RASPUTIN, IL SANTO PECCATORE di Roberto Negrini

RASPUTIN, IL SANTO
PECCATORE
Estasi, magia e illuminismo sociale nel crepuscolo dell’Impero
russo
di ROBERTO NEGRINI
Pubblicato unitamente ai 3 Box sul mensile
I Misteri n°5, Luglio 1995.
Troppo spesso un metodo storiografico miope, unilaterale o parzialistico impedisce di applicare all’analisi degli eventi storici criteri adeguati a esplorarne la complessit . In particolare la lettura esclusivamente sociologica, economica, politica o religiosa di avvenimenti e personaggi chiave da cui sono scaturiti crocevia o decisioni determinanti lascia spazio a piccole e grandi zone d’ombra, scomode, inquietanti, ma di enorme interesse per lo studioso multidisciplinare e libero da pregiudizi accademici. Esempio paradigmatico ne è la transazione dall’Impero sacrale degli Zar a quello comunista sovietico, nelle cui pieghe ritroviamo l’oscura e dimenticata protagonista di quell’ora fatale del nostro secolo: la spiritualit magica russa e i suoi strani, evanescenti interpreti. Una comparata analisi di quelle pluriformi fenomenologie sociali, religiose, etnologiche e magico-esoteriche compresenti nell’area dell’Impero zarista a cavallo fra Otto e Novecento aspetta ancora di essere scritta. Nell’intrecciarsi traumatico di una contraddittoria serie di influenze che raccordavano l’assolutismo teologico della più rigida ortodossia all’illuminismo razionalistico introdotto da Caterina la Grande, in un territorio comprendente parte dell’Europa e larga parte dell’Asia si videro coesistere sopravvivenze sciamaniche e teologia bizantina, feudalesimo medievale e rivoluzione industriale, immense ricchezze individuali e indicibili povert collettive. Un coacervo dal quale ebbe paradossalmente vita la più monumentale costruzione sociale materialistica di tutti i tempi.
Il mito della Terza Roma
“Caro amico, dirò ancora una volta: è spaventosa
la nuvola che sta sopra la Russia, disgrazia e tristezza
immense, buio senza schiarite, un illimitato mare di lacrime e
di sangue. Cosa dire? Non ci sono parole, orrore indescrivibile.
So che tutti vogliono da te la guerra, anche i fedeli, non
sapendo che sar la rovina ... Tu sei lo Zar, il padre
del popolo, non permettere che i pazzi vincano e perdano il
popolo e se stessi. Ecco, si vincer la Germania; ma la
Russia? A pensarci, non c’è vittima più pietosa in
tutti i secoli, è sommersa nel sangue, grande è il
disastro, infinita la tristezza”.
Con queste accorate parole dirette allo Zar di tutte le Russie
Nicola II, cariche di enfasi profetica
e vergate con mano malferma dal suo letto di ospedale a Tjumen
nel luglio 1914, il monaco “maledetto” Grigorij
Rasputin tentava per l’ultima volta di arrestare la
catena di eventi che era sul punto di travolgere e sconvolgere l’Europa.
Soltanto poche settimane prima, il 28 giugno (15 giugno secondo
il calendario Giuliano ancora vigente in Russia a quell’epoca),
a Sarajevo il terrorista serbo Gavrilo Prinzip aveva ucciso in
un attentato l’arciduca d’Austria Francesco
Ferdinando, erede al trono asburgico e sua moglie. La
conseguente dichiarazione di guerra alla Serbia da parte dell’Austria,
forte della sua alleanza con la Germania di Guglielmo II,
aveva rapidamente trascinato lo Zar verso la
mobilitazione generale a favore degli alleati serbi, nonostante
il gi precario equilibrio interno dell’Impero. E
proprio in quei giorni, con una sincronicit che ebbe
tutto il sapore del complotto, lo stregone Rasputin, la cui
enorme influenza a corte gi più volte aveva
esautorato i piani guerrafondai dell’estrema destra
politica e religiosa, era caduto vittima di un attentato durante
una visita al suo paese nativo nella zona della Siberia
occidentale.
Travestita da mendicante, Chionija Guseva, una mistica fanatica
e debole di mente discepola del predicatore e ieromonaco
ultranazionalista Jliodor (Sergei Trufanov), aveva atteso per
due intere settimane l’arrivo di Rasputin e infine era
riuscita ad avvicinarlo e pugnalarlo a tradimento al grido di “ho
ucciso l’Anticristo!”. Nonostante la gravissima
ferita al ventre la tempra fisica eccezionale e forse gli strani
poteri del monaco-contadino ebbero la meglio e dopo il trasporto
al vicino ospedale di Tjumen l’“Anticristo”
superò la crisi e sopravvisse. La forzata lontananza dalla
corte non gli permise però di raggiungere, come invece tante
volte era accaduto, la mente e il cuore dello Zar e nonostante i
suoi ripetuti appelli, le sue lettere, i suoi frenetici
telegrammi a Pietroburgo l’Impero zarista aprì l’ultimo
capitolo della propria storia mentre in Europa si accendevano i
bagliori del primo conflitto mondiale.
Si narra infatti che Nicola II, che
pure per quasi un decennio aveva prepotentemente subito il
fascino magnetico di Rasputin fino ad eleggerlo a proprio
consigliere personale, abbia strappato con rabbia l’ultimo
telegramma dell’amico convalescente che ancora lo
implorava di desistere dalla guerra. In quel frangente le
influenze di gran parte della Duma (il Parlamento russo), dell’aristocrazia
e dell’esercito prevalsero e, forse per la prima volta
nella sua sfortunata carriera di autocrate amletico, Nicola
Romanov ritenne di dover pienamente incarnare il mito imperiale
del “sovrano vittorioso” ereditato dai suoi avi.
Forse in quel rigurgito di orgoglio militare, e in qualche modo
religioso, che lo spingeva a contare su una guerra vittoriosa
come strumento di riaffermazione della propria sovranit
teocratica, egli rilesse o ricordò le parole, ben diverse,
che un altro monaco visionario, Filoteo di Pskov, aveva inviato
in un’epistola, 300 anni prima, al granduca di Mosca
Basilio III (1505-1533): “la
Chiesa dell’antica Roma cadde per la sua eresia; le porte
della seconda Roma, Costantinopoli, furono abbattute dalle asce
dei turchi infedeli; ma la Chiesa di Mosca, la nuova Roma,
risplende più del sole su tutto l’universo. Tu sei il
sovrano ecumenico, tu devi reggere le redini del governo nel
timore di Dio; abbi timore di Lui che te le ha affidate. Due
Rome sono cadute, ma la terza rimane salda in piedi; una quarta
non vi sar . Il tuo Regno Cristiano non sar mai
dato ad alcun altro sovrano”.
Secondo i teologi ortodossi russi, quindi, la Prima Roma aveva
portato nel mondo il Cristianesimo e la sua legge incarnando l’autorit
del Padre; poi era caduta nell’eresia e la luce della
retta dottrina, il Verbo-Logos o Figlio, si era incarnata, dopo
lo scisma della Chiesa Orientale, in Costantinopoli, la Seconda
Roma; infine quando Costantinopoli “per la sua corruzione”
era caduta in mani islamiche (1453) lo Spirito Santo aveva
trovato una sua incorporazione nella Terza Roma: Mosca, dalla
quale si sarebbe irradiato nel mondo il culto ortodosso e
santificante dell’Impero Perfetto. E quando nel 1547 Ivan
IV “il terribile”, successore di Basilio III,
si era consolidato nel titolo di Zar (interpretato dai
russi come l’equivalente del Basileus bizantino) e
successivamente il Metropolita di Mosca era stato nominato
Patriarca l’idea-forza della Terza Roma aveva trovato
nell’anima russa una completa sanzione storica.
Eretici, riformatori e visionari nel nome della Grande Madre
All’inasprimento istituzionale di ogni ortodossia
vengono sempre a contrapporsi atteggiamenti alternativi ed
eretici. Anche nell’ambito dell’ortodossia russa
gi dagli anni precedenti alla salita al trono di Ivan IV
si erano delineate due principali tendenze religiose
sensibilmente diverse tra loro.
La prima di queste, detta dei Giuseppiniti dal nome del
principale sostenitore Josif Sanin, Superiore del monastero di
Volotsk, sosteneva la necessit teologica e politica di
una stretta alleanza fra Chiesa e Trono, autorit
spirituale e potere secolare, con la conseguente enfasi sull’unit
dogmatica e sul formalismo ritualistico. La Terza Roma doveva
riflettere il modello teocratico gi rappresentato da
Bisanzio e dai Papi e ogni forma eretica di libero approccio al
sacro andava decisamente repressa.
L’opposta tendenza, definita dei Non Possidenti e
capeggiata dal monaco vagante Nilo di Sorks, un mistico esicasta
che aveva soggiornato per qualche tempo presso il monastero del
Monte Athos, propugnava l’assoluta separazione della
dimensione religiosa da quella mondana, la totale autonomia dei
monaci dal potere politico, la necessit etica di un’equa
distribuzione delle ricchezze e un libero approccio alle Sacre
Scritture articolato sull’esperienza mistica e
individuale del divino.
Per evidenti motivi di opportunit politica la corrente
giuseppinita trovò più largo consenso presso i granduchi
di Mosca - divenuti “Zar di tutte le Russie” - e
conseguentemente verso la met del secolo XVII,
con l’avvento della dinastia dei Romanov, venne
accelerato un processo di irrigidimento politico-religioso che
portò infine a una piena e dichiarata nazionalizzazione della
Chiesa russa. Pietro III Romanov il
Grande fu proclamato di fatto capo assoluto della Chiesa e il
Patriarcato di Mosca venne abolito per essere sostituito da un
“Santo Sinodo” di vescovi eletti e controllati dallo
Zar.
Ma nel Seicento le condizioni storiche e geografiche della Terza
Roma erano profondamente diverse da quelle dei modelli bizantini
e occidentali che erano maturate sull’onda portante dell’Impero
Romano. Di fatto la stretta e forzata coesione fra l’aristocrazia
guerriera di Mosca e la multiforme spiritualit
cristiano-ortodossa portò fatalmente a un indebolimento di
entrambe; la reazione dei Non possidenti contro il Patriarca
Nikon (1605-1681), che aveva spianato la strada alla teocrazia
bizantineggiante dei Romanov, si concretizzò infatti in un
autentico scisma, con la separazione dalla Chiesa russa di un
vasto movimento dissidente di ispirazione mistica noto come i
Vecchi Credenti.
La dottrina di questa dissidenza, che si diffuse dapprima fra le
classi più libere e intraprendenti come i mercanti, i
contadini dell’est e del nord e i cosacchi, enfatizzava
sia un ritorno alle radici slave del culto cristiano ortodosso,
sia una rinnovata forma di intimismo religioso e un radicale
rifiuto delle influenze greche e bizantine nel rito e nella
prassi sociale, aprendo così la strada alla proliferazione di
ulteriori e ben più radicali movimenti e sette, sempre più
orientati verso una spiritualit slegata da ogni margine
dogmatico o formalismo istituzionale. Andrej Amal’rick,
uno dei più interessanti fra gli storici sovietici
dissidenti, ricorda che “le prime sette sorsero in Russia
a cavallo dei secoli XVII e XVIII.
Anche prima vivevano in Russia adepti di sette diverse che
subivano influenze provenienti principalmente dalla Lituania e
dalla Svezia, ma a causa della predilezione delle masse per l’aspetto
rituale della religione ebbero poca risonanza prima dell’effervescenza
suscitata dallo scisma. Lo stato in cui l’uomo si sente
sottoposto a una volont non umana, in cui ha visioni e
proferisce parole incoerenti, era noto gi da tempo nella
Russia pagana e ‘profeti’ e ‘profetesse’
di campagna cadevano in trances isteriche. Generalmente si
attribuivano queste manifestazioni a forze demoniache, ma dalla
fine del secolo XVII alcuni di tali
profeti cominciarono ad assicurare che erano ispirati dallo
Spirito Santo” (Rasputin, il “monaco nero” e
la corte dell’ultimo Zar, Einaudi 1984).
La rivolta contro la sclerosi dogmatica e burocratica dell’ortodossia
ufficiale generò le migliori condizioni per il riaffiorare di
arcaici retaggi cultuali di carattere sciamanico pre-cristiano e
di influenze, mai del tutto sopite, risalenti ai precedenti
secoli di dominazione tartara. La trance, l’estasi, la
danza sfrenata, la possessione mistica, le varie tecniche per
indurre un superamento, anche violento, del normale stato di
coscienza attraverso il dolore o il piacere estremi emersero (o
riemersero) enfaticamente nella fenomenologia religiosa; si
caratterizzarono così forme estreme e dirette di rapporto con
lo Spirito Santo, cioè con quell’aspetto del divino
che più di ogni altro, nonostante il travestimento cristiano,
rifletteva l’arcaica eredit della Grande Madre
Cosmica, il più antico fra gli Archetipi del Sacro.
Patrona della Terza Roma era la Vergine Maria e fin dall’epoca
dei teologi gnostici le correnti illuminate ed eretiche del
Cristianesimo, sia orientale che occidentale, avevano assimilato
il suo simbolismo femminino - ricalcato sui culti materni
pre-cristiani - al mito dello Spirito Santo, terza Persona della
Trinit cristiana. I mistici russi, e in particolare
quelli dissidenti, tesero così a identificare lo “spirito
di illuminazione” con l’abbraccio estatico e
ambiguamente erotico della Grande Madre, sviluppando forme di
culto personali o collettive in cui la diretta identificazione
con il Divino veniva ricercata attraverso l’esaltazione
emozionale e la danza dionisiaca. E spesso tale processo venne
spinto fino al parossismo orgiastico carnale, inteso come
formula rettificatrice e liberatoria dalla “schiavitù
dei sensi”.
Le figure più caratteristiche di questo particolare scenario
furono gli staretz, monaci laici itineranti dotati di virtù
profetiche e spesso taumaturgiche che, vivendo dell’elemosina
dei fedeli, vagavano di paese in paese predicando le più
diverse dottrine. E se molti di loro erano malati di mente o
fanatici invasati e deliranti le cui follie venivano
interpretate dalla superstizione popolare come segni di
elezione, altri dimostrarono di possedere autentiche facolt
sovranormali e crearono movimenti o sette in cui sono
ravvisabili interessanti elementi di carattere magico o
sciamanico e contenuti e tecniche di un qualche valore
iniziatico.
La prima e probabilmente più significativa tra queste sette
fu quella della “gente di Dio”, detta dei Christi o
Chlysty, fondata nel Seicento nell’Alto Volga dallo
staretz Danilo Filippovic che, secondo la leggenda, aveva
gettato nel fiume tutte le sacre scritture cristiane dichiarando
che “per la salvezza occorre un unico libro: Libro d’oro,
Libro di vita, Libro-colomba, Il Signore Spirito Santo stesso”.
Dalla seconda met del Settecento, con l’introduzione
a corte della cultura illuministica voluta da Caterina la
Grande, anche fra le classi colte e presso una certa
aristocrazia iniziarono a diffondersi forme di religiosit
alternativa e tendenze filosofiche ereticali, dovute
principalmente all’influenza delle correnti illuminate e
iniziatiche europee, soprattutto massoniche. Tanto che - come
lamenta un autore contemporaneo evidentemente di parte come
Nicholas Zernov, teologo ortodosso e professore di teologia
ecumenica alla Drew University (USA) - “nella seconda met
del secolo XVIII le classi più
elevate della popolazione russa incominciarono a disertare la
loro Chiesa in cerca di altri sistemi di vita e alcuni si
allontanarono completamente dalla fede e dalla morale cristiana.
Alcuni si consideravano discepoli di Voltaire, altri entravano
nella Massoneria. Il numero di questi disertori fu in un primo
tempo piuttosto ristretto, ma tutti appartenevano all’aristocrazia
e a poco a poco i loro princìpi incominciarono a penetrare
nelle classi inferiori” (Il Cristianesimo orientale,
Mondadori 1990).
Così il medesimo spirito di libert e alterit
spirituale che animava le pratiche popolari e contadine dei
Chlysty si reificò e diede i suoi frutti attraverso pensatori
e filosofi, spesso di ampio respiro, che fino all’alba
del nostro secolo fecero sentire le loro voci. Essi tentarono di
conciliare nell’anima russa l’eroica rivolta del
libero pensiero contro la plumbea oppressione di una religiosit
sclerotizzata e malata di autoritarismo con la difesa dei valori
più autentici dell’anima slava, mistica e sensuale a
un tempo. Il romanziere simbolista Dmitrij Merezkovsky
(1865-1941), il mistico pansessualista Vasilij Rozanov
(1856-1919) - le cui dottrine magico-sessuali possono essere
affiancate a quelle di P.B. Randolph e
di Aleister Crowley - e lo stesso tormentato Lev Tolstoj sono
esempi emblematici di questo sommovimento, in cui il rifiuto
dell’assolutismo sia morale che filosofico e sociale
apriva le porte a una concezione magica del mondo. Un’interazione
tra diversificate influenze che contribuì più di quanto
gli storici razionalisti vogliano ammettere a generare l’humus
collettivo di un generale e catartico ribaltamento di valori di
cui la rivoluzione socio-economica non rappresentò che l’ultimo
stadio.
L’economista e il contadino-sciamano alleati per la pace
Tra il 1904 e il 1905 la stabilit politica interna
dell’Impero zarista era stata fortemente scossa dalla
sconfitta nell’infausta guerra contro il Giappone. Questo
disastro militare, oltre ad aver frustrato le mire
espansionistiche di Nicola II verso l’Oriente, aveva
favorito l’azione destabilizzatrice dei primi Soviet,
portando alla sanguinosa rivolta popolare del gennaio 1905 e
alla nascita di un effimero Parlamento, la Duma.
Grande protagonista del delicato momento politico era stato il
ministro delle finanze e successivamente Primo ministro conte
Sergeij Jul’evic Witte, autentico genio economico e
massone di larghe vedute. A Witte, elevato a dirigere il
Ministero delle finanze gi sotto Alessandro III,
andava il merito della grande industrializzazione russa
di fine secolo, con la promozione soprattutto di acciaierie e di
campi petroliferi, nonché l’attuazione della grande
ferrovia transiberiana e la riforma monetaria a sistema aureo
che permise fortunate transazioni con banche straniere. Il
progetto politico di Witte, che ben presto trovò l’ostilit
dell’aristocrazia fondiaria e dello stesso Zar, era di
evitare l’inasprimento dei conflitti di classe e i
conseguenti pericoli di crollo dell’intero sistema
imperiale attraverso una serie di graduali riforme economiche.
Per questo sia nel 1904 che successivamente nel 1914 egli si
dimostrò ostile alla guerra, nella quale vedeva soltanto un
grande pericolo di indebolimento sociale, oltre che di disagio
economico e politico. Mentre di contro la corrotta struttura
burocratica dell’aristocrazia non intendeva rinunciare ai
propri privilegi economici e si stringeva intorno allo Zar
alimentando in tutti i modi la sua pur gi notevole
miopia politica.
Altro grande protagonista di questo scenario fu il misterioso
monaco-sciamano, Grigorij Jefimovic Rasputin.
Nato a Pokrovskoe nella Siberia occidentale a est degli Urali,
probabilmente nel gennaio 1864, da una famiglia di contadini,
Grigorij dimostrò fin dall’infanzia di essere dotato
di strane facolt precognitive e di misteriose capacit
di comunicazione con la natura e con il mondo animale.
Dopo una gioventù dedita alle risse, alla vodka e soprattutto
ai piaceri carnali aveva subito una repentina trasformazione
spirituale in seguito a un pellegrinaggio al monastero di
Verchotur’e - nella regione di Ekaterinburg, oggi
Sverdlovsk - noto come centro di aggregazione locale dei Chlysty.
E’ quindi molto probabile, anche se non del tutto
dimostrato, che il turbolento e sensuale mugik (contadino) abbia
realizzato la sua strana svolta esistenziale attraverso la
partecipazione ai misteri di questa setta. Fatto sta che da quel
momento iniziò una serie di pellegrinaggi che, attraverso i
luoghi sacri e i principali monasteri della Russia, lo condusse
fino al monte Athos e a Gerusalemme. Lo accompagnavano ovunque
una crescente fama di santo staretz e l’eco dei suoi
prodigiosi poteri ipnotici, taumaturgici e profetici.
Se pure i suoi maestri spirituali erano stati i Chlysty,
Rasputin sicuramente estremizzò e superò le loro pratiche
e dottrine fino ad articolare una propria originale forma di
religiosit sciamanica, di cui la danza, il sesso e a un
certo punto anche l’ebbrezza alcolica furono le
componenti base per lo scatenamento di un travolgente potere
personale. In particolare l’enorme ascendente che egli
sempre esercitò sulle donne di ogni et e condizione
sociale ricorda da vicino alcune forme di stregoneria sessuale
tipiche della tradizione tantrica indo-tibetana e cinese e nell’area
etnica cui egli appartenne trovano forse l’uguale
soltanto nell’analoga, anche se più raffinata,
personalit di George Gurdjieff.
Dal momento della sua apparizione a corte, nel novembre 1905,
Rasputin conquistò la completa fiducia e devozione dei
sovrani, delle loro giovani figlie e in particolare del piccolo
Aleksej, erede al trono, le cui continue emorragie emofiliache
parevano sanabili esclusivamente dalle magnetiche mani del
taumaturgo. I miracolosi interventi con cui Rasputin salvò più
volte la vita dello Zarevic sono ampiamente documentati e lo
stesso Aleksej, secondo una testimonianza diretta, poco dopo la
morte dello staretz ebbe a dire: “adesso mi curano e
pregano per me, ma non serve a niente. Lui invece mi portava una
mela, mi faceva una carezza l dove io avevo male e
subito stavo meglio”.
Ben presto la fama del monaco-stregone divenne enorme ed enorme
fu il suo potere di influenzamento sullo Zar e soprattutto sulla
zarina Alexandra, che su di lui concentrò tutto il suo
mistico fanatismo, tanto che si disse ne fosse divenuta l’amante.
La pur vasta letteratura, soprattutto scandalistica e
diffamatoria, su Rasputin ha sempre enfatizzato la sua immagine
di astuto ciarlatano semianalfabeta ed erotomane, ma una più
accurata analisi, libera da pregiudizi storici e religiosi e
basata su quanto ci raccontano i documenti dell’epoca,
favorevoli e non, ci presenta una realt ben più
sfaccettata.
“Sono venuto a portarvi la Voce della nostra Santa Madre
Terra e a insegnarvi il beato segreto che essa mi ha trasmesso
circa la santificazione mediante il peccato”: in queste
parole di Rasputin è racchiuso il senso più profondo della
sua opera e probabilmente di tutta la sua vita. Egli volle,
sempre e ovunque, cavalcare la tigre di un mondo politico e
religioso in sfacelo, carico di ipocrisie, menzogne, crudelt
e “peccati” di ogni genere. Di tutto questo egli
fece il proprio strumento per offrire sia al popolo che all’aristocrazia
una via di scambio e di reciproca redenzione sociale e
spirituale.
Per più di un decennio il “santo diavolo”, come
molti religiosi lo chiamavano, manovrò le menti e i corpi dei
teocrati di Pietroburgo, consolando le nevrosi ossessive di
Alexandra e istruendo lo Zar ad ascoltare il cuore piuttosto che
la ragione - imbrigliata com’era nella ferrea logica dell’autocrazia
- tanto da riuscire a ritardare la crisi bellica di almeno due
anni. Nel frattempo beneficò e spesso guarì da malattie
fisiche e psichiche decine e decine di persone, soprattutto fra
gli aristocratici, pur non dimenticando, quando e come poteva,
di porgere il suo aiuto agli innumerevoli diseredati che gli si
rivolgevano. Quando accettò denaro da amici abbienti fu solo
per distribuirlo generosamente a chi ne era bisognoso e la sua
figura ben presto divenne una sorta di ponte gettato fra lo Zar
e il suo popolo.
Con una strategia basata più sull’istinto naturale che
su un pensiero strutturato, a lui probabilmente estraneo,
Rasputin promosse attraverso manovre e amicizie, in particolare
femminili, una formula politica improntata al pluralismo e alla
tolleranza sociale e religiosa, soprattutto verso le classi e le
categorie sociali maggiormente penalizzate come i contadini e
gli Ebrei. Le sue operazioni politiche sembrarono, così,
perfettamente sintonizzate con le profetiche vedute del conte
Witte, il massone illuminato che, allontanato dal potere fin dal
1906, fu forse uno dei pochissimi a comprendere realmente lo
staretz e, pur senza esserne soggiogato, gli fu amico devoto.
Witte giunse infatti a dire nell’estate del 1914, mentre
nonostante gli sforzi suoi e di Rasputin la Russia stava
inesorabilmente avviandosi verso la guerra: “esiste un
solo uomo oggi in grado di sbrogliare la complessa situazione
politica ... e quello è Rasputin”.
Profezia e catastrofe
Lo zar Nicola II, isolato
fisicamente dal suo consigliere a causa prima dell’attentato
allo staretz nel 1914, poi dei suoi impegni al fronte, divenne
succube di altre influenze e neppure l’alleanza tra l’illuminismo
massonico di Witte e i poteri sciamanici di Rasputin poté
evitare l’ultimo atto della tragica saga imperiale russa.
In Rasputin e nella sua capacit di assommare e
trasmutare tutti i peccati e le cattive coscienze della “nuova”
Roma si consumò la possibile opzione di una terza via per la
cibernetica della storia, una via altra, diversa e forse
superiore rispetto sia alla senescenza teocratica dei nobili
reazionari, sia a quel nascente ed effimero astro incarnato da
un altro “monaco”, laico, gelido, spietato e
totalitario, che portava il nome di Vladimir Il’ic Ul’Janov:
Lenin.
In una lettera scritta allo Zar il 18 aprile 1916 Rasputin aveva
preconizzato in questi termini la propria morte: “sento
che devo morire prima dell’anno nuovo. Voglio fare
presente però al popolo russo, al Babbo, alla Madre della
Russia e ai Ragazzi che se io sarò ucciso da comuni
assassini, e specialmente dai miei fratelli contadini russi, tu,
Zar di Russia, non avere paura, resta sul tuo trono e governa
... Ma se io verrò ucciso dai nobili le loro mani resteranno
macchiate dal mio sangue ... Zar della terra di Russia, se tu
odi il suono della campana che ti dice che Grigorij è stato
ucciso devi sapere questo. Se sono stati i tuoi parenti che
hanno provocato la mia morte allora nessuno della tua famiglia,
cioè nessuno dei tuoi figli o dei tuoi parenti, rimarr
vivo per più di due anni. Essi saranno uccisi dal popolo
russo”.
La romanzesca morte di Rasputin nel dicembre 1916, che tra
veleni e pallottole apparentemente inefficaci finì per
terrorizzare gli aristocratici attentatori, capeggiati appunto
da un parente di Nicola II, precedette
di soli pochi mesi l’abdicazione dello Zar e lo sterminio
della famiglia Romanov da parte dei Bolscevichi, proprio come lo
staretz aveva previsto. Nella localit di Ekaterinburg, a
breve distanza dal misterioso monastero dei Chlysty da cui il
cammino dell’“Anticristo” era iniziato, il
sangue degli ultimi teocrati cristiani segnò il tramonto
della Terza Roma, e nessuno sapr mai quale corso avrebbe
avuto la nostra storia se la voce appassionata e sensuale della
Santa Madre Terra fosse stata ascoltata dai “Signori della
guerra e della fede”.
BOX 1
I Chlysty, gli Illuminati della Carne
Il movimento dei Chlysty, o “gente di Dio”, che
ha avuto una sua importanza fino ai primi decenni del Novecento,
rappresentò in Russia una vera e propria religione nella
religione, organizzata come societ segreta secondo un
modello che presenta forti analogie con alcune sette medievali
europee quali quelle degli Adamiti, dei Luciferiani, dei
Fratelli del Libero Spirito o degli stessi Catari, tutte
decisamente pervase da un’intensa connotazione
paganeggiante e, per molti versi, dionisiaca.
Lo storico Mircea Eliade ci ricorda l’esistenza nella
Russia del XIX e del XX secolo di
altri movimenti mistico-erotici, fra cui gli Innocentisti che,
nell’estatica ricerca rituale della “purezza
adamica delle origini”, vivevano “in caverne
sotterranee, praticamente nudi e impegnati esclusivamente in
rapporti sessuali indiscriminati, sperando in tal modo che la
redenzione venisse loro dall’enormit dei loro
peccati” (Occultismo, stregoneria e mode culturali,
Sansoni 1982). Ma i Chlysty furono indubbiamente il primo e il
più articolato, oltre che il più longevo, fra questi
modelli meta-religiosi e nonostante le cruente persecuzioni
della Chiesa ufficiale e del potere imperiale la loro influenza
socio-politica fu enorme e giunse fino a penetrare negli
ambienti aristocratici di Mosca e Pietroburgo.
Presso la gente di Dio la morte del “vecchio Adamo”
e la rinascita della divinit interiore dovevano essere
realizzate attraverso una violenta forma catartica di
spersonalizzazione collettiva, in cui gli istinti di piacere e
di dolore venivano artificialmente esasperati fino al
raggiungimento di una dimensione estatica, in virtù della
quale lo Spirito Santo scendeva a incarnarsi negli adepti e
nelle adepte. E alla rigorosa morale esteriore - che comprendeva
la proibizione dell’uso di bevande fermentate e la totale
astensione da ogni manifestazione mondana e soprattutto dal
sesso, anche tra coniugi - veniva così combinata una precisa
e codificata utilizzazione dell’ebbrezza e dell’erotismo
orgiastico, intesi come tecnica estatica di collegamento con il
divino.
I rituali, celebrati nel cuore della notte, implicavano grandi
cerchi concentrici di danzatori e danzatrici, che nella
crescente esaltazione del movimento giungevano a un furore
pandemico, stracciandosi le bianche vesti rituali, flagellandosi
a sangue e infine gettandosi gli uni sugli altri in una sfrenata
orgia dei sensi. Un processo drammatico e liberatorio attraverso
il quale le energie del “peccato” si esaurivano e i
fedeli, uomini e donne, diventavano “puri” veicoli
del Santo Spirito, manifestando visioni e profezie.
Nei punti di più alta tensione gli adepti ritenevano di
raggiungere la personificazione del Cristo (da cui la
denominazione di Chrysti, mutatasi poi in Chlysty), mentre le
profetesse, che spesso gestivano il culto costituendone il
principale polo di attrazione, assumevano l’identit
della Vergine Maria, divenendo rappresentazioni viventi della
Grande Madre Terra rigenerata dallo Spirito delle origini e
simboleggiata dall’arcaico sigillo sciamanico della croce
a otto bracci.
BOX 2
La corte dei miracoli
Nikolaij Aleksandrovic Romanov, figlio di Alessandro III
e Zar regnante dal 1896 con il nome di Nicola II,
incarnò gli aspetti più deteriori dell’aristocrazia
russa del suo tempo. Di carattere debole e superficiale,
sostanzialmente pavido ma capace di pur ottusa rigidit
autocratica, governò di fatto subendo la costante influenza
dei vari gruppi di potere e delle personalit che lo
circondavano, oscillando costantemente da una posizione all’altra
senza mai - come egli stesso confessò - “riflettere
troppo su nulla”. Soprattutto ebbe potere su di lui la
mistica e nevrotica moglie, la zarina Alexandra Fedorovna, che
pure lo amò teneramente e ne fu riamata fino alla morte.
Intanto nell’epoca in cui ormai si annunciavano il
tramonto della teocrazia russa e la tragica apocalisse dei suoi
ultimi, sfortunati teocrati si assisteva a una paradossale
convivenza, sia a corte che in certi ambienti aristocratici, tra
la formale difesa della più autocratica ortodossia e la
sempre maggiore indulgenza verso dimensioni eretiche e magiche
del sacro. I principali interessi di Alexandra infatti, e quindi
di Nicola, erano la religione e un certo malato
pseudo-misticismo tendente a proiettarsi verso le peggiori forme
di religiosit “occulta”. Perciò alcune
fazioni di astuti cortigiani e di familiari intriganti erano
solite introdurre a corte ogni sorta di “santi”,
predicatori e “folli di Dio” allo scopo di
servirsene per influenzare le azioni e le decisioni dei
regnanti. I quali li accolsero soprattutto per poter rimediare
all’assenza di un figlio maschio e poi, quando nel 1904
nacque finalmente lo zarevic Aleksej, erede al trono, per poter
guarire quest’ultimo da una perniciosa forma ereditaria
di emofilia.
In tutto quel periodo alla corte di Carskoe Selo vicino a
Pietroburgo, la residenza estiva dove la famiglia reale viveva
gran parte dell’anno in volontario isolamento, furono
ricevuti e ospitati decine di strani personaggi, spesso folli o
pericolosamente esaltati, come l’ex macellaio balbuziente
e probabilmente pazzo Mitja Kozel’skij, che fu presentato
a corte insieme al suo protettore Sergei Nilus. Scopo di Nilus
era diventare consigliere spirituale dello Zar e pochi anni dopo
questo mistico fanatico, e sedicente professore, sarebbe
diventato famoso per la “denuncia” di un allucinante
complotto ebraico per la conquista del mondo, delineato in un
falso documento di presunta origine ebraico-massonica conosciuto
come i “Protocolli dei Savi Anziani di Sion”, la cui
prima edizione Nilus curò e commentò nel 1904. E’
tristemente nota la successiva strumentalizzazione dei
Protocolli da parte di forze politiche antisemite e soprattutto
del regime nazista, che ne fece uno degli alibi fondamentali per
la sistematica persecuzione e lo sterminio degli Ebrei.
Fra tanto squallore non va dimenticata la pur fugace presenza a
corte di personaggi di ben diversa levatura, quali l’occultista
e massone francese Papus (Gerard Encausse) - Gran Maestro dell’Ordine
Martinista e alto dignitario di alcuni tra i principali Ordini
illuministici europei - e il suo amico e fratello spirituale
Philippe Nozier che dal 1902 al 1905 visitò varie volte
Carskoe Selo. In questo caso fu la pochezza spirituale dei
sovrani a disgustare l’aristocratica sensibilit
di Papus, che dopo aver tentato di coinvolgere Nicola II in una
Loggia sperimentale martinista - come risulta da alcuni
documenti conservati da questo Ordine - tornò in Francia
affermando: “quella gente è pazza; sono alla mercé
del primo furfante che sappia accattivarsi le loro ossessioni;
stanno scivolando verso l’abisso”. Philippe invece,
sicuramente più mistico, reazionario e vicino alla sensibilit
dei Romanov, acquisì per breve tempo una discreta influenza,
ma alla fine, nel 1905, su pressioni della polizia segreta e di
alcuni cortigiani legati alla fazione di Nilus e Mitija, venne
allontanato dalla Russia, non senza aver lasciato ai sovrani il
viatico di una profezia: un altro amico sarebbe venuto che
avrebbe parlato loro “di Dio”.
Soltanto pochi mesi dopo, attraverso una serie di contatti
mediati dall’Archimandrita dell’Accademia
teologica di Pietroburgo, il primo novembre 1905 un nuovo
staretz veniva di fatto presentato a corte: il suo nome era
Grigorij Rasputin e la strana parabola del suo destino si
sarebbe sovrapposta a quella dei Romanov e della Russia per i
successivi 11 anni. Lo scopo di chi lo introdusse presso i
sovrani era quello di farne un ulteriore, docile strumento di
controllo sulla famiglia reale: speranze che furono amaramente
frustrate dai poteri e dalla statura psicologica assolutamente
indipendente e incontrollabile del “santo diavolo”.
BOX 3
L’allucinante morte dello stregone
La notte tra il 16 e il 17 dicembre 1916 il giovane principe
Feliks Jusupov, figlio omosessuale di una parente dei Romanov gi
a suo tempo allontanata da corte per la sua ostilit a
Rasputin, attirò quest’ultimo nel proprio palazzo per
un colloquio privato che risultò invece un mortale tranello.
Jusupov offrì allo staretz biscotti imbottiti di cianuro e
Madera avvelenato. Rasputin per due ore mangiò e bevve
avidamente, come suo solito, senza dare alcun segno di malessere
e fissando con aria di sfida il suo assassino inorridito. Alla
fine il principe, sconvolto, estrasse un'arma e sparò al
cuore del “diavolo”, che stramazzò al suolo.
Sopraggiunsero allora i complici del giovane, ma poco dopo il
loro arrivo Rasputin, ancora vivo, balzò in piedi e riuscì
a fuggire dall’edificio. Inseguito dai congiurati, fu
abbattuto con diversi colpi di pistola da Vladimir Puriskevic,
deputato di estrema destra della Duma. Il corpo martoriato dello
stregone fu legato e avvolto in una coperta e quindi gettato
nelle acque gelide del Neva.
Quando alcuni giorni dopo il cadavere fu ripescato si dovette
constatare che Rasputin si era “risvegliato” in
acqua ed era riuscito a liberare una mano dalle corde assumendo
una posizione benedicente. La morte definitiva era sopravvenuta
per affogamento.
Supreme Magus leaves the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (The UK illuminati )
In
June 2005 e.v
an historic event took place in the secretive world of the illuminati.
The Supreme Magus of the English illuminati known as the SRIA , leaves his office for the first time in history.This naturaly happens after the OTO satanic infiltration of Bro.Simon Kane and Frater Rui Gabirro's black magic practices are finaly exposed to the rest of the British illuminati.This episode forced the SRIA Metropolitan College in London to shut for one month! But check for yourself the official reasons instead in this rare illuminati document.Bro.Simon Kane and Bro.Rui Gabirro are no longer members of the SRIA.
REVEALING THE PERVERSE PRACTICES OF GARDNERIAN WITCHCRAFT
Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at
08:33PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
1
Comment
You must have often wondered how the New World Order
manipulates poor ignorant kids towards the devil using low forms
of magic and witchcraft.
So experience for yourself the Book of Shadows
Gardnerian Traditional Witchcraft Part I

A.1. Casting the Circle (1949)
It is most convenient to mark the circle with chalk, paint or
otherwise, to show where it is; but marks on the carpet may be
utilized. Furniture may be placed to indicate the bounds.
The only circle that matters is the one drawn before every
ceremony with either a duly consecrated Magic Sword or an Athame.
The circle is usually nine feet in diameter, unless made for
some very special purpose. There are two outer circles, each six
inches apart, so the third circle has a diameter of eleven feet.
1 Having chosen a
place proper, take the sickle or scimitar of Art or a Witch's
Athame, if thou mayest obtain it, and stick it into the center,
then take a cord, and 'twere well to use the Cable Tow for this,
and loop it over the Instrument, four and one half feet, and so
trace out the circumference of the circle, which must be traced
either with the Sword, or the knife with the black hilt, or it
be of little avail, but ever leave open a door towards the North.
Make in all 3 circles, one with in the other, and write names of
power between these.
2 First draw
circle with Magic Sword or Athame.
3 Consecrate Salt
and Water: Touch water with Athame, saying, "I exorcise
thee, O creature of Water, that thou cast out from Thee all the
impurities and uncleannesses of the Spirits of the World of
Phantasm, so they may harm me not, in the names of Aradia and
Cernunnos."
4 Touching Salt
with Athame, say, "The Blessings of Aradia and Cernunnos be
upon this creature of Salt, and let all malignity and hindrance
be cast forth hencefrom, and let all good enter herein, for
without Thee man cannot live, wherefore I bless thee and invoke
thee, that thou mayest aid me."
5 Then put the
Salt into the water.
6 Sprinkle with
exorcised water.
7 Light candles;
say, "I exorcise thee, O Creature of Fire, that every kind
of Phantasm may retire from thee, and be unable to harm or
deceive in any way, in the names of Aradia and Cernunnos."
8 Caution
initiate (if any); warn companions; enter circle and close doors
with 3 pentagrams.
9 Proclaim object
of working
10
Circumambulate 3 times or more before commencing work.
11 Summon:
"I summon, stir, and Call thee up, thou Mighty Ones of the
East, South, West, and North."
Salute and draw pentacle with Magic Sword or Athame, the first
stroke being from the top down to the left.
A.2. Drawing Down the Moon (1949)
High Priestess stands in front of Altar, assumes Goddess
position (arms crossed).
Magus, kneeling in front of her, draws pentacle on her body with
Phallus- headed Wand, invokes, "I Invoke and beseech Thee,
O mighty Mother of all life and fertility. By seed and root, by
stem and bud, by leaf and flower and fruit, by Life and Love, do
I invoke Thee to descend into the body of thy servant and High
Priestess [name]."
The Moon having been drawn down, i.e., link established, Magus
and other men give Fivefold Kiss:
(kissing feet) "Blessed be thy feet, that have brought thee
in these ways";
(kissing knees) "Blessed be thy knees, that shall kneel at
the sacred altar";
(kissing womb) "Blessed be thy womb, without which we would
not be";
(kissing breasts) "Blessed be thy breasts, formed in beauty
and in strength";
(kissing lips) "Blessed be thy lips, that shall speak the
sacred names." Women all bow.
If there be an initiation, then at this time the Magus and the
High Priestess in Goddess position (Arms Crossed) says the
Charge while the Initiate stands outside the circle.
A.3. "Lift Up the Veil"
[The Charge] (1949)
Magus: "Listen to the words of the Great mother, who of old
was also called among men Artemis, Astarte, Dione, Melusine,
Aphrodite, Cerridwen, Diana, Arianrhod, Bride, and by many other
names."
High Priestess: "At mine Altars the youth of Lacedaemon in
Sparta made due sacrifice. "Whenever ye have need of
anything, once in the month, and better it be when the moon is
full, ye shall assemble in some secret place and adore the
spirit of Me who am Queen of all Witcheries and magics.
"There ye shall assemble, ye who are fain to learn all
sorcery, yet have not won its deepest secrets. To these will I
teach things that are yet unknown."
"And ye shall be free from slavery, and as a sign that ye
be really free, ye shall be naked in your rites, both men and
women, and ye shall dance, sing, feast, make music, and love,
all in my praise."
"There is a Secret Door that I have made to establish the
way to taste even on earth the elixir of immortality. Say, `Let
ecstasy be mine, and joy on earth even to me, To Me,' For I am a
gracious Goddess. I give unimaginable joys on earth, certainty,
not faith, while in life! And upon death, peace unutterable,
rest, and ecstasy, nor do I demand aught in sacrifice."
Magus: "Hear ye the words of the Star Goddess."
High Priestess: "I love you: I yearn for you: pale or
purple, veiled or voluptuous."
"I who am all pleasure, and purple and drunkenness of the
innermost senses, desire you. Put on the wings, arouse the
coiled splendor within you." "Come unto me, for I am
the flame that burns in the heart of every man, and the core of
every Star."
"Let it be your inmost divine self who art lost in the
constant rapture of infinite joy."
"Let the rituals be rightly performed with joy and beauty.
Remember that all acts of love and pleasure are my rituals. So
let there be beauty and strength, leaping laughter, force and
fire by within you."
"And if thou sayest, `I have journeyed unto thee, and it
availed me not, ' rather shalt thou say, `I called upon thee,
and I waited patiently, and Lo, thou wast with me from the
beginning,' for they that ever desired me shall ever attain me,
even to the end of all desire."
This much of the rites must ever be performed to prepare for any
initiation, whether of one degree or of all three.
A.4. The Initiation (1949)
[First Degree]
Magus leaves circle by the doorway, goes to Postulant, and says,
"Since there is no other brother here, I must be thy
sponsor, as well as priest. I am about to give you a warning. If
you are still of the same mind, answer it with these words:
`Perfect Love and Perfect Trust.'" Placing the point of the
sword to the Postulant's breast, he says, "O thou who
standeth on the threshold between the pleasant world of men and
the domains of the Dread Lords of the Outer Spaces, hast thou
the courage to make the Assay? For I tell thee verily, it were
better to rush on my weapon and perish miserably than to make
the attempt with fear in thy heart."
Postulant: "I have two Passwords: Perfect Love and Perfect
Trust."
Magus drops the sword point, saying, "All who approach with
perfect love and perfect trust are doubly welcome."
Going around behind her, he blindfolds her, then putting his
left arm around her waist and his right arm around her neck, he
pulls her head back, says, "I give you the 3rd password, a
Kiss to pass through this dread Door," and pushes her
forward with his body, through the doorway and into the circle.
Once inside, he releases her saying, "This is the way all
are first brought into the circle."
Magus closes the doorway by drawing the point of the sword
across it three times, joining all three circles, saying, "Agla,
Azoth, Adonai," then drawing three pentacles to seal it.
Magus guides Postulant to south of altar, and whispers, "Now
there is the Ordeal."
Taking a short piece of cord from the altar, he ties it around
her right ankle, saying, "Feet neither bound nor free."
Taking a longer cord, he ties her hands together behind her
back, then pulls them up, so that the arms form a triangle, and
ties the cord around her neck, leaving the end dangling down in
front as a Cable Tow.
With the Cable Tow in his left hand and the sword in his right
hand, the Magus leads her sunwise around the circle to the east,
where he salutes with the sword and proclaims, "Take heed,
O Lords of the Watchtowers of the East, (name), properly
prepared, will be made a Priestess and a Witch."
Magus leads her similarly to the south, west, and north, making
the proclamation at each quarter.
Next, clasping Postulant around the waist with his left arm, and
holding the sword erect in his right hand, he makes her
circumambulate three times around the circle with a half-running,
half-dancing step.
He halts her at the south of the altar, and strikes eleven
knells on the bell. He then kneels at her feet, saying, "In
other religions the postulant kneels, as the Priests claim
supreme power, but in the Art Magical, we are taught to be
humble, so we kneel to welcome them and say:
"Blessed be thy feet that have brought thee in these ways."
(He kisses her feet.)
"Blessed be thy knees that shall kneel at the sacred
altar." (He kisses her knees.)
"Blessed be thy womb, without which we would not be."
(He kisses her Organ of Generation.)
"Blessed by thy breasts, formed in beauty and in strength."
(He kisses her breasts.)
"Blessed be thy lips, which shall utter the sacred names."
(He kisses her lips.)
Take measure thus: height, around forehead, across the heart,
and across the genitals.
Magus says, "Be pleased to kneel," and helps her kneel
before the altar. He ties the end of the Cable Tow to a ring in
the altar, so that the postulant is bent sharply forward, with
her head almost touching the floor. He also ties her feet
together with the short cord.
Magus strikes three knells on the bell and says, "Art ready
to swear that thou wilt always be true to the Art?"
Witch: "I am."
Magus strikes seven knells on the bell and says, "Before ye
are sworn, art willing to pass the ordeal and be purified?"
Witch: "I am."
Magus strikes eleven knells on the bell, takes the scourge from
the altar, and gives a series of three, seven, nine, and 21
strokes with the scourge across the postulant's buttocks.
Magus says, "Ye have bravely passed the test. Art always
ready to help, protect, and defend thy Brothers and Sisters of
the Art?"
Witch: "I am."
Magus: "Art armed?"
Witch: "With a knife in my hair."
Magus: "Then on that knife wilt thou swear absolute secrecy?"
Witch: "I will."
Magus: "Then say after me. `I, (name), in the presence of
the Mighty Ones, do of my own will and accord, most solemnly
swear that I will ever keep secret and never reveal the secrets
of the Art, except it be to a proper person, properly prepared,
within a circle such as I am now in. All this I swear by my
hopes of a future life, mindful that my measure has been taken,
and may my weapons turn against me if I break this my solemn
oath.'"
Magus now unbinds her feet, unties the Cable Tow from the altar,
removes the blindfold, and helps her up to her feet.
Magus says, "I hereby sign thee with the triple sign.
"I consecrate thee with oil."
(He anoints her with oil on the womb, the right breast, the left
breast, and the womb again.)
"I consecrate thee with wine." (He anoints her with
wine in the same pattern.)
"I consecrate thee with my lips" (he kisses her in the
same pattern),
"Priestess and Witch." Magus now unbinds her hands and
removes the last cord, saying, "Now I Present to thee the
Working Tools of a Witch.
"First the Magic Sword. With this, as with the Athame, thou
canst form all Magic Circles, dominate, subdue, and punish all
rebellious Spirits and Demons, and even persuade the Angels and
Geniuses. With this in your hand you are the ruler of the Circle.
[Here "kiss" means that the initiate kisses the tool,
and the Magus then kisses the Witch being initiated.]
"Next I present the Athame. This is the true Witch's weapon
and has all the powers of the Magic Sword [kiss].
"Next I present the White-Handled Knife. Its use is to form
all instruments used in the Art. It can only be properly used
within a Magic Circle [Kiss].
"Next I present the Wand. Its use is to call up and control
certain Angels and geniuses, to whom it would not be mete to use
the Magic Sword [Kiss].
"Next I present the pentacles. These are for the purpose of
calling up appropriate Spirits [Kiss].
"Next I present the Censer of Incense. This is used to
encourage and welcome Good Spirits and to banish Evil Spirits.[kiss]
"Next I present the scourge. This is a sign of power and
domination. It is also to cause suffering and purification, for
it is written, to learn you must suffer and be purified. Art
willing to suffer to learn?"
Witch: "I am.
"[Kiss]
Magus: "Next, and lastly I present the Cords. They are of
use to bind the sigils in the Art, the material basis, and to
enforce thy will. Also they are necessary in the oath. I Salute
thee in the name of Aradia and Cernunnos, Newly made Priestess
and Witch."
Magus strikes seven knells on the bell and kisses Witch again,
then circumambulates with her, proclaiming to the four quarters,
"Hear, ye Mighty Ones, (name) hath been consecrated
Priestess and Witch of the Gods."
(Note, if ceremony ends here, close circle with "I thank ye
for attending, and I dismiss ye to your pleasant abodes. Hail
and farewell." If not, go to next degree.)
[Second Degree]
Magus binds Witch as before, but does not blindfold her, and
circumambulates with her, proclaims to the four quarters, "Hear,
ye Mighty Ones, (name), a duly consecrated Priestess and Witch,
is now properly prepared to be made a High Priestess and Witch
Queen."
Magus now leads her thrice around the circle with the
half-running, half- dancing step, halts south of the altar, has
the Witch kneel, and ties her down to the altar as before.
Magus: "To attain this sublime degree, it is necessary to
suffer and be purified. Art ready to suffer to Learn?"
Priestess Witch: "I am."
Magus: "I prepare thee to take the great oath." He
strikes three knells on the bell, and again gives the series of
three, seven, nine, and 21 strokes with the scourge as before.
Magus: "I now give thee a new name: _______. [kiss]
Magus: "Repeat thy new name after me, I, (name), swear upon
my mother's womb and by mine Honor among men and among my
brothers and sisters of the Art, that I will never reveal to any
at all any of the secrets of the Art, except it be to a worthy
person, properly prepared, in the center of a Magic Circle, such
as I am now in. This I swear by my hopes of Salvation, my past
lives, and my hopes of future ones to come, and I devote myself
to utter destruction if I break this my solemn oath. "
Magus kneels, placing left hand under her knees and right hand
on her head, thus forming magic link.
Magus: "I hereby will all my power into you." Wills.
Magus now unties her feet, unties the Cable Tow from the altar,
and helps the Witch to her feet.
Magus: "I hereby sign and consecrate you with the great
Magic Sign. Remember how it is formed and you will always
recognize it.
"I consecrate thee with oil." (He anoints her with oil
on her womb, right breast, left hip, right hip, left breast, and
womb again, thus tracing a point-down pentacle.)
"I consecrate thee with wine." (He anoints her with
wine in the same pattern.)
"I consecrate thee with my lips" (he kisses her in the
same pattern), "High Priestess and Witch Queen."
Magus now unbinds Witch's hands and removes the cord, saying,
"Newly made High Priestess and Witch Queen" [kiss]
"you will now use the working tools in turn. First, the
Magic Sword; with it you will scribe the Magic Circle [kiss]
"Secondly, the Athame" (Form Circle) [kiss]
"Thirdly, the White Handled Knife" (use) [kiss]
"Fourthly, the Wand" (Wave to 4 Quarters) [kiss]
"Fifthly, the Pentacle" (Show to 4 Quarters) [kiss]
"Sixthly, the Censer of Incense" (Circle, cense) [kiss]
"Seventhly, the cords; bind me as I bound you.
" Witch binds Magus and ties him to Altar.
Magus: "Learn, in Witchcraft, thou must ever return triple.
As I scourged thee, so thou must scourge me, but triple. So
where you received 3, return 9; where you received 7, return 21;
where you received 9, return 27; where you received 21, return
63."
Witch scourges Magus as instructed, 120 strokes total.
Magus: "Thou hast obeyed the Law. But mark well, when thou
receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold."
Witch now unbinds Magus and helps him to his feet. Magus, taking
the new Initiate by the hand and holding the Athame in the other,
passes once round the Circle, proclaiming at the Four Quarters,
"Hear, Ye Mighty Ones, (name) hath been duly consecrated
High Priestess and Witch Queen."
(Note, if ceremony ends here, close circle with "Hail and
farewell." If not go to next degree.)
[Third Degree]
Magus: "Ere we proceed with this sublime degree, I must beg
purification at thy hands." High Priestess binds Magus and
ties him down to the altar. She circumambulates three times, and
scourges Magus with three, seven, nine, and 21 strokes. She then
unbinds him and helps him to his feet. Magus now binds the High
Priestess and ties her down to the altar. He circumambulates,
proclaiming to the four quarters, "Hear, ye mighty Ones,
the twice consecrate and Holy (name), High Priestess and Witch
Queen, is properly prepared and will now proceed to erect the
Sacred Altar." Magus scourges High Priestess with three,
seven, nine, and 21 strokes. Cakes and wine may now be taken [see
section A.5].
Magus: "Now I must reveal to you a great Mystery." [kiss].
Note: if High Priestess has performed this rite before, omit
these words. High Priestess assumes Osiris position.
Magus: "Assist me to erect the Ancient Altar, at which in
days past all worshipped, the Great Altar of all things. For in
the old times a woman was the Altar. Thus was the altar made and
so placed [Priestess lies down in such a way that her vagina is
approximately at the center of the circle], and the sacred place
was the point within the center of the circle, as we of old
times have been taught, that the point within the center is the
origin of all things. Therefore should we adore it." [kiss]
"Therefore, whom we adore, we also invoke, by the power of
the lifted lance." Invokes. "O circle of stars [kiss],
whereof our Father is but the younger brother [kiss], "Marvel
beyond imagination, soul of infinite space, before whom time is
ashamed, the mind bewildered and understanding dark, not unto
thee may we attain unless thine image be of love [kiss]. "Therefore,
by seed and root, and stem and bud and leaf and flower and fruit
do we invoke thee, O, Queen of space, O dew of light, O
continuous one of the Heavens [kiss]. "Let it be ever thus,
that men speak not of Thee as one, but as none, and let them not
speak of thee at all, since thou art continuous, for thou art
the point within the circle [kiss], which we adore [kiss], the
fount of life without which we would not be [kiss]. "And in
this way truly are erected the Holy Twin Pillars Boaz and Jachin
[kisses breasts]. In beauty and strength were they erected, to
the wonder and glory of all men."
(Eightfold Kiss: 3 points, Lips, 2 Breasts and back to lips; 5
points) "O Secrets of secrets that art hidden in the being
of all lives. Not thee do we adore, for that which adoreth is
also thou. Thou art that and That am I [kiss]. "I am the
flame that burns in every man, and in the core of every star [kiss].
"I am Life and the giver of Life, yet therefore is the
knowledge of me the Knowledge of Death [kiss]. "I am alone,
the Lord within ourselves whose name is Mystery of Mysteries [kiss].
"Make open the path of intelligence between us. For these
truly are the 5 points of fellowship [on the right appears an
illuminated diagram of the point-up triangle above the pentacle,
the symbol for the third degree], feet to feet, knee to knee,
groin to groin, breast to breast, arms around back, lips to lips,
by the Great and Holy Names Abracadabra, Aradia, and Cernunnos.
Magus and High Priestess: "Encourage our hearts, Let thy
Light crystallize itself in our blood, fulfilling us of
Resurrection, for there is no part of us that is not of the Gods."
(Exchange Names.)
Closing the Circle High Priestess Circumambulates, proclaiming,
"The twice consecrate High Priestess greets ye Mighty Ones,
and dismisseth ye to your pleasant abodes. Hail and Farewell."
She draws the banishing pentacle at each quarter.
A.5. Cakes and Wine (1949)
Magus kneels, fills Cup, offers to Witch [she is seated on the
altar, holding her athame; Priest kneels before her, holding up
the cup]. Witch, holding Athame between palms, places point in
cup.
Magus: "As the Athame is the Male, so the Cup is the female;
so, conjoined, they bring blessedness."
Witch lays aside Athame, takes Cup in both hands, drinks and
gives drink. Magus Holds Paten to Witch, who blesses with Athame,
then eats and gives to Eat.
It is said that in olden days ale or mead was often used instead
of wine. It is said that spirits or anything can be used so long
as it has life.
A.6. The Sabbat Rituals (1949)
November Eve
Walk or slow dance, Magus leading High Priestess, both carrying
Phallic wand or broom, people with torches or candles.
Witch chant or song:
"Eko, eko, Azarak Eko, eko, Zomelak Bazabi lacha bachabe
Lamac cahi achababe Karrellyos Lamac lamac Bachalyas cabahagy
sabalyos Baryolos Lagoz atha cabyolas Samahac atha famolas
Hurrahya!"
Form circle.
High Priestess assumes Goddess position.
Magus gives her Fivefold Kiss and is scourged.
All are purified [that is, bound and scourged with forty strokes,
as in the initiation rituals].
Magus assumes God position.
High Priestess invokes with Athame: "Dread Lord of the
shadows, god of life and the giver of life. Yet is the knowledge
of thee the knowledge of death. Open wide, I pray thee, thy
gates through which all must pass. Let our dear ones who have
gone before, return this night to make merry with us. And when
our time comes, as it must, O thou the comforter, the consoler,
the giver of peace and rest, we will enter thy realms gladly and
unafraid, for we know that when rested and refreshed among our
dear ones, we shall be born again by thy grace and the grace of
the Great Mother. Let it be in the same place and the same time
as our beloved ones, and may we meet and know, and love them
again. Descend, we pray thee, upon thy servant and Priest ( name)
"
High Priestess gives Fivefold Kiss to Magus.
Initiations if any; all others are purified.
(Note: Couples may purify each other if they will.)
Cakes and Wine.
The Great Rite if possible, either in token or truly.
Dismiss [the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the
people then stay to] feast and dance.
February Eve
After usual opening, all are doubly purified [that is, with
eighty strokes].
Dance round outside circle,
High Priestess with sword girded on and drawn, phallic wand in
left hand.
Enter circle.
Magus assumes God position.
High Priestess gives Fivefold Kiss, invokes: "Dread Lord of
death and Resurrection, life and the giver of life, Lord within
ourselves, whose name is Mystery of Mysteries, encourage our
hearts. Let the light crystalize in our blood, fulfilling us of
resurrection, for there is no part of us that is not of the gods.
Descend, we pray thee, upon this thy servant and Priest (name)."
All should be purified in sacrifice before him.
He then purifies the High Priestess with his own hands, and
others if he will.
Cakes and wine.
Great Rite if possible, in token or real.
Games and dance as the people will.
Dismiss [the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the
people then stay to] feast and dance.
May Eve
If possible ride poles, brooms, etc. High Priestess leading,
quick dance step, singing
"O do not tell the priests of our arts. For they would call
it sin, For we will be in the woods all night A conjuring summer
in. And we bring you good news by word of mouth for women,
cattle, and corn: The sun is coming up from the south, With oak
and ash, and thorn."
Meeting dance if possible.
Form circle as usual, and purify.
High Priestess assumes Goddess position; officers all give her
the fivefold kiss.
She purifies all.
High Priestess again assumes Goddess position.
Magus invokes, draws down moon, "I invoke thee and call
upon thee, O mighty Mother of us all, bringer of all
fruitfulness, By seed and root, by stem and bud, by leaf and
flower and fruit, by life and love, do we invoke thee, to
descend upon the body of thy servant and Priestess here."
Magus gives Fivefold Kiss to High Priestess.
All should be purified in sacrifice before her, and she should
purify Magus and some others with her own hands.
Cakes and wine.
Games.
Great Rite if possible, in token or truly.
Dismiss the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the
people then stay to feast and dance.
August Eve If possible, ride poles, broomsticks, etc.
Meeting Dance if possible [the double-spiral dance described in
Witchcraft Today, p. 167].
Form circle.
Purify.
High Priestess stands in pentacle position.
Magus invokes her: "O mighty Mother of us all, Mother of
all fruitfulness, give us fruit and grain, flocks and herds and
children to the tribe that we be mighty, by thy rosy love, do
thou descend upon thy servant and Priestess (name) here."
Magus gives Fivefold Kiss to High Priestess.
Candle game: Seated, the men form a circle, passing a lighted
candle from hand to hand "deosil".
The women form circle outside, trying to blow it out over their
shoulders.
Whoever's hand it is in when it is blown out is 3 times purified
by whoever blew it out, giving fivefold Kiss in return. This
game may go on as long as the people like.
Cakes and wine, and any other games you like.
Dismiss the guardians, and close down the magic circle; the
people then stay to feast and dance.
B.1. On Chants (1953)
Of old there were many chants and songs used especially in the
Dances. Many of these have been forgotten by us here, but we
know that they used cries of IAU which
seems muchly like the cries EVO or EVOHE
of the ancients. Much dependeth on the pronunciation if
this be so. In my youth, when I heard IAU it
seemed to be AEIOU, or rather, AAAEEIOOOOUU.
This may be but the natural way to prolong it to make it fit for
a call, but it suggests that these be possibly the initials of
an invocation as Agla is said to be, and of sooth 'tis said that
the whole Hebrew alphabet is said to be such, and for this
reason is recited as a most powerful charm, but at least this is
certain, these cries during the dances do have profound effect,
as I myself have seen.
Other calls are IEHOUA and EHEIE;
also Ho Ho Ho Ise Ise Ise.
IEO VEO VEO VEO VEOV OROV OV OVOVO
may be a spell but is more likely to be a call. 'Tis like
the EVOE EVOE of the Greeks and the
"Heave ho!" of sailors. "Emen hetan" and
"Ab hur, ab hus" seem calls; as "Horse and
hattock, horse and go, horse and Pellatis, ho, ho, ho!"
"Thout, tout a tout tout, throughout and about" and
"Rentum tormentum" are probably mispronounced attempts
at a forgotten formula, though they may have been invented by
some unfortunate being tortured, to evade telling the real
formula.
B.2. To Help the Sick (1953)
1 Ever remember
the promise of the goddess, "For ecstasy is mine and joy on
earth" so let there ever be joy in your heart. Greet people
with joy, be glad to see them. If times be hard, think, "It
might have been worse. I at least have known the joys of the
Sabbath, and I will know them again." Think of the grandeur,
beauty, and Poetry of the rites, of the loved ones you meet
through them. If you dwell on this inner joy, your health will
be better. You must try to banish all fear, for i t will really
touch you. It may hurt your body, but your soul is beyond it
all.
2 And ever
remember, that if you help others it makes you forget your own
woes. And if another be in pain, do what you may to distract his
attention from it. Do not say "You have no pain," but
if you may, administer the drugs which sooth as well as those
that cure. But ever strive to make them believe they are getting
better. Install into them happy thoughts. If you can only get
this into his inner mind so that it be always believed.
3 To this end it
is not wrong to let people think that we of the cult have more
power than we have. For the truth is that if they believe we
have more power than we really possess, we do really possess
these powers, insomuch we can do good to them .
4 You must try to
find out about people. If you tell a slightly sick man, "You
are looking better. You will soon be well," he will feel
better, but if he is really ill, or in pain, his Knowledge that
he is in pain will cause him to doubt your words in future. But
if you give him one of the drugs and then say, "The pain is
growing less. Soon it will be gone," because the pain goes,
the next time you say, "The pain is going," he will
believe you and the pain will really get less. But you must ever
say so with conviction, and this conviction must come from your
believing it yourself, because you yourself know that if you can
fix his mind so that he believes you, it is true.
5 'Tis often
better to look exactly between their eyes, looking as if your
eyes pierced their heads, opening your eyes as wide as you may
and never blink. This continued gazing oft causes the patient to
grow sleepy. If they show signs of this, say "You are
growing sleepy. You will sleep, you are tired. Sleep. Your eyes
grow tired. Sleep." If they close their eyes, say "Your
eyes close, you are tired, you cannot open your eyes." If
they cannot, say "Your arms are tired, you cannot raise
them." If they cannot, say "I am master of your mind.
You must ever believe what I tell you. When I look like this
into your eyes you will sleep and be subject to my will,"
then tell them they will sleep and wake up refreshed, feeling
better. Continue this with soothing and healing drugs, and try
to infuse into them the feeling of ecstasy that you feel at the
Sabbath. They cannot feel it in full, but you can command them
to feel what is in your own mind, and try to concentrate on this
ecstasy. If you may safely tell that you are of the Cult, your
task may be easier. And it were well to command them to know it
only with their sleeping mind, and forget it, or to be at least
unable to tell anyone about it when awake. A good way is to
command them that, if they are ever questioned about Witchcraft
or Witches, to immediately fall asleep.
6 Ever remember
if tempted to admit or boast of belonging to the cult you be
endangering your brothers, for though now the fires of
persecution may have died down, who knows when they may be
revived? Many priests have knowledge of our secrets, and they
well know that, though much religious bigotry has calmed down,
many people would wish to join our cult. And if the truth were
known of its joys, the Churches would lose power, so if we take
many recruits, we may loose the fires of persecution against us
again. So ever keep the secrets.
7 Think joy,
think love, try to help others and bring joy into their lives.
Children are naturally easier to influence than grown people.
Ever strive to work through people's existing beliefs. For
instance, more than half of the world believe in amulets. An
ordinary stone is not an amulet but if it hath a natural hole in
it, it must be something unusual, so if the patient hath this
belief give him one. But first carry it next your skin for a few
days, forcing your will into it, to cure pain, to feel safe, or
against their particular fear, and this amulet may keep imposing
your will when you are absent. The masters of talismans knew
this full well when they say they must be made in a circle, to
avoid distraction, by someone whose mind is on the subject of
the work.
8 But keep your
own mind happy. Remember the Words of the Goddess: "I give
unimaginable joys on Earth, certainty, not faith, while in life,
and upon death, peace unutterable, rest, and ecstasy, and the
promise that you will return again." In the old days many
of us went to the flames laughing and singing, and so we may
again. We may have joy in life and beauty, and peace and Death
and the promise of return.
9 The Bible
speaks sooth, "A merry heart doeth good like a medicine but
a broken spirit breaketh the bones." But you may not have a
merry heart. Perchance you were born under an evil star. I think
that the effects of the stars are overestimated, but you cannot
make a merry heart to order, you say. But you can, in the Cult;
there be secret processes by which your will and imagination may
be influenced. This process also affects the body, and brings it
to joy. Your body is happy, so your mind is happy. You are well
because you are happy, and you are happy because you are well.
10 Prayer may be
used with good result if the patient believes it can and will
work. Many believe it can, but do not believe their God or saint
will help. Prayers to the Goddess help, especially the Amalthean
Horn Prayer, as it causes stimulation to the body as well as to
the mind.
B.3. The Scourge and the Kiss.
(1953)
1 Invocation
(Feet, knees, and wrists should be tightly bound to retard blood.)
Scourge 40 or more, to make skin tingle, then say, invoking
Goddess,
Hail, Aradia, from the Amalthean horn
Pour forth thy store of Love. I lowly bend
Before Thee! I invoke thee at the end
When other Gods are fallen and put to scorn.
Thy foot is to my lips! My sighs inborn
Rise, touch, curl about thy heart. Then spend,
Pitiful Love, loveliest Pity, descend
And bring me luck who am lonely and forlorn.
Ask the Goddess to help you to obtain your desires, then Scourge
again to bind the spell. This be powerful in ill luck and for
sickness. It must be said in a Circle, and you must be properly
prepared and well purified, both before and after saying, to
bind the spell. Before starting you must make a very clear
picture in your mind of what you wish. Make yourself see the
wish obtained. Be sure in your own mind exactly what it is and
how it is to be fulfilled. This spell is the one that was taught
to me long ago and I have found it works, but I don't think
there is any special virtue in these words. Any others can be
substituted provided they ask the goddess's (or gods') help, and
say clearly what you wish and you form the clear mental image;
and if it doesn't work at first, keep on trying till it works.
Your helper, who wields the scourge, must know what you wish,
and also form the mental image. And at first at any rate, it
will be better for you to work the spell, then for the girl to
take your place and work it also; you scourge her. Don't try
anything difficult at first, and do it at least once a week till
it works. You have to get into sympathy with each other, before
anything happens, and regular working helps this. Of spells, the
exact words matter little if the intent be clear and you raise
the true power, and sufficient thereof. Always in rhyme they
are. There is something queer about rhyme. I have tried, and the
same seem to lose their power if you miss th e rhyme. Also in
rhyme, the words seem to say themselves. You do not have to
pause and think: "What comes next?" Doing this takes
away much of your intent. [2] Order and discipline must be kept.
A High Priest or Priestess may and should punish all faults to
this end, and all of the Cult must accept such corrections
willingly. All are brothers and sisters, for this reason: that
even the High Priestess must submit to the scourge. Each fault
should be corrected separately. The Priest or Priestess must be
properly prepared and call the culprit to trial. They must be
prepared as for initiation and kneel, be told their fault and
sentence pronounced.
Punishment should be the scourge, followed by a forfeit such as
several fivefold kisses or something of this nature. The culprit
must acknowledge the justice of the punishment by kissing hands
and scourge on receiving sentence and again when thanking for
punishment received.*
3 The scourgings
are 3, 7, 9 (thrice three), and 21 (thrice seven) 40 in all. It
is not meet to make offerings [scourgings] of less than two
score to the Goddess, for here be a mystery. The fortunate
numbers be: 3 and 5. For three added to two ( the Perfect Couple)
be five. And three and five be eight; eight and five be thirteen;
thirteen and eight be twenty-one.
The Fivefold Kiss is called 5, but there are 8 kisses, for there
be 2 feet and 2 knees and genitals and 2 breasts and the lips.
And 5 times 8 be two score. Also, fortunate numbers be 3, 7, 8,
and 21, which total 40, or two score. For each man and woman
hath ten fingers and ten toes, so each totals a score. And a
perfect couple be two score.
So a lesser number would not be perfect prayer. If more are
required make it a perfect number, as four score or six score.
Also there be Eight Elemental Weapons.
4 To make the
anointing ointment, take some glazed pans filled half full with
grease or olive oil. Put in one sweet mint, marjoram in another,
ground thyme in a 3rd, and it you may have it, patchouli, dried
leaves pounded. Place pans in hot water bath. Stir and cook for
several hours, then pout into linen bags, and squeeze grease
through into pans again, and fill up with fresh leaves. After
doing this several times, the grease will be highly perfumed.
Then mix all together and store in a well-corked jar.Anoint
behind ears, throat, armpits, breasts, and womb. Also, for all
ceremonies where the feet are kissed, they should also be
anointed.
B.4. The Priestess and the Sword
(1953)
It is said, "When a woman takes the main part in worship of
the Male God, she must be girt with a sword." Note. This
hath been explained as meaning that a man should be Magus
representing the God, but if no one of sufficient rank and
knowledge be present, a woman armed as a man may take his place.
The sheath should be worn in a belt. She should carry the sword
in hand, but if she has to use her hands, she should sheath the
sword. Any other woman in the circle while this worship is
performed shall be sword in hand. Those outside the circle only
have the athame.
A woman may impersonate either the God or the Goddess, but a man
may only impersonate the God.
B.5. The Warning (1953)
Keep this book in your own hand of write. Let brothers and
Sisters copy what they will, but never let this book out of your
hands, and never keep the writings of another, for if it be
found in their hand of write, they may well be taken and
tortured. Each should guard his own writings and destroy them
whenever danger threatens. Learn as much as you may by heart,
and when the danger is past, rewrite your book. For this reason,
if any die, destroy their book if they have not been able to,
for, if it be found, 'tis clear proof against them. "Ye may
not be a Witch alone"; so all their friends be in danger of
the torture. So destroy everything not necessary. If your book
be found on you, 'tis clear proof against you. You may be
tortured. Keep all thought of the cult from your mind. Say you
had bad dreams, that a Devil caused you to write this without
your knowledge. Think to yourself, "I Know Nothing . I
Remember nothing. I have forgotten all." Drive this into
your mind. If the torture be too great to bear, say, "I
will confess. I cannot bear this torment. What do you want me to
say? Tell me and I will say it." If they try to make you
talk of the brotherhood, do not, but if they try to make you
speak of impossibilities, such as flying through the air,
consorting with the Devis, sacrificing children, or eating men's
flesh, say, "I had an evil dream. I was not myself. I was
crazed." Not all Magistrates are bad. If there be an excuse,
they may show you mercy. If you have confessed aught, deny it
afterwards. Say you babbled under the torture; you knew not what
you did or said. If you be condemned, fear not. The Brotherhood
is powerful. They may help you to escape if you are steadfast.
If you betray aught, there is no hope for you, in this life, or
in that which is to come. But, 'tis sure, that if steadfast you
go to the pyre, drugs will reach you. You will feel naught , and
you go but to Death and what lies beyond, the ecstasy of the
Goddess.
The same with the working Tools. Let them be as ordinary things
that anyone may have in their homes. The Pentacles shall be of
wax that they may be melted or broken at once. Have no sword
unless your rank allows you one. Have no names or signs on
anything. Write them on in ink before consecrating them and wash
it off at once when finished. Never boast, never threaten, never
say you wish ill to anyone. If any speak of the craft, say,
"Speak not to me of such, it frightens me, 'tis evil luck
to speak of it."
B.6. Of the Ordeal of the Art
Magical (1953)
Learn of the spirit that goeth with burdens that have not
honour, for 'tis the spirit that stoopeth the shoulders and not
the weight. Armour is heavy, yet it is a proud burden and a man
standeth upright in it. Limiting and constraining any of the s
enses serves to increase the concentration of another. Shutting
the eyes aids the hearing. So the binding of the initiate's
hands increases the mental perception, while the scourge
increaseth the inner vision. So the initiate goeth through it
prou dly, like a princess, knowing it but serves to increase her
glory. But this can only be done by the aid of another
intelligence and in a circle, to prevent the power thus
generated being lost. Priests attempt to do the same with their
scourgings and mortifications of the flesh. But lacking the aid
of bonds and the ir attention being distracted by their
scourging themselves and what little power they do produce being
dissipated, as they do not usually work within a circle, it is
little wonder that they oft fail. Monks and hermits do better,
as they are apt to work in tiny cells and coves, which in some
way act as circles. The Knights of the Temple, who used mutually
to scourge each other in an octagon, did better still; but they
apparently did not know the virtue of bonds and did evil, man to
man.
But perhaps some did know? What of the Church's charge that they
wore girdles or cords?
B.7. The Eightfold Way. (1953)
Eightfold Path or Ways to the Centre.
1. Meditation or Concentration. This in practice means forming a
mental image of what is desired, and forcing yourself to see
that it is fulfilled, with the fierce belief and knowledge that
it can and will be fulfilled, and that you will go on willin g
till you force it to be fulfilled. Called for short,
"Intent"
2. Trance, projection of the Astral.
3. Rites, Chants, Spells, Runes, Charms, etc.
4. Incense, Drugs, Wine, etc., whatever is used to release the
Spirit. (Note. One must be very careful about this. Incense is
usually harmless, but you must be careful. If it has bad
aftereffects, reduce the amount used, or the duration of the
time it is inhaled. Drugs are very dangerous if taken to excess,
but it must be remembered that there are drugs that are
absolutely harmless, though people talk of them with bated
breath, but Hemp is especially dangerous, because it unlocks the
inner eye swiftly and easily, so one is tempted to use it more
and more. If it is used at all, it must be with the strictest
precautions, to see that the person who uses it has no control
over the supply. This should be doled out by some responsible
person , and the supply strictly limited.)
5. The Dance, and kindred practices.
6. Blood control (the Cords), Breath Control, and kindred
practices.
7. The Scourge.
8. The Great Rite.
These are all the ways. You may combine many of them into the
one experiment, the more the better.
The Five Essentials:
1. The most important is "Intention": you must know
that you can and will succeed; it is essential in every
operation.
2. Preparation. (You must be properly prepared according to the
rules of the Art; otherwise you will never succeed.)
3. The Circle must be properly formed and purified.
4. You all must be properly purified, several times if
necessary, and this purification should be repeated several
times during the rite.
5. You must have properly consecrated tools.
These five essentials and Eight Paths or Ways cannot all be
combined in one rite. Meditation and dancing do not combine
well, but forming the mental image and the dance may be well
combined with Chants. Spells, etc., combined with scourging and
No. 6, followed by No. 8, form a splendid combination.
Meditation, following scourging, combined with Nos. 3 and 4 and
5, are also very Good. For short cuts concentration, Nos. 5, 6,
7, and 8 are excellent.
B.8. To Gain the Sight (1953)
1 This cometh to
different people in diverse ways. 'Tis seldom it cometh
naturally, but it can be induced in many ways. Deep and
prolonged meditation may do it, but only if you be a natural,
and usually prolonged fasting was also necessary. Of ol d monks
and nuns obtained visions by long vigils, combined with fasting,
flagellation till the blood came, and other mortifications of
the flesh, and so undoubtedly had visions. In the East it is
tried with various tortures, at the same time sitting in cramped
postures, which retard the flow of blood, and these torments,
long and continued, give good results. But in the Art we are
taught an easier way to intensify the imagination, at the same
time controlling the blood supply, and this may bes t be done by
using the ritual.
2 Incense is also
good to propitiate the Spirits, but also to induce relaxation
and to help to build up the atmosphere which is neces-sary to
suggestibility. (For our human eyes are so blind to what really
is, that it is often necessary to suggest that it is there,
before we may see it, as we may point out to another something
at a distance before they may see it themselves. Gum mastic,
aromatic rush roots, cinnamon bark, musk, juniper, sandalwood,
and ambergris in combination are all good, b ut patchouli is
best of all. And if you may have hemp, 'tis better still, but be
very careful of this.
3 The circle
being formed, all properly prepared, and the Rites done, and all
purified, the aspirant should warlock and take his tutor round
the circle, saluting the Mighty Ones, and invoke them to aid the
operation. Then both dance round till gid dy, invoking or using
chants. Scourge. Then the Tutor should warlock very tightly, but
not so to cause discomfort, but enough to retard the blood
slightly. Again they should dance round, chanting, then scourge
with light, steady, monotonous, slow s trokes. lt is very good
that the pupil may see them coming (this may be arranged from
position, or if a big mirror is available, this can be used with
excellent effect) as this has the effect of passes, and helps
greatly to stimulate the imagination , and it is important that
they be not hard, the object being not to do more than draw the
blood to that part and so away from the brain. This with the
tight warlocking, which should be warricked, slows down the
circulation of the blood, and the pas ses soon induce a
drowsiness and a stupor. The tutor should watch for this. As
soon as the aspirant sleeps, the scourging should cease. The
tutor should also watch that the pupil become not cold, and if
they struggle or become distressed, they sho uld be at once
awakened. (Note: if it cannot be arranged for the pupil to see,
the wand may be used, for a time, then return to scourging.)
4 Do not be
discouraged if no results come after two or three attempts. It
will come, when both are in the right state. When you get some
result, then results will come more quickly. Soon some of the
ritual may be shortened, but never neglect to invoke the
Goddess, and the Mighty Ones, or to form the Circle and do
everything rightly. And for good and clear results, it is ever
better to do too much ritual than too little. [5] It hath been
found that this practice doth often cause a fondness between
aspirant and tutor, and 'tis a cause of better results if this
be so. If for any reason it is undesirable that there be any
great fondness between aspirant and tutor, this may be easily
avoided, by both parties from the onset firmly resolving in
their minds that if any doth ensue, it shall be that of brother
and sister or parent and child. And it is for this reason that a
man may only be taught by a woman and a woman by a man, and that
man and man, and woman and woman, should never attempt these
practices together. And may all the Curses of the Mighty Ones be
on any who make the attempt.*
6 Remember, the
Circle, properly constructed, is ever necessary to prevent the
power released from being dissipated. It is also a barrier
against any disturbances of mischievous forces, for to obtain
good results you must be free from all disturba nces. Remember
that darkness, points of light gleaming amid the surrounding
dark, incense, and the steady passes by a white arm are not
stage effects. They are the mechanical implements which start
the suggestions, which later unlocks the knowledge that it is
possible to obtain the divine ecstasy, and so attain knowledge
and communion with the Divine Goddess. When once you have
attained this, Ritual is not needed, as you may attain the state
of ecstasy at will, but till then, or if you having attained
this yourself, and wish to bring a companion to this state of
joy, ritual is best.
B.9. Power (1953)
Power is latent in the body and may be drawn out and used in
various ways by the skilled. But unless confined in a circle it
will be swiftly dissipated. Hence the importance of a properly
constructed circle. Power seems to exude from the body via the
skin and possibly from the orifices of the body; hence you
should be properly prepared. The slightest dirt spoils
everything, which shows the importance of thorough cleanliness.
The attitude of mind has great effect, so only work with a
spirit of reverence. A little wine taken and repeated during the
ceremony, if necessary, helps to produce power. Other strong
drinks or drugs may be used, but it is necessary to be very mod
erate, for if you are confused, even slightly, you cannot
control the power you evoke.
The simplest way is by dancing and singing monotonous chants,
slowly at first and gradually quickening the tempo until
giddiness ensues. Then the calls may be used, or even wild and
meaningless shrieking produces power. But this method inflames
the mind and renders it difficult to control the power, though
control may be gained through practice. The scourge is a far
better way, for it stimulates and excites both body and soul,
yet one easily retains control.
The Great Rite is far the best. It releases enormous power, but
the conditions and circumstances make it difficult for the mind
to maintain control at first. It is again a matter of practice
and the natural strength of the operator's will and, in a lesser
degree, of those of his assistants. If, as of old, there were
many trained assistants present and all wills properly attuned,
wonders occurred.
Sorcerors chiefly used the blood sacrifice; and while we hold
this to be evil, we cannot deny that this method is very
efficient. Power flashes forth from newly shed blood, instead of
exuding slowly as by our method. The victim's terror and anguish
add keenness, and even quite a small animal can yield enormous
power. The great difficulty is in the human mind controlling the
power of the lower animal mind. But sorcerers claim they have
methods for effecting this and that the difficulty disapp ears
the higher the animal used, and when the victim is human
disappears entirely. (The practice is an abomination but it is
so.) Priests know this well; and by their auto-da-fs, with the
victims' pain and terror (the fires acting much the same as
circles), obtained much power.
Of old the Flagellants certainly evoked power, but through not
being confined in a circle much was lost. The amount of power
raised was so great and continuous that anyone with knowledge
could direct and use it; and it is most probable that the clas
sical and heathen sacrifices were used in the same way. There
are whispers that when the human victim was a willing sacrifice,
with his mind directed on the Great Work and with highly skilled
assistants, wonders ensued but of this I would not speak .
B.10. Properly Prepared. (1953)
Naked, but sandals (not shoes) may be worn. For initiation, tie
hands behind back, pull up to small of back, and tie ends in
front of throat, leaving a cable-tow to lead by, hanging down in
front. (Arms thus form a triangle at back.) When initiate is
kneeling at altar, the cable-tow is tied to a ring in the altar.
A short cord is tied like a garter round the initiate's left leg
above the knee, with ends tucked in. Another is tied round right
ankle and ends tucked in so as to be out of the w ay while
moving about. These cords are used to tie feet together while
initiate is kneeling at the altar and must be long enough to do
this firmly. Knees must also be firmly tied. This must be
carefully done. If the aspirant complains of pain, th e bonds
must be loosened slightly; always remember the object is to
retard the blood flow enough to induce a trance state. This
involves slight discomfort, but great discomfort prevents the
trance state; so it is best to spend some little time loosening
and tightening the bonds until they are just right. The aspirant
alone can tell you when this is so. This, of course, does not
apply to the initiation, as then no trance is desired; but for
the purpose of ritual it is good that the initiates b e bound
firmly enough to feel they are absolutely helpless but without
discomfort.
B.11. The Meeting Dance. (1953)
The Maiden should lead. A man should place both hands on her
waist, standing behind her, and alternate men and women should
do the same, the Maiden leading and they dance following her.
She at last leads them into a right-hand spiral. When the cen
ter is reached (and this had better be marked by a stone), she
suddenly turns and dances back, kissing each man as she comes to
him. All men and women turn likewise and dance back, men kissing
girls and girls kissing men. All in time to music, it i s a
merry game, but must be practices to be done well. Note, the
musicians should watch the dancers and make the music fast or
slow as is best. For the beginners it should be slow, or there
will be confusion. It is most excellent to get people to know
each other at big gatherings.
B.12. To Leave the Body. (1953)
'Tis not wise to strive to get out of your body until you have
thoroughly gained the Sight. The same ritual as to gain the
Sight may be used, but have a comfortable couch.
THE ENTERED APRENTICE HANDBOOK by W.Bro. J.S.M. WARD
Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at
08:00PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment
THE ENTERED APPRENTICE HANDBOOK
by W.Bro. J.S.M. WARD
INTRODUCTION - By the Hon. Sir John A. Cockburn
W. Bro. Ward is one of the most able and earnest of Masonic
students. He brings to bear on the task of research the mind of
a scholar, enriched by extensive reading, much travel and a wide
experience of men and affairs. In addition to being a well known
author of Masonic Works, he was the Founder of the Masonic Study
Society, whose first President was the late Sir Richard Vassar
Vassar-Smith, 33 degree, and in whose ranks are to be found many
eminent Masonic writers.
Brother Ward has by precept and example led others to become
eager explorers in the realms of Masonic truth. The present
volume is No. 1 in a series of studies as to the meaning of our
Ritual. It deals with the degree of an Entered Apprentice and is
calculated to inspire the younger brethren with the resolve not
to content themselves with the outward form of our ceremonies,
beautiful though it be, but to gain a knowledge of the
indwelling soul of Masonry and to comprehend the deep meaning of
the ritual with which they are step by step becoming familiar.
Hence they will learn to regard the Craft not only as a
world-spread, civilising medium, nor yet only as the most
benevolent of all Institutions, but also as a mine of surpassing
wealth in which the Wisdom of the Ages has become embedded and
preserved. Bro. Ward at the outset disarms anything like hostile
criticism by admitting that many brethren may not find
themselves in complete accord with all his conclusions. Indeed,
it would be surprising if this were the case.
Like Holy Writ, the Ritual is capable of many interpretations.
It is a gradual accretion in which succeeding epochs have left
their mark. Evolution takes place under the alternation of
forces that make for difference and agreement. The process
demands a continual adjustment between these apparently
contrary, but in reality complementary factors. Each age sets
out to balance any deficiency in the preceding period.
When materialism has been pushed to excess, the tendency is
rectified by a spiritual revival. On the other hand, an age in
which zeal for the gifts of the spirit has caused neglect of
temporal welfare is naturally followed by a renaissance of the
just claims of the flesh. The subject matter of Masonry is the
relationship between Spirit and Matter, between Heaven and
Earth, between God and Man, between the Soul and the Body.
Emphasis is everywhere laid on the necessity of their
reconciliation. Consequently to attain the juste milieu emphasis
has sometimes to be laid on one side and sometimes on the other.
For example, the Cross and the Square, which have now such
deeply spiritual significance , were originally signs of Earth,
and became respectively, the essential symbols of Christianity
and Masonry, because it was necessary to proclaim the fact that
professions of piety towards God were idle, unless they bore
fruit in kindly relationship between man and man.
Bro. Ward regards the J.W. as
representing the body, and the S.W. the
soul, although the emblems and jewel of the former are celestial
and of the latter terrestrial. The fact is that things divine
and human are so interwoven in Masonry as to be inseparable.
Duty towards God and towards our neighbour are but different
aspects of the same truth. For the Fatherhood of God implies the
Brotherhood of Man, and, conversely, he who devotes himself to
the service of his fellow creatures proves, through his
brotherly relationship, his descent from the Father of AII.
The issue of Bro. Ward's series of handbooks cannot fail to
accomplish its main object, which is to lead not only juniors,
but also those well versed in the ritual, to mark, leam and
inwardly digest the significance of the ceremonies, which when
properly understood, causes our jewels and emblems to glow with
an inner light which infinitely enhances their beauty.
The ready reception which Bro. Ward's books have already
received at the hands of the Craft, prove that they meet a
recognised requirement as expositions of the character of a
ritual with whose external features we are familiar, and in
which we take our daily delight.
J.A.C.
The Mysteries
In every race and every clime,
Since the earliest days of Time,
Men have taught the Mystic Quest
Shown the Way to Peace and rest.
Bacchus died, and rose again,
On the golden Asian Plain;
Osiris rose from out the grave,
And thereby mankind did save:
Adonis likewise shed his blood
By the yellow Syrian flood,
Zoroaster brought to birth
Mithra from His Cave of Earth.
And to-day in Christian Lands
We with them can join hands.
J.W.
CHAPTER I. THE
OPENING OF THE FIRST DEGREE.
The W.M. calls the brethren together
with one knock so as to remind them that the body must be
prepared to obey the higher faculties, for if it is not, no
spiritual progress is possible. The first question and answer of
the J.W. indicate this quite clearly,
for the J.W. represents the body and
so he satisfies himself that man's body is on guard against
outside influences. The S.W., representing
the Soul, next proves that all present have made some progress
towards the light.
It is only when this has been achieved that any real advancement
becomes possible, and only those who have started can help those
who still remain in spiritual darkness. The next series of
questions indicates that Man has a seven-fold nature. The
Ancient Egyptians held this view , and it is endorsed in Masonry
by the fact that it takes seven to make a perfect lodge.
There is also, no doubt, an astrological reference to the seven
planets and a connection with stellar worship, but as our system
is mainly solar, it is almost impossible to give a logical
planetary interpretation to the seven who form a lodge, or to
the seven officers. In short, the planetary symbolism has become
disorganised by the stress laid on the solar aspect of the three
principal officers who rule a lodge. Moreover, the predominance
of the solar aspect has emphasised the triune nature of man, and
symbolises it in these officers.
Thus it will be seen that too much stress must not be laid on
the planets, as represented by the seven officers, and a passing
reference to the fact that it is still remembered in the number
seven is all that can be logically maintained. Similarly there
is merely a hint of the seven-fold nature of man. If ours were a
stellar system, then clearly the Tyler would represent the body,
the divine spark would be represented by the W.M.
, the various officers between would symbolise the
various sub-divisions of the non-materials parts of man, such as
his astral body, his intellectual faculties, and so forth.
Since, however, our system is solar in the main, we should
continue to interpret our symbols from that aspect, making but
passing reference to stellar influences when they occur. The
duties of the Tyler are considered elsewhere, so we will pass to
the I.G. Although in some popular
workings he and the other two subordinate officers are not
allowed to speak for themselves, the Wardens doing this work, in
many other rituals they are allowed to answer the W.M.
direct.
The I.G. stands for the power which
permits the Soul to enter flesh at any given moment. The Soul
may desire to become incarnate, but unless its time has come it
is turned back at the threshold, and even if it forces itself
into birth it is cut short. Entry into life is not an accident,
but ordained of God, Who works through His spiritual as well as
through His human agents. Those who saw Maeterlinck's play,
"The Blue Bird," will remember that the same idea is
dealt with in one of the scenes.
Spiritually, the I.G. represents the
warning which must be given to those who attempt, without due
caution, to probe into the Mysteries of God. They must neither
rush forward hastily, nor, having once started, withdraw
suddenly; for, if they do, dire evil will befall. This warning
all the Mysteries gave, and it is certain that those who dabble
in the so-called occult run grave risks unless they use the
utmost caution.
Hence it is absolutely essential that the candidate should be
properly prepared before he starts on his quest. The J.D.
represents the physical means by which the Soul,
represented by the S.W., passes on the
inspirations received from the Spirit, the W.M.,
to the material world. In this sense therefore he
represents intelligence, and the five senses of man, whereas the
S.D. stands for intuition, whereby the
Soul obtains its inspiration from the Divine.
In the ancient operative days these officers no doubt had a
practical use, the S.D. being the
personal messenger of the Master, who took messages to the S.W.,
not merely when in Lodge, but when he was at a distance,
employed on his task, or possibly when he was resting from his
labours, In like manner the S.W. 's
deacon was sent by him to find the J.W.
The J.W. describes his position in L.
and indicates quite clearly that he represents the Sun at noon.
From the operative point of view it must be remembered that Noon
has always been, and still is, a workingman's dinner hour, hence
the special duty of the J.W. ; but in
the spiritual sense, since he stands for the body, it is natural
that he should have charge over the body's needs. As he also
represents the preservative side of God, his interest in the
physical well-being of man is appropriate.
With this in mind the F. C. will realise the significance of the
P.W., and its connection with C. and
W. , which are the emblems of the God of Vegetation in the more
primitive rites. When men evolved, and the solar system of
religion developed, the God of Vegetation became the Preserver.
This characteristic of the J.W. is
emphasised by the upright lines of his plumb, which latter
reminds us of water which falls from heaven, and of the cast
marks of Vishnu in India.
This aspect of the J.W., as
representing the Preserver , is carefully maintained throughout
the whole of the three degrees and must never be forgotten. In
like manner, the fact that he stands for the body is also
maintained throughout. Bearing this in mind , we shall perceive
the significance of the fact that the Architect of K.S.
's Temple was the J.W. Finally,
bread and water represent the bare necessities, without which
mortal life cannot be preserved.
Luxuries, which are obtained when we have acquired worldly
possessions, i.e., wealth, lead to the death of the soul, and
even of the body, unless employed with the greatest caution.
Some masons claim that the J.W. originally
sat in the North to mark the Sun at noon, meaning to see, or
point out, that it had reached the midheavens. Honestly, I can
find no real evidence in support of this view, which likewise
places the W.M. in the West and the S.W.
in the East. It is due, in my opinion, to a complete
misunderstanding of the use of the words "to mark."
This phrase implies that the J.W. is
placed on a certain spot to mark the position of the Sun at
noon, and not that 'he may see it. In a closed-in building, such
as a lodge room was, it would be desirable to mark the three
positions of the Sun, for the candidate has to pass through each
point in turn, and these three officers, who represent the Sun
in its three aspects, would naturally sit in the positions in
use in a speculative lodge.
Any arguments adduced from the rituals of the modern Operative
Lodges are vitiated by two facts-(1) we have no evidence that
this peculiarity is really old (it may be due to Stretton's
inventive mind) and (2) the Operatives, if old, would be
descended from the Guild Masons and not from the Freemasons ;
and this might be a peculiarity of theirs, or deliberately
adopted so as to differentiate them from the Freemasons.
That the Guild Masons and Freemasons were quite distinct has
been proved as far back as 1913, and the fact is gone into in my
other book, "Freemasonry and the Ancient Gods." That
the Operatives are not descended direct from the Mediaeval
Freemasons is shown by the fact that they have entirely
different signs from our own. Thus we need not discuss further
the question as to whether the J.W. should
be in the North or South.
The S.W., as he indicates in his reply
to the W.M., represents the Sun in its
setting, and so the Destructive Side of the Deity, or Shiva. He
also stands for the Soul. Shiva shall close not only our mortal
life, but Time itself. But I have dealt with this side of the S.W.
very fully elsewhere. It should be noted, however, that
the S.W. is associated with level and
horizontal lines , and not with perpendiculars, and here again
he follows the Hindu system, for Shiva's caste mark is two or
more parallel lines.
As the Great Leveller this is most natural, and it reminds us
that in the sight of God all souls are equal, even though in
mortal life their stations may appear to differ. Shiva is
associated with the element of Fire, whereas Vishnu is
associated with Water, and as we see that great care has been
taken to maintain the connection between the J.W.
and Water, so we find that with us the S.W.
is similarly associated with Fire, though perhaps less
obviously.
Firstly, his level is of a triangular form with the point
upward, the world-wide symbol for Fire. Again, the S.W.
's P.W. has hidden within it
the same idea. A smith who works in metals can only do so by the
help of fire, and in one ritual this fact is stressed. Thus
metals come out from the dark earth, and the Sun sinks in the
West into darkness and the grave, as does man. But, by means of
fire, man obtains wealth from the metals hidden in the earth,
and in like manner the Soul of Man rises refined and purified
from the grave by means of the divine fire within.
Moreover, one cannot ignore the fact that there is here a hint
of the necessity of the purging fire of remorse to cleanse away
our sins. The S. W. is the Soul, the link between mortal life
and the Divine Spark , but he acts on instructions from the
Spirit; in other words, it is only when God decrees our death
that the Soul departs from the body. The W.M.
represents, as his words indicate, the creative side of
God and the Divine Spirit in Man. He sets us to work on earth,
but delegates to another the task of calling us back whence we
came.
He represents the male aspect of the Deity, as is shown by the
tau crosses, called levels, on his apron, and by his use of the
gavel, which represents the same emblem. The Tau Cross is, of
course, a phallic symbol and stands for the male and creative
aspect in Man. As the three principal officers represent the Sun
(a masculine planet) in various phases, it is natural that they
should all wield the gavel, but the two wardens are less
essentially male than the W.M., as is
indicated by the fact that they do not have the tau cross or
Master's level on their aprons.
The Spirit, being active, is male; whereas both soul and body,
being more or less passive, are female. The feminine side of the
S.W. or Soul is deliberately
emphasised later-in the first degree-by a reference to the Moon,
a feminine planet, the emblem of the Soul and of the psychic
nature in man. Nor can we ignore the fact that the West is known
as the feminine quarter of the heavens, whereas the East is the
masculine; it is also worth noticing that Shiva is often
depicted with the moon.
Finally, before declaring the L. open, the W.M.
offers up a prayer, thereby reminding us that the Divine
Spark in Man, or the Spirit, must turn to the Source of All for
aid if it would control body and soul. The three knocks, as
distinct from the one knock with which the proceedings started,
indicate that the members are about to work for the union and
advancement of body, soul and spirit, and not for the body only.
But the way in which the three knocks are given show that, as
yet, there is no unity between the three elements which
constitute Man.
CHAPTER II. THE TYLER
The first thing that greets the eyes of the aspirant to our
Order is a man, whom he soon discovers is called the Tyler,
standing in front of the door with a d.n. s.d. in his hand. He
naturally wants an answer to the question which actually occurs
in a certain famous old ritual, "Why does the Tyler wear a
s.d.?"and the answer is, "To guard the brethren
and to hele the Word." Let us consider this answer:
"To guard the brethren. "In certain old rituals of the
18th century we are told that Masons' Lodges formerly met in the
open-"on the highest hill or lowest valley, where never dog
barked nor cock crew."
Brethren will no doubt have read the interesting article in the
"Masonic Record" relating to this state of affairs,
but I am bound to say that I do not think that the ordinary
mediaeval lodge met in such places. The reference to the cock,
together with certain details we possess with regard to those
lodges which did meet in the open, (they were mostly in
Scotland) indicate that they were not ordinary Craft lodges, but
much more probably Templar Lodges.
The Templars in the 18th century claimed to be descended from a
body which had been suppressed in the years 1307 to 1314-, and
actually prescribed. There was every reason therefore why they
should meet in out of the way places, but no such reason existed
in the case of a lodge of ordinary Freemasons. That such a
phrase should have wandered into a craft ritual from Templary is
perfectly natural, but it is not safe to argue from this that
all Masonic lodges met under the canopy of heaven.
In those early days, many higher degrees were worked in ordinary
Craft Lodges, in a way not permitted to-day; and this may easily
account for phrases more appropriate to a Templar Preceptory
being found in a Craft working. I might add that until the
middle of the 19th century Templar meetings were always called
"Encampments," indicating that they were camps held in
the open fields.
But in mediaeval times we know that the Freemasons had Lodge
buildings, and if they went to a new place to build a church or
castle , the first thing they did was to erect a temporary Lodge
room, which they attended before starting the day's work. Those
interested will find abundant details in Fort Newton's
interesting little book, "The Builders." There also it
is clearly shown that there were two kinds of masons in those
days, and the man who conclusively proved this was not a modern
Speculative Freemason.
The two groups were the Freemasons and the Guild Masons. The
former were lineal descendents of the Comacine Masons-who,
incidentally, knew a certain Masonic Sign-and these men were
skilled architects, free to go anywhere. They had a monopoly of
ecclesiastical building and of work otlrside the towns, e.g.
castles. The Guild Masons were humbler folk. They were not
allowed to build outside their particular city, but had a
monopoly of all building inside that city, with one important
and significant exception:-they were not allowed to build
ecclesiastical buildings.
In return for their charter they had to maintain the
fortifications. When a church had to be built the Freemasons
were sent for, and apparently they called on the Guild Masons to
help them with the rough work, e.g., to square the stones, etc.
I suggest that Speculative Freemasonry is mainly descended from
the Freemasons, whereas the few Operative Lodges that survive
are probably descended from the Guild masons. This theory is
borne out by the fact that while the Operatives have our g.s.
they have not our s.ns, yet these s.ns are unquestionably old.
They would all have the same g. for convenience in proving to
the Freemasons that they were really masons, but they would keep
their s.ns to themselves, as did the Freemasons, since they did
not want the other group to have access to their private
meetings. Further, we find that the Master Masons of the
Freemasons were entitled to maintenance as
"gentlemen," clearly indicating that they were
different from ordinary craftsmen (See Fort Newton).
After the Reformation no doubt Freemasons and Guild masons
tended to amalgamate, and this explains much. Now if the
Freemasons erected a lodge before they started to build a church
or castle, we shall see that their meeting in the open would be
merely occasional, e.g., while the temporary lodge was being
built, and not a regular custom ; but the very fact that is was
a temporary building, and open to approach by all and sundry who
came to the site of the new edifice, is quite sufficient to
explain why they had someone on guard.
Why, however, is he called a Tyler, instead of Sentinel, or some
similar name? There are three explanations, and we can adopt
which we please:-
1. To tile is to cover in; hence the Tyler is one who covers or
conceals what is going on in the lodge. 2. In the old mediaeval
Templar ceremony there were three sentinels; one inside the
door, one outside, and one on the roof or tiles, who could see
if anyone was approaching the building. It will be remembered
that the old Templar Churches were round, so that a man perched
on the roof was able to see in every direction. 3. That the
tilers were inferior craftsmen as compared with the genuine
Freemasons; poor brethren, as it were, and not admitted to full
membership, although one or two were chosen to act as Outer
Guards.
I am not greatly impressed with the latter theory, and my person
predilection is in favour of No. 1 ; but there is a good deal to
be said for No. 2. The tyler guarded the brethren from
"cowans" or eavesdroppers. The former word is still
used in the country districts of Lancashire and Westmorland for
a dry-dyker, that is, a man who builds rough walls between the
different fields, of rough, uncut, and unmortared stones.
When I was living in Yorkshire I had a number of fields so
surrounded; the stones for which were picked from the hillside,
and piled one upon another. No particular skill was needed to
build such a wall; I repaired several myself. In other words, a
"cowan" is one who pretends to be a mason because he
works in stone, but is not one. Some fanciful derivations have
been suggested from "Cohen," the Jewish priest. I
disagree entirely with this view.
Why should the Jewish Cohens be more likely to pretend to be
Freemasons than any other priests? As the other word is spelt as
we spell ours, and means what I have stated, I see no reason to
invent this suggestion regarding the Jewish priests, who were
always few in number, and in the Middle Ages hardly existed:-the
Jews were driven out of England by Edward I.,
and not re-admitted until the time of Cromwell.
"Eavesdroppers" means men who listen under the eaves.
The eaves of a primitive or of a mediaeval cottage overhung a
considerable distance beyond the walls, and between the roof and
the wall was an open space. Through this space the smoke of the
fire escaped; the general arrangement being very similar to that
found in the tropics. The walls of such a cottage were often
only five to six feet high, and thus a man could stand under the
eaves in the shadow, hidden from the light of the sun or moon,
and both see and hear what was going on inside, without those
who were in the lodge knowing he was there.
But the Tyler was on guard outside the door of the Lodge; he was
armed with a d..n s..d, and woe betide any eavesdropper he
discovered, for our mediaeval brethren undoubtedly interpreted
their obligations literally. Incidentally, I understand that
nominally the duty of carrying out the pen. still rests on the
shoulders of the Tyler.
With regard to the use of temporary buildings on or near the
site of the edifice, it should be noted that during the building
of Westminster Abbey there was at least one, if not two, such
lodges, and they are mentioned in the records of the Abbey. One
seems to have stood on the site of the subsequent nave. Thus we
can see that it was essential that there should be an Outer
Guard to keep off intruders, owing to the fact that Lodges were
usually held in temporary buildings, often with overhanging
eaves and an open space between the top of the walls and the
beams which supported the roof.
The word "hele" should, in my opinion, be pronounced
"heal," not "hale." The use of
"hale" is due to the fact that in the 18th century the
words "conceal," and "reveal," were
pronounced "concale" and "revale." Since the
words obviously were a jingle, I consider it is more correct
to-day to pronounce it "heal." Moreover, the word
"hele" means to cover over.
You still hear the phrase used, "to hele a cottage,"
or even a haystack, and the word "Hell" implies the
place that is covered over, e.g., in the centre of the earth.
"Hele" is connected with "heal"-to cover up,
or to close up, a wound-and the meaning therefore is
tautalogical, viz, "to cover up the word." (The
Masonic s -t")
The use of the pronunciation "Hale" is to-day most
misleading, and is apt to cause a newly initiated Bro. to think
he has to "hail" something, or "proclaim it
aloud." The C. is taken in hand by the Tyler, who makes him
sign a form to the effect that he is free and of the full age of
21 years. Why "free?" Well, in mediaeval days he had
to bind himself to serve as an apprentice for seven years.
Unless he was a free man, his owner might come along and take
him away, before he had completed his apprenticeship and, worse
still, might extort from him such secrets as he had learnt from
the masons. Thus the master might be enabled to set himself up
as a free lance, not under the control of the fraternity. The
twenty-one years is, I believe, an 18th century Speculative
innovation, aiming at a similar object.
I think there is no doubt that usually in the Middle Ages an
apprentice was a boy, who placed himself under the control of a
Master with his parents' consent. The Master was henceforth in
loco parentis. In the 18th century without some such safeguard
(as 21 years) some precocious youth might have joined the
fraternity without his father's consent.
The father might have been one who disapproved of F.M.,
and in such a case would probably have not hesitated to
exercise his parental authority in the drastic manner at that
time in vogue, and so exhort the secrets, which he could then
have "exposed." To-day it is still a very reasonable
clause, for it presupposes that man has reached years of
discretion and knows what he is about.
Any real hardship is removed by the fact the G.L.
has power to dispense, which power it constantly uses in
the case of the University Lodges at Oxford and Cambridge. I
myself was one of those who thus benefited. It is, I believe,
still the custom in England that a Lewis, the son of a mason,
may be admitted at 18, though the right is seldom claimed; but
in some countries, I understand, it is a privilege highly
valued, and regularly used by those entitled to it.
In masonry a lewis is a cramp of metal, by which one stone is
fastened to another. It is usually some form of a cross, and a
whole chapter could be written on its significance, but this
casual reference must suffice.
CHAPTER III. PREPARATION.
The next thing that happens is that the C. is prepared by the
Tyler. This is a very important matter. There seems little doubt
that originally candidates were str..d n..d, and even to-day in
the U.S.A. C's are left in their sh-s
only. In Burma we changed out of everything into a one-piece
pyjama suit, a most convenient arrangement.
What we now have is a system by which the parts which have to be
b. are made b. We take our ob. on our L.K., therefore
that.K. must be B.. Why? So that our
flesh may be in contact with Mother Earth. It is possible that
there was a practical as well as a symbolical meaning in this ,
and also in the case of our deprivation of m..s. In some of the
ancient mysteries it has been suggested that a charge of
electricity was passed through the C. as he knelt at the altar,
either from a battery, or by what is now called magnetism.
If any question the use of electricity in those days, I would
point out that certain statements of Herodotus, to the effect
that the Egyptian priests brought down lightning by means of
rods, can best be explained by admitting that they had some
rudimentary knowledge of electricity. The b.b. is in order that
the S.I. can be applied.
The Scotch ritual, however, says it is to show your sex, but I
am inclined to think this is a modern gloss. Personally, I
should not regard this as conclusive proof in itself, for I have
seen (when abroad) many well grown girls who had no breasts
worth mentioning, while many native men had quite well developed
busts.
It should always be remembered that this is the degree of birth
and we were born n..d.. We are s. s. because we are about to
tread on holy ground, just as in the East we wear slippers when
entering a mosque. It is probable that the Scotch ritual has
preserved a real tradition when it refers to the custom in
Israel of removing a shoe, as a witness, when confirming an
obligation.
Those interested will find the details in Ruth, where Boaz
under-takes to marry Ruth. A.C.T. is
placed about his n.. This piece of symbolism is old and world
wide. On a vase found at Chama, in Mexico, several candidates
are depicted going through a ceremony very similar, apparently,
to a certain degree in M.,* One is
being taught a certain sign, and the others wha stand waiting
their turn all have C.T.s with a
running noose about their necks.
In India this C.T. is the emblem of
Yama, the God of Death, with which he snares the souls of men
and drags them forth from their bodies. It is carried by - Shiva
to indicate his destructive character in relation to human life.
There are in masonry meanings within meanings, and I will
therefore indicate a few of those associated with the C.T.
, but I shall not do so with all the details upon which I
shall touch. The C.T. is an emblem of
Death.
It is fastened round the necks of captives as showing that they
are at the absolute mercy of their conqueror. Thus the
burghesses of Calais had to come before Edward III.
in their shirts-note that-with c.T. 's round their necks.
They were only saved by the desperate pleading of good Queen
Philippa. But this is the degree of birth. Some come into the
world with a caul which may strangle them if not removed, and in
any case we are said to be born in original sin and therefore
doomed to die.
*See "Freemasonry and the Gods" Birth, in the very
nature of things, means death, and that is why the Hindoos have
made Shiva, the Lord of Death, also the Lord of Birth. We
ourselves are captives-souls bound by the chains of the
flesh-and offenders against the Law of the King of Kings.
Further, we come in bondage to sin, seeking to be freed from our
bonds by the word of God.
The holding of the C.T. , and the
dangers entailed, are sufficiently explained to need no further
mention just now, though this does not imply there are not inner
meanings. The h.w. is always found in every great initiatory
rite. In general, it reminds us that as in the physical world we
came out of darkness into light, so in the intellectual, and
finally, in the spiritual world.
We come into masonry seeking the Light of God's word. In other
language, to try and comprehend through the use of symbols what
God really is. But as the veil of darkness is slightly lifted as
we grow in years and our intellect awakens , so it is in the
craft, and the first thing we see there is the V.S.L.,
itself a symbol of Divine inspiration; for without the
Divine spark, which speaks from the inmost recesses of the soul,
we shall remain in spiritual darkness all our natural life.
The C. is then brought to the door of the L. and challenged, but
strange to say, in our ritual there is no p.w.. There was once,
I have no doubt, and it is still in use in Scotland, Ireland and
U.S.A. Moreover, it is one of the
tests there when visiting, and if a man cannot give it he will
run a serious risk of being refused admission. Strange to say,
we do get it inside the Lodge, though perhaps most brethren do
not realise it.
It is "The T. of G.R."
(sometimes it is "Free and of G.R.,"
though this is less usual). But before entering we are deprived
of M.. Now, among the Dervishes M. =
mineral substances, but we interpret it M . . . 1. It is M . . .
1s!-that is important. "Valuables" is a real, but
subsidiary, meaning. Let us consider this carefully. There is an
explanation of why it is done in the lecture,-now, alas, seldom
read in Lodge-and also, of course, in the questions.
These lectures were the real instruction; on them were based the
tracing board Iectures, which were pictorial summaries, on which
were set certain questions. Now the lectures (which can be
bought at any Masonic furnishers) tell us that at the building
of the Temple no metallic implements were used. Why? Because
metals came from below. They were the gifts of the Thonic
Gods:-the Gods of the Underworld-useful, no doubt, but being
gifts of the Gods of the Underworld they were in their very
nature evil, and abhorrent to the Gods of Light, whom the white
races worshipped.
For this reason the Egyptians continued to use stone knives to
open the corpse preparatory to embalming it, long after they
used metal knives constantly. The holy dead must not be polluted
with the gifts of the evil powers. If there is anything in the
theory of an electric or magnetic discharge being made at the
time when a metal point is applied to the n. 1. b. at the ob. ,
this would also be a practical reason; the presence of metal
might make such a charge dangerous.
But the first reason is no doubt the original one, and probably
the only one. The idea that we bring nothing into this world is,
of course, likewise obvious; but its full significance is lost
in our ritual, although seen in the Irish. There a C. is
deprived of metals in the first and in the second degrees. The
significance of this will be realised by M.M.'s
if they ponder awhile on the meaning of the S.W.'s
P.W.- "How hardly shall a rich
man enter the kingdom of Heaven." That worldly possessions
hamper a man's spiritual progress is proclaimed by every
religion in the world which can truly be called great.
The Buddhist monk and the mediaeval friar alike agree on this.
Why p.w.s. at all? Here we wander into a strange field, no less
than that of old world magic, I think. The C. enters an E. A.
Lodge from the outside world. Prior to his entry this Lodge has
been opened by a peculiar ceremony :- a ceremony which, in the
technical language of magic and the occult, raises the
vibrations of those present; thus they are , as it were , raised
to a higher key, and force is generated.
Now those who have studied such matters know that a body of men
who are all concentrating on a particular subject do generate a
peculiar, subtle, but powerful force, which has not been
accurately defined by science , but is loosely called magnetic.
In the old days of phenomenal magic certain words, when uttered
in the correct tone, were believed to be in consonance with this
"power," like a tuning fork is to a violin.
Therefore we give this p.w. to the C. to raise him quickly to
the same "power" as the Lodge. But I am afraid I may
be getting rather deep for our younger readers. All I need say
further is that such p.w.s are universal in the great mystery
rites, ancient or modern, and it is not surprising, therefore,
that in some rituals we find a P.W. leading
to the 1 degree.
CHAPTER IV. ADMISSION.
Now our C. enters and is received on a S.L..
This signifies many things, one idea lying within the other. It
reminds us of the pain we, as distinct from our mothers ,
suffered when we entered this physical world. It is a test of
our courage and obedience. Probably in olden days blood was
drawn, as a sacrifice. The Can. comes seeking for knowledge;
self-restraint and quiet confidence should mark his bearing.
In all primitive initiatory rites most painful tests are
applied, and if the candidate does not bear them with courage he
is rejected, and told that henceforth he is to dress as a woman
and will be treated with contempt by the men of the tribe. We
note that the instrument is a Latin cross, the age-old symbol of
suffering, and this is the only place in the Lodge where the C.
sees this cross, (e.g. when it is shown him later) though M.M.
's may realise that there does come a time when he treads
the Way of the Cross of suffering.
The use of a Latin Cross as the S.I. is
peculiarly significant, for it is associated with pain and the
danger of death, and tells us, in symbolic language, that the
way of life is the path of suffering, and begins with the threat
of death and ends in death itself: but by this hard road we draw
nearer to the object of our quest. Next the C. kneels while the
blessing of H. is invoked.
This needs no explanation, for he is about to start on The Quest
and needs Divine help. But the phrase, "Relying on such
sure support, you may safely rise and follow your leader, . . .
, for where the name of God is invoked we trust no danger can
ensue" seems pointless in Emulation working, for the danger
was at the door and is passed.
At Leeds, however, they have a working which is, they say,
derived from the Old York ritual, and it does explain this
passage. I saw this ceremony at Alfred 306, Leeds. The C. was
brought in h-w and bidden to k . . l., and after the prayer, the
W.M. said:- "Mr. Brown it is but
fair to tell you of the perilous position in which you are now
placed.
Before you stand one with a d.s. in his hand, pointed at your n.
l.b. , and behind you one holds the end of the c.t. which is
about your neck; in this position of difficulty and danger, in
whom do you put your trust?" Answer:-"In God. "
W.M.:-"Right glad am I to see your faith is so well
founded; relying, etc." Here you see the C. is in danger.
Next the C. is taken round with the Sun, for this is the road of
life , and in all ancient religions on entering a temple a man
had to follow this path.
In Burma to this day you are expected to pass round the pagoda
in this manner. The words are:-"Brethren in the N.E.S.
and W. will take notice. " It is clear therefore
that emphasis is laid on the fact that the candidate is
following the path of the Sun, for otherwise why not employ the
more usual phrase, "North, South, East and West?"
Now the Swastika, which may be regarded as the "lost
sign" in Freemasonry (+), indicates the path of the Sun and
is the emblem of life, whereas the Suwastika is the emblem of
the life beyond the grave, for, according to ancient symbolism
and eschatology, the departed soul went through the underworld
the reverse way, just as the Sun was supposed to do, e.g. W.S.E.N.
This then, is the road of the Spirits. Thus the candidate starts
on the symbolic (+) First suggested by Wor. Bro. Sir John
Cockburn. journey of life, and in some of the eighteenth century
rituals there is evidence that the way was made hard and
difficult, to symbolise the trials and tribulations we meet with
in life , particularly if we strive to attain to the Light.
This lesson is still taught in certain foreign rituals. In
"Freemasonry and the Ancient Gods" I have discussed
the probability of the theory that the Swastika was once used in
our Lodges to represent God, as it still is in the operative
lodges, and have shown that a square-a-gamma *, the Greek
"G," and therefore that the fourfold gamma represents
the four letters of the Hebrew alphabet which denote the sacred
name of God.
I refer again to this point later, and so will content myself
with saying that in an operative lodge the Swastika if formed of
four gallow-squares, one of which always rests on the open
volume of the Bible, while the other three belong to the three
Grand Master Masons, and are placed by them on the Bible before
opening the Lodge, in such a way as to form a Swastika.
Thus even to-day in the manner of our progress round the L. we
are reminded of that age-old symbol, which is found all over the
world, *First suggested by Wor. Bro. Sir John Cockburn.
representing Life and the Sun, the latter being itself an emblem
for God. The C. is then told to step off with the l. f. f.. Why?
Because the Preserver in ancient mythology is always depicted as
trampling with his l. f. on the Serpent of Evil.
This is so, alike in ancient Egypt, in India and elsewhere. But
some may ask "Why should Horus or Krishna plant his l. f.
on the serpent of Evil?" Major Sanderson, who has spent
many years in Nyasaland as Medical Officer of Health and has
been initiated into several native rites, tells me that among
many primitive races there is a superstition that when entering
a shed where rice is stored one must enter r. f. first, "so
as not to hurt the Spirit who rules over the rice store."
The same idea prevails among these people wherever food is
stored, and we here get an explanation of "l. f. f.".
When fighting against the Spirit of Evil you do desire to hurt
him, and so reverse the superstition, and step off l. f. f..
This is Major Sanderson's view, and I consider it is probably
the correct one. It may also be well to point out that our
ceremonies have come in contact, at various periods, with many
different religious beliefs, ana this fact explains why there
are often several meanings attached to certain points in the
ritual, all of which may be correct.
The great serpent, Apepi, in Egypt, represents the powers of
spiritual evil, e.g. the Devil. But it also specifically refers
to ignorance, as is shown in the Indian legend in which Krishna
tramples on the five-headed cobra. The five heads, moreover,
also have a reference to our five senses, which in that allegory
must be cleansed of every evil thought. Thus we may consider
that the World is represented by the C.T. and
H.W., and the brotherhood helps us to
free ourselves from them.
The Flesh is represented by the f. r. s. , in which we
"trample" on the Tau Cross, while the Devil is
represented by the snake, of whose existence we are reminded by
the warning to "step off with the l. f. f.". Strictly,
the C. should enter the L. in the N. , not in the West. The
North is the place of darkness, and at birth we come out of
darkness into physical light, and so in the spiritual journey.
This is done at Leeds. Out of darkness, Light. But the Light
shineth in the darkness and the candidate comprehends it not,
for the darkness of gross materialism is upon him until he
kneels before the emblem of the divine light, the V.S.L..
The C. is then challenged by the J.W. and
the S.W.. The J.D. gives
the pass word "Free and of G.R. ,"
and the Wardens acknowledge its potency and bid him enter (Note
"enter,") as if he were outside a door on which he had
knocked for admission.
This brings to our mind the three regular knocks. For reasons
which cannot be stated here, but which I will deal with more
fully later, I suggest that the E.A. knocks
remind us that man is Body, Soul and Spirit, and as in this
stage of ignorance the Body is as important as the other two,
the three knocks are all of equal duration. Lest any
misunderstand this, I would argue that in the process of
creation the Spirit first comes from God, secondly, clothes
itself with a Soul, and finally enters flesh.
Thus, the first knock represents the Spirit, seeking God whence
it came, the second, the Soul, and the third, the Body. To
understand the full meaning of this passing by the Wardens one
needs to consider why the C. is being led round the L..
There are two reasons given- (1) To show that he is properly
prepared. (2) To show that he is a fit and proper person to be
made a mason. Being made a mason symbolises the birth of the
Christ within, and before anyone can attain to this mystical
re-birth he must have progressed some way along the road of
evolution, have gained certain experiences, and learned certain
lessons.
Think again of the P.W., F. and of G.R.!
In the earlier stages man is bound in materialismearthly things
satisfy, and he is ruled by his physical passions. The C. for
masonry has begun to desire more than the material: he has felt
the desire for spiritual growth and knowledge, and so has become
"free. " This is recognised as he passes the J.W.
, who represents the Material Nature. Next he approaches
the S. W.- the representative of the Soul-and with the aid of
the P.W. is again bidden to enter.
Notice, having passed the material stage, when the Body reigns
supreme, the Soul immediately, takes control, and presents the
C. to the W.M.-i.e. the Soul calls
upon the Divine Spirit of God to give L. to the C. The reply is
significant, but is almost incomprehensible unless one
understands the symbolical journey which the C. has just taken,
and one is apt to wonder why the questions which follow were not
asked at the very beginning of the ceremony.
Really they are most important! They constitute the final
testing of the C. before he is bidden to advance towards the E.
to receive the L. , and enter on the pathway which begins with
initiation and ends with God Himself. Also they "are very
searching: the C. being required to declare solemnly that he
comes seeking knowledge, not because others desire him to do so,
nor yet for unworthy motives of personal gain, but because he is
prompted from within by a genuine desire to help Humanity.
Then follows a hint that the journey upwards is by no means
easy, and patience, perseverance, caution and courage are
essential if we are to achieve our goal. The C. having replied
satisfactorily, the S.W. is given
permission to direct the guide to instruct him in the proper
method of advancing towards the L. This is by three squares
which symbolise, not only uprightness of life, but also the
three letters of the Great Name, Yod, He, Vau; Male, Female, and
Variable.
In other words, God the Father, Mother, and child; and the
fourth square is on the Ped., which gives us the final He, or
the complete name of Him we seek,- Jehovah, or J.H.V.H.
But the letter HE (pronounced Hay) is female, and its female
aspect is emphasised by the position of the sq. and c.s., which
form a lozenge, itself a well known symbol for the Vesica
Piscis, as all who study heraldry know ; for in heraldry a
woman's arms are placed, not on a shield, as are a man's, but on
a lozenge.
A great truth is here taught,-that each soul is part of the
Divine whole and cannot be separated from the God we seek. The
C. is only just about to emerge from the darkness of gross
materialism, yet the God he seeks is within him. True He is so
veiled that many do not realise His presence, just as hundreds
of C's tread out the proper steps without ever realising their
full significance, but those who rise above the material start
on the path of return to God, and each stage that they pass as
they progress along the path, reveals more fully His Nature and
Being. Notice, the C. only treads three squares,-Yod, He, Vau;
Male, Female, Variable; the fourth square needed to complete the
whole is on the Ped.
This is particularly significant-never whilst in the flesh shall
we be able fully to comprehend His nature. No finite mind can
comprehend the Infinite Deity. It is only after we have left the
first initiation long behind, and travelled far, that we can
hope to obtain that transcendent knowledge which enables us to
understand fully, the Nature and Being of Him Who is the
beginning and end of all.
Again comes the reminder that Masonry is free ; entrance to the
path can only be gained by those who hear the call from within.
No-one is coerced;-even at this late stage the C. is given an
opportunity to retire. Thus he is asked if he is willing to take
a serious Ob., and on his agreeing to do so, the W.M.
directs him to k. on his l. k. etc.
It should be noted that the l. side of an individual is usually
said to be "Femine," and it is not surprising,
therefore that in this, the first and femine degree, the C. is
told to k. on his l. k.. Notice the exact position! On the l. k.
keeping the r. f. in the f. of a s. Now when you k. on the l. k.
you must of necessity form a sq. at that k. , and, if you try
it, you will find that you cannot keep the r. f. in the form of
a sq. without keeping the r. k. in the form of a sq. also; so
once again we get three sq's, with the fourth on the Ped.
Thus we get another glimpse of the truth already hinted at, that
each soul is part of the Divine whole, and cannot be separated
from God. The C. is only just about to emerge from the darkness
of ignorance , and yet he is instructed so to k. that by his
very attitude, -i.e. by forming three sq.'s with his body (the
fourth being on the Ped.) he shows symbolically that the God he
seeks is within.
Possibly the C. is not conscious of His presence , any more than
he realizes the significance of the steps by which he approached
the Ped. , or of the posture he assumes as he k's thereat, yet
verily God is with him, and within him, and, be the journey
short or long, back to God he must return. Once a M. , ever a M.
, there is no such thing as straying permanently from the path.
CHAPTER V. THE
OBLIGATION.
Why should there be any ob. ? In all the ancient mysteries an
ob. was exacted, and for this reason: -The secret teachings
given in these mysteries disclosed an inner meaning, often of a
most exalted kind, unsuitable for the general public, who were
lacking in education. In the ancient world the external
religion, with its worship of many gods, suited the ordinary man
in the street, who was incapable of comprehending more advanced
spiritual truths.
It would have been dangerous, alike to the populace and to the
preacher, to have shouted aloud such a doctrine as the essential
unity of God, and still more fatal to have attempted to describe
His Nature. The danger to the populace was that the preacher
might have destroyed their belief in the religious system in
which they had been reared, while failing to convert them
properly to the new doctrine.
For the preacher, the fate of Socrates, and the failure of the
so-called heretic King of Egypt-who tried to popularise the
worship of the one God, under the symbol of the Atendisk, or
disk of the Sun-are sufficient evidence of the risks which would
be encountered. Moreover, these mysteries all purported to teach
certain occult secrets, whose diffusion among vicious, or
ignorant, men would have been dangerous. Even in the Middle Ages
these dangers were still very real.
Any deviation from orthodoxy might have endangered the social
fabric of the community, and such an attempt was certain to
involve the advocate of new doctrines in a struggle with Church
and State which could only have ended at the stake. Within an
oath-bound Society men felt free to speculate and compare their
personal standpoints, while to the outside world they continued
to conform to orthodoxy.
The fate of the Templars must have been an ever present warning
to the speculative mind, in the Middle Ages. In addition, there
is little doubt that the building trades, like other Guilds, had
important trade secrets, and wished to safeguard these from
interlopers. A mediaeval Guild , on the one hand protected the
interests of its members, while on the other it trained those
members, and inspected and passed their wtirk; thus protecting
the community from deliberate fraud or careless work.
Nor must it be forgotten that in a building bad work might
involve actual danger to the users of that building. For all
these reasons it was right and proper that no one who was not a
member of the fraternity should be in possession of its trade
secrets. The ob. is undoubtedly ancient, but its full
significance is realised by few. The penalty is d. , and in the
Middle Ages I do not doubt that it would have been enforced,
though to-day it is purely symbolical.
Studying it carefully, we note in passing the word
"hele," whose meaning has already been explained, -and
also that every printed ritual in existence is a clear breach of
our Ob. The strict interpretations of this clause is one of the
reasons why we cannot expect to find any mediaeval rituals,
although the fact that the bulk of the members in those days
could not read or write would lessen the temptation to make
them.
From a practical point of view, however, the essential object
to-day is to prevent anyone who has not been regularly initiated
from entering our Lodges and the printed rituals usually does
this, for s. ns., w.s. and g.s. are missing and a careful
cross-questioning would undoubtedly lead to the discovery of an
imposter, even if he could produce a stolen G.L.
certificate. In the altered conditions of the present era
our secrecy is more of the nature of privacy, unlike that which
prevails in a political secret society, which usually has
revolutionary tendencies.
The old penalty has many striking points. It means that the
culprit will be sl., and his b. b . . d. in unconsecrated
ground. More than that, the ground can never be consecrated,
and, according to the beliefs of the middle ages, and also of
the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, the soul of a man so buried
could not rest in peace , but would wander up and down in misery
till the Judgment Day.
Suicides, for a similar reason, were buried at the cross road,
and to prevent their bodies being used by vampires a stake was
driven through the middle of the body to keep it nailed down.
(It should be noted than even in England the p . . . s vary in
different localities). Thus the culprit is not only d. . . . d
to d . . . h, but to be a wandering outcast spirit till the day
when the Great Judge consigns it to Hell. It is not perhaps a
very charitable, or Christian idea, but that is what is meant
all the same.
The T. is removed so that he cannot s. on his own behalf at the
Judgment Day. The more effective punishment is, of course , a
later "gloss," inserted at a time when; owing to
better police supervision, it would have been dangerous to the
members of the Order to enforce the ancient py. To-day, in
England, it is the only effective penalty, but in some foreign
countries d. is still enforced under certain circumstances.
In such cases, however, the Lodges are usually strongly
political and revolutionary in tendency. But with us it still
remains an obvious symbolical meaning. Immediately after the Ob.
the W.M. says, "Having been kept
. . . ."etc. We have seen that the C. has already been
asked several questions ; these have gradually led up to this,
the greatest and most important! Now the climax is reached. It
is as if the W.M. says, you have
declared that you are here of your own free will, not for
unworthy motives, but led by an earnest desire for knowledge.
Your humility and obedience have been tested, and you are
therefore entitled to request the fulfilment of the greatest
desire of your heart. The question put at this moment can be
answered by no one but the C. , for it is meant to teach him
that essential lesson that no appeal for L. is ever made in
vain. His answer given, the w.M. says, "Then let . ."
etc. Notice the word restored.
Mystical rebirth marks the beginning of our journey towards God
the Light, of our ascent towards God, but it is a restoration,-a
journey back to Him from Whom we came. Exactly the same
procedure is followed in the initiatory rites of the Turkish
Dervishes. Among them, however, the incident is followed by a
beautiful exposition of the mystical meaning of Light.
It is the Divine Light, emblem of God Himself, and of Divine
inspiration. It is, moreover, present, not only in the sacred
writings, but in every true believer's heart. The light of the
sun itself is but a faint similitude of the Divine Light of
God's love, through which, and in which, we have our being.
Though not expressed in our ritual , this act has the same inner
meaning, as I have explained.
So to the C.L. is restored, and he
sees, what? The V.S.L. , the S. and
the C.s. The V.S.L. is in a place of
honour, because without its divine standard and authority the S.
and C.s. placed thereon would be practically meaningless. These
latter form a lozenge, which as I have already said , is a well
known symbol for the Vesica Piscis , which represents the female
or preservative principle of the Deity, without which we could
not exist for a single day, or hope to be preserved from the
powers of darkness which threaten us upon our spiritual journey.
Thus the W.M. 's words teach the
aspirant that we have a duty to God, ourselves, and our brother
men. The C. is raised with the proper g. , but this is not
explained at once. Rather his attention is directed to the three
lesser lights, which we are told represent the Sun, Moon and the
Master. As our Lodges are at present arranged the W.M.
should point to the S. for the Sun, and to the W. for the
Moon , but it must be admitted that the lesson to be derived
from these three luminaries is not very clear.
Indeed, the Moon plays no real part in our mysteries, which are
essentially solar in character, while the implied contrast
between Sun, Moon and Master is in no way helpful. In reality
the three lesser lights are the W.M. and
his two wardens, with their respective candles, and these
officers have a real symbolic meaning of great importance, which
symbolic characters they maintain consistently throughout all
three degrees.
My personal view is that it was to the lights on the pedestals,
and their respective officers, that this phrase originally
applied, and that the Sun and Moon are 18th century
interpolations.
THE THREE PRINCIPAL OFFICERS In any
case this makes a convenient place in which to consider the
symbolic meaning of the three principle officers in a lodge. The
W.M. represents the rising Sun, and in
this sense he covers two distinct meanings: the first in
connection with the nature of God, and the other with regard to
the nature of man. And a similar dual character exists in the
case of S.W. and J.W.
The W.M. represents God the Creator,
He who calls the Lodge into being, He who created the World out
of Chaos. In India this aspect of God, the Incomprehensible, has
been individualised as Brahma, so that the devotee many be able
to comprehend Him, at least in part. It is the Master who opens
the Lodge, who calls it out of nothing. He sits in the East, the
place of light; but though he opens, he does not close the
lodge.
That is the work of another aspect of the Divine Being. In the
nature of man the W.M. represents the
Spirit, the Divine Spark within us, ever striving for the light,
never truly separated from the divine source of its being. This
dual aspect of the W.M. and his
principal officers must be borne in mind, if we are to delve
down into the inner, or esoteric, meaning of our wonderful
rituals. The S.W. represents the
Setting Sun, and hence the Destructive, or Transformative ,
aspects of the Deity.
Among the Hindoos this aspect is called Shiva. He shall one day
close the Grand Lodge of this World, when time shall be
swallowed up into Eternity. The S.W. closes
the Lodge. As the Destroyer he reminds us that Death, the great
leveller, will bring all men low, and his symbol is the Level.
This in itself reminds us of the caste mark of Shiva, which
consists of horizontal lines. But in the nature of Man he
represents the Soul, which alone enables the Spirit to raise the
body towards divine things.
Without the medium of the Soul, the Spirit would be unable to
influence the body. It is for this reason that the C. is
invested in craft masonry by the S.W. or
Soul, and not by the W.M. ,
representing the Divine Spark. Thus we learn that we must raise
ourselves , step by step , towards the Divine Light. Shiva is,
above all, the great M.M..
The J.W. represents the Sun in its
Meridian. He stands for the Way of Life, the balance between
birth and death. His is the sunny side of life. He calls us from
labour to refreslunent and from refreshment to labour. In the
divine aspect he represents the Preserver, called Vishnu in
India, of whom it is stated that as Rama he sent the skilful
craftsmen , Hanuman , to build the bridge for Him , by means of
which He crossed the straits to fight against the powers of evil
in ancient Ceylon.
Vishnu is associated with the element of water and with corn,
and his caste mark is a perpendicular, straight line , referring
to the rain which falls from heaven. This symbol is remembered
in our lodges by the plumb rule. In the nature of man he stands
for the body, which perishes. He is H.A.B. in
the Grand Lodge at Jerusalem. He represents the life and
sufferings of the body, only terminated by death; the body which
in every man dies before its divine work is accomplished.
Our divine temple is not finished at death: all that we can hope
is that the foundations have been well and truly laid. In short,
in this life we cannot hope to "see God face to face,"
nor, being finite, can we truly comprehend the Infinite , but we
can hope to make such progress that, when called hence, we shall
be able to continue , and complete , the work of our own
salvation on the foundations of a good and spiritual earthly
life.
Finally, it will be noted that in every degree these three
officers co-operate to advance the C., and
so it is in the spiritual life, for body, soul and spirit' must
co-operate if real progress is to be attained. Next the C. is
informed of the three great dangers-note the triplicity
again-and the few sentences devoted to them must be considered
in the light of what has already been written by me on the S.I.,
the C.T., and the Ob..
At the door of the L. the C. was in great danger, because
entrance thereat marked the beginning of the ceremony of
initiation into m., and initiation symbolises the mystical
re-birth, the end of the descent into matter and the beginning
of the ascent to God, and there can be no more critical time
than that. The S.I. warns us of the
dangers of rushing unprepared into the field of occultism, while
the C.T. indicates the danger that the
Divine Spark may be quenched, strangled by materialism, if we do
not continue steadfastly.
But even when these dangers are passed, throughout the whole of
our mystic journey there remains that last danger of our ob.,
namely, that of infidelity to the vows which marked our
entrance, or of abandoning our further quest for light;-knowing
the right, but deliberately choosing the wrong. This means
death; not primarily physical death, but that greater death,
referred to by our Hindoo Brethren as "Being born again at
the bottom of the ladder of evolution up which we have for so
long been ascending. " We next come to the moment, so long
expected, when the s. . . . s are disclosed.
No doubt many Brethren could not suppress a slight feeling of
disappointment at their comparative insignificance. Was such a
tremendous Ob. necessary to safeguard a S. , W. , and G. which
appear to be Purely arbitrary? This question is a fair one, and
the answer is that the Ob. safeguards, not so much the G.,
etc., which are but the outward and visible signs, as the
inner esoteric meaning, hidden in our ritual, and never properly
explained.
Firstly, the W.M. instructs the C. in
the f. r. s., which on investigation proves to be the tau cross.
The tau cross was originally the phallus, and has many inner
meanings. It is the emblem of generation and creation, but since
these powers may be prostituted they must be brought under
control. As the f. r. s. , it represents our natural and animal
passions, which must be trampled underfoot and brought under
complete control, otherwise we cannot make any advancement in
Freemasonry.
In plain language , unless we bring our passions into complete
subjection, we cannot hope to advance towards a true knowledge
of God. For that, I consider, is the real search, or quest, in
Freemasonry. Therefore in every one of the Craft degrees we
trample on the tau cross. It will be remembered that one of the
charges against the Templars, in 1307, was that they trampled on
the cross, and this charge seems to be correct.
Yet these same men adored the Cross three times a year in their
ceremonies and, moreover, fought and died for it on many a
corpse-strewn field in Palestine. I have no doubt this act of
theirs was a symbolic one , associated more with the cross as an
emblem of our passions than with the Christian cross of
suffering. Yet symbols emerge by imperceptible degrees into each
other, and so it is that we can truly say that Christ was
crucified on the Cross of our passions.
In mediaeval pictures you will usually find that while Christ
hangs on a Latin, or fourarmed cross , the two thieves are hung
on Tau , or three-armed crosses. This indicates that they died
for their own sins, but Christ, Who hangs on the cross of
sacrifice , died for the sins of others. Thus, my brothers, the
f. r. s. is full of inner meaning nor is this the only place in
which we meet with the tau cross in the craft. Its higher and
holier aspect when associated with the W.M.
I shall discuss later.
CHAPTER VI. CONCLUSION OF THE
CEREMONY.
Having taken the f. r. s. the C. is given the S..
This he is told refers to the P. of his Ob., and no doubt it
does, but it also seems to refer to something much more
startling. The part of the body indicated has always been
regarded as an important occult centre. In some strange way, the
laws of which are but little understood, it has always been
associated with the phenomena known amongst psychic students as
Materialisations.
As, however, this subject lies somewhat outside our theme, we
will discuss the point no further. But all our P. 's have a
striking analogy to the legend of the creation of man as given
by the Hindoo sages. From Brahma sprang all four castes. From
His head came the Brahmins, from His Breasts the Kshatra, or
fighting caste, from His Belly, the peasants, and from His feet,
the Sudras.
The latter were not true Arians, and were not twice born men; in
other words, only the first three castes were regarded as really
and truly admissible to the Temple of the High Gods, and free to
participate in Their worship. It will be noted that in this
degree the S..n suggests the cutting
off of the first caste from those below. This S..n,
Bro. Major Sanderson suggests, was originally a mantra, or magic
prayer, which must be most carefully guarded from the profane.
The T. appears to be an arbitrary one, although it may possibly
refer to a certain piller. Explanations of this, together with
the meaning, derivation , and significance of the W. , are
reserved for the next volume, for reasons which will be obvious
to those entitled to know them. No doubt, however, the basic
idea of both pillar and word is phallic, and other
interpretations have evolved later.
Having received s. w. and t. , the C. is warned to be cautious
and told how to receive a challenge, then, having been given
strength to help him on his way, he is sent forth in order that
the important lesson of caution may be implanted in his mind.
The testing by J.W. and S.W.
are obviously of practical use, but I think that here
also there is an inner meaning. The Body and Soul test the Cand.
to see that the lessons have been well and truly learnt; also
there seems to be a definite astrological reference.
Having satisfied these important officers, the s.w. asks for
some special mark of favour. That is, the Soul calls on the
Spirit, but is told that it is the Soul which must invest the
regenerate man with the outward signs of the change he has
undergone. This point has already been mentioned, but its deep
significance must not be forgotten. It may truly be said that it
is the S.W. who sets the seal on the
candidate's initiation, and proclaims him as at length a member
of the Order.
The address of the S.W. and the
subsequent one by the Master, are fairly self-explanatory. But
one or two points deserve stressing. The reference to the
antiquity of the apron refers mainly, of course, to its use
among the Operatives, and implies the dignity of honest labour.
The present form of our apron is comparatively modern, but there
is evidence that our predecessors, the Comacine Masons , wore
aprons when they met in Lodge , and aprons have had a special
significance among many religious systems.
Thus some of the Chinese gods wear aprons , and I have a
photograph of one (See The Hung Society, Vol. III.,
op. p. 122) and this "God" is making a certain
high degree sign. Among the ancient races of America the apron
was also evidently used with a religious significance (see
picture of the Toltec Preserver in "Freemasonry and the
Ancient Gods"). The address of the W.M. lays
stress on the importance of not entering the L. if a brother is
at variance with another.
At first sight this may seem a somewhat unnecessary charge.
Normal, well conducted gentlemen are not likely to start an
unseemly wrangle in Lodge , even if they are at enmity; and
should two men so far forget the common decencies of life as to
do so, the W.M. has ample power to
deal with the situation. The real significance of the
injunction, however, is that it implies that the mere presence
of two brethren who are at variance will disturb the harmonious
atmosphere of the meeting.
This is a purely spiritual atmosphere, and the belief that such
disturbance would occur without any open disagreement, is
correct. In short, such differences disturb the spiritual
atmosphere, prevent concentration, and can be detected by
sensitive individuals. Every Lodge has an "atmosphere of
its own," and any sensitive man who comes to it can detect
it* I have myself noticed the different "atmospheres"
of various lodges, and also variations in that of my own.
Too much regard therefore cannot be paid to this rule, and if
ignored the Lodge will certainly suffer. The C. is placed in the
N.E. corner of the Lodge for the
reason given in the ritual, but it is important to remember that
he himself is building his own temple-a spiritual temple to the
glory of God. Why should the cornerstone be laid in the N.E.?
This was for a very practical reason; namely, so that the
Operatives could work round with the Sun, and thus obtain the
maximum amount of light.
Symbolically, it refers, of course, to the journey of the soul,
which begins in the N., enters life at
the East, at birth, and so proceeds to the West, where death
ends our day. The position in which the C. stands is not only a
sq., the emblem of rectitude and of God, but at the particular
point he make a "lewis," or angle clamp, which binds
together the life which has been (in the North) and his future
life (in the East).
In physical life the North is pre-natal, but in the spiritual it
is before we turned to better things. Above all, such a clamp
gives rigidity and strength to the corners, and assures
stability. It will be noted that this position in like manner
makes a "footing stone." The testing of the candidate
is explained, but perhaps I ought once more to remind my reader
that it is absolutely essential that we should leave behind us
the baleful gifts of the underworld and the canker of wealth,
which destroy spirituality. The lecture on the working tools
explains itself. It appears to be mainly 18th century work.
CHAPTER VII. THE CHARGE.
When the C. has been restored to his personal comfort he
receives the charge. The first significant point is the phrase
"Ancient, no doubt it is, as having subsisted from time
immemorial." In "Freemasonry and the Ancient
Gods" I have endeavoured to show that this phrase is
literally true , and a stong claim can be made that modern
Freemasonry is the lineal descendant of the Ancient Mysteries,
via the Roman Colleges of Architects, the Comacine Masons, and
the Mediaeval Freemasons.
The other significant phrase is that relating to "The
Ancient Landmarks." Much learned discussion has taken place
concerning what these are. Common sense indicates the following
points as obviously falling within this heading, whereas many
others may be matters of opinion, on which brethren are entitled
to differ. 1.-The signs, words and tokens. I
f these were changed it would shatter the universality of
Freemasonry and prevent old masons recognising new ones, or
members of various jurisdictions doin so. It must be
acknowledged that the charge mad by the Ancients against the
Moderns, that they had removed the Ancient Landmarks, was
largely justified, for they appear to have transposed the w.s.
in the first and second degrees. Still apparently, they did not
entirely change them. 2 & 3.-Belief in God and a Future
Life.
I these are removed, then the object and purpose of masonry is
destroyed, since it is the "quest of knowledge of, and
union with, God." Again, the elimination of the idea of a
future life" woull destroy the teaching of one of the most
important craft degrees. If these landmarks were removed,
Freemasony would either perish, or else have to substitute a new
object, as the Grand Orient of France has done. This having
become atheistical, had to turn masonry into a secret political
society, with disastrous results.
Hence it is that the Grand Lodge of England felt compelled to
break off fraternal relations with that body. 4.-The Order of
the Degrees. If these were reversed or changed it would reduce
the whole system to nonsense. The remainder of this address is
fairly clear as it stands. It contains excellent teaching, the
meaning of which lies on the surface, and so we need spend no
further space on it here. The first tracing board contains a
great deal of useful instruction, but it is so seldom given in
most lodges that we will pass it by, hoping at some future date
to give it the attention it deserves.
The purpose of these tracing boards will be explained in the
book dealing with the second degree, and we can therefore take
leave of the Entered Apprentice. There is no pretence that we
have exhausted the subject, much more could be written, but in a
small book like this the author must restrict himself to giving
an outline explanation, and suggestions for study, in the hope
that his readers will follow the hints given, and discover
further meanings for themselves.
CHAPTER VIII THE CLOSING OF THE
FIRST DEGREE.
The first degree closing is remarkably short, and its meaning is
fairly clear. The candidate has not yet advanced sufficiently
far to be able to appreciate any more esoteric teaching. He is
therefore given one brief and tremendous lesson. The Destructive
side of the Deity is invoked, and the same officer, it must be
remembered, also represents the Soul. Thus, at the very
beginning of his symbolical career, the novice is warned of the
inevitable end.
During the ceremony of his initiation the fact has been
impressed upon him that his spiritual advancement is by means of
his soul, i.e. when the S.W. invests
him with his apron. Now he is warned that the same soul which
may help him to rise, may also cause his spiritual destruction.
But even more this fact should show him that, when he has
learned all that life can teach him, the Soul acting on the
instructions of God, calls him to other fields of usefulness. It
should also be noted that the S.W. closes
in the name of the G.A., and by
command of the W.M. , thus reminding
us of Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End
CONCLUSION.
This then concludes our consideration of the meaning of the
first degree. The author has not tried to be exhaustive , and
would stress the point that usually he has only attempted to
give one esoteric meaning, although often there are other inner
meanings, each within the other. But he trusts he will have
helped his brethren to perceive that there are indeed deep and
invaluable meanings hidden within our ritual, and that his
readers, having once started on this line of study , will not
rest content until they themselves have discovered further inner
meanings. If this be so, then this little book will not have
been in vain.
AL PRESIDENTE:MEDITANDO SUL TEATRINO DI ROMA E IL VITELLO D'ORO
Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at
11:33AM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment
Subject:
AL PRESIDENTE:MEDITANDO SUL
TEATRINO DI ROMA E IL VITELLO
D'ORO...
To: presidenza.republica@quirinale.it
26 Luglio 2006 Oslo
documento dell' ORDO ILLUMINATORUM
UNIVERSALIS
AL PRESIDENTE DELLA REPUBLICA ITALIANA
DAL DIRETTORE DELLA AS-HERMETIS FOUNDATION
(OSLO)
MEDITANDO SUL TEATRINO DI ROMA E IL VITELLO D'ORO...
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
Anti-Masonry and Anti-Semitism
Leon Zeldis, FPS, 33°
PSGC, Supreme Council of the Scottish
Rite for the
State of Israel
Honorary Adjunct Grand Master
More than once in the course of the last two
centuries, anti-Masonry has been fused with an older
hatred, hatred of the Jews, that is to say
anti-Semitism. Probably, the irrational nature of both
phobias facilitates their juxtaposition. Be that as it
may, from the middle of the 19th Century, we are
witnessing an increasing wave of simultaneously
anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic propaganda. Possibly,
the paradigmatic work of this class of "literature" is
an opuscule entitled "The Protocols of the Wise Men of
Zion" sometimes also known as "The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion."
This is one of the most well-known literary
falsifications in history, based on plagiarism and
fraud from the very beginning of its gestation.
Nevertheless, this swindle has captivated the
imagination of many people who are sensible in other
respects, and it has been transformed into the "source
of indispensable information" in the baggage of all
the anti-Semites and anti-Masons.
dal Libro di Serge Hutin
GOVERNI OCCULTI E SOCIETA
SEGRETE
(EDIZIONI MEDITERRANEE)
Tuttavia i famosi Protocolli dei Savi anziani di Sion
non sono che un falso.
Infatti il redattore non e' altri che Piotr Ivanovic
Rachovsky,che dal 1884 al 1902 diresse ,come abbiamo
gia' detto ,la sezione estera della polizia segreta
Zarista.l'Okhrana.Egli avrebbe molto semplicemente
plagiato e rimaneggiato un Dialogue aux enfers entre
Machiavel et Montesquieu(Dialogo agli inferi tra
Macchiavelli e Montesquieu) disponibile su ECIG,Genova
1995,si tratta di una curiosa opera del francese
Maurice Joly ,la morte del quale ,nel 1878,e' sempre
rimasta un mistero (aggiungiamo ???)
E' un fatto che il dialogo scritto da Joly era di per
se' un manuale per gli apprendisti dittatori del mondo
moderno.Nella settima parte,Macchiavelli,che si
suppone conversi con Montesquieu post mortem,dice
infatti ."CAPO DEL GOVERNO ,TUTTI
I MIEI ORDINI
TENDEREBBERO ALLO STESSO FINE:LO SVILUPPO
SMISURATO
DELLA PREPONDERANZA DELLO STATO ,SI DA
FARNE IL
MASSIMO PROTETTORE,PROMOTORE E REMUNERATORE".
Tra i mezzi atti a provocare il livellamento delle
masse sono enumerati nella medesima settima parte:l'
aumento costante delle tasse,il privilegio sistematico
accordato all'industria e alla speculazione,che
trascina fatalmente al declino agricoltura e
artigianato.
Tuttavia ,da un esame piu' attento sia del dialogo che
dei Protocolli appare chiaro,secondo noi,come i
secondi non siano affatto un abile plagio del primo
,ma appaiono piuttosto come la tracrizione diretta
dellle decisioni prese durante le assemblee segrete
dei governanti occulti d'Europa.
Quali furono,dunque,i motivi che spinsero Rachovsky a
diffondere sistematicamente i Protocolli?Quelli di
servire le autorita' dell'Impero Russo appoggiando gli
antisemiti.Questi ultimi non potevano che reaggire
violentemente all'idea di un immensa cospirazione
ebraica su scala internazionale ,mirante a provocare
ovunque crisi economiche e rivoluzioni per giungere
infine al potere.Vi si trovano i temi della battaglia
ideologica sostenuta da precedenti opere,come quelle
di Gougenot des Mousseaux (Le juif,le judaisme et la
judaisation des peuples chrétiens,edito a Parigi nel
1869) o come il famoso France juive di Edouard
Drumont.In Germania,ancor piu' che in
Francia,l'antisemitismo si era compiaciuto
d'attribuire agli ebrei un osuro piano di
conspirazione internazionale.Romanzi come Biarritz di
"Sir John Retcliffe" ( pseudonimo dello scrittore
Herman Goedsche,Berlino1868),avevano contribuito alla
diffusione di quest'idea.Nel romanzo in questione
troviamo un capitolo,fantasioso al massimo,nel quale
e' descritta un'impressionante cerimonia segreta
notturna nel vecchio cimitero ebraico di Praga,dove si
raccolgono i tredici capi del governo invisibile.Delle
misteriose figure vestite d'un lungo mantello
bianco,scivolano ad un ad una nel cimitero per
riunirsi attorno ad un sinistro monumento
funebre.Quando si odono i dodici rintocchi della
mezzanotte ,l'ultimo personaggio il tredicesimo
,prende posto.Al segnale di uno strano suono metallico
una fiamma bluastra illumina la pietra tombale.Chi
sono questi tredici inquietanti personaggi? I membri
del governo segreto mondiale ebraico.Essi
rappresentano le dodici tribu' d'Israele ed il
tredicesimo rappresenta "gli scomparsi e gli
esiliati".Ognuno di loro getta sulla tomba una pietra
ed a questo punto dalla fiamma irreale sorge un enorme
vitello d'oro...
MA IL FRATELLO JOLY?
L'illustre Fratello Maurice Joly apparentemente faceva
parte di uno specifico Rito Massonico che apparteneva
fin dalla sua nascita in Italia e poi in Francia a una
specifica famiglia Ebrea collegata alla Lobby Sionista
e rivestiva la carica di Rosa+Croce e noi studiosi del
settore sappiamo benissimo come stanno le cose in base
al successivo collegamento tra il patto Sinarchico,i
Protocolli e il falso Priorato di Sion.
PAPUS I PROTOCOLLI
E SION
In 1884 a certain copies of The Protocols of Zion
were found circulating amongst the members of a
Masonic lodge to which Papus himself belonged - the
lodge where the aforementioned legend of the wise
Egyptian sage named Ormus.
LA QUESTIONE SIONISTA
La domanda a lei caro illustrissimo Presidente della
Republica Italiana e la seguente: vogliamo continuare
ad adorare un vitello d'oro o finalmente ascoltare
tutti insieme la parola di Dio?
Questo potrebbe accadere come non mai nel nuovo
villaggio globale di internet ,ma anche e sopratutto
in maniera piu' Sacrale nel nuovo villaggio per gli
affari interreligiosi che si va via via costruendo a
ridosso del monte Sinai in Egitto grazie al supporto
di tutti i veri Illuminati delle varie fedi.
Personaggi chiari,onesti,mossi da intenzioni genuine,
desiderosi di comunicare in maniera chiara e autentica
il messaggio di pace e vera liberta' che Dio a per gli
uomini di buona volonta', non il fondamentalismo
inutile di questi tristi giorni che servono da
copertura per affari corporativi di natura oserei dire
criminale e senza scrupoli verso l'umanita' intera.
Non si puo' continuare a giocare con gli uomini e
gestire le Nazioni Unite come un business in giacca e
cravatta per ipocriti dell'ultima ora, bisogna invece
poter aprire un dialogo serio e costruttivo sulla
rinascita spirituale delle nuove generazion italiane
ed estere in pasto ad una minoranza satanica che
preferisce purtroppo tenersi il vitello d'Oro
Hollywoodiano, il materialismo sfrenato, e le farse
Medio Orientali.Farse che servono solamente per
gettare discredito sui veri credenti nell'unico Dio il
Grande Architetto degli Universi che e' uguale per
tutti che lo vogliate oppure no.
Noi giovani (ho solamente 36 anni) che ci sposiamo ora
e cerchiamo con mille difficolta di mettere su
famiglia come il sottoscritto vogliamo la pace nel
mondo caro Presidente, e siamo pronti piu' che mai a
lasciar da parte l'ipocrisia delle chiacchere
corporative per dar finalmente posto all'amore piu'
sincero verso Dio e alla carita' tra le genti di
questo pianeta,un pianeta' come lei ben sa sempre piu'
afflitto dal maligno e dai suoi compari.Quindi
Fratellanza Universale SI ma con il rispetto dovuto da
noi occidentali a culture millenarie che vengono
direttamente da Dio altissimo,il compassionevole,il
misericordioso e tutto questo in ricordo di sua
Santita' Giovanni Paolo II e del suo memorabile
incontro di Assisi.
A presto.
Cordialmente,
Leo Lyon Zagami
LA MASSONERIA IN VATICANO
Posted on Thursday, October 12,
2006 at 04:55PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment
La rivista cattolica messicana `Processo` (No 832 del 12 Ottobre 1992) informava che la massoneria ha diviso il territorio Vaticano in otto quartieri,dove sono in funzione quattro logge massoniche del Rito Scozzese i cui adepti ,alti funzionari del piccolo Stato,standovi in forma indipendente non si riconoscerebbero fra loro,neanche battendo i colpi col polpastrello del police.Esse all`occorenza prendono contatti con altre logge massoniche delle singole nazioni,anzi la dove la Chiesa opera in clandestinita` a causa del Corano ,le relazioni con la Chiesa locale passano segretamente attraverso tale network.
Nel 1987 il gionalista massone Pier Carpi,confermando l`assunto del Fratello Fulberto Lauro secondo il quale alla Loggia P2 aderivano anche cardinali e vescovi in incongnito ,specificava che si chiama Loggia Ecclesia ed ` in contatto diretto con il Gran Maestro della Gran Loggia Unita d`Inghilterra il Duca Michele di Kent.Tale loggia opera in Vaticano dal 1971.Vi appartengono piu` di cento fra cardinali ,vescovi e monsignori di curia.Riescono a mantenere il piu` assoluto segreto , ma non al punto da sfuggire alle indagini degli uomini della potente `Opus Dei`.(L`Espresso,12 Dicembre 1987)
A me e` stato confermato sia da un alto dignitario della Gran Loggia Unita d`Inghilterra sia da un Porporato di mia conoscenza che esistono ben due logge di Rito Emulation che lavorano con i nomi `Simbolo` ed `Ekklesia` all`interno della citta` del Vaticano con una bolla americana,la Libera Muratoria in Vaticano sembra quindi operare nell`ipocrisia generale dal 1945, con il supporto interessato degli Stati Uniti d`America che la usa allegramente per i suoi scopi di manipolazione generale insieme alla perfida Albione.
Ci sono poi numerosi Vescovi della Chiesa Cattolica coinvolti nella massoneria Italiana che non fanno parte del GOI o della Gran Loggia d`Italia degli ALAM ma di formazioni minori, che pur essendo Regolari dal punto di vista constitutivo garantiscono una maggiore segrettezza e riservatezza per i propri affiliati, un Vescovo era presente a Roma in occasione del bicentenario della famosa Patente 1805 del R.S.A.A. proprio durante i funerali di Papa Giovanni Paolo II, come puo dimostrarvi chiaramente e senza ombre di dubbio, il seguente documento a firma dell'illustre Fratello Massone Klaus E. Schmidt, attuale capo della polizia segreta Albanese:
Report on the visit to the meeting in Rome 8 - 10
April 2005
Dear Bro. Gabirro:
I was received at the airport by GM Cesare Cocchi and
some other Brr.
Due to the air traffic restrictions at the day of the
funeral of the
Pope 14 delegations could not arrive in Rome for this
event.
Delegations present: France, Spain, Serbia - Montenegro, Italy, UK
Ritual work: Saturday, 09 April 2005, from 09:00 -
12:30 and 16:00 - 18:00
The main work plan was delivered by Bro. Sarigu Armando
from the
Orient of Cantanzaro (a Catholic Bishop !)
Greetings of the MHC of
England and Wales during work were delivered
Formal dinners with all delegations: Friday, 8 April
2005, 20:00 -
23:00 and Saturday, 8 April 2005, 20:00 - 23:00.
Special contacts:
ITALY
Bro. Cesare Cocchi, GM
Bro. (Prof) Lello Gervasi
Bro. Antonio Notaro
FRANCE
Bro. Gerald Frapech, gfrapech@wanadoo.fr
SPAIN
Bro. Gaspar Guzzo Galvez
Bro. Rafael Roman Jara, GM of Andaluza
Bro. Jesus Corella Garcia, Grand Orador
Bro. Johnny Sheppard Regules
SERBIA
Bro. Milan Lajhner
Bro.Dragutin Zagorac, Grand Commandeur Serbia
Bro.Predrag Nikolic, Grand sec
Bro.Aleksandar D. Rodic
Some of the Brr from Serbia will pay me a visit to Tirana soon.
The Brr from the different delegations are seeking
official close
cooperation with the MHC of
England and Wales and expressed their wish
to stay in frequent contact with me. I told them that I
will forward
this to the MHC in due time.
The delegation from Serbia handed over a present for
the MHC which I
will deliver during me visit in London.
The entire meeting was blessed with an extremely good
spirit and
closed in harmony.
Best frat. greetings
Klaus E. Schmidt
Ricordiamoci poi l`articolo publicato prima di morire dal povero Fratello Mino Pecorelli il 12 Settembre 1978 sul suo intrigante settimanale `OP` dal titolo `La Gran Loggia Vaticana`....121 nomi di esponenti vaticani...
vi segnalo inoltre riviste e rotocalchi che hanno scritto apertamente dell`infiltrazione massonica in Vaticano e potrebbero magari aiutarvi nella vostra ricerca su questo delicato argomento:
`Panorama` del 10 Agosto 1976,
`Introibo` del Luglio 1976
`Euroitalia` del 17 e 25 Agosto 1978`
`Osservatore Politico` del 12 Settembre 1978
`Oggi` del 17 Giugno 1981
`30 Giorni` dell`11 Novembre 1992
Ed infine la recente nomina a Gran Cappellano di un prete Cattolico alla Gran Loggia Regolare d'Italia nonostante la scomunica ufficiale di Papa Ratzinger. Poveri noi, abitiamo ormai nel Regno del Maligno e dell'ipocrisia, dove la doppia appartenenza Massoneria-Opus Dei e' quasi diventata un vanto.
Leo Lyon Zagami
Freemasonry,Satanism,and the Church of England
Posted on Thursday, October 12,
2006 at 04:41PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment

Freemasonry, Satanism and the Church of England: The
correspondence between the Grand Secretary of the United
Grand Lodge of England and the new Archbishop of
Canterbury
"New Archbishop: Masons have no place in the Church
"
by Jason Bennetto ("The Independent", 15
November 2002)
The new Archbishop of Canterbury has said he believes
Christianity and Freemasonry are
"incompatible" and has refused to appoint
clergymen to senior posts because they are members of
the Brotherhood.
Dr Rowan Williams, who becomes head of the Church of
England next month, told The Independent that he is not
in favour of ministers being Masons because it is a
"secret organisation" whose views are
questionable.
He also voiced doubts in a letter to Hugh Sinclair, who
has been investigating the Brotherhood: "I have
real misgivings about the compatibility of Masonry and
Christian profession ... I have resisted the appointment
of known Masons to certain senior posts."
Dr Williams' comments will renew controversy about the
Freemasons. In the past 50 years some of its most senior
members have been in the Church's higher echelons, and
there have been links between the two organisations for
centuries. Thousands of leading clergymen and
churchgoers are among its 350,000 British members.
The Rev Gregory Cameron, chaplain to Dr Williams, said:
"He questions whether it's appropriate for
Christian ministers to belong to secret organisations.
He also has some anxiety about the spiritual content of
Masonry."
A spokesman for the Archbishop said he was "worried
about the ritual elements in Freemasonry - which some
have seen as possibly Satanically inspired - and how
that sits uneasily with Christian belief". He
continued: "The other idea is that because they are
a society, there could be a network that involves mutual
back-scratching, which is something he would be greatly
opposed to."
A spokesman for the Freemasons in England said: "As
far as we are concerned, there is no incompatibility
between Christianity and our organisation
whatsoever."
****
The Most Reverend and Rt. Hon. Archbishop of Canterbury
Lambeth Palace
London
SE1 7JU
2 December 2002
Dear Archbishop
I write in response to the reports in The Independent
newspaper of your views on Freemasonry.
According to the reports:
a) you have doubts on the compatibility of Freemasonry
with Christianity and believe that elements of the
ritual may have a Satanic basis
b) you believe Freemasonry to be both a secret society
and a self-serving network
c) you have in the past not appointed to sensitive
senior posts candidates who are Freemasons and intend to
continue that practice.
For nearly 300 years Freemasonry has existed in an
organised way in England and Wales. During that period
hundreds of thousands of committed Christians (clergy
and laity) have found no incompatibility between their
Christian faith and the principles and practices of
Freemasonry. Indeed many have testified that their
membership of Freemasonry has strengthened their faith
and, in some cases, brought them back into active church
membership.
The prime and inalienable qualification for admission
into Freemasonry is a belief in God. An individual's
religion is a matter for his conscience, and Freemasonry
will not interfere in or in any way comment on religious
matters. As a result our membership encompasses
Christians of all denominations, Jews, Muslims, Hindus,
Sikhs, etc., who meet together in harmony, knowing that
their religions differ but not allowing those
differences to come between them on Masonic occasions.
The suggestion that Freemasonry is "Satanically
inspired" in its rituals would be risible were it
not for the fact that it questions the basis of the
faiths of over 300,000 Freemasons under the United Grand
Lodge of England, whatever their religion may be. Even a
small amount of elementary research would have shown how
nonsensical this dreadful assertion is, and would have
enabled you to avoid giving deep and gratuitous offence
to so many who are encouraged in every form of
Freemasonry to be true to their God above all other
considerations.
As for the claim that Freemasonry is a "secret
organisation", it must surely be a very peculiar
"secret" society which makes its rules and
aims available to the public; publishes annual lists of
its national and local leaders together with the dates
and places of meeting of all of its units; opens its
national headquarters to the general public on a daily
basis; maintains national and local web sites on the
Internet; gives regular briefings to the media; and
provides spokesmen to speak anywhere about its nature
and activities. Each Freemason is at perfect liberty to
tell whomsoever he pleases that he is a Freemason.
Indeed Freemasonry is one of the few organisations to
have been specifically declared not to be a secret
society. In July 2001 the European Court of Human Rights
ruled that (a) Freemasonry was neither a secret,
criminal nor an illegal organisation, and (b) that in
making appointments or promotions it is illegal to
discriminate against a candidate simply because he is a
Freemason.
Rather than being a self-serving network, the opposite
is true. On at least six occasions during the process of
becoming a Freemason the new member is told that it is
contrary to our principles and rules to use his
membership to gain any form of advantage for himself or
anyone else. Any attempt to do so will result in
disciplinary proceedings, with sanctions running from
admonition to irrevocable expulsion.
I have enclosed two booklets and some leaflets which
explain the background to Freemasonry and how it relates
to society in general. The booklet "Your Questions
Answered" deals in particular with the myths which
surround Freemasonry.
I also extend to you an invitation to meet privately
with some senior Freemasons to discuss at the true
source any doubts you may have, in preference to simply
putting your faith in secondary and unreliable
information. Your three immediate predecessors each came
here for lunch and found it an interesting, stimulating
and enjoyable experience. I realise that you have much
to consider at the present, and that it may not be
convenient to accept this invitation immediately. I
trust that you will permit me to write to you again
after your Enthronement to reaffirm our wish to welcome
you here and show that your doubts about Freemasonry
have no justification in fact.
Yours sincerely
R A H Morrow
Grand Secretary
****
R. A. H. Morrow
Grand Secretary, United Grand Lodge of England
Freemason's Hall
Great Queen Street
London
WC2B 5AZ
23 January 2003
Dear Mr Morrow
I have been sorry to learn of the distress of a
considerable number of Freemasons. It is true that a
great deal of upset and hurt has been caused by the
newspaper reports about my purported views on
freemasonry. In replying to private correspondence, I
had no intention of starting a public debate nor of
questioning the good faith and generosity of individual
freemasons and I regret the tone and content of the
media coverage.
Much of the distress has been due to what amounts to a
serious misrepresentation of views I am supposed to
hold. The quoted statements about the
"satanic" character of masonic ceremonies and
other matters did not come from me and do not represent
my judgement. Since my late father was a member of the
Craft for many years, I have had every opportunity of
observing the probity of individual members.
Where anxieties exist, however, they are in relation not
to Freemasonry but to Christian ministry, and. my letter
simply reflected a personal unease about Christian
ministers subscribing to what could be and often is
understood (or misunderstood) as a private system of
profession and initiation, involving the taking of oaths
of loyalty. Concerns like these have led to a number of
debates within the church in recent years and it is
clear that there are still widely differing views ? held
with sincerity and honesty ? about the compatibility of
certain aspects of Freemasonry with Christian belief,
ministry and, service.
My statement about resisting the appointment of
freemasons to certain posts in Wales needs to be
understood against the background of the belief that I
and the church had deliberately advanced the cause of
Freemasons. In saying that I had resisted the
appointment of Freemasons to certain posts I was not
suggesting that people had been blackballed, but
asserting that I was satisfied that membership of the
Craft was neither a disqualifier nor an advantage.
I welcome the manner in which Freemasons have engaged in
debate and especially the increasing openness of recent
years. Their commitment to charitable causes and the
welfare of the wider community is beyond question.
Yours sincerely,
+ Rowan Cantuar [Williams]
Archbishop of Canterbury
25th of January 2005 and the creation of the Masonic High Council - REGULAR GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND
Posted on Thursday, October 12,
2006 at 03:20PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment
To all concerned Masons
Masonic High Council for England,
Wales the Channel Islands and Districts Overseas
ANCIENT AND HONOURABLE FRATERNITY
OF FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS
A group of Regular Master Masons, disillusioned,
disappointed and concerned by the state of the
Administration and Management of the Masonic Order in
general and the Craft in particular, assembled at
Freemasons Arms, Convent Garden in London in order to
put forward their legitimate concerns and to discuss and
debate those issues being ignored by the Craft
Administration. This Assembly of Masons at London, with
the assistance of various highly respected and
knowledgeable Brethren, Constituted and Consecrated a
Masonic High Council for England, Wales and the Channel
Islands in Due Form on the 25th of January, 2005.
The Masonic High Council is a de jure and de facto Sovereign Masonic Body with jurisdiction over the Craft in England and Wales and has issued a warrant for the Creation of its first Lodge, named Grand Lodge No.1, at the orient of London. Three other regularly established Lodges have requested to join the Masonic High Council.
Once this process in completed it is the aim of the MHC to establish a Regular Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of England in Accordance with the Old Constitutions.
The MHC/RGLE is a truly independent and self-governing body with authority over Craft Freemasonry in the symbolic degrees of Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft and Master Mason.
The MHC/RGLE is a male only organization.
The MHC/RGLE requires of all its members a belief in a Supreme Being or Creator.
The Volume of the Sacred Law is present and open at all its Lodge meetings and all Oaths and Obligations are made upon it.
The Masonic light and symbols are present at all Lodge meetings.
The discussion of religion and politics within MHC/RGLE Lodges is prohibited.
The MHC/RGLE observes the Ancient Landmarks and Old Constitutions and insists on them being observed within all its Lodges.
Concern for the Craft
Thoughtful Brethren have long endured serious dissatisfaction with the administration and state of the Craft in England. It was in direct response to these concerns that on the 25th of January this year a number of Master Masons came together to constitute a Masonic High Council, to prepare a firm Foundation for a Regular Grand Lodge of England true to the Ancient Constitutions and fundamental spiritual values of the Craft.
At the core of these concerns is the heartfelt lament that Masonry in England has effectively degenerated into a social and dining club, meeting upon the excuse of a initiating yet another candidate into a society whose only apparent purpose is to carry out initiations, whilst seeking to justify its existence through the business of institutional charity. And where the heirarchy classically maintains discipline through the assiduous manufacture of ‘honours’ whilst ignorantly sacrificing ancient form and spiritual value in obeisance to transient political correctness.
Harsh words indeed, and doubtless the majority of English Masons will persist in their disinclination to give any thought to there being anything more to the Order than this. But whatever it is, and however socially valuable in some respects it may be, it isn’t Freemasonry.
If the words of our initiation ceremonies are actually heeded, rather than airily dismissed as so much quaint mumbo-jumbo, we learn that we are speculative Masons. And as speculative Masons we are meant to moralise, philosophise and speculate upon the symbols of the Craft, as traditionally practised in Lodges of old, before the initiation sausage-machine had been cranked up. If Freemasonry means anything it means the making of the whole man, from rough ashlar to polished stone. It implies a psychological and spiritual journey through an esoteric interpretation of our rich symbology. For too long have English Freemasons wishing to pursue such studies in a working setting been effectively disenfranchised.
Thus the Masonic High Council, after heartfelt debate and consideration, regretfully concluded that our duty to the Craft in general and to our Brethren and to ourselves in particular far outweighed attachment to the United Grand Lodge of England which we, and very many others, believe has long neglected the core, esoteric values of Freemasonry and now represents little more than a grandiose façade of what was and what might have been. The almost overwhelming response received from numerous Brethren, both in England and overseas, has more than confirmed us in this belief.
The Masonic High Council for England, Wales the Channel Islands and Districts Overseas.
“THE ACT OF REGULARITY”
To amend what has happen amiss, and to hold a yearly communication and General Assembly of Masons at London, England.
1 – The Reinstatement of the full wording on the delivery of the Masonic Penalties.
2 – The freedom and right of a Lodge to Practice its Masonic ritual of choice, such as York, Ancient and Accepted, Ancient and Primitive, Adoniram, Swedish, Rectified Scottish Rite, Schroeder Rite, etc…
3 – The right of every Master Mason to use and chose an apron design as long it is decorated with symbols that relate to the Craft.
4 – No interference of the Craft in the so-called higher degrees and vice versa.
5 – An equilibrium between Masonic work, instruction and science and charitable and social duties.
6 – The option of reading the Masonic ritual in Lodge.
7 – Greater autonomy for the Symbolic Lodges.
8 – Better and more transparency in Grand Lodge decisions and affairs.
9 – Devolution of the Masonic Library, Museum and archives to the Craft legal owners.
10 – To permit all aspects of the esoteric Masonic tradition, such as symbols, words, uses and customs.
11 – Freedom of association outside of the Craft.
12 – To promote the spirit of Brotherhood among Freemasons.
13 - The reinstatement of the Mark Mason Ceremony as a complement of the Fellow Craft Degree.
Lastly, this our Regulations shall be Recorded in our Registry, to show posterity how much we desire to revive the Ancient Craft upon true Masonical principles.
FOR MORE INFO ON THE
MASONIC HIGH COUNCIL AND THE REGULAR GRAND LODGE
OF ENGLAND PLEASE CHECK:
http://www.rgle.org.uk/
THE XIo DEGREE OF THE OTO AND THE VATICAN interview with Senior OTO Caliphate Officer
Posted on Wednesday, October 11,
2006 at 09:51PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment

THE XIo DEGREE
OF THE ORDO TEMPLI ORIENTIS AND
THE VATICAN
interview with Senior OTO
Caliphate officer by Leo Young
Did the original Swiss-based Reuss branch of the OTO
initiate candidates in a homosexual XI degree
ritual? No. There is no evidence for this whatsoever
that I am aware of. Reuss was accused of incorporating
the mutual touching of phalluses into his rituals, but I
believe this was a smear campaign rather than an
intimation of something queer going on. After reviewing
the available evidence, I believe the XIo was entirely
Crowley's invention, the basic formula having been
explored prior to his membership in OTO
(See the Vision & the Voice --Crowley was
initiated into OTO about 4
months later, and received the IXo about 4 years after
that.) In any case, the XIo is not, strictly speaking, a
homosexual degree -- I'll go into that below. Do or did
any other OTO jurisdictions,
contemporary or defunct (e.g. OTO-Antigua,
etc.) initiate candidates in a homosexual XI degree
ritual? I'm not so sure about that, but it is my
impression that only C.S.
Jones was ever entrusted with the XIo secrets by
Crowley, if indeed anyone was. This impression follows
primarily from instructions to Jones in Liber Aleph.
There have been many attempts to incorporate what others
see the XIo into magical orders -- sometimes it involves
homosexuality (as in Bertiaux's group), and sometimes it
doesn't (as in SOTO,TOTO). IMO,
there is no reason to believe that any of these
various XIos have anything much to do with Crowley's
idea of the XIo.Does the ©OTO currently initiate
candidates with a homosexual XI degree ritual? I believe
there are members of "cOTO" who currently hold
the XIo. That degree was not exclusively homosexual in
Crowley's time since he records many XIo operations with
women in his magical diaries. I don't believe it is
"homosexual" in its current incarnation in the
Caliphate OTO, but this is so
primarily to bring it into line with Crowley's vision --
there is no reason homosexuals can't be admitted to the
degree of course,and to some extent, the sex magick of
the XIo is better suited to homosexuals (IMO) than
heterosexuals. If the ©OTO does not currently
initiate candidates with a homosexual XI degree ritual,
did it ever do so (e.g. when Grady McMurtry rather than
William Breeze was head of the order)? Grady McMurtry
(at Patrick King's demand, by his own admission)
chartered an experimental XIo sanctuary run by Patrick
King called the "Rite of Shiraz." Some members
of the Caliphate OTO around at
the time felt that Grady chartered the Rite of Shiraz so
he could wash his hands of the degree feeling that it was
homosexual and therefore something he didn't
wantassociated with him. In any case, the Rite of Shiraz
was pronounced defunct by the current OHO
for various reasons -- primarily, I think (I
haven't asked him, so this is just speculation more than
anything, although I think there's an old issue of the
Magical Link that contains a note to this effect),
because it failed to really live up to thenature of the
XIo as Crowley understood it. There's a great deal of
information about the XIo in Crowley's published works,
actually, and having seen some of the materials that
Patrick King produced, I happen to agree. If the ©OTO
did at one time initiate candidates with a homosexual XI
degree ritual, and does not do so now, when was the
ritual terminated and what reason was given for the
termination? I could be wrong, but I seem to remember
that the Rite of Shiraz was declared defunct -- a failed
experiment basically -- in 1987. Hymenaus Beta has
publicly claimed XIo, so I think it's entirely probable
that there is currently a functioning body of XIo
initiates, though it must be relatively small and it
seems to be present in what Crowley defined with his own
words as the Black Lodge of the Vatican, a place of
equal demonic strenght that Crowley respected very
much.The rise of the Pink Palace phenomena within
the US Catholic Church in the 60's made it possible
for the OTO XIo degree to
infiltrate the Vatican even further as demonstrated by
the recent scandals in the United States Catholic
clergy and then find support in the already
existing Black Lodge of homosexuals and pedophiles
residing since time immemorial in the Vatican HQ's
in Rome.
Leo Young
Crowley and Satanism, compiled by P.R. Koenig ( a Jewish satanist secretely working for the illuminati)
Posted on Wednesday, October 11,
2006 at 09:36PM by
[Your
Name Here] |
Post
a Comment

To: "leo young"
From: "Peter-R. Koenig"
Subject: Satanism and Thelema
regarding satanism and crowley, i have written a
short summary on all
this, that is: quotations of his secret diaries.
anyway, here is my summary on satanism:
-------------------------
Crowley and Satanism, compiled by P.R. Koenig
"I was compelled to set myself in opposition to
the Bible itself," "I
simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I
cannot tell why,"
(The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, edited by John
Symonds/Kenneth
Grant, London 1969, 67, 73).
Crowley identified Aiwaz, the
outer-human-intelligence who allegedly
dictated the Book of the Law in 1904 with/as "Thee
Satan my saviour",
diary entry 15th March 1922. Crowley saw Aiwaz, His Holy
Guardian Angel,
as the messenger/avenger of Hoor-Paar-Krat, ie Set, god
of destruction,
brother and murderer of Osiris. Set is Shaitan, the
role-model for the
christian Satan. Crowley referenced this also when he
credited "thanks
to Aiwaz, our Lord God the Devil," or: "I sing
for God, our Devil, our
Lord, Aiwaz," etc. (Magical Records, 22nd and 28th
July 1920.
Similarily also in Symonds/Grant: "Magical and
Philosophical Commentaries,"
Montreal 1974, 81). See also Crowley's Liber Samekh/The
Bornless Ritual:
"Thou Satan-Sun [...] Satan, my Lord! The Lust of
the Goat!".
Diary, 30th June 1920: "When I was [Eliphas]
Levi, I drew myself as
Ayin or Baphomet, 'The Devil', with Beast's Head. This
is the Beast
throned, crowned, exalted; the leaper, the erect, the
butter-in. Her womb is
my city, Babel. This Ayin is then my Phallic Will, my
Holy Guardian
Angel, Aiwaz, who was afterwards called Satan."
Diary 19th/20th January
1918 about Baphomet: "I find 729 = the curse of
Satan! Of course."
His sexmagickal formula was summoned in ShTN
(Shaitan, Set, Satan): Sh
the magical fire, T the lion snake, N as the Scarlet
Woman. Defining
himself as To Mega Therion equates him with Shaitan.
Crowley is Aiwaz and
equally Thelema in persona: Diary 22nd October 1920:
"I am the Beast
[...] I am Thelema" and on 27th May 1917: "I
myself AIWAZ have been
considering all the time how to act as to Crowley's body
and mind." On 14th
June 17: "I am getting quite to the point of
habitual recognition of
myself as AIWAZ."
----------------------------------------------------
The Womb of Thelema,
questions by P.R. Koenig,
reactions by Thelemites
The Womb Of Thelema
"I was compelled to set myself in opposition to the
Bible itself," "I
simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I
cannot tell why,"
(The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, edited by John
Symonds/Kenneth
Grant, London 1969, 67, 73).
* Didn't he at that time think the anglican church was
'satanic',
he himself coming from a Plymouth brethren background?
Crowley identified Aiwaz, the outer-human-intelligence
who allegedly
dictated the Book of the Law in 1904 with/as "Thee
Satan my saviour",
diary entry 15th March 1922. Crowley saw Aiwaz, His Holy
Guardian Angel,
as the messenger/avenger of Hoor-Paar-Krat, i.e. Set,
god of
destruction, brother and murderer of Osiris. Set is
Shaitan, the role-model for
the christian Satan. Crowley also referred to this when
he wrote in his
Magical Records, 22nd and 28th July 1920: "thanks
to Aiwaz, our Lord God
the Devil," or: "I sing for God, our Devil,
our Lord, Aiwaz," etc. (see
also in Symonds/Grant: "Magical and Philosophical
Commentaries,"
Montreal 1974, 81). Read Crowley's Liber Samekh/The
Bornless Ritual: "Thou
Satan-Sun [...] Satan, my Lord! The Lust of the
Goat!".
AC also states in Book IV that a devil exalted to the
status of a God
cannot be considered to be a devil anymore. Moreover,
Liber Samekh
contains both polarities of God and Devil, the ritual
intends to transcend
both. Mentioning the term 'Satan' or 'Devil' doesn't
make one a
satanist.
* Do You know much about the Yezidi, true Satan
worshippers, where
Satan originated in name? Have you any idea what it
would mean to set
yourself in opposition to the Bible itself, THE
BOOK, so to speak, of
power in the world today, that is, Western World? If
Crowley was working
with the powers that be, than why would he set himself
in opposition to
the Bible? If he wanted to make a complete demarkation
in the religious
belief of the time, than he would certainly bring back,
the worth of
the Body, the body which was so ignored and rejected by
Constantines new
religeon, THE BIBLE.
Diary, 30th June 1920: "When I was [Eliphas] Levi,
I drew myself as
Ayin or Baphomet, 'The Devil', with the Beast's Head.
This is the Beast
throned, crowned, exalted; the leaper, the erect, the
butter-in. Her
womb is my city, Babel. This Ayin is then my Phallic
Will, my Holy
Guardian Angel, Aiwaz, who was afterwards called
Satan."
* Referring to the Tarot card of 'The Devil' with a
whole complex
of meanings surrounding that, doesn't make one a
satanist.
Diary 19th/20th January 1918 about Baphomet: "I
find 729 = the curse
of Satan! Of course."
* he identifies Baphomet® with the Tarot card of the
Devil.
His sexmagickal formula was summoned in ShTN (Shaitan,
Set, Satan): Sh
the magical fire, T the lion snake, N as the Scarlet
Woman. Defining
himself as To Mega Therion equates him with Shaitan.
Crowley is Aiwaz and
equally Thelema in person: Diary 22nd October 1920:
"I am the Beast
[...] I am Thelema" and on 27th May 1917: "I
myself AIWAZ have been
considering all the time how to act as to Crowley's body
and mind." On 14th
June 17: "I am getting quite to the point of
habitual recognition of
myself as AIWAZ."
Let's assume that Crowley knew what he was doing. Liber
AL was a poem
developed over a longer period of time. All terms and
ideas exist in
context (preexisting ideas based on "other"
sources).
Did Crowley (fueled by his own ego's fantasies) use on
purpose a
"satanic" context in order to put himself and
his followers under the stigma
of a masochistic religion?
The embrace of satanism by Aleister Crowley demonstrates
the degree of
inescapable influence his religious upbringing had on
him, and that he
was unable to remove himself from within the ideological
box formed by
the biblical religions. He joked about it, and made many
contradictory
statements concerning biblical myth, yet it's clear
which basket he
placed his eggs in. The challenge for 21st century
Thelemites is to
extricatethemselves from the ideological box by
abandoning the
sinkingbiblical barge for higher ground before it sinks
entirely--it's already
listing to one side. TBOTL provides
the basis needed to moveforward without
constantly being pulled backwards, which is the
onlything tradition and
dogma are really good for.
With references to Satan and Satanism absent from TBOTL,
there is no
direct literary connection between Satanism and Thelema.
The Biblical
characters the Beast and Scarlet
Woman are generally perceived as
being in league with the Devil, which makes it easy for
critics of TBOTL to
associate it with Satanism. The Beast and the Scarlet
Woman could just
as easily and accurately be viewed as personal monikers
for Aleister
Crowley and his wife Rose-
* If there is no necessity please provide some
precendence in any
literature for the use of these ideas. They are clearly
references to
the Apocalypseof St. John. the Beast and Scarlet Woman
are a pair of
male/female images taken from Revelations due to the
appeal the
characters had for Crowley, a result of his fascination
with the myth, and his
life-long fantasy of being the Beast.
to ignore the obvious biblical references seems
determined to be pretty
silly. All terms and ideas exist in context. A reader
cannot understand
any term unless they have some preexisting idea based
onpreviously
experienced sources. Since the only sources for these
ideas are the Bible
or literature directly dependant on the Bible your
assertion here is
false on its face.
The source of an image can, and is often secondary, or
even irrelevant
to the use and purpose intended by an author or artist
for the image.
In this case, the origin of the Beast and the Scarlet
Woman as Biblical
imagery is irrelevant to the contextual meaning of the
images provided
by the author of TBOTL. The
Beast and Scarlet Woman are equated to the
Sun and Moon, the two most universally recognized
symbols of the
male/female forces found in nature. Better yet, the
author goes one step
further and equates the Beast and Scarlet Woman to the
two most
widely-known images of the male/female counterparts in
ancient Egypt: the winged
sun--the winged secret flame--and the arched figure of
Nuit--the
stooping starlight.
Provided the fictional characters had been known at the
time TBOTL was
created, the author could have used the characters
Blondie and Dagwood,
Lucy and Dezi, or Popeye and Olive Oil--they can all
serve the same
purpose, with exception of the fact that using the Beast
and Scarlet Woman
appealed to Aleister Crowley's ego, and fueled his
fantasies, thereby
assuring his cooperation.
There is want to divorce Crowley from authorship of the BOTL
but even
assuming some seperate praeter human authorship assumes
the words the
author uses have contextual meaning. As no other
contextual meaning is
even vaguely possible here, blaming Crowley is absurd at
best.
-there is no necessity in projecting Biblical myth into
the pages of
TBOTL. On the other hand,
Crowley relished his assumption of the role of
the Beast of Revelations, and the role of the
anti-christ. Crowley also
identified his perceived Holy Guardian Angel--Aiwass--as
being a
core-figure at the heart of what he fantasized was the
origin of
Satanism, the worship of Shaitan in Mesopotamia. Any
connections that exist
between Thelema as it is known today and Satanism rests
squarely on the
shoulders of Aleister Crowley.
Jesus and Mary are mentioned in TBOTL.
How about the Desolation of
Abomination, this has a purely and exclusively biblical
origin. The Quran
isn't mentioned in the Book of the Law either.
The issue of Satanism and Thelema existing as bedfellows
certainly
raises an interesting question. If the author of TBOTL
had intended for the
book to act as a catalyst for the integration of the
world's religions,
he certainly seems bent on self-defeat in that area of
achievement.
Invoking the names of the two characters most dreaded by
readers of the
New Testament, combined with vicious attacks leveled
at religions' demigods, all but insures that TBOTL
will be viewed
negatively by most people.
PRKoenig:
#> ...Set is Shaitan, the role-model for the
christian Satan....
I gather that a good number of Satanists believe
this, some of them
Setians. my research into the history of the
personification of evil
through time does not lead me to this simplistic
conclusion and I would
appreciate additional reflection from any reading this.
no doubt some post-Christians and Neopagan Setians think
that this is
the case, but I'm not aware that the most recent
Egyptology or
investigations into the roots of the Christian Bogey
play out so clearly as a
single derivation of Satan from this particular deity.
corrections welcomed.
Becky Brook
<
# Do You know much about the Yezidi, true Satan
worshippers,
# where Satan originated in name?
everything I encounter about the Yezidis indicates
their encompassing
enshrinement of the Most High God and respects to its
Creation that
include the anti-God or Force For Waywardness and Sin.
that they are
interested in appeasing or assisting this has been used
by Satanists to call
them kindred, and surely there is some kind of
relationship
amongst those who have in mind the assistance to the
demonic. yet it
would be foolhardy to presume that such activities are
usually
monolatric, or in this case strictly demonolatric
(worshipping one being, let
alone merely the Adversary, Iblis, or whatever they do).
-
Have you any idea what it would mean to set yourself in opposition
-
to the Bible itself, THE BOOK, so to speak, of power in the world
-
today, that is, Western World?
a good many secular humanists have made an effort to
do so, and even to
go further and educate the world in materialistic
empiricism. it is my
contention that dispensing with the Evul Book and The
Books of the
Fathers of the Religions of the Book has come due. for
this reason such
texts as promote their superiority may be mocked and
burnt in revelry and
without compunctions about their sacrality to us.
-
If Crowley was working with neters, that is, the powers that be,
I have absolutely no reason to think he was.
-
[then] why would he set himself in opposition to the Bible?
quite simply, the powers that be are not so
associated. in large they
are not associated with any single cult or culture, even
with any single
species. anthropomorphism is almost as popular as
insular cult
dogmaticism and intertribal warfare over symbol.
-
If he wanted to make a complete demarkation in the religious
-
belief of the time,
with EyeofHoor, I echo the commentary that Crowley
was boxed into his
Christian religion and constitutes a kind of Bridge or
Tunnel from it
into an enhanced subjective landscape. it does not
appear that he himself
fully navigated said Bridge, but that he may have made
it available to
others (as LaVey did with his CoSatanism) is remarkable
and admirable
to a degree.
-
[then] he would certainly bring back, the worth of the Body,
-
the body which was so ignored and rejected by Constantines
-
new religeon, THE BIBLE.
anything associated with it ought be considered
subsumed to it.
so many times Christians have sought to recapture
something
fundamental (discipline, focus on the changing scripture
or its
enshrined cementation, feminine-progeny-attractors,
etc.), that any particular
novel emphasis is one more of a myriad lineage composite
at least
trying to draw from it (as in syncretic pursuits like
Hermeticism or
applied within Christianity proper).
--------------------------------------------------------
attached you also find several online postings from
high degree members
of the 'caliphate'.
regarding satanism in Thelema: all OTO
people are heavily against the
Temple of Set and the Church of Satan: double membership
is strictly
forbidden.
i hope that i have helped you bit. if you forward
this email: please do
so in extenso/complete.
HTML Attachment [ Scan and
Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]
Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen
Groups Suchergebnis 16 für satan thelema crowley maroney
Best Western Hotels • Thousands of Discounted
Hotel rooms Compare, Reserve, and Save Money! •
www.BestStay.com Anzeigen
Masonic Software • e-books, Masonic Database,
test, screensavers, graphics and more! •
mastermason.biz
FreeMason Store • 2400+ Masonic items for sale.
Rings, Books, Auto Emblems and More •
www.freemasonstore.com
Suchergebnis 16
Von:Bill Heidrick (heidrick@well.sf.ca.us)
Betrifft:Re: More fake AC bio (was: Need advice
regarding Co-Masonry)
View: Complete Thread (2 Beiträge)
Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.freemasonry, alt.magick, alt.satanism
Datum:1994-11-19 09:14:22 PST
93
Tim Maroney (tim@toad.com) writes:
>The Simon Necronomicon was published in 1979 or
1980, more
>than thirty years after Crowley's death.
Not only that, Crowley would likely have considered it revolting.
>Crowley was a Mason, and was granted degrees in
numerous
>rites of Masonry.
Well, yes, but not in regular GLOE
Masonry, it would appear. His
French Lodge was recently made regular, but that isn't
retroactive.
>His groups, the A.'. A.'. and
O.T.O., use Masonic
>symbolism extensively.
Quite true, although much more so of O.T.O.
than of A.'.A.'., honor
points excluded. Consider also that Crowley's main book:
"Liber AL vel
Legis" is called "The Book of the Law"
and is used in those O.T.O.
initiations as the VSL.
>There's little doubt that to Crowley,
"Satan" was an entirely
>positive symbol, and he repeatedly identified
himself with it.
Tim, I disagree with you on this utterly. It simply
isn't true.
Crowley did use "Satan" as the subject of
poetry and irony, but
he denied the existence of the critter. "Entirely
positive"
is belied by may instances of his usage. A study of
incidence
of the words: "Lucifer", "Satan" and
"Christ" in 20 megs of A.C.'s
Stuff here on disk came out with the following:
lucifer ---- 22 occurrences
satan ---- 165 occurrences
christ ---- 1,260 occurrences
Analysis of "lucifer" finds (some from
Crowley's translation of E.Levi's
The Key of the Mysteries in Equinox Vol. I, #10
supplement):
similes (one is a
duplicate)---------------------------------- 3
Satanists called Christians
---------------------------------- 1
name of a person (Fr. Lucifer)
------------------------------- 1
figures of speech (e.g. left Lucifer at the door)
------------ 1
poetic salutation (O' Lucifer)
------------------------------- 1
Lucifer saved eventually (see
below)-------------------------- 1
Lucifer is not Satan (see
below)------------------------------ 1
"Daughter of Lucifer and accomplice of
Prometheus" ----------- 1
Rhetorical question
------------------------------------------ 1
Book review, scurrilous remark
------------------------------- 1
Book review, non scurrilous
---------------------------------- 1
Warning against pride
---------------------------------------- 1
Poetic image linking Lucifer, Satan and Christ (below)
------- 2 (dup)
Not Satan, but one of the princes of evil
-------------------- 1
As Brahma (part of a general assault on religions)
(below) --- 2 (dup)
As planet Venus
---------------------------------------------- 1
Acceptance of common usage (MTP below) out of
frustration ---- 1
Other poet using the word "Lucifer"
-------------------------- 1
Equinox Vol. I, No. 10, page 23 suppliment:
Lucifer, of whom the dark ages have made the genius
of evil, will be truly
the angel of light when, having conquered liberty at the
price of infamy, he
will make use of it to submit himself to eternal order,
inaugurating thus the
glories of voluntary obedience.
Ibid:
The fallen angel is not Lucifer the light-bearer; it
is Satan, who
calumniated love.
Eq. I, 4:
By Thy most secret and Holy Name of Apophis be Thou
blessed, Lucifer, Star
of the Dawn, Satan-Jeheshua, Light of the World!
Eq. I, 5:
And Satan is worshipped by men under the name of
Jesus; and Lucifer is
worshipped by men under the name of Brahma; and
Leviathan is worshipped by
men under the name of Allah; and Belial is worshipped by
men under the name
of Buddha.
Magick in Theory and Practice (MTP):
This has led to so much confusion of thought that THE
BEAST 666 has
preferred to let names stand as they are, and to
proclaim simply that AIWAZ
--- the solar-phallic-hermetic "Lucifer" is
His own Holy Guardian Angel, and
"The Devil" SATAN or HADIT of
our particular unit of the Starry Universe.
Conclusion: Except for the MTP reference,
which context places as a
defiance of popular prejudice more than an _expression
of belief, Crowley
did not appear to make much use of "Lucifer"
as a serious subject. Most
references combining "Lucifer" and
"Satan", few though they are,
differentiate between the two.
-------------------
The references to "satan" are more varied.
Most are simile, metaphor,
derogatory or associations of "Satan" to
Christianity. Some appear to
use the term in a non-traditional fashion. Examples of
the latter below.
There are a couple of poems dedicated to Satan, but they
appear to be
intended either for humor or shock value. Satan is also
associated with
Saturn in Astrology, the Sun in mythology (not
Astrology), and several
philosophical ideas and ancient deities not relevant to
Christian
concepts of a Devil or Personification of Evil. The
first example below
associates "Satan" to a geographic direction.
Comment on Liber AL:
It is also to be considered that Nu is connected with
North, while
Had is Sad, Set, Satan, Sat (equals "Being" in
Sanskrit), South.
Confessions:
I simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I cannot tell why.
My satanism did not interfere with it at all; I was
trying to take the
view that the Christianity of hypocrisy and cruelty was
not true
Christianity.
The problem of life was not how to satanize, as
Huysmans would have
called it; it was simply to escape from the oppressors
and to enjoy the
world without any interference of spiritual life of any
sort.
For instance, if I mention a beetle I expect the
reader to understand
an allusion to the sun at midnight in its moral sense of
Light-in-Darkness;
if a pelican, to the legend that she pierces her own
breast to feed her
young on her heart's bleed; if a goat, to the entire
symbolism of
Capricornus, the god Pan, Satan or Jesus (Jesus being
born at the winter
solstice, when the sun enters Capricorn); if a pearl, to
the
correspondences of that stone as a precious and
glittering secretion of
the oyster, by which I mean that invertebrate animal
life of man, the
Nephesch.
Equinox I, 1:
[Or vice versa, friend, if you are a Satanist; 'tis a
matter of
words --- words --- words.
Eq. I, 10:
and Satan is only so incoherent and so formless
because he is made up
of all the rags of ancient theogonies.
Eq. I, 2:
Thus it happens that until you become God, God
Himself is in Reality
The Tempter, Satan, and the Prince of Darkness, who,
assuming the
glittering robes of Time and Space, whispers in our
ears: "Millions and
millions and millions of eternities are as nothingness
to me; then how
canst thou, thou little mote dancing in the beam of mine
eye, hope to
span me?
Eq. I, 5:
SMAL, Satan so-called, but really only Samael, the
accuser of the
brethren, unpopular with the Rabbis because their
consciences were
not clear.
Also OMMV SThH, Ommo Satan,
the Satanic Trinity of Typhon, Apophis,
and Besz; also ShM IHShVH, the
name of Jesus.
Gospel According to St. Bernard Shaw:
Refreshed, he continued: "The men who are
willing by this means to
become the saviours of their country shall be called the
Synagogue of
Satan, so as to keep themselves from the friendship of
the fools who
mistake names for things.
MTP:
This "Devil: is called Satan or Shaitan, and
regarded with horror
by people who are ignorant of his formula, and,
imagining themselves
to be evil, accuse Nature herself of their own
phantasmal crime.
Satan is Saturn, Set, Abrasax, Adad, Adonis, Attis, Adam, Adonai, etc.
This serpent, SATAN, is not
the enemy of Man, but He who made Gods of
our race, knowing Good and Evil; He bade "Know
Thyself!
Thus, in low grades of initiation, dogmatic quarrels
are inflamed
by astral experience; as when Saint John distinguishes
between the Whore
BABALON and the Woman clothed
with the Sun, between the Lamb that was
slain and the Beast 666 whose deadly wound was healed;
nor understands
that Satan, the Old Serpent, in the Abyss, the Lake of
Fire and Sulphur,
is the Sun-Father, the vibration of Life, Lord of
Infinite Space that
flames with His Consuming Energy, and is also that
throned Light whose
Spirit is suffused throughout the City of Jewels.
He is the Lord of the Sabbath of the Adepts, and is
Satan, therefore
also the Sun, whose number of Magick is 666, the seal of
His servant the
BEAST.
In AL note that Saturn or Satan is exalted in the
House of Venus or
Astarte, and it is an airy sign.
Conclusion: Crowley used "Satan" most often
in the Christian context
as a term of common speech to indicate some image of
myth suited to
another subject under discussion; next most often as an
anti-establishment
slur, especially for a brief period in his late teens or
early 20's when
he followed "Satan" as an act of rebellion;
more rarely but philosophically
as a Miltonian ideal and positive image for ideas
concealed by common
prejudices; occasionally as an insult or joke, including
categorization
of his own public reputation. The more profound usages
of "Satan" by
Crowley appear to be totally irrelevant to Christian
ideas.
---------
The 1,260 occurrences of "Christ"
(including "Christian", "Christmas"
and other combinations) in this sample indicate a
greater interest in
Christianity than Satanism, per say. With so large a
number, I have
not analyzed the patterns closely, but at significant
number are positive.
One is a usage of devotion to Christ (Crowley's 5 = 6 G.'.D.'.
motto).
Most references to "Christ" directly are quite
positive, although very
frequently contrary to popular views of the historicity
of "Christ".
About half the references to Christianity are negative,
emphasizing
"false doctrines" and vice pervading Christian
theology or tradition.
>His tradition of Thelema has a great deal to do
with the Satanic
>symbols of the Beast and the Scarlet Woman,
servitors of the Draconic
>form of Satan in the Apocalypse of John.
Calling these various things "Satanic
symbols" is not responsible,
IMHO. To Christians, yes,
mostly. To Satanists, some, yes, some no.
To Thelemites, mostly no. To the author of the
Apocalypse, definitely
no. Where do you get "servitors of the Draconic
form of Satan..."?
That one throws me.
>Our own Bill Heidrick denies that any of these
symbols are actually
>central to Thelema, to which opinion he is of course
entitled, just as
>I am entitled to the opinion that Crowley did
consider them central.
On the centricity or lack of it in the symbols, I've
never commented.
On the meaning of these symbols in Crowley's usage and
in Thelema,
not all of this is a matter of opinion. There is ample
evidence in
Crowley's writings toward determination actual fact of
usage.
N.B. for follow-up, it
might be best if the alt.freemasonry cross-post
was dropped on some follow-up. If you want me to
respond, please retain
the cross-post to alt.magick.
93 93/93
Bill Heidrick
©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and
Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]
Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen
Groups Suchergebnis 20 für satan thelema crowley
European Security Fencing • Concertina
manufacturer & installer for high security fencing.
• www.europeansf.com Anzeigen
Digital CCTV •
Specialists in multi site remote management and
observation • www.globaleye.co.uk
Securityproshop • Your complete source for top
brands video surveillance products & more •
www.securityproshop.com
Suchergebnis 20
Von:Tim Maroney (tim@hoptoad.uucp)
Betrifft:Re: Thelema
View: Complete Thread (7 Beiträge)
Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.pagan
Datum:1991-03-13 15:52:00 PST
In article
> Since Tim Moroney has deigned not to respond, I
thought I would post
> a file from one of the bulletin board systems he
frequents, ThelemNet.
Well, the last time some bozo showed up with this
"Thelema is not
Satanism" crap, the Thelemites here (including an O.T.O.
member) jumped
all over him, and I thought it would happen again. I
guess everyone
else is as tired of this cut-and-dried issue as I am.
But I will
happily give examples of the Satanic focus of Thelema.
Do you want
ritual examples, theological examples, mythological
examples,
scriptural examples, philosophical examples,
biographical examples,
or what?
As for the file you posted, the questions and answers
express the
opinions of particular individuals, not of Thelema as a
whole or even
of the O.T.O. Some of them do
not even represent the opinion of Josh
Gordon, the sysop of the board you mentioned; for
instance, he was one
of the affirmative posters in the last alt.pagan round
of "is Thelema a
kind of Satanism?" The file is rather old and was
written before the
late-1980's round of consciousness raising on the idea
of Satanism,
back when denial was still king.
>3. Q: Are you Satanists?
> A: No. Are you a murderer and a rapist? Neither am
I. And I'd rather you
> didn't associate me with them. Satanism is a
Christian heresy, and
> doesn't interest me in the least (except
academically.)
Notice the Satanist-bashing manner of expressing
this. I think that
these days, even those Thelemites who still say that
Thelema is not
Satanism would be embarrassed to make such a
Texe-Marrs-type
statement. (Incidentally, I'm surprised no one has
mentioned my
favorite fact about Texe Marrs in the current
discussion; in MYSTERY
MARK OF THE
NEW AGE, Marrs says that the Smurfs are a Satanic
conspiracy!)
The current argument among the "Thelema is not
Satanism" crowd,
paraphrased, is "Well, sure Crowley was incredibly
fond of Satan and of
such chthonic deities, demons, and devils, and sure he
identified with
the Satanic symbol of the Beast and sang rapturous
love-songs to Satan,
but he didn't use only Satan. A
Satanist uses only Satan, and
Thelema doesn't, even though it uses him a lot, so
Thelema is not
Satanism." However, this argument rests on a
definition of Satanism
with which few professing Satanists would concur. It
would, for
instance, leave out the Temple of Set, the Church of
Satan, and the
Process Church.
I don't know what proportion of Thelemites deny that
Thelema is
Satanism. I suspect most have never considered the issue
and would
respond to the question by aping the reflexive Wiccan
denial of any
connection. Of those who have
considered the issue seriously, I
think most would either enthusiastically affirm the
identity or
grudgingly admit that Thelema is a form of Satanism
under some
reasonable definition. The textual evidence is clear
that Thelema
holds Satan and related symbols very close to its heart.
--
Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant, sun!hoptoad!tim,
tim@toad.com
"Don't talk to me about disclaimers! I invented
disclaimers!"
- The Censored Hacker
©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and
Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]
Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen
Groups Suchergebnis 63 für satan thelema crowley
Best Western Hotels • Thousands of Discounted
Hotel rooms Compare, Reserve, and Save Money! •
www.BestStay.com Anzeigen
Magick & Mystic Supplies • candles, organic
herbs, crystals incense, oils, aromatherapy (Aff)
• www.magickrose.co.uk
Maybe Logic Academy • Peter Carroll Online Courses
Chaos Magick instruction/community •
www.maybelogic.org
Suchergebnis 63
Von:nagasiva (tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com)
Betrifft:TMaroney: Crowley and Satanism
Dies ist der einzige Artikel zu diesem Diskussionsthema
View: Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.magick.tyagi, alt.magick, alt.satanism,
talk.religion.misc
Datum:1996/12/05
[from
[TMaroney]
>>By definition the Satan of Satanists is not the
Satan
>>of Christians; it is a reinterpretation and
reclamation of a demonized
>>symbol.
[Bheidrick]
>Post Crowley, minority and growing. What does that
have to do with Crowley's
>usage?
Why do you say that? Do you think that Blake's
Satanic reinterpretation
of Swedenborg in "The Marriage of Heaven and
Hell" was post-Crowleyan,
for instance, or that the Satan of Baudelaire was the
Satan of Calvin, or
that Levi's identification of "the devil" as
the "instrument of liberty"
was in line with Church teaching at the time? Crowley
was hardly the
first of the Western reinterpreters of the Satanic, nor
will he be the
last.
>Crowley did a similar thing, different in his own
way and for other
>ends. He didn't use the style of the term for what
he did. This is like
>AMORC claiming that Francis Bacon was a past
Imperitor of their organization.
>Worse, since Bacon wrote of Rosicrucianism.
Eh?
>>Are you actually resting your argument on
>>your "suspicion" that there was some
precursor of the Apocalypse in which
>>there were forms of the Beast and the Scarlet
Woman that were not demonic
>>or linked with the Dragon, Satan? Is there the
slightest evidence for
>>this, or are you simply multiplying entities and
flouting Occam's razor?
>What is your point? "St. John" didn't
write it. Mead contends there are
>pre-Christian precursors. The G.'.D.'.
played with it in terms of Qabalah.
>Crowley specialized in his own interpretation of the
symbols and such.
None of this seems to have anything to do with the
issue. I could point
out that Rudolph Steiner was also quite interested in
the symbolism of
the Apocalypse, or that there were many Apocalypses
attributed to
different people, but what would that have to do with
Crowley's
self-identification as the Beast from the Apocalypse
attributed to John?
>Why would the entities in it be demonic or "linked with the Dragon, Satan"?
Because the text says so in clear and direct
language. It uses the phrase
"the great dragon, the primeval serpent, known as
the devil or Satan",
then links him with the beast and the whore of Babylon:
"the dragon had
handed over to it [the beast] his own power and throne
and world-wide
authority"; "a woman riding a scarlet beast
who had seven heads and ten
horns". I trust you are familiar with Revelations,
chapters 12, 13, and
17? Though the book is often ambiguous (to say the
least) its Satanic
symbols are undeniable here.
>>I do see in Mead that the Dragon is linked
with Satan as the lord of the
>>punishments in the Outer Darkness in the Pistis
Sophia (pp. 490, 492,
>>503), which implies that if there was some
Gnostic precursor of the
>>Apocalypse, then if it featured the same
characters, there was still a
>>link to Satan.
>How implies? There were and are many forms of
Gnosticism. Is the precursor
>Gnostic? Not even that is established.
Funny, that's not what you said in your previous
message: "The underlying
material in the Apocalypse attributed to John is still
accessible under
the distortion, quite valuable, based on Merkabah and
influenced by
Gnostic ideas." It seems that this hypothetical
precursor is Gnostic or
not as it suits you. The attempt to explain away the
Satanic symbols of
the Revelation through this (infinitely flexible)
precursor of the
Apocalypse of John seems to have nothing going for it in
the way of
evidence.
>>while there seems to be no way for him to
have known about your
>>hypothetical precursor,
>Since he followed a course of denying the accuracy
of the NT and completely
>re-interpreted Revelations away from the Christian
ideas, I find it difficult
>to understand how you can imagine anything else
short of invention out of
>whole cloth.
This is another non sequitur. I ask again: Suppose
that there was some
(currently unknown) precursor of the Apocalypse of John
such that the
symbols that were Satanic in the later form were not
Satanic in the
original. How is it that Crowley came into contact with
this lost text
and was influenced by it?
Further, why does he then go ahead and use the
Satanic legend from the
later form, as already quoted from Liber Samekh
("Satan... whose number
of Magick is 666, the seal of His servant the
Beast")?
>>that selling one's soul to the devil is a fit
metaphor for
>>crossing the Abyss,
>No, rather a description of the failure of that
experience in an unsuitable
>metaphor.
What-EH-ver....
>>And the relevance of this observation is what
again? You seem to have
>>some idea of what Satanism is that does not have
much to do with the way
>>I am using the term.
>I confess to being unable to guess how you are using
the term.
>You appear to be attributing a usage to Crowley that
dates from the 1950's,
>at the same time alleging that any positive use of
words characterized by
>Christians as Satanic makes one a Satanist. This is
very obscure to me.
I don't know of any major transformation of the words
"Satanism" or
"Satanic" that began in the 1950's. I am
looking at earlier usages than
that in the Oxford English Dictionary right now.
"Satanic" means "of or
pertaining to Satan" and dates back centuries;
"Satanism" has two main
meanings, both of which apply to Crowley: the worship of
Satan (see Liber
Samekh, again) and the "Satanic school" in
literature, beginning with
Byron and Shelley, of which Crowley was a
self-proclaimed part.
Crowley used the word "Satanism" with
respect to himself (Confessions, p.
73). The last time this came up, you claimed he had
referred to "my
Satanism" as a childish affectation; in fact, not
only does he never
forewear this allegiance, but as the Confessions go on
he continues to
discuss his romance with the figure of Satan and with
other proponents of
the figure, such as Shelley, Baudelaire and (in
Crowley's eyes, as in
those of others, such as Blake) Milton.
>>In what way would metaphorical use of Satanic
>>terminology undercut the idea of Crowley's
Satanism? To me it seems to
>>support it.
>If Crowley used "Satanic terminology" as
metaphor, to that extent he could
>not be a believing Satanist. That others
characterize themselves
>now-a-days as "Satanists" and also use a
different metaphor would appear
>to me to be irrelevant.
There are not now, and never have been, many
literalistic Satanists. In
the West this has almost always been a consciously
mythic/symbolic usage
among the intelligentsia. I don't know where you got the
idea that this
metaphorical Satanism started in the 1950's, but I can
only direct you
once again to the OED, or
perhaps to Crowley's Confessions, where a
number of Satanists of this type appear as acknowledged
influences.
>>As for the epiphenomenality of Satan in Liber
Samekh, this is not supported
>>by the text which freely uses Satan time and
again; in which other "DEVILS"
>>(described as such) such as Besz and Apophrasz
are called upon; and which
>>contains the following illuminating passage:
>>
>>"Now this word SABAF, being
by number Three score and Ten, is a name of
>>Ayin, the Eye, and of the Devil our Lord, and
the Goat of Mendes. He is
>>the Lord of the Sabbath of the Adepts, and is
Satan, therefore also the
>>Sun, whose number of Magick is 666, the seal of
His servant the BEAST."
>How you can quote that in support of your contention
is beyond me.
>It clearly refutes your assertion. Here is Crowley
using correspondences
>and discussing a non-Christian handling of ideas in
Revelations and
>elsewhere.
>That no more makes him a "Satanist" by his
lights and time than wearing
>loops on a jacket makes one a Frenchman.
These seem to be more non sequiturs. Crowley refers
to himself as the
Biblical Great Beast, explicitly affirms that he is a
servant of Satan,
and to you this proves he was not any kind of Satanist.
That is a
nonsensical mode of argument.
>>Here it is made perfectly plain that the
repeated use of the name Satan
>>in the translation of the main invocation was
not some accident, but a
>>deliberate and enthusiastic adoption by Crowley.
>Yes, he wrote it with vigor. Your point?
My point is that Crowley used Satanic symbols in a
positive light with
enthusiasm and at central points in his system. That is
all I have said
all along, and all I am saying now.
>>the explicit reiteration of the relationship
between Satan and the Beast
>>from the "Apocalypse of John". This
puts an end, I hope, to any further
>>unsupported suspicions that Crowley was actually
referring to some
>>hypothetical pre-Satanic text of the Apocalypse.
>I rather think it evidences that he thought he was
expounding an earlier use.
Is there more to this than simple speculation? Is
there anything about
his words in themselves which would lead anyone to
believe he was
referring to a hypothetical precursor of the Apocalypse
in which the
Beast and Scarlet Woman were not connected with Satan?
By saying "Satan"
and "His servant the Beast" he seems to be
reaffirming the Satanic
symbolism. I don't see how another reading is possible.
The reiteration
of the doctrine of the Apocalypse is a fact about the
text. What layers
of meaning Crowley attached to that doctrine is a matter
of
interpretation, but the Satanic nature of the doctrine
-- "of or
pertaining to Satan" -- is there in the ink on the
page.
>>Now of course we could get into all sorts of
interpretation about what he
>>meant by Satan, the Beast, and so on, but as for
whether they are
>>Satanic, well, he uses the word Satan and makes
undeniable allusions to
>>myths bearing on Satan, so the only reasonable
answer is that the texts
>>are Satanic.
>If this is your thesis, you have no thesis but
reduction to trivia.
>As you are a serious writer, I can only assume that
you have something
>else as yet uncommunicated to my understanding in
this discussion.
>He wears blue clothing, hence he is a Bluest! Why
bother to mention it?
Fear not. If at some point I should find that Crowley
had written an
important invocation of the form, "O thou bluest of
blue! Thou raiment
which hath absorbed such a dye, yea, as if to reflect
the very Ether,
thou who cleansest us as that great Ocean of Azure, O
thou Cerulean
Vestment, O thou Blouse of Sheerest Sapphire, fasten thy
splendid buttons
upon the breast of thy adorer", or repeated
passages in his Confessions
stating that "This difference between the Blue and
Red Shirts was of the
greatest importance to me, and for my part, I stood
squarely on the side
of the Blue, as Shelley and Milton had done
before", I would indeed come
to think of him as a Blueist.
The fact is that from Crowley's own writings it is
clear that this issue
of Satanism was one about which he cared very deeply; it
ranks with his
major themes and is integral to his self-definition as
the Great Beast.
To you it is not one of his main themes. That's fine.
You have every
right (even an obligation) to create your own system of
Thelema with its
own system of values; but you seem to be making the
common mistake of the
religious: you are confusing what you prefer to think
with what is
written in the books of the religion. Rather than simply
saying "Crowley
felt this was important, but I do not", you adjust
your account of what
Crowley thought to fit your own views. As long as you
continue to
misrepresent the historical facts this way, you will
find me returning
the public attention to them.
Tim Maroney
©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and
Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]
Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen
Groups Suchergebnis 15 für satan thelema crowley
Best Western Hotels • Thousands of Discounted
Hotel rooms Compare, Reserve, and Save Money! •
www.BestStay.com Anzeigen
Magick & Mystic Supplies • candles, organic
herbs, crystals incense, oils, aromatherapy (Aff)
• www.magickrose.co.uk
Maybe Logic Academy • Peter Carroll Online Courses
Chaos Magick instruction/community •
www.maybelogic.org
Suchergebnis 15
Von:Jon Allen Boone (jb3o+@andrew.cmu.edu)
Betrifft:Re: Jimmy, Crowley, and Satan - Another
trinity?
View: Complete Thread (11 Beiträge)
Original Format
Newsgroups:talk.religion.newage, alt.rock-n-roll
Datum:1990-01-22 01:33:31 PST
tim@hoptoad.uucp (Tim Maroney) writes:
> In article <10691@thor.acc.stolaf.edu>
seebs@thor.stolaf.edu (The Laughing
> Prophet) writes:
> >had to have a higher goal to be dedicated to,
and he commented that the only
> >viable such goal was the helping of other
creatures.
Personally, i have found that Crowley felt that the
only viable goal
was the expansion of one's consciousness. If that
involved helping
others, then fine. If not, then fine too.
> Ahem. Whether Crowley was a Satanist or not is
highly debatable. His
> entire mythology centered around a Satanic
inversion of the Book of
> Revelation, in which the fall of Christ was seen as
good and
> inevitable, and the rise of agents of Satan, the
Beast and the Scarlet
> Woman, was a vindication of humnanity and justice.
He used inverted
> pentagrams in rituals, explicitly stated his
sympathy for the Devil and
> Satan many times, and frequently identified his
"Holy Guardian Angel",
> Aiwass, as a devil. In the preface to the play
"Why Jesus Wept" he
> said that he had found his savior in Satan and all
his angels.
That needs to be qualified. It depends entirely upon
what you mean by
"his entire mythology". Crowley borrowed
frequently and plentifully
from the mythos of many cultures, especially the
Egyptians. In 777,
he equates all (i believe) mythological/magical systems,
enabling one
to translate concepts from one framework to another.
Crowley's life and work are based on an
anti-Christian attitude.
However, to say that he was a Satanist seems ridiculous.
Seen from a
Christian perspective, every non-Christian is a
Satanist. Crowley got
the name "The Beast" from his mother who used
to call him that all the
time.
Crowley did find the End of the Aeon of Osiris (whom
you refer to as
Jesus) as good - after he resigned himself to it. The
Aeon of Horus
(the Conquering Child) was to replace the Aeon of Osiris
(perhaps as
per the book of Revelation).
> In"Magick" he wrote:
> "This 'Devil' is called Satan or Shaitan, and
regarded with horror by
> people who are ignorant of his formula, and,
imagining themselves to be
> evil, accuse Nature herself of their own phantasmal
crime. Satan is
> Saturn, Set, Abrasax, Adad, Adonis, Attis, Adam,
Adonai, etc. The most
> serious charge against him is only that he the Sun
in the South.
As you so succinctly point out in your quote, Uncle
Aleister does not
base his entire mythology on an anti-Christian bias.
Indeed, he
frequently points out the faults/biases of Christianity,
while
pointing out the good points of the equivilant of Satan
(or Shaitan in
Arabic) in other cultures' mythos.
> [...] We have therefore no scruple in restoring
the 'devil-worship' of
> such ideas as those which the laws of sound, and
the phenomena of
> speech and hearing, compel us to connect with the
group of 'Gods'
> whose names are based upon ShT or D, vocalized by
the free breath A.
> For these Names imply the qualities of courage,
frankness, energy,
> pride, power and triumph; they are the words which
express the creative
> and paternal will. Thus 'the Devil' is Capricornus,
the Goat who leaps
> upon the loftiest mountains, the Godhead which, if
it become manifest
> in man, makes him Aegipan, the All."
This again shows Uncle Aleister's sympathy with the
active/phallic
forces in nature, as often symbolized by Satan.
> I think, based on this and many other passages
expressing sympathy for
> the devil, Crowley certainly was a Satanist. That's
not all he was,
> but he surely was that. Many occultists and pagans
have internalized
> the reflexive "we are NOT
Satanists" to the extent that they can't even
> recognize a Satanist when he puts horns on his head
and chants Ave
> Satanis. What they fail to realize is that there's
nothing wrong
> with being a Satanist.
I think that Uncle Aleister was a Satanist in some
sense of the word.
However, he was not a Satanist in the
negative-connotation,
emotionally loaded sense that the media uses it. The
media picture of
Satanists are those who consider what they do evil and
revel in it.
Uncle Aleister didn't consider these things evil -
merely part of
life. If one is to live according to the Law of Thelema,
then one may
well be called to do things which the Judeo-Christian
ethic consider
"evil"; however, as one is following one's
True Will, one can not be
considered to be doing evil.
> He's highly interested in Crowley, so much so
that he owns Crowley's
> house on Lake Ness. Whether he calls himself a
Satanist or not, I
> really can't say.
Not that what Page calls himself really matters. Too
bad I can't
afford Uncle Aleister's house on Loch Ness - I'd love to
move to
Scotland, especially if I could live in Boleskine.
> Yes, I noticed that. Unfortunately for you, and
fortunately for those
> of us who aren't scared of the red man with the
horns and fork, you're
> completely wrong.
What's to be afraid of?
> He rarely did any animal sacrifices; I believe
in his whole life he
> only sacrificed one pigeon, one frog, and one goat.
Not that sacrifices have anything to do with
Satanism. The Aztecs
sacrificed humans - yet one cannot really consider them
Satanists.
> As for "had
> nothing to do with Satan", please read the
above quote, as well as the
> numerous similar statements in his works (such as
the section on Atu XV
> in "The Book of Thoth"), and ask yourself
how the Beast and the Scarlet
> Woman can be considered non-Satanic! Have you even
read the Revelation
> of St. John?
Uncle Aleister's choice of terms for himself and his
miscellaneous
mistresses have a distinctive anti-Christian flair to
them. His
former secretary, the late Dr. Israel Regardie
postulates in the his
introduction to the Book of the Law (rebound with intro
and minor
editing under the title The Law Is For All) that large
portions of
Liber Legis stemmed from Uncle Aleister's rebellion
against Christian
authorities. However, like you said, Uncle Aleister was
definitely
more than "just" a Satanist.
> >Mostly he used the Inochian (sp?) system of
magic
> >which is based on communication with angels,
which then cause the
> >desired effect.
>
> He did use the Enochian system derived from Dr. Dee
and Edward Kelly,
> but I wouldn't say this was "mostly"; he
used it only for the most
> serious mystical workings, such as the crossing of
the Abyss. Most of
> his work was either yogic or derived from
non-Enochian sources, such as
> Barrett and Mathers. (Which is not to say the
Golden Dawn wasn't
> Enochian, only that again, this was just one small
part of their
> techniques.)
The primary techniques that Uncle Aleister prescribes
are indeed
derived from Mathers work on the Golden Dawn system of
Magick, as well
as the Yogic forms (such as the ones in Book 4 - the
last part of
Magick in Theory and Practice - available seperately).
> --
> Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant,
sun!hoptoad!tim, tim@toad.com
- iain
> "The Diabolonian position is new to the
London playgoer of today, but not to
> lovers of serious literature. From Prometheus to
the Wagnerian Siegfried,
> some enemy of the gods, unterrified champion of
those oppressed by them, has
> always towered among the heroes of the loftiest
poetry."
> - Shaw, "On Diabolonian Ethics"
Every man and every woman is a star.
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
Love is the law, love under will.
- Uncle Aleister
©2004 Google
HTML Attachment [ Scan and
Save to Computer | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]
Web Bilder Groups Verzeichnis NewsNeu!
Erweiterte Groups-Suche
Einstellungen
Groups Suchergebnis 6 für satan thelema crowley maroney
Magick & Mystic Supplies • candles, organic
herbs, crystals incense, oils, aromatherapy (Aff)
• www.magickrose.co.uk Anzeigen
Maybe Logic Academy • Peter Carroll Online Courses
Chaos Magick instruction/community •
www.maybelogic.org
Golden Dawn Tools • All for ceremonial magick
wands, elemental weapons, enochian •
www.ritual-magic.org
Suchergebnis 6
Von:Tim Maroney (tim@hoptoad.uucp)
Betrifft:Is Thelema a form of Satanism? -- from a Fido
discussion
Dies ist der einzige Artikel zu diesem Diskussionsthema
View: Original Format
Newsgroups:alt.pagan, alt.magick
Datum:1991-07-23 22:38:28 PST
Dear Diane,
To expand on my earlier comments on Satanic symbolism in
Thelemic ritual,
and their relevance to the question of whether Thelema
is a form of
Satanism under some reasonable definition of that word.
You ought to get a copy of "Magick in Theory and
Practice" if you're
interested in the issue. Crowley's ritual and meditative
instructions
were his best writing, possibly because they dealt with
what he knew best.
It's because of the power and importance of these
instructions that I was
willing to overlook his appalling right-wing politics
and cite Crowley
as a source in Twilight Crossing; LaVey and Aquino have
made no
contributions that measure up to these.
I'm going to track through the various Liberi in
Appendix VI, "A Few
Principal Rituals", in order.
Grimorium Sanctissimum. The O.T.O./A.'.A.'.
sex magic expressed in the
form of a Black Mass, with a naked virgin as the altar.
The Star Ruby. Therion and Babalon, who are the Beast
and the Scarlet
Woman from the Apocalypse of John, and who are
explicitly Satanic symbols.
(The Star Ruby is the Thelemic recension of the Lesser
Banishing Ritual
of the Pentagram.)
The Star Sapphire. Set, a very close Satanic cognate,
and Baphomet,
the demon supposedly worshipped by the Templars.
The Mass of the Phoenix. The magician carves his or her
breast with
the Mark of the Beast, soaks the blood into a cake, and
eats it.
Liber V vel Reguli. "Being the Ritual of the Mark
of the Beast".
The Beast 666, Therion, Babalon, Averse Pentagrams,
"Saturn or Satan
is exalted in the House of Venus or Astarte",
"the Father-Mother
Set-Isis", and so on.
The Gnostic Mass. Chaos, Babalon, Baphomet, Abrasax,
Therion, Simon
Magus, and another reclaiming of the Black Mass with its
naked virgin
on the altar. (The G.S. form
above is more adapted to the ceremonial
use of two people, while this form is for the puhblic
and is veiled
with a cloak of symbolism.) Interestingly, something
very like this
ritual may have a great deal to do with our general
conception of the
Black Mass, coming from the Star Chamber affair in
France. It is
unclear how much of the accusations were exagerrated and
brought into
line with the Inquisitional mythology, and how much was
an actual
"amatory mass" as some of the sources refer to
it.
This ends the appendix containing the principal Thelemic
rituals, with
the exception of Liber Samekh. That is so important that
it receives
its own appendix, IV. As you
know, the emphasis of Liber Samekh on
Satan is intense. It also exalts the Beast and the
Scarlet Woman yet
again. This is the ritual of "the Attainment of the
Knowledge and
Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel" or Higher
Self; in Crowley's
case, he believed this "devil or angel" to be
named Aiwaz or Aiwass,
and to have delivered the Book of the Law, the
foundation of Thelema.
I have not mentioned the constant repetition of the
Serpent symbol,
which for Crowley was interpreted along the lines of
Genesis -- or an
anti-Genesis which reclaimed the pagan symbol demonized
in the Hebrew
myth. Someone could object, after all, that
Serpent-worship is hardly
confined to Satanism; we have to see how much Crowley
explicitly inverted
the tail of the Bible before we can know certainly that
he did the same
with the head. So the Serpent or Snake has little
evidentiary value
in itself, except where it is very plainly a reference
to Genesis, as
in "I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge" in
the Book of the Law.
As we can see, there is not one Thelemic ritual, among
those Crowley
thought most important, which is lacking in Satanic
symbols.
Now, we should also consider Appendix VII,
"A Few of the Principal
Instructions Authorised by the A.'.A.'."
These are much less Satanic
by and large. Many of them have no Satanic references
worth mentioning,
such as the Yogic instructions of Liber HHH,
Liber E, and Liber RV,
and the Golden Dawn derived ceremonial magick practices
of Liber O,
Liber Yod, Liber Resh, and Liber A. Similarly for the
past-life recall
practice (perhaps Theosophical?) of Liber Thisharb and
the penultimate
practice of Liber B vel Magi. Yet there are other works
in the same
appendix which contain notable Satanic symbolism, such
as Liber Astarte,
Liber III, Liber Cheth, and
Liber A'ash.
The interesting thing about the instructions of this
category is that,
for the most part, they are not particularly Thelemic
either. There is
little mention of the Thelemic trinity of Nuit, Hadit,
and Ra-Hoor-Khuit,
or of the Book of the Law, or of the word Thelema, or
"Do what thou wilt"
or its cognates such as "the law of liberty".
Where these do occur, they
are usually in passing rather than central to the
instruction; and in
nearly every case, the degree of Satanic symbolism is
proportional to
the degree of Thelemic symbolism.
That is, there is hardly a book that contains noteworthy
Satanic symbolism
that does not also contain Thelemic symbolism of roughly
equal note, and
vice versa. The books which don't contain one rarely
contain the other.
Liber A vel Armorum could be taken as a counterexample,
but even there
the quote from the Book of the Law is merely an opening
clause having
no import to the teaching in itself; it is a single
sentence stating
Crowley's authority to present the book. If it were
omitted, it would
have no effect on the instruction of how to construct
elemental weapons.
It's of no more significance than the mention of Typhon
in Liber O.
In Liber Astarte and Liber III, the
Thelemic and the Satanic symbolism
are both used in passing, almost as afterthoughts.
(Astarte also contains
some of the anti-Satanic symbolism that Crowley
sometimes uses; the
Thelemic devil is named Choronzon, and here he is
presented as leading
the aspirant astray.) In Astarte, the little Satanic
symbolism consists
of a reference to Babalon, which is also Thelemic
symbolism; the only
other Thelemic references are to Choronzon and a single
short clause
(out of fifty clauses) which urges the use of Thelemic
books and aphorisms
in the practice. In Liber III, the
Thelemic mythology is solely in an
opening benediction which (once again) could easily be
omitted without
having the slightest import to the meditation practice,
while the Satanic
symbol of "Cerebus, the great Beast of Hell"
is almost as unimportant.
(Is it even Satanic at all? some might ask. After all,
Cerebus is Greek.
Indeed, if Crowley had not craftily used the phrase
"the great Beast"
there might be some doubt under a restrictive definition
of Satanism.
The Twilight Crossing definition of Satanism as the
reclamation of
demonized mthological figures would include it even
without that
phrase, but there is simply no way that Crowley used the
phrase "the
great Beast" except as an explicit reference to the
demon of Revelation.
Crowley's "Cerebus, the great Beast of Hell"
has a double meaning, both
of which are Satanic under the Twilight Crossing
definition, and one of
which is Satanic even under the overly restrictive
definition preferred
by anti-Satanists.)
Liber Cheth and Liber A'ash are the only books of the
category which are
aggressively either Satanic or Thelemic. And each of
them are both. In
them, we are back to the sex magic of the O.T.O.
and the A.'.A.'., and
once again we are dealing with Babalon, the Beast,
Hadit, Nuit, Set, Chaos,
and Baphomet. No knowledgable person would deny the
centrality of these
sex practices to Crowley's systems, and no truthful
person could deny that
every time they are set forth in ritual and meditation
instructions, they
are flanked and upheld by a constellation of Thelemic
and Satanic symbols.
Was Crowley a Satanist? Is Thelema a form of Satanism?
Only the most
contrived definition of "Satanism" could
answer these questions "no".
What would Crowley have answered? In a dedication to
"Why Jesus Wept",
he told G. K. Chesterton that he, Crowley, had
"found [his] Messiah in ...
the Devil and all his angels", and showed through
gematria that the
Serpent was the true Messiah. In "Magick in Theory
and Practice" (cap.
IV) and "The Book of Thoth", and many other
places, he praised Satan
at length. He sang rapturous love-songs to the devil in
his ritual
practices, and gave him the unholy kiss referred to in
the legends of
the templars and the Sabbat. He wrote, in the last
chapter of "Magick
in Theory and Practice", that:
"The Devil" is, historically, the God of any
people that one
personally dislikes. This has led to so much confusion
of
thought that THE BEAST 666 has
preferred to let names stand
as they are, and to proclaim simply that AIWAZ
-- the solar-
phallic-hermetic Lucifer -- is His own Holy Guardian
Angel,
and "The Devil" SATAN or HADIT
of our particular unit of the
Starry Universe. This serpent, SATAN,
is not the enemy of
Man, but HE who made Gods of our race, knowing Good and
Evil;
He bade "Know Thyself!" and taught Initiation.
He is "the
Devil" of the Book of Thoth, and His emblem is BAPHOMET,
the
Androgyne who is the hieroglyph of arcane perfection.
We have no need to speculate on the issue. The man has
spoken clearly
for himself.
Tim
--
Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant, sun!hoptoad!tim,
tim@toad.com
"The above opinions and suggestions have
absolutely nothing to do with
the little fat man putting crisp $100 bills in my
pocket."
-- Alan Vymetal

