lot, so Thelema is not
Satanism." However, this argument rests on a definition of Satanism
with which few professing Satanists would concur. It would, for
instance, leave out the Temple of Set, the Church of Satan, and the
Process Church.

I don't know what proportion of Thelemites deny that Thelema is
Satanism. I suspect most have never considered the issue and would
respond to the question by aping the reflexive Wiccan denial of any
connection. Of those who have considered the issue seriously, I
think most would either enthusiastically affirm the identity or
grudgingly admit that Thelema is a form of Satanism under some
reasonable definition. The textual evidence is clear that Thelema
holds Satan and related symbols very close to its heart.
--
Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant, sun!hoptoad!tim, tim@toad.com

"Don't talk to me about disclaimers! I invented disclaimers!"
- The Censored Hacker

©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]

Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen

Groups Suchergebnis 63 für satan thelema crowley

Best Western Hotels • Thousands of Discounted Hotel rooms Compare, Reserve, and Save Money! • www.BestStay.com Anzeigen
Magick & Mystic Supplies • candles, organic herbs, crystals incense, oils, aromatherapy (Aff) • www.magickrose.co.uk
Maybe Logic Academy • Peter Carroll Online Courses Chaos Magick instruction/community • www.maybelogic.org

Suchergebnis 63
Von:nagasiva (tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com)
Betrifft:TMaroney: Crowley and Satanism
Dies ist der einzige Artikel zu diesem Diskussionsthema
View: Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.magick.tyagi, alt.magick, alt.satanism, talk.religion.misc
Datum:1996/12/05
[from : Tim Maroney ]

[TMaroney]
>>By definition the Satan of Satanists is not the Satan
>>of Christians; it is a reinterpretation and reclamation of a demonized
>>symbol.

[Bheidrick]
>Post Crowley, minority and growing. What does that have to do with Crowley's
>usage?

Why do you say that? Do you think that Blake's Satanic reinterpretation
of Swedenborg in "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell" was post-Crowleyan,
for instance, or that the Satan of Baudelaire was the Satan of Calvin, or
that Levi's identification of "the devil" as the "instrument of liberty"
was in line with Church teaching at the time? Crowley was hardly the
first of the Western reinterpreters of the Satanic, nor will he be the
last.

>Crowley did a similar thing, different in his own way and for other
>ends. He didn't use the style of the term for what he did. This is like
>AMORC claiming that Francis Bacon was a past Imperitor of their organization.
>Worse, since Bacon wrote of Rosicrucianism.

Eh?

>>Are you actually resting your argument on
>>your "suspicion" that there was some precursor of the Apocalypse in which
>>there were forms of the Beast and the Scarlet Woman that were not demonic
>>or linked with the Dragon, Satan? Is there the slightest evidence for
>>this, or are you simply multiplying entities and flouting Occam's razor?
>What is your point? "St. John" didn't write it. Mead contends there are
>pre-Christian precursors. The G.'.D.'. played with it in terms of Qabalah.
>Crowley specialized in his own interpretation of the symbols and such.

None of this seems to have anything to do with the issue. I could point
out that Rudolph Steiner was also quite interested in the symbolism of
the Apocalypse, or that there were many Apocalypses attributed to
different people, but what would that have to do with Crowley's
self-identification as the Beast from the Apocalypse attributed to John?

>Why would the entities in it be demonic or "linked with the Dragon, Satan"?

Because the text says so in clear and direct language. It uses the phrase
"the great dragon, the primeval serpent, known as the devil or Satan",
then links him with the beast and the whore of Babylon: "the dragon had
handed over to it [the beast] his own power and throne and world-wide
authority"; "a woman riding a scarlet beast who had seven heads and ten
horns". I trust you are familiar with Revelations, chapters 12, 13, and
17? Though the book is often ambiguous (to say the least) its Satanic
symbols are undeniable here.

>>I do see in Mead that the Dragon is linked with Satan as the lord of the
>>punishments in the Outer Darkness in the Pistis Sophia (pp. 490, 492,
>>503), which implies that if there was some Gnostic precursor of the
>>Apocalypse, then if it featured the same characters, there was still a
>>link to Satan.
>How implies? There were and are many forms of Gnosticism. Is the precursor
>Gnostic? Not even that is established.

Funny, that's not what you said in your previous message: "The underlying
material in the Apocalypse attributed to John is still accessible under
the distortion, quite valuable, based on Merkabah and influenced by
Gnostic ideas." It seems that this hypothetical precursor is Gnostic or
not as it suits you. The attempt to explain away the Satanic symbols of
the Revelation through this (infinitely flexible) precursor of the
Apocalypse of John seems to have nothing going for it in the way of
evidence.

>>while there seems to be no way for him to have known about your
>>hypothetical precursor,
>Since he followed a course of denying the accuracy of the NT and completely
>re-interpreted Revelations away from the Christian ideas, I find it difficult
>to understand how you can imagine anything else short of invention out of
>whole cloth.

This is another non sequitur. I ask again: Suppose that there was some
(currently unknown) precursor of the Apocalypse of John such that the
symbols that were Satanic in the later form were not Satanic in the
original. How is it that Crowley came into contact with this lost text
and was influenced by it?

Further, why does he then go ahead and use the Satanic legend from the
later form, as already quoted from Liber Samekh ("Satan... whose number
of Magick is 666, the seal of His servant the Beast")?

>>that selling one's soul to the devil is a fit metaphor for
>>crossing the Abyss,
>No, rather a description of the failure of that experience in an unsuitable
>metaphor.

What-EH-ver....

>>And the relevance of this observation is what again? You seem to have
>>some idea of what Satanism is that does not have much to do with the way
>>I am using the term.
>I confess to being unable to guess how you are using the term.
>You appear to be attributing a usage to Crowley that dates from the 1950's,
>at the same time alleging that any positive use of words characterized by
>Christians as Satanic makes one a Satanist. This is very obscure to me.

I don't know of any major transformation of the words "Satanism" or
"Satanic" that began in the 1950's. I am looking at earlier usages than
that in the Oxford English Dictionary right now. "Satanic" means "of or
pertaining to Satan" and dates back centuries; "Satanism" has two main
meanings, both of which apply to Crowley: the worship of Satan (see Liber
Samekh, again) and the "Satanic school" in literature, beginning with
Byron and Shelley, of which Crowley was a self-proclaimed part.

Crowley used the word "Satanism" with respect to himself (Confessions, p.
73). The last time this came up, you claimed he had referred to "my
Satanism" as a childish affectation; in fact, not only does he never
forewear this allegiance, but as the Confessions go on he continues to
discuss his romance with the figure of Satan and with other proponents of
the figure, such as Shelley, Baudelaire and (in Crowley's eyes, as in
those of others, such as Blake) Milton.

>>In what way would metaphorical use of Satanic
>>terminology undercut the idea of Crowley's Satanism? To me it seems to
>>support it.
>If Crowley used "Satanic terminology" as metaphor, to that extent he could
>not be a believing Satanist. That others characterize themselves
>now-a-days as "Satanists" and also use a different metaphor would appear
>to me to be irrelevant.

There are not now, and never have been, many literalistic Satanists. In
the West this has almost always been a consciously mythic/symbolic usage
among the intelligentsia. I don't know where you got the idea that this
metaphorical Satanism started in the 1950's, but I can only direct you
once again to the OED, or perhaps to Crowley's Confessions, where a
number of Satanists of this type appear as acknowledged influences.

>>As for the epiphenomenality of Satan in Liber Samekh, this is not supported
>>by the text which freely uses Satan time and again; in which other "DEVILS"
>>(described as such) such as Besz and Apophrasz are called upon; and which
>>contains the following illuminating passage:
>>
>>"Now this word SABAF, being by number Three score and Ten, is a name of
>>Ayin, the Eye, and of the Devil our Lord, and the Goat of Mendes. He is
>>the Lord of the Sabbath of the Adepts, and is Satan, therefore also the
>>Sun, whose number of Magick is 666, the seal of His servant the BEAST."
>How you can quote that in support of your contention is beyond me.
>It clearly refutes your assertion. Here is Crowley using correspondences
>and discussing a non-Christian handling of ideas in Revelations and
>elsewhere.
>That no more makes him a "Satanist" by his lights and time than wearing
>loops on a jacket makes one a Frenchman.

These seem to be more non sequiturs. Crowley refers to himself as the
Biblical Great Beast, explicitly affirms that he is a servant of Satan,
and to you this proves he was not any kind of Satanist. That is a
nonsensical mode of argument.

>>Here it is made perfectly plain that the repeated use of the name Satan
>>in the translation of the main invocation was not some accident, but a
>>deliberate and enthusiastic adoption by Crowley.
>Yes, he wrote it with vigor. Your point?

My point is that Crowley used Satanic symbols in a positive light with
enthusiasm and at central points in his system. That is all I have said
all along, and all I am saying now.

>>the explicit reiteration of the relationship between Satan and the Beast
>>from the "Apocalypse of John". This puts an end, I hope, to any further
>>unsupported suspicions that Crowley was actually referring to some
>>hypothetical pre-Satanic text of the Apocalypse.
>I rather think it evidences that he thought he was expounding an earlier use.

Is there more to this than simple speculation? Is there anything about
his words in themselves which would lead anyone to believe he was
referring to a hypothetical precursor of the Apocalypse in which the
Beast and Scarlet Woman were not connected with Satan? By saying "Satan"
and "His servant the Beast" he seems to be reaffirming the Satanic
symbolism. I don't see how another reading is possible. The reiteration
of the doctrine of the Apocalypse is a fact about the text. What layers
of meaning Crowley attached to that doctrine is a matter of
interpretation, but the Satanic nature of the doctrine -- "of or
pertaining to Satan" -- is there in the ink on the page.

>>Now of course we could get into all sorts of interpretation about what he
>>meant by Satan, the Beast, and so on, but as for whether they are
>>Satanic, well, he uses the word Satan and makes undeniable allusions to
>>myths bearing on Satan, so the only reasonable answer is that the texts
>>are Satanic.
>If this is your thesis, you have no thesis but reduction to trivia.
>As you are a serious writer, I can only assume that you have something
>else as yet uncommunicated to my understanding in this discussion.
>He wears blue clothing, hence he is a Bluest! Why bother to mention it?

Fear not. If at some point I should find that Crowley had written an
important invocation of the form, "O thou bluest of blue! Thou raiment
which hath absorbed such a dye, yea, as if to reflect the very Ether,
thou who cleansest us as that great Ocean of Azure, O thou Cerulean
Vestment, O thou Blouse of Sheerest Sapphire, fasten thy splendid buttons
upon the breast of thy adorer", or repeated passages in his Confessions
stating that "This difference between the Blue and Red Shirts was of the
greatest importance to me, and for my part, I stood squarely on the side
of the Blue, as Shelley and Milton had done before", I would indeed come
to think of him as a Blueist.

The fact is that from Crowley's own writings it is clear that this issue
of Satanism was one about which he cared very deeply; it ranks with his
major themes and is integral to his self-definition as the Great Beast.
To you it is not one of his main themes. That's fine. You have every
right (even an obligation) to create your own system of Thelema with its
own system of values; but you seem to be making the common mistake of the
religious: you are confusing what you prefer to think with what is
written in the books of the religion. Rather than simply saying "Crowley
felt this was important, but I do not", you adjust your account of what
Crowley thought to fit your own views. As long as you continue to
misrepresent the historical facts this way, you will find me returning
the public attention to them.

Tim Maroney

©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]

Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen

Groups Suchergebnis 15 für satan thelema crowley

Best Western Hotels • Thousands of Discounted Hotel rooms Compare, Reserve, and Save Money! • www.BestStay.com Anzeigen
Magick & Mystic Supplies • candles, organic herbs, crystals incense, oils, aromatherapy (Aff) • www.magickrose.co.uk
Maybe Logic Academy • Peter Carroll Online Courses Chaos Magick instruction/community • www.maybelogic.org

Suchergebnis 15
Von:Jon Allen Boone (jb3o+@andrew.cmu.edu)
Betrifft:Re: Jimmy, Crowley, and Satan - Another trinity?
View: Complete Thread (11 Beiträge)
Original Format
Newsgroups:talk.religion.newage, alt.rock-n-roll
Datum:1990-01-22 01:33:31 PST
tim@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Maroney) writes:
> In article <10691@thor.acc.stolaf.edu> seebs@thor.stolaf.edu (The Laughing
> Prophet) writes:
> >had to have a higher goal to be dedicated to, and he commented that the only
> >viable such goal was the helping of other creatures.

Personally, i have found that Crowley felt that the only viable goal
was the expansion of one's consciousness. If that involved helping
others, then fine. If not, then fine too.

> Ahem. Whether Crowley was a Satanist or not is highly debatable. His
> entire mythology centered around a Satanic inversion of the Book of
> Revelation, in which the fall of Christ was seen as good and
> inevitable, and the rise of agents of Satan, the Beast and the Scarlet
> Woman, was a vindication of humnanity and justice. He used inverted
> pentagrams in rituals, explicitly stated his sympathy for the Devil and
> Satan many times, and frequently identified his "Holy Guardian Angel",
> Aiwass, as a devil. In the preface to the play "Why Jesus Wept" he
> said that he had found his savior in Satan and all his angels.

That needs to be qualified. It depends entirely upon what you mean by
"his entire mythology". Crowley borrowed frequently and plentifully
from the mythos of many cultures, especially the Egyptians. In 777,
he equates all (i believe) mythological/magical systems, enabling one
to translate concepts from one framework to another.

Crowley's life and work are based on an anti-Christian attitude.
However, to say that he was a Satanist seems ridiculous. Seen from a
Christian perspective, every non-Christian is a Satanist. Crowley got
the name "The Beast" from his mother who used to call him that all the
time.

Crowley did find the End of the Aeon of Osiris (whom you refer to as
Jesus) as good - after he resigned himself to it. The Aeon of Horus
(the Conquering Child) was to replace the Aeon of Osiris (perhaps as
per the book of Revelation).

> In"Magick" he wrote:
> "This 'Devil' is called Satan or Shaitan, and regarded with horror by
> people who are ignorant of his formula, and, imagining themselves to be
> evil, accuse Nature herself of their own phantasmal crime. Satan is
> Saturn, Set, Abrasax, Adad, Adonis, Attis, Adam, Adonai, etc. The most
> serious charge against him is only that he the Sun in the South.

As you so succinctly point out in your quote, Uncle Aleister does not
base his entire mythology on an anti-Christian bias. Indeed, he
frequently points out the faults/biases of Christianity, while
pointing out the good points of the equivilant of Satan (or Shaitan in
Arabic) in other cultures' mythos.

> [...] We have therefore no scruple in restoring the 'devil-worship' of
> such ideas as those which the laws of sound, and the phenomena of
> speech and hearing, compel us to connect with the group of 'Gods'
> whose names are based upon ShT or D, vocalized by the free breath A.
> For these Names imply the qualities of courage, frankness, energy,
> pride, power and triumph; they are the words which express the creative
> and paternal will. Thus 'the Devil' is Capricornus, the Goat who leaps
> upon the loftiest mountains, the Godhead which, if it become manifest
> in man, makes him Aegipan, the All."

This again shows Uncle Aleister's sympathy with the active/phallic
forces in nature, as often symbolized by Satan.

> I think, based on this and many other passages expressing sympathy for
> the devil, Crowley certainly was a Satanist. That's not all he was,
> but he surely was that. Many occultists and pagans have internalized
> the reflexive "we are NOT Satanists" to the extent that they can't even
> recognize a Satanist when he puts horns on his head and chants Ave
> Satanis. What they fail to realize is that there's nothing wrong
> with being a Satanist.

I think that Uncle Aleister was a Satanist in some sense of the word.
However, he was not a Satanist in the negative-connotation,
emotionally loaded sense that the media uses it. The media picture of
Satanists are those who consider what they do evil and revel in it.
Uncle Aleister didn't consider these things evil - merely part of
life. If one is to live according to the Law of Thelema, then one may
well be called to do things which the Judeo-Christian ethic consider
"evil"; however, as one is following one's True Will, one can not be
considered to be doing evil.

> He's highly interested in Crowley, so much so that he owns Crowley's
> house on Lake Ness. Whether he calls himself a Satanist or not, I
> really can't say.

Not that what Page calls himself really matters. Too bad I can't
afford Uncle Aleister's house on Loch Ness - I'd love to move to
Scotland, especially if I could live in Boleskine.

> Yes, I noticed that. Unfortunately for you, and fortunately for those
> of us who aren't scared of the red man with the horns and fork, you're
> completely wrong.

What's to be afraid of?

> He rarely did any animal sacrifices; I believe in his whole life he
> only sacrificed one pigeon, one frog, and one goat.

Not that sacrifices have anything to do with Satanism. The Aztecs
sacrificed humans - yet one cannot really consider them Satanists.

> As for "had
> nothing to do with Satan", please read the above quote, as well as the
> numerous similar statements in his works (such as the section on Atu XV
> in "The Book of Thoth"), and ask yourself how the Beast and the Scarlet
> Woman can be considered non-Satanic! Have you even read the Revelation
> of St. John?

Uncle Aleister's choice of terms for himself and his miscellaneous
mistresses have a distinctive anti-Christian flair to them. His
former secretary, the late Dr. Israel Regardie postulates in the his
introduction to the Book of the Law (rebound with intro and minor
editing under the title The Law Is For All) that large portions of
Liber Legis stemmed from Uncle Aleister's rebellion against Christian
authorities. However, like you said, Uncle Aleister was definitely
more than "just" a Satanist.

> >Mostly he used the Inochian (sp?) system of magic
> >which is based on communication with angels, which then cause the
> >desired effect.
>
> He did use the Enochian system derived from Dr. Dee and Edward Kelly,
> but I wouldn't say this was "mostly"; he used it only for the most
> serious mystical workings, such as the crossing of the Abyss. Most of
> his work was either yogic or derived from non-Enochian sources, such as
> Barrett and Mathers. (Which is not to say the Golden Dawn wasn't
> Enochian, only that again, this was just one small part of their
> techniques.)

The primary techniques that Uncle Aleister prescribes are indeed
derived from Mathers work on the Golden Dawn system of Magick, as well
as the Yogic forms (such as the ones in Book 4 - the last part of
Magick in Theory and Practice - available seperately).

> --
> Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant, sun!hoptoad!tim, tim@toad.com

- iain

> "The Diabolonian position is new to the London playgoer of today, but not to
> lovers of serious literature. From Prometheus to the Wagnerian Siegfried,
> some enemy of the gods, unterrified champion of those oppressed by them, has
> always towered among the heroes of the loftiest poetry."
> - Shaw, "On Diabolonian Ethics"

Every man and every woman is a star.
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
Love is the law, love under will.

- Uncle Aleister

©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]

Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen

Groups Suchergebnis 6 für satan thelema crowley maroney

Magick & Mystic Supplies • candles, organic herbs, crystals incense, oils, aromatherapy (Aff) • www.magickrose.co.uk Anzeigen
Maybe Logic Academy • Peter Carroll Online Courses Chaos Magick instruction/community • www.maybelogic.org
Golden Dawn Tools • All for ceremonial magick wands, elemental weapons, enochian • www.ritual-magic.org

Suchergebnis 6
Von:Tim Maroney (tim@hoptoad.uucp)
Betrifft:Is Thelema a form of Satanism? -- from a Fido discussion
Dies ist der einzige Artikel zu diesem Diskussionsthema
View: Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.pagan, alt.magick
Datum:1991-07-23 22:38:28 PST
Dear Diane,

To expand on my earlier comments on Satanic symbolism in Thelemic ritual,
and their relevance to the question of whether Thelema is a form of
Satanism under some reasonable definition of that word.

You ought to get a copy of "Magick in Theory and Practice" if you're
interested in the issue. Crowley's ritual and meditative instructions
were his best writing, possibly because they dealt with what he knew best.
It's because of the power and importance of these instructions that I was
willing to overlook his appalling right-wing politics and cite Crowley
as a source in Twilight Crossing; LaVey and Aquino have made no
contributions that measure up to these.

I'm going to track through the various Liberi in Appendix VI, "A Few
Principal Rituals", in order.

Grimorium Sanctissimum. The O.T.O./A.'.A.'. sex magic expressed in the
form of a Black Mass, with a naked virgin as the altar.

The Star Ruby. Therion and Babalon, who are the Beast and the Scarlet
Woman from the Apocalypse of John, and who are explicitly Satanic symbols.
(The Star Ruby is the Thelemic recension of the Lesser Banishing Ritual
of the Pentagram.)

The Star Sapphire. Set, a very close Satanic cognate, and Baphomet,
the demon supposedly worshipped by the Templars.

The Mass of the Phoenix. The magician carves his or her breast with
the Mark of the Beast, soaks the blood into a cake, and eats it.

Liber V vel Reguli. "Being the Ritual of the Mark of the Beast".
The Beast 666, Therion, Babalon, Averse Pentagrams, "Saturn or Satan
is exalted in the House of Venus or Astarte", "the Father-Mother
Set-Isis", and so on.

The Gnostic Mass. Chaos, Babalon, Baphomet, Abrasax, Therion, Simon
Magus, and another reclaiming of the Black Mass with its naked virgin
on the altar. (The G.S. form above is more adapted to the ceremonial
use of two people, while this form is for the puhblic and is veiled
with a cloak of symbolism.) Interestingly, something very like this
ritual may have a great deal to do with our general conception of the
Black Mass, coming from the Star Chamber affair in France. It is
unclear how much of the accusations were exagerrated and brought into
line with the Inquisitional mythology, and how much was an actual
"amatory mass" as some of the sources refer to it.

This ends the appendix containing the principal Thelemic rituals, with
the exception of Liber Samekh. That is so important that it receives
its own appendix, IV. As you know, the emphasis of Liber Samekh on
Satan is intense. It also exalts the Beast and the Scarlet Woman yet
again. This is the ritual of "the Attainment of the Knowledge and
Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel" or Higher Self; in Crowley's
case, he believed this "devil or angel" to be named Aiwaz or Aiwass,
and to have delivered the Book of the Law, the foundation of Thelema.

I have not mentioned the constant repetition of the Serpent symbol,
which for Crowley was interpreted along the lines of Genesis -- or an
anti-Genesis which reclaimed the pagan symbol demonized in the Hebrew
myth. Someone could object, after all, that Serpent-worship is hardly
confined to Satanism; we have to see how much Crowley explicitly inverted
the tail of the Bible before we can know certainly that he did the same
with the head. So the Serpent or Snake has little evidentiary value
in itself, except where it is very plainly a reference to Genesis, as
in "I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge" in the Book of the Law.

As we can see, there is not one Thelemic ritual, among those Crowley
thought most important, which is lacking in Satanic symbols.

Now, we should also consider Appendix VII, "A Few of the Principal
Instructions Authorised by the A.'.A.'." These are much less Satanic
by and large. Many of them have no Satanic references worth mentioning,
such as the Yogic instructions of Liber HHH, Liber E, and Liber RV,
and the Golden Dawn derived ceremonial magick practices of Liber O,
Liber Yod, Liber Resh, and Liber A. Similarly for the past-life recall
practice (perhaps Theosophical?) of Liber Thisharb and the penultimate
practice of Liber B vel Magi. Yet there are other works in the same
appendix which contain notable Satanic symbolism, such as Liber Astarte,
Liber III, Liber Cheth, and Liber A'ash.

The interesting thing about the instructions of this category is that,
for the most part, they are not particularly Thelemic either. There is
little mention of the Thelemic trinity of Nuit, Hadit, and Ra-Hoor-Khuit,
or of the Book of the Law, or of the word Thelema, or "Do what thou wilt"
or its cognates such as "the law of liberty". Where these do occur, they
are usually in passing rather than central to the instruction; and in
nearly every case, the degree of Satanic symbolism is proportional to
the degree of Thelemic symbolism.

That is, there is hardly a book that contains noteworthy Satanic symbolism
that does not also contain Thelemic symbolism of roughly equal note, and
vice versa. The books which don't contain one rarely contain the other.

Liber A vel Armorum could be taken as a counterexample, but even there
the quote from the Book of the Law is merely an opening clause having
no import to the teaching in itself; it is a single sentence stating
Crowley's authority to present the book. If it were omitted, it would
have no effect on the instruction of how to construct elemental weapons.
It's of no more significance than the mention of Typhon in Liber O.

In Liber Astarte and Liber III, the Thelemic and the Satanic symbolism
are both used in passing, almost as afterthoughts. (Astarte also contains
some of the anti-Satanic symbolism that Crowley sometimes uses; the
Thelemic devil is named Choronzon, and here he is presented as leading
the aspirant astray.) In Astarte, the little Satanic symbolism consists
of a reference to Babalon, which is also Thelemic symbolism; the only
other Thelemic references are to Choronzon and a single short clause
(out of fifty clauses) which urges the use of Thelemic books and aphorisms
in the practice. In Liber III, the Thelemic mythology is solely in an
opening benediction which (once again) could easily be omitted without
having the slightest import to the meditation practice, while the Satanic
symbol of "Cerebus, the great Beast of Hell" is almost as unimportant.

(Is it even Satanic at all? some might ask. After all, Cerebus is Greek.
Indeed, if Crowley had not craftily used the phrase "the great Beast"
there might be some doubt under a restrictive definition of Satanism.
The Twilight Crossing definition of Satanism as the reclamation of
demonized mthological figures would include it even without that
phrase, but there is simply no way that Crowley used the phrase "the
great Beast" except as an explicit reference to the demon of Revelation.
Crowley's "Cerebus, the great Beast of Hell" has a double meaning, both
of which are Satanic under the Twilight Crossing definition, and one of
which is Satanic even under the overly restrictive definition preferred
by anti-Satanists.)

Liber Cheth and Liber A'ash are the only books of the category which are
aggressively either Satanic or Thelemic. And each of them are both. In
them, we are back to the sex magic of the O.T.O. and the A.'.A.'., and
once again we are dealing with Babalon, the Beast, Hadit, Nuit, Set, Chaos,
and Baphomet. No knowledgable person would deny the centrality of these
sex practices to Crowley's systems, and no truthful person could deny that
every time they are set forth in ritual and meditation instructions, they
are flanked and upheld by a constellation of Thelemic and Satanic symbols.

Was Crowley a Satanist? Is Thelema a form of Satanism? Only the most
contrived definition of "Satanism" could answer these questions "no".

What would Crowley have answered? In a dedication to "Why Jesus Wept",
he told G. K. Chesterton that he, Crowley, had "found [his] Messiah in ...
the Devil and all his angels", and showed through gematria that the
Serpent was the true Messiah. In "Magick in Theory and Practice" (cap.
IV) and "The Book of Thoth", and many other places, he praised Satan
at length. He sang rapturous love-songs to the devil in his ritual
practices, and gave him the unholy kiss referred to in the legends of
the templars and the Sabbat. He wrote, in the last chapter of "Magick
in Theory and Practice", that:

"The Devil" is, historically, the God of any people that one
personally dislikes. This has led to so much confusion of
thought that THE BEAST 666 has preferred to let names stand
as they are, and to proclaim simply that AIWAZ -- the solar-
phallic-hermetic Lucifer -- is His own Holy Guardian Angel,
and "The Devil" SATAN or HADIT of our particular unit of the
Starry Universe. This serpent, SATAN, is not the enemy of
Man, but HE who made Gods of our race, knowing Good and Evil;
He bade "Know Thyself!" and taught Initiation. He is "the
Devil" of the Book of Thoth, and His emblem is BAPHOMET, the
Androgyne who is the hieroglyph of arcane perfection.

We have no need to speculate on the issue. The man has spoken clearly
for himself.

Tim
--
Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant, sun!hoptoad!tim, tim@toad.com

"The above opinions and suggestions have absolutely nothing to do with
the little fat man putting crisp $100 bills in my pocket."
-- Alan Vymetal

 

 
                                     Illuminati Confessions
                                    Web:
www.
illuminaticonfessions.webfriend.it - E-Mail: illuminati@webfriend.it